Download - Just say no! f2014

Transcript
Page 1: Just say no! f2014

JUST SAY NO!

Social protest and the politics of resistance

Page 2: Just say no! f2014

Today we will

Introduce the sociology of resistance

Consider whether democracy remains an effective means of political participation

Discuss the role of digital media in protest, particularly in regards to the Occupy movement and the Arab Spring

Page 3: Just say no! f2014

Our questions

1. Given the divides within society, why is there not more deviance, disobedience and resistance?

2. Do existing political and social mechanisms allow for effective political participation and representation?

3. What are the most effective means of contemporary political resistance?

Essay questions: Using the case studies discussed in the module, critically examine the relationship between communication technology and social protest.

Page 4: Just say no! f2014

The agents of resistance

Cultures establish relatively fixed patterns of behaviour that are difficult to change: we generally repeat and reproduce what is expected of us

Resistance seeks to break from these patterns and occurs whenever social norms, structures or institutions are rejected or disrupted (transformative action)

What counts as resistance or deviance is socially defined: alternative fashions might be transformative, but not deviant – what might be deviant use of social media in Saudi Arabia is not in Britain

Page 5: Just say no! f2014

Forms of disobedience

NO

Page 6: Just say no! f2014

When was your last act of resistance/

deviance?

Page 7: Just say no! f2014

If you disagree with what I’m saying, what someone else is saying, or with the social norms in the class,

how do you resist?

What would the most effective means of

resistance be?

Page 8: Just say no! f2014

Virtual resistance

Resistance is an everyday element of life, from social disagreement to physical protests

Because social media allows for active audience participation, it facilitates resistance to dominant or received messages

We see this process in the responses to famous twitter personalities

Page 10: Just say no! f2014

Disorder from order

Resistance may be an everyday element of life, from social disagreement to physical protests, but resistance doesn’t necessarily mean disorder

Resistance is embedded within effective means of power: our institutions and social norms often encourage and allow resistance, within certain boundaries

For resistance to create conflict and disrupt the established way of doing things, it needs to break the existing norms of resistance

Page 11: Just say no! f2014

Democratic participation

Democracy is the political organisation within which members have an equal say in collective decisions

The are a large range of democratic mechanisms – in Western societies democracy tends to involve a designated group of people voting to choose someone to represent them

Democracy thus allows legitimate resistance: if you disagree, you have a voice and the mechanisms to express it, provided that you follow the rules and have sufficient support

The democratic ethos extends to participation in ‘civil society’, including freedom of speech, independent media, freedom of assembly (protest) and trade unions

Ultimately it is the state, through government control of violence, who decides what the rules are for legitimate resistance

Page 12: Just say no! f2014

Why disobey in a democracy?

Democracies are open to resistance in that they do not demand obedience to a single way of being

Indeed, both capitalism and democracy thrive on counter-culture

Protest and resistance can be sanitised through ‘legitimate channels’ but, if those you are resisting allow you to resist, is there any point in protesting?

Page 13: Just say no! f2014

Should all protest be agreed to by government authorities?

Page 14: Just say no! f2014

Union resistance

At various times whilst you have been at Brunel, the University and College Union has been on strike

The principle of unions is that workers can have power over their employers if they act collectively – ‘collective bargaining’

In the UK, union members are permitted to take industrial action when negotiations with employers ‘break down’

In order for the strike to be lawful, union’s must ‘ballot’ their members and receive the support of the majority of voters

Page 15: Just say no! f2014

Striking back

The purpose of a strike is to disrupt the regular operation of an employer

This disruption places pressure on the employer and changes the political conditions under which negotiations occur

Worker’s lose pay, but cannot be dismissed

Union’s were powerful advocates for working people until they were ‘broken’ during the 1970s and 1980s.

Regular strikes are being held, but their influence is mixed

Page 16: Just say no! f2014

Has your life at Brunel been disrupted by

strikes?

Page 17: Just say no! f2014

Consumer activism

The place of people-power has shifted from production to consumption

We have influence over corporations not by withdrawing work, but by withholding purchases

This has been seen recently in corporate tax avoidance cases

The shift from productive to consumptive activism has individualised protest and has placed more power in the hands of the wealthy

Page 19: Just say no! f2014

Which mode of resistance is most likely to have an

impact?

Page 20: Just say no! f2014

New Social Movements

Social movements are organised collective activities that are designed to bring about lasting political change

The Civil Rights movement and Gay Rights movement are two of the most notable

Social movements lie outside of institutional mechanisms, particularly those ‘new social movements’ that emerged after World War II

These movements have been particularly effective in democratic societies, especially when demands can be incorporated within the existing system

Page 21: Just say no! f2014

Political disobedience

In the reading, Harcourt distinguishes between civil and political disobedience in regards to the Occupy movement

Civil disobedience seeks to right injustices within the system, such as by highlighting issues and ‘raising consciousness’

Political disobedience suggests that the system cannot be justly reformed by the mechanisms it provides and must seek alternative forms of resistance

Page 22: Just say no! f2014

Direct action

Direct action is a form of resistance that produces immediate intervention into a socio-political issue

These actions can include non-violent actions like sit-ins and occupations or direct violence

Direct action was particularly effective in colonial India and in the Civil Rights movement in the United States, and is common in the contemporary Green movement

Page 23: Just say no! f2014

If you were working for the NUS campaign to reduce fees, what methods would you

use?

Page 24: Just say no! f2014

Democracy: A discussion

Do you vote?

Do your politicians represent you?

Does democracy work for some more than others?

Is democratic participation still a relevant form of political engagement?

Page 25: Just say no! f2014

Social (media) movements

Traditional protest movements have relied on the physical and local presence of protestors

Contemporary social movements are often generated, controlled and sustained through social media

Page 26: Just say no! f2014

Advantages and challenges

Social media also allows groups to circumvent traditional means of communication, particularly the mass media, in order to get its message across to a diverse audience

Through mechanisms like Twitter #hashtags, a greater sense of connectedness can be developed as individual concerns become more identifiably common

The speed of social media, along with the possibility of collective communication, allows protests and movements to move rapidly – the Occupy movement is a strong example of this

However, although social media protests can be highly decentralised and participatory, without leadership they can struggle to produce demands or negotiate with those in power – as seen in the Arab Spring

Page 29: Just say no! f2014

Occupy

The ‘Occupy’ movement begun when people ‘occupied’ Zuccotti Park beside Wall Street in New York on 17/11/2011, although organising meetings had been previously held

Occupy’s initial motivation was to protest corporate influence over democracy, beginning with the slogan ‘We are the 99%’

Occupy soon became an international movement, including Occupy London outside of St.Paul’s Cathedral, and is evidence of the abilityof social media to transcend location

Page 32: Just say no! f2014

Do you feel part of the 99%?

Page 33: Just say no! f2014

Occupying

Through direct action as part of a global movement, Occupy sought to evoke collective solidarity amongst ‘the majority’

The Occupy movement has been defined by its non-hierarchical organisation and a commitment to participatory democracy, which required the physical presence of activists

The group has also refused to posit specific alternatives and demands, which has been the subject of significant criticism

Whilst the momentum of the movement has slowed considerably, at the time it tapped into popular dissent over economic conditions and bankers

Page 34: Just say no! f2014

Occupied

The movement was also one of the first in the Western world to utilise the potential of social media

Through this use of social media the initially small occupy movement was able to mobilise activists outside of the mainstream media

Social media also allowed the ideas to change through participation and spread to other parts of the country

Occupy demonstrated how a counter-hegemonic cause could challenge dominant government, corporate and mass-media messages, this time predominately through Facebook

Nonetheless participation was far higher amongst the young, particularly college students

Page 35: Just say no! f2014

Creating solidarity

Occupy sought to create connections through social media, but required a physical presence to be successful

The occupations produced strong reactions from authorities, often arresting protestors and clearing sites of activists

These clearance were often violent and solidarity required strong commitment from the activists

Page 36: Just say no! f2014

Maintaining occupation

Such was the necessity of maintaining social media contact, the Occupiers used a stationary bike to fuel battery chargers (Deborah Gambs, 2012)

That they didn’t want to leave to charge phones, but required phones to maintain the movements, demonstrates the difficult balance of the movement

Page 38: Just say no! f2014

Have you ever felt motivated to engage in any form of

organised resistance?

Page 39: Just say no! f2014

Arab Spring

The ‘Arab Spring’ was a series of political uprisings in the Arab world

These begun in Tunisia with the death of a street trader and most notably spread to Bahrain, Egypt, Libya, Syria and Yemen

These movements were built on mass demonstrations, occupations and direct action

Page 40: Just say no! f2014

Springing social

Building on the movements in Moldova and Iran in 2009, the Arab Spring was the first widespread revolutionary movement engaged with social media According to Emma Hall, Facebook users in Egypt increased from 450,000 to 3

million in the six months following the revolution, and have now risen to 5 million

Government censorship in the Middle East had made control of

information one of the most powerful weapons

Protestors were able to communicate with each other outside of the state and gain a wider audience through collective solidarity, but also act as ‘citizen journalists’ for the rest of the world

Page 41: Just say no! f2014

Mediating sources

For many journalists, the most direct information in chaotic situations comes from social media, particularly following popular hashtags such as #iranrevolution

Indeed, during the attempted Iranian revolution of 2009, the majority of the tweets were from the Western world

Whilst those invested in the events and engaged with social media might investigate social media for themselves, we still rely on mass media reproductions of these events

Page 42: Just say no! f2014

Organising information

Social media allows for potentially greater control of the message by activist, even though the most influential information comes from a small range of sources

Because internet access was often shut down, information often came from key ‘nodal points’ outside of the protests and these key tweeters and media organisations dominated the discussion and were most often retweeted

Information via social media user is by definition partial and it can be very difficult to capture the full story as it is difficult to trust internet sources and rumours often spin out of control, and thus trusted sources remain dominant

Nonetheless, access to social media was a powerful tool against state propaganda and control of information during the Arab Spring

Page 43: Just say no! f2014
Page 44: Just say no! f2014

Getting physical in Egypt

Alex Choudhary argued social media was a powerful device for establishing emotional connections amongst demonstrators in Egypt by sharing stories

Twitter and YouTube in particular were able to convey counter-hegemonic messages

Yet, it is easy to exaggerate the impact of social media

Page 45: Just say no! f2014

How social was the Arab Spring?

Social media usage is particularly low [.26% in Egypt] in Arab countries leading to the possibility of a ‘Dissident Elite’ that is not representative of the general population

As twitter usage is very low in poorer countries (Tunis 0.10%, Libya 0.07% and Yemen 0.02%) and in censored regions such as China, these methods of social protest may not be available to those who might need it the most

Social activism requires a deep commitment (strong ties) and social movements have always built from person to person communication, as well as through mass media

Most of the gains made can be attributed to the physical presence of protestors in the face of government violence

The problems of elite resistance, along with creating positive demands, were very evident in the Arab Spring

Page 46: Just say no! f2014

Clicktivism

The internet is often said to bring in a whole new wave of means of social resistance and political participation

The other side of digital activism is ‘clicktivism’ in which internet users can engage in passive resistance (slacktivism) by ‘liking’ pages or ‘signing petitions’

This form of engagement makes us feel like we are participating and resisting without actually having to do anything

Page 47: Just say no! f2014

Estimate how many social media ‘connections’ you have

Who would you sacrifice anything for the rest?

Page 48: Just say no! f2014

Chaotic conclusions

Whilst resistance is an everyday occurrence, some forms have more capacity to disrupt power

Resistance through participation is embedded within democratic systems

Digital protest has changed the dimensions of resistance, but generally requires a physical presence

Page 49: Just say no! f2014

Next Week

DIVIDING THE FUTURE: INFORMATION, ECONOMY AND ENVIRONMENT

+ COURSE REVIEW (1HR)

READING

Payne, G. (2006) Social Divisions as a Sociological Perspective. In G. Payne (Ed.) Social Divisions (second edition), Basingstoke: Macmillan.