8/6/2019 Jeff Ashton vs. Joseph Vega
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/jeff-ashton-vs-joseph-vega 1/61
ΛV Tranz E-Reporting and Transcription
www.avtranz.com(800) 257-0885
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THENINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN ANDFOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDACRIMINAL JUSTICE DIVISION
1
2
3
STATE OF FLORIDA,4
Plaintiff,5
Vs. CASE NUMBER: 2008-CF-5351-O6
JOSEPH VEGA, DIVISION NUMBER: 157
Defendant.8
_________________/9
10
CHANGE OF PLEA HEARING11
BEFORE12
THE HONORABLE BOB LEBLANC13
14
Recorded by Digital Court Reporters15
In the Orange County Courthouse425 North Orange Avenue16Courtroom 7-DOrlando, Florida 3280117Commencing at 1:35 p.m.Tuesday, June 22, 201018Transcribed By Kelley A. Grijalva
19
20
21
APPEARANCES:22
JEFFREY ASHTON KATHLEEN T. GILLARD23Assistant State Attorney Assistant Public Defender415 North Orange Avenue 501 N. Magnolia Avenue24Orlando, Florida 32801 Orland, Florida 32801On Behalf of the Plaintiff On Behalf of the Defendant25
26
8/6/2019 Jeff Ashton vs. Joseph Vega
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/jeff-ashton-vs-joseph-vega 2/61
2
ΛV Tranz E-Reporting and Transcription
www.avtranz.com(800) 257-0885
I N D E X1PAGE
2TABLE OF EXHIBITS 3
3TESTIMONY OF JOSEPH VEGA
Direct Examination By Ms. Gillard 54 Cross-Examination By Mr. Ashton 10Redirect Examination by Gillard 315
COURT’S RULING 536
CERTIFICATE OF COURT TRANSCRIBER 617
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
2526
8/6/2019 Jeff Ashton vs. Joseph Vega
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/jeff-ashton-vs-joseph-vega 3/61
3
ΛV Tranz E-Reporting and Transcription
www.avtranz.com(800) 257-0885
TABLE OF EXHIBITS1
Offered for Admitted2Identification Into Evidence
3DEFENDANT'S EXHIBIT A/1 47 48
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
8/6/2019 Jeff Ashton vs. Joseph Vega
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/jeff-ashton-vs-joseph-vega 4/61
4
ΛV Tranz E-Reporting and Transcription
www.avtranz.com(800) 257-0885
P R O C E E D I N G S1
THE COURT: Okay. State of Florida versus Joseph2
Vega, 08-CF-5351.3
MS. GILLARD: Kathleen Gillard for Mr. Vega, Your4
Honor. Mr. Vega is present next to me, Your Honor.5
MR. ASHTON: Jeff Ashton for the State of Florida.6
THE COURT: And I know we granted an evidentiary7
hearing as to what?8
MR. ASHTON: Well, Judge, we never received an order9
indicating what claims would or would not be set for10
hearing. We just received a notice of hearing. And I did11
file a response indicating that I felt that -- I know I12
said just one of the claims was -- should be summarily13
dismissed. But as I said, we never really got a14
determination.15
I believe I indicated that ground 1 should be16
summarily denied. But ground 2 would require a hearing17
since there's –- it involved as opposed to discussions18
between Counsel and Defendant.19
THE COURT: I'm sure not sure I said which grounds.20
I just said each side has one hour. We'll set the hearing21
and you can argue and present whatever you want. So you22
each got one hour.23
MS. GILLARD: Thank you. I believe we have the24
burden, Your Honor. So if I may call Mr. Vega.25
8/6/2019 Jeff Ashton vs. Joseph Vega
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/jeff-ashton-vs-joseph-vega 5/61
5
ΛV Tranz E-Reporting and Transcription
www.avtranz.com(800) 257-0885
THE COURT: Okay. Mr. Vega, raise your right hand to1
be sworn.2
* * * * *3
WHEREUPON: The Defendant was duly sworn, examined and4
testified as follows:5
MS. GILLARD: Can he sit right there, Your Honor?6
THE COURT: I think for cross-examination purposes,7
probably should sit in the witness box. And for the8
record, this is a motion with withdraw plea. Is that9
correct?10
MR. ASHTON: It is titled that, but it is under Rule11
3.850.12
THE COURT: All right.13
MR. ASHTON: But it's obviously a withdrawal of plea.14
* * * * *15
DIRECT EXAMINATION16
BY MS. GILLARD:17
Q Okay. Mr. Vega, will you please state your name for18
the record?19
A Joseph Luis Vega.20
Q And Mr. Vega, at some point in 2008, you were charged21
with criminal actions where your -- I guess, ex or separated22
wife was the victim. Correct?23
A Correct.24
Q And you did not have a trial in those matters.25
8/6/2019 Jeff Ashton vs. Joseph Vega
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/jeff-ashton-vs-joseph-vega 6/61
6
ΛV Tranz E-Reporting and Transcription
www.avtranz.com(800) 257-0885
Correct?1
A Correct.2
Q And you ultimately entered pleas to all four counts?3
All four charges?4
A Correct.5
Q All right. And I don't know if you recall the case6
number, but that 08-CF-5351.7
A Correct.8
Q Does that sound right? Okay. Now, Mr. Vega, what's9
your background as far as education10
A Four-year degree, business. That's it.11
Q So you have no legal background? You never went to12
law school?13
A No, ma'am.14
Q Okay. And as far as ever being charged with a15
felony, was this your first time -- with a felony?16
A Yes, it was.17
Q So you didn't have a lot of knowledge about the18
criminal justice system?19
A I have no knowledge about how it worked.20
Q Okay. Now, prior to entering your plea, did you meet21
with your -- you were assigned a public defender. Correct?22
A Correct.23
Q And that would have been Ms. Shepherd?24
A Yes.25
8/6/2019 Jeff Ashton vs. Joseph Vega
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/jeff-ashton-vs-joseph-vega 7/61
7
ΛV Tranz E-Reporting and Transcription
www.avtranz.com(800) 257-0885
Q And you see her here today?1
A I do.2
Q Okay. So that's the same Ms. Shepherd that3
represented you on the charges. Correct?4
A It is.5
Q How many times would you say you met with her?6
A I would say for sure two, possibly three times.7
Q Okay. Now, most of your charges -- or all of them8
rather -- stem from the fact that there had been injunctions in9
place or served or issued or requested prior to these charges.10
Correct?11
A Correct.12
Q Did you discuss with Ms. Shepherd the temporary13
injunction at all that was -- looks like -- issued on March the14
-- yeah, March 18th of 2008.15
A Ms. Shepherd told me she would not discuss the16
injunction with me.17
Q Okay. And at some point you did get served with that18
temporary injunction. Correct?19
A I did.20
Q And did you read it over?21
A I looked it over. I didn't study it, but I looked it22
over.23
Q Okay. I guess at some point, later, after you had24
entered your pleas, you had had further conversations with Ms.25
8/6/2019 Jeff Ashton vs. Joseph Vega
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/jeff-ashton-vs-joseph-vega 8/61
8
ΛV Tranz E-Reporting and Transcription
www.avtranz.com(800) 257-0885
Shepherd with regards to the 15 days that a temporary1
injunction could be issued?2
A It was about six months after I entered my pleas in3
February of '09, six months later, I happened -- I don't know4
how come -- I happened to be looking at the paperwork and I5
noticed the dates.6
Q Okay. When you discuss the injunction with Ms.7
Shepherd, is it because you didn't understand or you weren't8
sure if it was valid? What was your purpose of wanting to9
discuss the injunction?10
A You mean, six months after I plead --11
Q No, originally when you said --12
A Oh, originally, before I plead?13
Q Yes.14
A I just thought that, you know, the attorney and the15
client should look at the paperwork that the charges were based16
on together and go over it together. And she didn't think that17
was the case.18
Q Okay. Did you rely solely on Ms. Shepherd's advice19
when you entered your plea?20
A I relied solely on her advice.21
Q Now, you if you had the chance to have discussed this22
with her and the outcome after doing some research, it appears23
that the temporary injunction would not have been valid --24
MR. ASHTON: Objection. Assumes a fact not in25
8/6/2019 Jeff Ashton vs. Joseph Vega
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/jeff-ashton-vs-joseph-vega 9/61
9
ΛV Tranz E-Reporting and Transcription
www.avtranz.com(800) 257-0885
evidence. And it's legally incorrect.1
THE COURT: Sustained.2
BY MS. GILLARD:3
Q Okay. So, Mr. Vega, you said that you had met with4
her on three occasions. Correct?5
A I said two for sure, three possibly.6
Q Okay. Two or three.7
A And I could even -- it could even be four, I just8
don't remember exactly. But two for sure.9
Q Okay. And did you ever have the opportunity to10
discuss with Ms. Shepherd during those meetings the fact that11
the permanent injunction was -- as to when it was served upon12
you?13
A She didn't want to discuss anything regarding the14
injunctions period.15
Q Okay. So what you made you enter a plea to these16
charges if you weren't aware of the evidence?17
A I was going totally by her advice. And she told me18
that either I made the three calls or I didn't. And that's all19
that mattered. And if I was going to go to a jury trial, they20
would look at those facts whether I made the three calls or21
not. And that was it. That was all that mattered.22
Q If you were -- had been aware of possible defenses to23
these charges, would you have entered your pleas?24
A No, I would not have.25
8/6/2019 Jeff Ashton vs. Joseph Vega
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/jeff-ashton-vs-joseph-vega 10/61
10
ΛV Tranz E-Reporting and Transcription
www.avtranz.com(800) 257-0885
MS. GILLARD: I don't have any other questions.1
THE COURT: Cross-examination.2
* * * * *3
CROSS-EXAMINATION4
BY MR. ASHTON:5
Q Just so we're clear, you had been served with the6
temporary injunction at the time you made the contact with your7
wife that was prohibited. Is that correct?8
A I don't know what the date was. I have no idea when9
I was served.10
Q So you don't know when you were served?11
A I don't know the date.12
Q Okay. But you said you looked at the injunction13
very, very thoroughly six months after your plea and that your14
basis of complaint was the terms of the injunction. But you're15
testifying now that you don't -- you didn't notice on that when16
it was served on you.17
A At the time, I don't remember the date that it was18
served.19
Q Well, as you looked through and examined the20
document, did you observe that the events alleged happened21
after you were served with the injunction?22
A There's no way the events could have occurred after I23
was served with the injuct -- I mean -- when I received the24
injunction -- I don't understand exactly what you mean by that.25
8/6/2019 Jeff Ashton vs. Joseph Vega
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/jeff-ashton-vs-joseph-vega 11/61
11
ΛV Tranz E-Reporting and Transcription
www.avtranz.com(800) 257-0885
Q It's very simple. After you received the temporary1
injunction, you called your wife.2
A I did.3
Q Okay. That's my point. You got the injunction4
telling you not to have any contact with her -- I'm5
paraphrasing -- and then later you did.6
A I did.7
Q All right. Now, are you familiar with any of the8
following cases: Seaboard Airline RY Company versus Tampa9
Southern Rail Company found at 134 So. 529? Are you familiar10
with that case, the legal holding of this case?11
A Are these cases that I have put forth?12
Q No. They're cases I put forth in my response.13
A Oh. I have no knowledge of what those cases are14
about.15
Q Is it your present position that because the16
injunction hearing was more than 15 days after the issuance of17
the injunction that --18
MS. GILLARD: Objection, Your Honor.19
BY MR. ASHTON:20
Q -- you had a legal right ---21
MS. GILLARD: Calls for a legal answer.22
MR. ASHTON: I believe his direct testimony was that23
upon reading the injunction he believed he had a legal24
defense. And I'm just exploring that thought process with25
8/6/2019 Jeff Ashton vs. Joseph Vega
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/jeff-ashton-vs-joseph-vega 12/61
12
ΛV Tranz E-Reporting and Transcription
www.avtranz.com(800) 257-0885
him.1
THE COURT: A defense to the injunction or a defense2
to these charges.3
MR. ASHTON: I assume to the defense of these4
charges. Otherwise there's no --5
THE COURT: No point in us being here.6
MR. ASHTON: -- reason for us being here. Unless I7
misunderstood something.8
MS. GILLARD: It's his question. I mean --9
THE COURT: Say the question over.10
MR. ASHTON: Yes.11
BY MR. ASHTON:12
Q Is it your position that because the temporary13
injunction hearing date was more than 15 days after the14
injunction was issued that you had the right to ignore the15
order. Just a minute -- let me -- Counsel wants to object16
again or -- okay. Go ahead.17
A I didn't know anything about any dates whatsoever18
period.19
Q Is it your position having -- you said you read the20
injunction about six months after you plead.21
A Yes.22
Q And having read that, is it now your position that23
because the hearing date in the temporary injunction was more24
than 15 days after the date of issuance, you had the right to25
8/6/2019 Jeff Ashton vs. Joseph Vega
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/jeff-ashton-vs-joseph-vega 13/61
13
ΛV Tranz E-Reporting and Transcription
www.avtranz.com(800) 257-0885
ignore the injunction completely.1
A My position is I never would have plead guilty to the2
charges had my attorney advised me of the date conflicts.3
Q Okay. But --4
THE COURT: I'm sorry.5
BY MR. ASHTON:6
Q -- is it that premise --7
THE COURT: I'm sorry. If your attorney had advised8
you of what?9
THE WITNESS: The date conflicts. The date10
conflicts.11
THE COURT: But you were served with the injunction.12
Right? At some point.13
THE WITNESS: I was served. But I --14
THE COURT: Did you read the injunction?15
THE WITNESS: I wasn't aware of anything about --16
regarding the date conflicts. I had no idea.17
BY MR. ASHTON:18
Q So are the date conflicts important to you?19
A When? I mean --20
Q Now. You're telling us that there was something21
about those date conflicts that was so important that had you22
known it at the time you wouldn't have entered the plea.23
A Well --24
Q What about them?25
8/6/2019 Jeff Ashton vs. Joseph Vega
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/jeff-ashton-vs-joseph-vega 14/61
14
ΛV Tranz E-Reporting and Transcription
www.avtranz.com(800) 257-0885
A It started like this. I hate to say this. But I1
never really read the paperwork which I plead guilty to2
thoroughly from beginning to end until six months after I plead3
guilty to the charges. Something just told me, look at the4
paperwork. And I was amazed to see on the second page of the5
injunction in bold face type, it said, "Not to exceed 15 days6
maximum" in bold face type. And I said to myself, "If this is7
on the injunction, what does that mean?" And then I looked at8
the date when the judge signed the order and the date he gave9
for the -- for me to come back for the hearing on the permanent10
and it turned out to be 17 days. And I was amazed that no one11
had told me this, including the State prosecutor's office, my12
defense attorney, no one had told me anything about dates13
whatsoever.14
Q So what? That's a natural question. That's15
something --16
A So what? What you do you mean --17
Q So -- calm down. Calm down. Calm down. Calm down.18
So what? What difference does that make in -- let me finish.19
Just calm down. Slow down. I want you to tell this Court what20
legal significance there is, according to you, to that21
difference in dates. That date conflict.22
A Well, first of all --23
MS. GILLARD: I object, Your Honor. Any legal24
argument would come from his lawyer. That's why Mr. Vega25
8/6/2019 Jeff Ashton vs. Joseph Vega
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/jeff-ashton-vs-joseph-vega 15/61
15
ΛV Tranz E-Reporting and Transcription
www.avtranz.com(800) 257-0885
was appointed an attorney.1
THE COURT: But I need to know the effective dates of2
the injunction if I'm to be able to find that it is or is3
not in place.4
MS. GILLARD: I know. But that's not what his5
question is.6
MR. ASHTON: I'll rephrase the question.7
BY MR. ASHTON:8
Q If this Court were to find as a matter of law that9
the date conflict that you focused on legally is irrelevant,10
has nothing to do with your guilt or innocence, okay, assume11
that for the purpose of this question.12
A Assume the dates have nothing to do with my guilt or13
innocence?14
Q The date conflict that you've pointed out.15
A Assume that the dates on the injunction have nothing16
to do with whether an injunction is valid or not?17
Q Yes, exactly.18
A In other words, an injunction without dates is not an19
injunction. What is an injunction without dates?20
Q Mr. Vega, do you understand my question?21
A No, I don't. Because I can't understand you22
separating dates from an injunction. It's part of the same23
process. How can you eliminate dates from an injunction? I24
don't understand that. It doesn't make sense to me.25
8/6/2019 Jeff Ashton vs. Joseph Vega
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/jeff-ashton-vs-joseph-vega 16/61
16
ΛV Tranz E-Reporting and Transcription
www.avtranz.com(800) 257-0885
Q Now, when you were offered the plea, you were facing1
five years in the department of corrections for the felony2
count. Is that not correct? Five years in prison.3
A You know what? I don't remember exactly what my4
attorney told me at the time. So I don't -- I can't say that I5
knew that at the time.6
Q Does that sound familiar at all to you? That you7
could go into prison for this crime?8
A Five years in prison for making three phone calls9
about my children? I don't know if I made the connection10
between those calls about my children and five years. I don't11
remember that. I don't remember that.12
Q Do you remember signing a plea form in this case that13
included a maximum/minimum sentences for these various14
offenses?15
A I remember signing a form that said I was making my16
plea voluntarily and with knowledge to the facts. And now it17
turns out, I did not have knowledge as to the facts. So it was18
not a voluntary plea. I didn't have complete knowledge of the19
dates.20
Q Right. I understand that. And we've already talked21
about whether that's legally significant or not will be up to22
the Court. Right? Now, what do you recall the maximum23
penalties were?24
A I don't. I left that up to my attorney to deal with.25
8/6/2019 Jeff Ashton vs. Joseph Vega
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/jeff-ashton-vs-joseph-vega 17/61
17
ΛV Tranz E-Reporting and Transcription
www.avtranz.com(800) 257-0885
And she told me some kind of, you know -- I don't know if it1
was three to five, two to five. I don't know. I don't exactly2
remember the phrase she used.3
Q Do you recall --4
A So she never said just five years. Nobody ever told5
me five years, that's it. Nobody told me that.6
THE COURT: I beg to differ with you. Any time7
anyone enters a plea in front of me --8
THE WITNESS: Uh-huh.9
THE COURT: -- I make sure to tell them every single10
count they're entering a plea to and what the maximum11
penalty is on each count. I do it with every single12
person.13
THE WITNESS: I agree. The maximum --14
THE COURT: So somebody told you what the maximum15
penalty was.16
THE WITNESS: I agree, the maximum. I'm saying no17
one told me five years for sure.18
That's what I'm saying.19
BY MR. ASHTON:20
Q No. No. No.21
A That's what I'm --22
THE COURT: I think he's asking you if you understood23
at the time you entered the plea what maximum penalty it24
is you were facing.25
8/6/2019 Jeff Ashton vs. Joseph Vega
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/jeff-ashton-vs-joseph-vega 18/61
18
ΛV Tranz E-Reporting and Transcription
www.avtranz.com(800) 257-0885
BY MR. ASHTON:1
Q And that's all I asked you --2
A Okay. I guess that I heard Ms. Shepherd say3
something to five.4
Q Okay.5
A Two to five, three to five. I don't know what it6
was. But something to five.7
Q So my point is that you knew that worst case8
scenario, you could potentially go to prison for five years for9
this crime. Whether you thought you deserved it not, you10
could. Correct?11
A But which crime are you talking about? There were12
several things --13
Q The felony case. The aggravated -- I believe it was14
the aggravated stalking count.15
A And that was based on the three calls? Is that what16
you're talking about? Cause I'm not sure exactly what17
you're -- what the felony count is comprised of.18
Q The charge of aggravated stalking after an19
injunction.20
A Which injunction are you talking about?21
Q Sir, you know --22
A I don't -- you know --23
Q We're not going to play this. We're not going to24
play this.25
8/6/2019 Jeff Ashton vs. Joseph Vega
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/jeff-ashton-vs-joseph-vega 19/61
19
ΛV Tranz E-Reporting and Transcription
www.avtranz.com(800) 257-0885
MS. GILLARD: Objection, Your Honor.1
BY MR. ASHTON:2
Q The question is --3
MS. GILLARD: If the Court needs to admonish --4
THE COURT: Hold on.5
MS. GILLARD: -- my client --6
THE COURT: We're talking about the specific charges7
that you entered a plea to that you're seeking to have8
withdrawn.9
THE WITNESS: There was --10
THE COURT: That's the only charges we're talking11
about. Right?12
THE WITNESS: There's two injunctions involved13
though, sir. I'm asking him which injunction he's talking14
about that I --15
THE COURT: That's good to know. Go ahead.16
THE WITNESS: The charges were split up among two17
different injunctions. So which one are you talking18
about?19
BY MR. ASHTON:20
Q Anyway, why don't I let you read the information to21
yourself. That way you can be fully educated in the matter. I22
will provide you with the information and with the Court's23
indulgence as much time as you need to read it.24
THE COURT: It's your hour. Like I said, you each25
8/6/2019 Jeff Ashton vs. Joseph Vega
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/jeff-ashton-vs-joseph-vega 20/61
20
ΛV Tranz E-Reporting and Transcription
www.avtranz.com(800) 257-0885
have an hour.1
THE WITNESS: So what am I supposed to read here?2
BY MR. ASHTON:3
Q This is the information charging you with the4
offenses in this case.5
THE WITNESS: And, Your Honor, am I supposed to read6
it to myself or read it out loud?7
THE COURT: I think just to yourself.8
BY MR. ASHTON:9
Q Yeah. Actually --10
THE WITNESS: I mean, because I think if I read it11
out loud, at least everyone will know what I'm reading.12
THE COURT: Well, we know you're -13
THE WITNESS: And we'll be on the same page.14
THE COURT: What the formal document is charging you15
is called an information. So we know he's handed you the16
information.17
THE WITNESS: Right. But I mean --18
BY MR. ASHTON:19
Q Just, if you would, please, read the first what's20
called count. Which is this paragraph --21
A Okay. All right. All right. Lawson Lamar, State22
Attorney of the Ninth Judicial --23
Q To yourself. To yourself is fine.24
A -- prosecuting for the State of Florida in Orange25
8/6/2019 Jeff Ashton vs. Joseph Vega
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/jeff-ashton-vs-joseph-vega 21/61
21
ΛV Tranz E-Reporting and Transcription
www.avtranz.com(800) 257-0885
County.1
MS. GILLARD: Mr. Vega, you can read it to yourself,2
please. The Court said to yourself is fine.3
THE WITNESS: Okay. Okay. The last line here where4
it says, "After an injunction for protection under Florida5
Statute 78.046 or 741.30 had been duly issued and served."6
BY MR. ASHTON:7
Q Sir --8
A What does --9
Q Excuse me. There is not a question for you to answer10
right now. Have you finished reading the paragraph?11
A Well, that's the main thing --12
Q Have you finished reading the paragraph?13
A The dates -- let's see the dates 27th of March, 7th14
of April -- so it's split between --15
MR. ASHTON: Judge, could you instruct the witness16
just to answer the question that I asked.17
THE COURT: I think he's just asking have you now18
read the charge in Count I?19
BY MR. ASHTON:20
Q Have you read Count I. That's all I'm asking.21
A Count I?22
Q This paragraph right here.23
A That's what I was referring.24
Q Very good. Thank you.25
8/6/2019 Jeff Ashton vs. Joseph Vega
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/jeff-ashton-vs-joseph-vega 22/61
22
ΛV Tranz E-Reporting and Transcription
www.avtranz.com(800) 257-0885
THE COURT: So you've read it.1
THE WITNESS: Duly issued and served is what I have a2
problem with. The very last part of it.3
BY MR. ASHTON:4
Q Sir, I didn't ask you what you have a problem with.5
If you could just answer my questions and then your attorney6
can get up and allow you to -- ask you additional questions.7
A Okay. Okay.8
Q Now, did you understand at the time of your plea that9
the maximum possible sentence for that crime you just read was10
five years in the Department of Corrections?11
A I never was told that it was going to be definitely12
five years. I told you the window was three to five or two to13
five. It was never told to me, you will definitely go for five14
years.15
THE COURT: And in all fairness, you did not.16
Correct?17
THE WITNESS: Well, you're right.18
THE COURT: You did not go for five years.19
THE WITNESS: No.20
BY MR. ASHTON:21
Q Do you understand I used the word maximum.22
A I don't understand what the point is, sir.23
Q Do you understand the word maximum?24
MS. GILLARD: Can I --25
8/6/2019 Jeff Ashton vs. Joseph Vega
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/jeff-ashton-vs-joseph-vega 23/61
23
ΛV Tranz E-Reporting and Transcription
www.avtranz.com(800) 257-0885
MR. ASHTON: What?1
MS. GILLARD: If you don't mind. Mr. Vega?2
THE WITNESS: Yes.3
MS. GILLARD: The question to you is, did you4
understand that if you were found guilty of that charge5
that you could potentially face five years in prison? Not6
that you were going to be sentenced to prison if you plead7
to it. But the maximum penalty you were facing was five8
years. Did you understand that at the time? That's the9
question. And whether you did or not, you can answer it.10
But that's the question. Not --11
THE WITNESS: I --12
MS. GILLARD: -- that anyone said you were going to13
prison for five years.14
THE WITNESS: I understood that I was pleading guilty15
to a charge --16
MS. GILLARD: That carried a maximum penalty --17
THE WITNESS: -- that carried somewhere between three18
to five years. And --19
MS. GILLARD: And maybe that was your score? Like20
maybe you scored a certain amount and it went --21
MR. ASHTON: Well, Judge, I appreciate --22
MS. GILLARD: -- to five years?23
MR. ASHTON: -- the assistance. But I think --24
THE WITNESS: Yeah. That's -- you know, that's as25
8/6/2019 Jeff Ashton vs. Joseph Vega
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/jeff-ashton-vs-joseph-vega 24/61
24
ΛV Tranz E-Reporting and Transcription
www.avtranz.com(800) 257-0885
far as I'm going to take it. I did never in my mind ever1
thought being a first time offender that I would go to2
jail or prison for five years. It never crossed my mind.3
It never occurred to me that --4
BY MR. ASHTON:5
Q Can you let me ask you a question?6
THE COURT: And you didn't. Right?7
THE WITNESS: Sir?8
THE COURT: You didn't.9
THE WITNESS: You're right, sir. I didn't.10
THE COURT: So calm down. It's okay.11
THE WITNESS: Well, I don't understand why he --12
THE COURT: You don't have to understand why he's13
asking what he's asking. Let him ask what he's asking14
seeing if you can answer. You didn't go to prison for15
five years. So calm down.16
THE WITNESS: Okay.17
THE COURT: And you're not going to prison for five18
years. So calm down.19
THE WITNESS: Okay, Judge. Thank you.20
BY MR. ASHTON:21
Q Now --22
A Uh-huh.23
Q -- did you also understand that the maximum sentence24
for the additional three misdemeanors was a year each?25
8/6/2019 Jeff Ashton vs. Joseph Vega
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/jeff-ashton-vs-joseph-vega 25/61
25
ΛV Tranz E-Reporting and Transcription
www.avtranz.com(800) 257-0885
A You know, I can't remember separating the charges in1
my mind, individually, understanding anything to do with each2
individual charge. I had a vague notion of three to five3
years. And that's all I thought. And that's all that occurred4
to me. And that's as far as I can take it.5
I cannot any further into detail because I didn't break it6
down in my mind. I was just facing one charge in my mind,7
three to five years, that was it. Or two to five or whatever8
it was. I don't -- that's as far as I could go with it. I9
can't go any further --I can't break it down any more than10
that.11
Q And you -- was this a negotiated plea negotiated with12
the State? In other words, that they offered you a plea with a13
certain sentence and you accepted. Was that not the situation14
here?15
A The State failed to share with my defender any16
information whatsoever that could have led --17
MR. ASHTON: Objection. Non-responsive to the18
question.19
THE COURT: Sustained.20
MR. ASHTON: And please -- if the Court could help my21
by instructing the witness to answer the questions that I22
ask.23
THE COURT: Repeat the question.24
MR. ASHTON: Sure.25
8/6/2019 Jeff Ashton vs. Joseph Vega
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/jeff-ashton-vs-joseph-vega 26/61
26
ΛV Tranz E-Reporting and Transcription
www.avtranz.com(800) 257-0885
BY MR. ASHTON:1
Q This was a negotiated plea. In other words, the2
State offered that if you plead guilty to these crimes, you3
would get a certain sentence. Is that not correct?4
A Negotiated in bad faith.5
Q Now --6
A That's correct. Negotiated in bad faith.7
Q Now --8
A That's the way I perceive it.9
Q -- that offer was no time in jail. Correct? Not one10
day in jail. Correct?11
A Incorrect.12
Q Please correct.13
A Violation of probation, I was told automatic jail.14
Q Did you violate your probation?15
A I was told that was a possibility. No, I never16
violated my probation.17
Q But your plea offer was probation with no additional18
jail time. Is that --19
A I did never -- I never had the concept that I would20
never go to jail in my mind because I thought it was always a21
possibility as long as I was on probation. So I never felt22
free from the possibility of jail ever until the probation was23
terminated.24
THE COURT: Nobody's free from the possibility of25
8/6/2019 Jeff Ashton vs. Joseph Vega
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/jeff-ashton-vs-joseph-vega 27/61
27
ΛV Tranz E-Reporting and Transcription
www.avtranz.com(800) 257-0885
jail until they're terminated. Every single probationer1
is subject to that exact same feeling.2
THE WITNESS: Well, that's what I'm explaining.3
THE COURT: I understand.4
BY MR. ASHTON:5
Q However, you did not go to jail as a result of your6
sentence, did you?7
A Not as a result of the sentence --8
Q Okay.9
A -- but prior to the sentence I did.10
Q Now, so --11
A My jail time was incorporated in the sentence.12
Q Credit for time served.13
A Exactly.14
Q Exactly. So you were faced with the possibility of15
going to prison for perhaps up to five years versus the16
certainty of probation. Now, are you telling this Court that17
that had nothing to do with your decision to enter this plea?18
A What had nothing to do? I'm not -- you're not making19
yourself very clear. What had nothing to do with making the20
plea?21
Q The sentence that you might have received versus the22
sentence in the plea offer.23
A You know, why are we sitting here discussing what I24
might have said when it's very clear I had no knowledge of the25
8/6/2019 Jeff Ashton vs. Joseph Vega
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/jeff-ashton-vs-joseph-vega 28/61
28
ΛV Tranz E-Reporting and Transcription
www.avtranz.com(800) 257-0885
date conflicts in the injunctions? So what I might have said1
doesn't matter because I had no knowledge of the dates2
conflicts in terms of being served, in terms of issuance, in3
terms of exploration. All the dates I had no knowledge of. So4
I cannot go into anything about, you know --5
Q So you didn't know about the date conflicts on the6
time of the plea. Correct? That's what you said.7
A I left all that work up my attorney.8
Q So why did you enter the plea?9
A Because I was ignorant of the facts of the case in10
terms of the injunction having been duly issued and served11
which your charging papers state. I did not realize what that12
meant.13
Q But why did you enter the plea? I mean, did you14
enter the plea -- let me give you some examples.15
A Okay.16
Q Did you enter the plea to spare the victim17
testifying? Did you enter the plea to avoid a possible harsher18
sentence? Did you enter the plea because you felt it was in19
your best interest? Why did you enter the plea at the time you20
did it, not in hindsight --21
A I entered the plea --22
Q -- but at the time you did it?23
A -- lacking the knowledge of the true facts of the24
case. It was a bad faith plea.25
8/6/2019 Jeff Ashton vs. Joseph Vega
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/jeff-ashton-vs-joseph-vega 29/61
29
ΛV Tranz E-Reporting and Transcription
www.avtranz.com(800) 257-0885
Q But at the time, you didn't believe that you lacked1
knowledge. Correct? At the time.2
A I was not the attorney representing myself at the3
time. My attorney's job was to let me know about anything like4
that.5
Q I don't want to know about hindsight. I want to know6
what was in your head at the time you entered the plea.7
A What was in my head was that the charges that your8
office brought before the Court that the injunctions had been9
duly issued and served were true and correct. That was in my10
head. The charges were real. I never -- it never crossed my11
mind to question the charging affidavit where your office12
states under oath that the injunctions had been duly issued and13
served which was not the case.14
Q And if this Court finds as a matter of law that they15
were duly issued and served -- no. Let me finish. Let me16
finish. Then would you agree that you would have entered the17
plea anyway?18
A That question is convoluted. I don't understand19
exactly what the question is. What -- please restate the20
question.21
Q I will.22
THE COURT: You are saying in hindsight that had you23
known that the -- at least, in your belief -- the24
injunction had not been duly issued and served you25
8/6/2019 Jeff Ashton vs. Joseph Vega
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/jeff-ashton-vs-joseph-vega 30/61
30
ΛV Tranz E-Reporting and Transcription
www.avtranz.com(800) 257-0885
wouldn't have entered the plea.1
THE WITNESS: Correct.2
THE COURT: So that if you now find out the3
injunction was duly issued and served, then in hindsight,4
you would have entered the plea. Yes?5
THE WITNESS: Being served in jail almost three weeks6
after I was accused of violating injunction is not duly7
issued and served.8
BY MR. ASHTON:9
Q But if the Court --10
THE COURT: You only spent 14 days in jail. How were11
you served three weeks later?12
THE WITNESS: It was 20 days I think it was. They13
had me in Seminole County first and then they transferred14
me to --15
THE COURT: Oh.16
THE WITNESS: -- to -- so I was there 20 days before17
I was actually served the injunction which I was charged18
with violating.19
BY MR. ASHTON:20
Q Okay. I'll end this with this question. Wouldn't it21
be fair to say then that that one issue, that one issue, the22
date issue, is the issue that you believe had you known then23
you would not have entered the plea. Correct?24
A It's not one date, sir.25
8/6/2019 Jeff Ashton vs. Joseph Vega
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/jeff-ashton-vs-joseph-vega 31/61
31
ΛV Tranz E-Reporting and Transcription
www.avtranz.com(800) 257-0885
Q I said the date issue, I believe is the word I used.1
A It's a date issue on the service of the injunction.2
It's a date issue on the issuance of the injunctions. It's a3
date issue on the expiration of the temporary injunction at 154
days. It's -- there's many dates here that are involved in5
this whole case. Many dates.6
Q And if again that wasn't a problem -- never mind. I7
think we're done.8
* * * * *9
REDIRECT EXAMINATION10
BY MS. GILLARD:11
Q Mr. Vega, when you -- how long would you say Ms.12
Shepherd was your attorney?13
A I believe it was from when I came of jail the first14
time in April, I believe, of '08 all the way up to the point15
where I plead, in February, I believe it was, of '09.16
Q Okay. So -- what's that? About --17
A Eleven months.18
Q -- ten, eleven month. Okay.19
A Eleven months which I thought was quite a long time.20
Q Okay. Did you also come to the pretrials during that21
time?22
A I did not attend the pretrial. I think it was handled23
between my attorney --24
Q Okay.25
8/6/2019 Jeff Ashton vs. Joseph Vega
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/jeff-ashton-vs-joseph-vega 32/61
32
ΛV Tranz E-Reporting and Transcription
www.avtranz.com(800) 257-0885
A -- and the state attorney without me being present.1
Q Okay.2
A Which I didn't understand why I wasn't there. But --3
Q Okay. So your appearance was waived and you didn't4
come to them.5
A Okay.6
Q Now, when Ms. Shepherd was your attorney, did you7
discuss in detail the individual charges, for example, the8
aggravated stalking after an injunction?9
A What do you mean by in detail? What do you mean10
about --11
Q Well, I know you mentioned something about three12
phones and so she said if you made the three phone calls that's13
all that matters. Is that --14
A Yeah. She -- we did not discuss the circumstances15
that led the charges being filed. It was just a -- to me, Ms.16
Shepherd was making it clear that it was black and white. It17
was just the actual act of making three calls. And that was18
the issue. Nothing else was at issue. Just the act of making19
the three calls.20
Q So did she read the statute to you so that you could21
understand that, you know, in order to be found guilty of that22
offense, the State would have to prove at least two incidents23
of some form of repeated, malicious, willful, harassing24
behavior?25
8/6/2019 Jeff Ashton vs. Joseph Vega
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/jeff-ashton-vs-joseph-vega 33/61
33
ΛV Tranz E-Reporting and Transcription
www.avtranz.com(800) 257-0885
A She never broke it down into at least. She just said1
the three as taken together as three calls. I mean, it was2
never broke down to me in terms of anything other than just3
three calls. Just --4
Q Did you and attorney ever discuss any case law with5
regards to the fact that two of the calls alleged that you had6
just called to see --7
MR. ASHTON: Objection. Scope.8
BY MS. GILLARD:9
Q -- about seeing your --10
MR. ASHTON: Objection. Exceeds the scope of cross.11
I didn't ask him about this.12
THE COURT: I'm going to allow it. Go ahead.13
BY MS. GILLARD:14
Q With regards to the phone calls that were made that15
were alleged to have been made in this case where two of the16
incidents, I believe the first two date dealt with your17
calling -- the first call dealt with you saying that you wanted18
another chance --19
MR. ASHTON: Objection. Leading. Leading.20
THE COURT: Finish the question. Start over.21
MS. GILLARD: Thank you. Okay.22
BY MS. GILLARD:23
Q Did you and Ms. Shepherd discuss in detail with24
regards to the aggravated stalking after an injunction charge25
8/6/2019 Jeff Ashton vs. Joseph Vega
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/jeff-ashton-vs-joseph-vega 34/61
34
ΛV Tranz E-Reporting and Transcription
www.avtranz.com(800) 257-0885
which allegedly a period of time -- and Mr. Ashton just had you1
read the count that dealt with dates in between the 27th of2
March 2008 and the 7th day of April 2008 -- did you and your3
attorney discuss any case law with regards to defenses to the4
fact that one of your phone calls probably really wasn't5
harassment because you only calling to ask for a second chance.6
MR. ASHTON: Objection.7
BY MR. ASHTON:8
Q And to --9
MR. ASHTON: Leading. Compound.10
THE COURT: It certainly is compound. Can you break11
that down?12
MS. GILLARD: Okay.13
BY MS. GILLARD:14
Q Did Ms. Shepherd ever discuss a defense with you with15
regards to your phone call that was alleged to have been made16
on the 27th of March 2008 not being harassment because you17
called with a specific purpose of seeing your children?18
A I don't remember it being broken down by Ms. Shepherd19
that way. I just remember her saying that they have to prove20
it was a harassment situation. And she says it could go either21
way. But, you know, she didn't tell me point blank that, you22
know, I mean -- she just said it -- the statute was -- could be23
interpreted different ways. And, you know, I just -- to me it24
was all vague in my mind as to what harassment meant. And, you25
8/6/2019 Jeff Ashton vs. Joseph Vega
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/jeff-ashton-vs-joseph-vega 35/61
35
ΛV Tranz E-Reporting and Transcription
www.avtranz.com(800) 257-0885
know, and obviously I thought making a call about can I see my1
children was somehow defined as harassment under the law, which2
I didn't understand that. I didn't understand it. And that's3
one reason why I plead to the charges is because Ms. Shepherd4
said she couldn't guarantee that any jury would understand the5
-- you know, the harassment -- the legal definition of6
harassment was just so vague and so up there, you know, I just7
-- I couldn't break it down. I didn't understand. I left it8
all to her. I mean, I'm not an attorney. I didn't understand9
what that meant.10
Q Did Ms. Shepherd read you the definition from the11
statute book of harassment to make you better understand?12
A I think we did look at the -- what definition of13
harassment was. And that left me more confused than before14
because I didn't know, you know, which was it could go. So I15
think she did go over that phrase in the statute about16
harassment.17
Q Did she ever go over any case law with you at any --18
were you aware of her doing any legal research with regards to19
the telephone calls and the content of them as a possible20
defense to where you would not have had three contacts if two21
of them were not deemed to be harassing.22
A Well --23
Q Did she ever discuss that with you? Any case law.24
A She never talked about what she was actually doing in25
8/6/2019 Jeff Ashton vs. Joseph Vega
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/jeff-ashton-vs-joseph-vega 36/61
36
ΛV Tranz E-Reporting and Transcription
www.avtranz.com(800) 257-0885
the case in terms of case law to me. No, we never had those1
kinds of discussions at all. I mean, you know, it's -- I knew2
she was doing something in the case, but I didn't know exactly3
what she was doing in the case. You know, I had no real idea.4
Q Okay. And Mr. Ashton was questioning you repeatedly5
about the dates and how you seemed to think that they're6
important. Correct?7
A No. I --8
Q To pursue an injunction?9
A No. He misinterpreted what I said. I don't seem to10
think they're important. The statutes in the Florida laws deem11
that they're important. It's not my opinion. This is not an12
opinion. This is what I read in the statutes.13
Q Right. It's clear that you think the dates are14
important. Correct? Based on your reading of the statutes.15
Yes?16
A Yes. Yes, I do.17
Q Okay. And you had referred to Page 2 of the18
temporary injunction which states about the 15 days. Correct?19
A Not to exceed 15 days.20
Q Is that correct?21
A Correct. Correct.22
MS. GILLARD: May I approach the witness with a copy23
of the temporary injunction, Your Honor?24
THE COURT: Sure.25
8/6/2019 Jeff Ashton vs. Joseph Vega
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/jeff-ashton-vs-joseph-vega 37/61
37
ΛV Tranz E-Reporting and Transcription
www.avtranz.com(800) 257-0885
MS. GILLARD: Thank you.1
MR. ASHTON: I just ask that it be marked for2
identification so that we have a record of what it was --3
THE COURT: Yeah, I wouldn't mind seeing it.4
MS. GILLARD: Right. That's my goal here. So -- and5
you have a copy, you said.6
MR. ASHTON: A couple, I think.7
MS. GILLARD: Okay.8
Now, may I approach, Your Honor?9
THE COURT: Yes.10
MS. GILLARD: Thank you.11
BY MS. GILLARD:12
Q Mr. Vega, I'm now showing you what is -- the clerk13
has just marked this as Defense Exhibit A for identification.14
Okay? Do you recognize this document? Take a look at it.15
A This looks like the document that I studied for the16
very first time in detail after I plead.17
Q Do you recognize it?18
A I do recognize it.19
Q And do you recognize it to be a copy of the temporary20
injunction for protection against domestic violence with minor21
children that was issued in 08DR4285-0?22
A Yes, I do.23
Q Okay. And the problem with the dates that you're24
referring to, is it the fact that it looks to be Judge25
8/6/2019 Jeff Ashton vs. Joseph Vega
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/jeff-ashton-vs-joseph-vega 38/61
38
ΛV Tranz E-Reporting and Transcription
www.avtranz.com(800) 257-0885
Komanski had signed this temporary injunction on March 18th,1
2008, which is reflected on the last page. Is that correct?2
A Yes. That's correct.3
Q Okay. And it appears that it was docketed, if you4
look at that little stamp up on the top of the front page --5
A Uh-huh.6
Q -- the clerk stamped that it was also docketed at the7
exact same day. Correct?8
A Yes. Yes. Yes.9
Q Okay. And then there is a stamp where it shows that10
you were served with a copy of this. Correct?11
A Yes.12
Q Okay. And that occurred on what day?13
A The 24th day of March.14
Q Okay. Now, the place that you're referring to with15
regards to the 15 days is on Page 2 of this document. Correct?16
A Correct.17
MS. GILLARD: If the Court wouldn't mind, I can give18
Mr. Vega another copy to reference and you can -- I can19
present -- enter this one into evidence so the Court can20
be reviewing it as we're discussing?21
MR. ASHTON: Well, the document speaks for itself so22
I do object to Mr. Vega --23
THE COURT: I don't have one in front of me. I have24
no idea --25
8/6/2019 Jeff Ashton vs. Joseph Vega
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/jeff-ashton-vs-joseph-vega 39/61
39
ΛV Tranz E-Reporting and Transcription
www.avtranz.com(800) 257-0885
MR. ASHTON: Yeah.1
THE COURT: -- what you're talking about.2
MR. ASHTON: I have no objection to the Court getting3
a copy of it. That's fine. I may have an objection to4
Mr. Vega giving commentary on what he thinks it means as a5
matter of law --6
MS. GILLARD: I have not ask him for any commentary.7
MR. ASHTON: That's fine.8
MS. GILLARD: If I may approach the Court, I can give9
you another copy of this document --10
THE COURT: Okay.11
MS. GILLARD: -- while Mr. Vega continues to testify.12
(Counsel confer)13
MS. GILLARD: May I approach?14
THE COURT: Sure.15
BY MS. GILLARD:16
Q Okay. So, now, Mr. Vega, the Court -- Judge17
LeBlanc has a copy of the temporary injunction that you're18
looking at as well so everyone can follow along. Okay?19
A Right.20
Q And -- now, with regards to this injunction, there21
was a hearing set which I believe you did not attend --22
correct? -- on April 3rd?23
A I did not attend it.24
Q So April 3rd at 8:30. And the problem that you're25
8/6/2019 Jeff Ashton vs. Joseph Vega
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/jeff-ashton-vs-joseph-vega 40/61
40
ΛV Tranz E-Reporting and Transcription
www.avtranz.com(800) 257-0885
having with this after we've reviewed the statute --1
A Right.2
Q -- is on Page 2 and the first line under Temporary3
Injunction in terms. Correct?4
A Correct.5
Q Where it states that the injunction shall in no event6
be in effect -- well, I paraphrased. Sorry. This injunction7
shall be effective until the hearing set above and in no event8
for longer than 15 days unless extended by the Court. Correct?9
A Correct.10
Q Are you aware of any extension that was granted --11
let me finish -- with regards to the temporary injunction to12
make it last longer than 15 days?13
A I'm not aware nor did I find any evidence of any14
court order extension of this injunction.15
Q Okay. So actually you had your -- the hearing was16
set with regards to this temporary injunction to become17
permanent more than 15 days. Correct?18
A Correct.19
Q About -- I believe if you start from the 18th, it20
comes out to be 17 days. Right?21
A Seventeen days exactly. Which falls in the middle of22
the week.23
THE COURT: Wait a minute. I thought you weren't24
served with the injunction until the 24th of March. Isn't25
8/6/2019 Jeff Ashton vs. Joseph Vega
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/jeff-ashton-vs-joseph-vega 41/61
41
ΛV Tranz E-Reporting and Transcription
www.avtranz.com(800) 257-0885
it in effective for 15 days from the 24th of March?1
MS. GILLARD: He doesn't have to ever be served. And2
he's still going to have the hearing on the 3rd.3
THE COURT: That's not what I asked. The injunction4
was served --5
MS. GILLARD: I think it was from the date of --6
THE COURT: -- on the 24th of March is the injunction7
not in force for 15 days from the date at -- maximum -- of8
the 24th of March on for 15 days.9
MS. GILLARD: No. I believe it goes from the 15 days10
of the issuance of it.11
THE COURT: Why? It had no effect until it was12
served. It's 15 days from the date it's served.13
MS. GILLARD: Well, wouldn't -- that's like saying14
then it wouldn't have an effect if he never was served.15
Right? And that he'd still have a permanent injunction?16
I mean, I think the hearing is set in that time frame to17
correspond with the 15 days. In this case, though,18
however, it was set out 17 days later. And I believe the19
other aspect of this argument that Mr. Vega is stating is20
that no temporary injunction can be in effect for longer21
than 15 days meaning basically had he been in court and22
been served on that day, now we have an injunction that's23
in place for longer than 15 days -- temporary24
injunction --25
8/6/2019 Jeff Ashton vs. Joseph Vega
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/jeff-ashton-vs-joseph-vega 42/61
42
ΛV Tranz E-Reporting and Transcription
www.avtranz.com(800) 257-0885
THE COURT: But it wasn't.1
MS. GILLARD: -- that the judge issued.2
THE COURT: It was only served on the 24th of March.3
MS. GILLARD: That's if it goes by the service date.4
But the --5
THE COURT: Well, when is it in effect otherwise? It6
can't be in effect unless he's served with it.7
MR. ASHTON: I think the key point is that the events8
alleged to -- two of the events occurred within the 159
days period of either the beginning date when it was10
issued or it was served. And the State's position in its11
response is that -- and I think what the Defendant is not12
understanding is that as a matter of law, you can't --13
that error if it in fact is an error, does not invalidate14
the injunction. You still have to follow the injunction.15
It is still valid. And as I've cited all the cases in my16
memorandum that show that it is still valid so this is not17
a defense. Unless a legal argument for the Court -- you18
know, I sort of tried to talk to the Defendant about that.19
We aren't communicating. But -- so I think either way,20
it's still valid. There is no defense as a matter of law.21
But I don't expect the Defendant to agree with that.22
MS. GILLARD: Can I continue? But basically Mr.23
Vega's position that I am putting forth for Mr. Vega24
here --25
8/6/2019 Jeff Ashton vs. Joseph Vega
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/jeff-ashton-vs-joseph-vega 43/61
43
ΛV Tranz E-Reporting and Transcription
www.avtranz.com(800) 257-0885
THE COURT: Is?1
MS. GILLARD: -- is that basically the 15 -- that2
because this temporary injunction -- I mean, it was3
issued. This temporary injunction, whether it be served4
or not, was it issued. And it cannot be --5
THE COURT: It doesn't matter when it's --6
MS. GILLARD: -- issued --7
THE COURT: -- issued. It could be issued in 2008.8
If it's served today, it's in effect for 15 days today.9
The injunction has no effect unless and until it's served.10
If it's not served, he has no idea he can't make a phone11
call.12
MS. GILLARD: Well, it says --13
THE COURT: The injunction has absolutely no effect14
until it's served.15
MS. GILLARD: It says it's effective until the16
hearing or --17
THE COURT: Once it is served.18
MS. GILLARD: No.19
THE COURT: So if I issue an injunction today and you20
don't know about it, I can cite you with violating the21
injunction cause it hasn't been served? Of course not.22
An injunction has no effect until it is served.23
MS. GILLARD: Well, then that's like saying that this24
temporary injunction has no effect --25
8/6/2019 Jeff Ashton vs. Joseph Vega
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/jeff-ashton-vs-joseph-vega 44/61
44
ΛV Tranz E-Reporting and Transcription
www.avtranz.com(800) 257-0885
THE COURT: It didn't --1
MS. GILLARD: -- at all --2
THE COURT: -- until March 24th. So when he made the3
calls on March 27th, March 28th and April 7th, he was4
violating the injunction.5
MS. GILLARD: Well, I understand the Court's --6
THE COURT: Analysis.7
MS. GILLARD: Yes. And the argument that Mr. Vega is8
putting forth is that -- basically the whole document --9
this whole document is a nullity, that the Court has no10
jurisdiction to issue this for longer than 15 days.11
Basically, it was issued on the date that March 18th and12
because it was issued for a period to last longer than 1513
days that it is not valid. And I know the Court's saying14
it's not valid until served.15
THE COURT: And what would that do about the first or16
second of three phone calls?17
MS. GILLARD: Well, the first or second were --18
MR. ASHTON: Judge, before we argue the merits, could19
we -- could I just finish my cross-examination?20
THE COURT: Well, are you done questioning him?21
MR. ASHTON: We seem to be getting into the merits --22
MS. GILLARD: No.23
THE COURT: Okay.24
MR. ASHTON: -- of the arguments.25
8/6/2019 Jeff Ashton vs. Joseph Vega
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/jeff-ashton-vs-joseph-vega 45/61
45
ΛV Tranz E-Reporting and Transcription
www.avtranz.com(800) 257-0885
THE COURT: Then continue your questioning.1
MS. GILLARD: Okay.2
BY MS. GILLARD:3
Q So, Mr. Vega, that was your argument -- correct? --4
that the 15 days started from the date of March --5
A My argument was that the 15 days is what the Court6
has to reach the point where they're going to decide on whether7
to issue a permanent injunction or not. And whether --8
MR. ASHTON: Excuse me, sir.9
THE WITNESS: -- it was served or not.10
MR. ASHTON: Excuse me, sir. I need to --11
THE WITNESS: Whether it was served or not --12
THE COURT: Hang on.13
THE WITNESS: -- has nothing --14
THE COURT: He's objecting.15
MR. ASHTON: Judge, could you ask the witness --16
THE COURT: Once he objects, stop answering.17
THE WITNESS: He would object --18
THE COURT: I didn't tell you that before.19
THE WITNESS: Well, he --20
MR. ASHTON: Well, I was trying to be polite and ask21
Mr. Vega to calm down and stop. I have an objection.22
This witness is giving a legal opinion which is not23
relevant to this matter.24
THE COURT: Correct.25
8/6/2019 Jeff Ashton vs. Joseph Vega
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/jeff-ashton-vs-joseph-vega 46/61
46
ΛV Tranz E-Reporting and Transcription
www.avtranz.com(800) 257-0885
MR. ASHTON: Facts are what they are. I object to1
the narrative legal opinion. And if you could wait, sir,2
until the Court rules.3
THE COURT: It does call for a legal opinion.4
MS. GILLARD: Okay. I'm asking for Mr. Vega's5
opinion as to his belief, which is why we're here today.6
THE COURT: His opinion doesn't matter. His belief7
is a different thing. His belief might make a difference.8
THE WITNESS: My belief is --9
MS. GILLARD: Let --10
THE WITNESS: Oh, okay.11
MS. GILLARD: The Court and I are --12
THE COURT: So go ahead --13
MS. GILLARD: -- discussing --14
THE COURT: Go ahead and answer the question.15
MS. GILLARD: Okay. Go ahead.16
THE WITNESS: My belief is that if the injunction is17
never served on the respondent that nevertheless, the18
Court has 15 days to set a hearing date -- up to 15 days19
for the permanent hearing. That's it. Whether the20
respondent is ever served or not has nothing to do with21
the fact that 15 days will go by maximum and then a22
hearing is set forth to decide it should become permanent23
or not. So it has nothing to do with the service on the24
respondent. It's a time frame set forth by the25
8/6/2019 Jeff Ashton vs. Joseph Vega
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/jeff-ashton-vs-joseph-vega 47/61
47
ΛV Tranz E-Reporting and Transcription
www.avtranz.com(800) 257-0885
legislature in the laws that gives the Court up to 15 days1
to come up with a hearing date for the permanent2
injunction. And that has nothing -- and the wording in3
the statutes has nothing to say about being served or4
anything. It just says this is what a temporary5
injunction is. This is why they call it a temporary6
because it lasts up to 15 days. That makes it temporary.7
And temporary means it could go away.8
BY MS. GILLARD:9
Q Right.10
A It's not permanent.11
Q Okay.12
A So that's my belief is that, you know --13
THE COURT: I think your belief is correct. It is14
temporary and it can go away. That's correct.15
THE WITNESS: Regardless of whether it's served on16
the respondent or not.17
THE COURT: Well, there you're wrong. But go ahead.18
MS. GILLARD: I'd like to move into evidence --19
THE COURT: Move on.20
MS. GILLARD: -- as Defense Exhibit 1 for21
identification a copy of the temporary injunction22
that's --23
THE COURT: Any objection?24
MS. GILLARD: -- previously been marked as Defense --25
8/6/2019 Jeff Ashton vs. Joseph Vega
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/jeff-ashton-vs-joseph-vega 48/61
48
ΛV Tranz E-Reporting and Transcription
www.avtranz.com(800) 257-0885
MR. ASHTON: No objection.1
THE COURT: All right. Then Defense A will come in as2
Defense 1 without objection. Copy of the temporary3
injunction served March 24th, 2008.4
(Defendant's Exhibit 1 admitted into evidence)5
THE COURT: Mr. Vega, I just want to point out to6
you --7
THE WITNESS: Yes, sir.8
THE COURT: -- the very first paragraph of all9
injunctions state, "Under the laws of Florida, the Court10
has jurisdiction of the petitioner and the subject matter11
and has jurisdiction of the respondent upon service of the12
temporary injunction." In other words, once it's served,13
it's in effective and 15 days run. But not until then.14
THE WITNESS: What happens if they can't find the15
respondent?16
THE COURT: Then there ain't no injunction in force.17
THE WITNESS: Then the petitioner doesn't have a18
chance to go and get a permanent on the 15th day --19
THE COURT: Correct.20
THE WITNESS: -- the petitioner is disallowed from21
going forth?22
THE COURT: Correct. Because there is no service on23
the respondent.24
THE WITNESS: But the respondent might be out of25
8/6/2019 Jeff Ashton vs. Joseph Vega
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/jeff-ashton-vs-joseph-vega 49/61
49
ΛV Tranz E-Reporting and Transcription
www.avtranz.com(800) 257-0885
state for -- or might be hiding. And the petitioner1
deserves protection from the Court. And on the 15th2
day --3
THE COURT: Oh, I'm not here to argue the4
philosophical merits of that or not. However, I just want5
to point out the first paragraph of the injunction for6
which you are served states the Court has jurisdiction7
over you upon service of the injunction. That's when the8
15 days starts running. Okay? I'm telling you.9
THE WITNESS: Okay.10
THE COURT: I'm not asking you. I'm telling you.11
THE WITNESS: If I understand what you're saying, so12
if I'm not located, it just --13
THE COURT: If you're not located, there's not14
injunction because there's been no service. And unless15
the petitioner comes to court with another act alleged16
that would give rise to issuing of another temporary17
injunction, there's not injunction.18
BY MS. GILLARD:19
Q Okay. Mr. Vega, when were you served with a copy of20
the permanent injunction?21
A I was served with a copy of the permanent injunction22
about three weeks after I was charged with violating the23
injunction, on the third call. Three weeks after. In other24
words, according to what I just heard put forth, if you haven't25
8/6/2019 Jeff Ashton vs. Joseph Vega
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/jeff-ashton-vs-joseph-vega 50/61
50
ΛV Tranz E-Reporting and Transcription
www.avtranz.com(800) 257-0885
been served yet, you can't be charged with violating the1
injunction and I wasn't served on -- at the time of the third2
charge.3
Q Okay.4
A So it's very clear now to me that that charge was5
totally -- did not belong in the charges -- the third call6
because I had never been served at that date.7
THE COURT: The question was --8
BY MS. GILLARD:9
Q So, Mr. Vega, the answer was --10
THE COURT: -- when were you served with --11
BY MS. GILLARD:12
Q -- three weeks?13
THE COURT: -- the temporary injunction?14
BY MS. GILLARD:15
Q About three weeks later?16
A Three weeks after I was charged with violating it.17
THE COURT: So the 24th of March is not a correct18
date as to when you were served?19
THE WITNESS: She asked about the permanent. She20
asked about the permanent.21
BY MS. GILLARD:22
Q Okay.23
THE COURT: Oh.24
THE WITNESS: That's a separate injunction, Your25
8/6/2019 Jeff Ashton vs. Joseph Vega
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/jeff-ashton-vs-joseph-vega 51/61
51
ΛV Tranz E-Reporting and Transcription
www.avtranz.com(800) 257-0885
Honor.1
THE COURT: Does it matter whether it's the permanent2
or the temporary? An injunction was in force whether it's3
the temporary or the permanent. The information doesn't4
specify nor does the stalking charge. What difference5
does it make. The question is whether --6
MS. GILLARD: It was the temporary --7
THE COURT: The question is whether an injunction was8
in place at the time the phone calls were made on the 27th9
of March, the 28th of March or the 7th of April, whether10
it's the temporary or the permanent one, who cares. Was11
there an injunction in place? Were you served with the12
temporary injunction on the 24th of March 200 --13
THE WITNESS: I was served with the temporary.14
THE COURT: All right. And 15 days from the 24th of15
March would be when?16
THE WITNESS: Like the 9th of June, I guess. I don't17
know.18
THE COURT: Fifteen days from the 24th of March would19
be when?20
THE WITNESS: The 10th.21
THE COURT: Well, it's a little less than that. It's22
actually --23
MS. GILLARD: The 8th.24
THE COURT: -- the 7th. So the injunction would25
8/6/2019 Jeff Ashton vs. Joseph Vega
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/jeff-ashton-vs-joseph-vega 52/61
8/6/2019 Jeff Ashton vs. Joseph Vega
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/jeff-ashton-vs-joseph-vega 53/61
53
ΛV Tranz E-Reporting and Transcription
www.avtranz.com(800) 257-0885
those calls were made. Those calls are charged in three1
separate counts. And those calls comprise the aggravated2
stalking in Count I.3
THE WITNESS: Or the charging affidavit said I4
violated the permanent injunction.5
THE COURT: It didn't say permanent or temporary. It6
just said injunction. Do you want me to show you?7
THE WITNESS: It's --8
THE COURT: I'm just -- I don't want to waste our9
time.10
THE WITNESS: I know, Your Honor. But I mean I11
thought they broke it down into two on the temporary and12
one on the permanent. That's the way the State broke it13
down.14
THE COURT: It just said that there was an injunction15
in place. They didn't say permanent or temporary. They16
just said violation of an injunction.17
MS. GILLARD: If I can approach Mr. Vega, I can show18
him.19
* * * * *20
COURT'S RULING21
THE COURT: I just don't want to waste anyone's time.22
He's saying there was no injunction in place. There was.23
It was in place for 15 days. It expired at midnight April24
7, 2008. The three phone calls were March 27, March 28th25
8/6/2019 Jeff Ashton vs. Joseph Vega
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/jeff-ashton-vs-joseph-vega 54/61
54
ΛV Tranz E-Reporting and Transcription
www.avtranz.com(800) 257-0885
and April 7th. That's Count I, Count II, and Count III.1
And the reason that he entered a plea is because he scored2
22 months in prison. And he didn't want to go to prison.3
So instead of going to prison, they agreed on a downward4
departure and gave him probation. So instead of facing5
eight years in jail, he took a plea to a downward6
departure and probation, complied with the conditions of7
probation and we terminated him early. The motion is8
denied.9
MS. GILLARD: Thank you, Your Honor.10
THE DEFENDANT: As of this moment, I don't have an11
attorney. Is that correct? Because now the 3850 is over12
so -- I put in a motion into my file for an appointment of13
an attorney. It's in my case file.14
THE COURT: That motion is denied. You're not15
entitled to it. You've had an attorney. What do you need16
an attorney for at this point?17
THE DEFENDANT: The appeal of the 3850.18
THE COURT: You can file an appeal on the 3850. I19
don't know if you're entitled to counsel on that.20
However, based on the record, the injunction having been21
in force, the motion to withdraw the plea and the post-22
conviction motion is denied as unfounded.23
MS. GILLARD: And, Your Honor, I don't know -- I24
never got a copy, but I think Mr. Vega had told me that he25
8/6/2019 Jeff Ashton vs. Joseph Vega
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/jeff-ashton-vs-joseph-vega 55/61
55
ΛV Tranz E-Reporting and Transcription
www.avtranz.com(800) 257-0885
had written something about -- did you request different1
counsel from me anyway. Right?2
THE DEFENDANT: No. I knew that the moment the3
hearing would be settled, I would -- you told me you could4
not be my attorney any longer.5
MS. GILLARD: Well --6
THE DEFENDANT: And I put forth the motion to the7
judge to -- for appointment of a counsel. And I --8
MS. GILLARD: We had discussed if we were successful9
then no I would not have been his attorney cause I was10
only appointed for the 3850. And then --11
THE COURT: Mr. Vega, the motion is denied and you12
have the right to file an appeal. If you wish to do so,13
it must be filed within 30 days. You file the appeal.14
You file the paperwork. I don't do it for you.15
MS. GILLARD: And I don't do it either. Right?16
THE COURT: You are the attorney of record for it. I17
believe you are required to and then motion to withdraw.18
MS. GILLARD: Right. I think I do.19
THE COURT: I'm not sure it's going to make much20
difference. You have to understand what you're up21
against.22
THE DEFENDANT: I don't understand.23
THE COURT: What are you trying to do? You're trying24
to get your record wiped clean.25
8/6/2019 Jeff Ashton vs. Joseph Vega
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/jeff-ashton-vs-joseph-vega 56/61
56
ΛV Tranz E-Reporting and Transcription
www.avtranz.com(800) 257-0885
THE DEFENDANT: No. I'm trying to just -- have the1
record set straight. That's all. The facts of the case.2
THE COURT: And I just set the record straight.3
THE DEFENDANT: Yes, sir.4
THE COURT: You believed you were not under force of5
an injunction and you were based on the injunction in6
place. You believed the injunction was not in force at7
the time those three phone calls were made. The8
injunctions were in force at the time those three phone9
calls were made.10
THE DEFENDANT: I was under the impression the 385011
had nothing to do with my guilt or innocence. It only had12
to do with what my attorney made me aware of or not aware13
of and my attorney made no --14
THE COURT: Yes. But your belief is wrong. You're15
saying you're attorney didn't make you aware that there16
was no injunction. Your attorney didn't make you aware of17
that because there was an injunction in force. So that18
your belief of what your attorney knew or didn't know is19
wrong. She knew there was an injunction in force because20
there was an injunction in force. I find that there was21
an injunction in force. And there's absolutely no basis22
for me to find that she was ineffective. You got a23
probation officer when you should have gone to prison.24
And now you don't like it?25
8/6/2019 Jeff Ashton vs. Joseph Vega
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/jeff-ashton-vs-joseph-vega 57/61
57
ΛV Tranz E-Reporting and Transcription
www.avtranz.com(800) 257-0885
THE DEFENDANT: First offense, Your Honor. I never1
did anything in my life ever before.2
THE COURT: Kill someone only one time, you go to3
prison. It has nothing to do with whether it's your first4
offense or not. It has to do with how you score, what the5
offenses are. You got a good deal. You took advantage of6
the deal. And it's done with. But it's a conviction on7
your record.8
THE DEFENDANT: I thought you withheld adjudication9
on it. Then it's not --10
THE COURT: Oh. If I withheld adjudication, then11
it's correct. I didn't realize that. You are correct.12
Yeah.13
THE DEFENDANT: Okay.14
THE COURT: I didn't realize that.15
THE DEFENDANT: Now, I'm not clear about the fact16
that I have an attorney now. The Court is withdrawing my17
attorney. Is that --18
THE COURT: No, I'm not withdrawing. I'm doing19
nothing other than denying the motion to withdraw the plea20
and denying the motion for post-conviction relief as21
unfounded.22
MS. GILLARD: And basically --23
THE COURT: That's all I'm doing.24
MS. GILLARD: -- under my appointment -- I'm just25
8/6/2019 Jeff Ashton vs. Joseph Vega
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/jeff-ashton-vs-joseph-vega 58/61
58
ΛV Tranz E-Reporting and Transcription
www.avtranz.com(800) 257-0885
going to explain this if the Court will indulge me.1
THE COURT: Oh, you were court appointed?2
MS. GILLARD: Yes.3
THE COURT: Then it is up to you to perfect the4
appeal if he so chooses.5
MS. GILLARD: Exactly.6
THE COURT: However, I don't believe he's entitled to7
counsel for purpose of -- court appointed counsel for8
purposes of a post-conviction appeal. If wants to do an9
appeal, he can do one himself.10
MS. GILLARD: Right.11
THE COURT: But he's not entitled to counsel.12
THE DEFENDANT: But once you have counsel appointed,13
Your Honor, they can't take it away in the middle of your14
case.15
THE COURT: It's not --16
MS. GILLARD: No.17
THE COURT: -- in the middle. The case is over with.18
MS. GILLARD: The statute with regards to my19
appointment requires me to file the initial paperwork for20
an appeal. However --21
THE COURT: The case is over with.22
MS. GILLARD: -- once the appeal is filed, the23
paperwork requesting -- I mean, I think he's going to have24
to be paying for copies and transcripts and everything.25
8/6/2019 Jeff Ashton vs. Joseph Vega
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/jeff-ashton-vs-joseph-vega 59/61
59
ΛV Tranz E-Reporting and Transcription
www.avtranz.com(800) 257-0885
It's not like a public defender is appointed.1
THE COURT: Well, I can declare indigent for costs2
for purposes of appeal. But he doesn't get court3
appointed counsel.4
MS. GILLARD: Right. So he's going to have to get5
everything --6
THE COURT: Right.7
MS. GILLARD: -- himself. And he would have to file8
a motion to be declared indigent.9
THE DEFENDANT: It's already been filed. I've10
already been declared indigent.11
MS. GILLARD: Not for the appeal.12
THE COURT: You're not entitled to counsel. You've13
been entitled to counsel long enough. And it's not that I14
don't -- it's not my decision. That's an appellate court15
-- they've made the rules not me.16
THE DEFENDANT: But if you have 30 days, what17
happens -- I mean, I have --18
THE COURT: You have 30 days to file the appeal.19
THE DEFENDANT: I have to personally --20
THE COURT: Don't ask me for legal advice, ask your21
attorney.22
THE DEFENDANT: Is she still my attorney?23
THE COURT: She is until she --24
MS. GILLARD: I'm only doing the appellate --25
8/6/2019 Jeff Ashton vs. Joseph Vega
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/jeff-ashton-vs-joseph-vega 60/61
60
ΛV Tranz E-Reporting and Transcription
www.avtranz.com(800) 257-0885
THE COURT: She --1
MS. GILLARD: -- I will do the appeal paperwork if2
you request me to file an appeal for you. But I do not --3
it's very basic paperwork. It is not --4
THE COURT: She would file --5
MS. GILLARD: -- legal.6
THE COURT: -- the notice of appeal and then withdraw7
as counsel of record.8
MS. GILLARD: It's just a notice of appeal. It's a9
piece of paper. And a few other pieces of paper that10
designate a court reporter with regards to the date of11
hearing. But it's -- it's not a full blown memorandum of12
law or anything like that. It's just -- and it's done for13
every person who appeals. That's the initial documents14
that the Judge is saying then you would be required to15
write your own brief --16
THE COURT: I'm done.17
MS. GILLARD: -- with regards to the appeal.18
THE COURT: We're done. We're off the record.19
MR. ASHTON: Could we go ahead and adjourn?20
THE COURT: We're done. We're --21
MR. ASHTON: They need to talk.22
THE COURT: This proceeding is concluded.23
(Proceedings concluded at 2:36 p.m.)24
* * * * *25
8/6/2019 Jeff Ashton vs. Joseph Vega
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/jeff-ashton-vs-joseph-vega 61/61
61
C E R T I F I C A T E1
STATE OF FLORIDA:2
COUNTY OF ORANGE:3
I, Kelley A. Grijalva, CET**D, being a Digital Court4
Transcriber as authorized by Rule 2.535(h)(3), Florida Rules of5
Judicial Administration, and the Administrative Order of the6
Ninth Judicial Circuit numbered 07-98-43, certify that the7
foregoing transcription is true and correct.8
Dated this 21th of December, 2010, in the City of Orlando,9
County of Orange, State of Florida.10
11
12
________________________13
KELLEY A. GRIJALVA, CET**D14Digital Court Transcriber
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
Top Related