For discussion PWSC(2017-18)37 on 28 March 2018
ITEM FOR PUBLIC WORKS SUBCOMMITTEE OF FINANCE COMMITTEE
HEAD 707 – NEW TOWNS AND URBAN AREA DEVELOPMENT Support – Others 188GK – Government Flying Service Kai Tak Division
Members are invited to recommend to the Finance
Committee the upgrading of 188GK to Category A at
an estimated cost of $469.1 million in
money-of-the-day prices for the establishment of the
Government Flying Service Kai Tak Division.
PROBLEM
We need to establish a Kai Tak Division (KTD) for the Government Flying Service (GFS) in order to clear the North Lantau Expressway (NLE) flight route to enable timely construction of new housing units under the Tung Chung New Town Extension (TCNTE), and to maintain the effectiveness and efficiency of GFS’s emergency services under all-weather conditions. PROPOSAL 2. The Director of Civil Engineering and Development, with the support of the Secretary for Development and the Secretary for Security, proposes to upgrade 188GK (the Project) to Category A at an estimated cost of $469.1 million in money-of-the-day (MOD) prices to establish the KTD for GFS.
/PROJECT …..
PWSC(2017-18)37 Page 2
PROJECT SCOPE AND NATURE 3. The site of the Project occupies an area of about 7 400 square metres (m2) at the tip of the Ex-Kai Tak Runway (EKTR). The proposed scope of works under 188GK includes –
(a) construction of an apron to provide a helicopter
take-off/landing pad, two helicopter parking pads and the associated safety/protection areas1;
(b) construction of an office building to accommodate an
Air Command and Control Centre, a Flight Planning Centre and ancillary facilities including offices for GFS’s aircrew, engineering and administration staff, a multi-purpose function room for mission planning, briefing, training and meeting, and an aircraft and mission equipment storage area;
(c) construction of a hangar to accommodate two helicopters and the associated maintenance equipment;
(d) provision of supporting facilities for helicopter
operation including radio and communication facilities, navigation, security and surveillance systems, helicopter refueling facilities and firefighting facilities; and
(e) associated civil, drainage, sewerage, water supply,
building and landscaping works, etc. 4. A layout plan and two architectural renderings showing the proposed works are attached at Enclosures 1 and 2 respectively. 5. Subject to funding approval of the Finance Committee (FC), we plan to commence the construction works of the Project in the fourth quarter of 2018 for completion by the first quarter of 2021. To meet the programme, the Civil Engineering and Development Department plans to invite tenders for the construction contract in May 2018 tentatively to facilitate timely commencement of the construction works, but the construction contract will only be awarded upon FC’s funding approval.
/JUSTIFICATIONS …..
1 The take-off/landing pad can be shared use by GFS and the future commercial operator(s) of a possible
cross-boundary heliport when it is pursued. There will be two parking pads, with one dedicated for GFS’s use and the other for use by the future commercial operator(s).
PWSC(2017-18)37 Page 3
JUSTIFICATIONS 6. GFS was established under the Government Flying Service Ordinance (Cap. 322) in 1993 to provide a wide range of flying services, including search and rescue, air ambulance, fire-fighting, aerial survey and support for law enforcement, for various departments of the Government and people in need. Currently, GFS deploys emergency flights from its Headquarters at the Hong Kong International Airport (HKIA) in Chek Lap Kok. The NLE (see Enclosure 3) is one of the four major helicopter flight routes2 used by GFS’s helicopters for transiting to and from its Headquarters. It is also the primary flight route used by GFS’s helicopters in response to emergency call-outs under unfavourable weather conditions. With developments under the TCNTE project coming up along the northern shore of Lantau, the NLE flight route would be hampered by new buildings below the flight path, making it difficult for GFS to continue using that route for supporting its emergency services under unfavourable weather conditions 3 . Hence, there is a need to establish an operational base for GFS outside its Headquarters at the HKIA in order to maintain the effectiveness and efficiency of GFS’s emergency services under all-weather conditions. 7. An extensive site search process, having regard to key factors such as GFS’s operational needs, compatibility with aviation safety requirements, land use planning, technical feasibility, optimal site utilisation and compliance with statutory requirements, etc., was conducted between 2015 and 2016. Following the site search and technical feasibility assessments, a site at the tip of the EKTR (the Site) was identified as the most suitable location for establishing an operational base for GFS outside its Headquarters. The Site has been zoned as “Other Specified Uses” annotated “Heliport” under the Kai Tak Outline Zoning Plan (OZP) S/K22/2 since 2007, taking into account the possible provision of an at-grade cross-boundary heliport. Co-location of the proposed GFS KTD with the possible cross-boundary heliport on the Site will maintain GFS’s performance commitments and emergency response effectiveness, as well as maximise the use of limited waterfront land resources.
/8. ….. 2 The other routes are the Silvermine Pass, Tung Chung Pass and western coastline of Lantau. 3 Under unfavourable weather conditions, other primary helicopter flight routes to and from the HKIA (i.e.
the Silvermine Pass and Tung Chung Pass) are often subject to low cloud level and poor visibility conditions and are unsafe for use. If the NLE is also hampered, GFS has to consider using the western coastline of Lantau as the last resort, but this route is subject to much higher risk factors such as little effective visual references for pilots, presence of high terrain and turbulence, rendering it unsafe for use under poor weather conditions or at night time. In addition, its longer travelling distance to any part of Hong Kong will adversely lengthen the flight time for all emergency response flights, further compromising GFS’s effectiveness in responding to emergency call-outs.
PWSC(2017-18)37 Page 4
8. Upon the establishment of the proposed KTD, the existing GFS Headquarters at Chek Lap Kok will continue to provide support for other scheduled flying services and routine training, as well as emergency responses depending on the call-out location, resources (including helicopters, aircrew and equipment) available for deployment during the specific situation, weather conditions, etc. 9. In undertaking the design of the proposed GFS KTD, every care has been taken to ensure the feasibility of the co-location with the cross-boundary heliport when it is pursued in future. The proposed works at the apron area (item (a) under paragraph 3 above) will be able to meet the operational needs of both GFS and the possible cross-boundary heliport, thereby minimising the need for carrying out additional works after the GFS KTD has started operation. 10. The TCNTE is one of the major initiatives to increase land supply to meet housing and other development needs of Hong Kong. The timely commissioning of the proposed GFS KTD is thus crucial to ensure that the supply of over 40 000 new housing units (with over 60% for public housing) in Tung Chung East under the TCNTE project would be made available starting from 2023-24 to meet the strong demand for housing in the short to medium term. To enable construction of the housing units in a timely manner and to maintain GFS’s emergency services at its current level, we need to commence the construction works of the Project in the fourth quarter of 2018 for commissioning of the KTD in 2021, in order to allow construction of the superstructure of the housing blocks in Tung Chung East which falls within GFS’s NLE flight path. GFS will endeavor to gear up the required manpower, including aircrew and engineering professionals, to cope with the proposed commencement of the KTD. FINANCIAL IMPLICATION 11. We estimate the capital cost of the Project to be $469.1 million in MOD prices (see paragraph 13 below), broken down as follows –
/$ million …..
PWSC(2017-18)37 Page 5
$ million (in MOD prices)
(a) Construction of an apron
62.2
(b) Construction of an office building
56.5
(c) Construction of a hangar4
161.3
(d) Provision of supporting facilities
54.7
(e) Associated civil, drainage, sewerage, water supply, building and landscaping works
45.4
(f) Consultants’ fee for (i) contract administration (ii) management of resident site
staff (RSS)
6.5 5.1 1.4
(g) Remuneration of RSS
37.7
(h) Contingencies
44.8
Total 469.1
12. A breakdown of the estimates for the consultants’ fees and RSS costs by man-months is at Enclosure 4. 13. Subject to approval, we plan to phase the expenditure as follows –
/$ million …..
4 Construction of the hangar includes foundation, reinforced concrete and steel structures, green roof,
facade, etc.
PWSC(2017-18)37 Page 6
Year $ million (MOD)
2018 – 2019 24.2
2019 – 2020 178.7
2020 – 2021 202.2
2021 – 2022 38.6
2022 – 2023 25.4
469.1
14. We have derived the MOD estimates on the basis of the Government’s latest forecast of trend rate of change in the prices of public sector building and construction output for the period from 2018 to 2023. Subject to funding approval, we will deliver the proposed works under a re-measurement contract because the quantity of works described in paragraph 11(a), (b), (c) and (e) may vary depending on the actual ground conditions. The contract will be prepared in the New Engineering Contract (NEC) form5 with the provision of price adjustments. 15. We estimate the annual recurrent expenditure arising from the Project to be $69.7 million. PUBLIC CONSULTATION 16. We consulted the Housing and Infrastructure Committee of the Kowloon City District Council (DC), the Food and Environmental Hygiene Committee of the Wong Tai Sin DC and the Environment and Hygiene Committee of the Kwun Tong DC on 15 June, 27 June and 20 July 2017 respectively. Members of the three DCs generally supported the Project.
/17. …..
5 NEC is a suite of contracts developed by the Institution of Civil Engineer, United Kingdom. It is a
contract form that emphasises cooperation, mutual trust and collaborative risk management between contracting parties.
PWSC(2017-18)37 Page 7
17. We also consulted the Task Force on Kai Tak Harbourfront Development (KTTF) of the Harbourfront Commission on 8 September and 1 November 2017. Members of the KTTF generally supported the Project. 18. We consulted the Panel on Security on the Project on 9 January 2018, with members from the Panel on Development invited to join the discussion. Members supported the submission of the funding proposal of the Project to the Public Works Subcommittee for consideration. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPLICATIONS 19. The Project is not a designated project under the Environmental Impact Assessment Ordinance (Cap. 499). We have carried out a Preliminary Environmental Review (PER) under the technical feasibility study and revealed that the Project, together with the planned cross-boundary heliport to be co-located at the Site, will not cause long-term adverse environmental impacts. The Project will be designed and implemented in accordance with the requirements of the Hong Kong Planning Standards and Guidelines. GFS will also adopt specific flight paths and procedures to minimise potential helicopter noise impact. 20. We will also incorporate into the relevant works contract the mitigation measures recommended in the PER to control the environmental impacts arising from the construction works within established standards and in accordance with relevant guidelines. These include use of silencers, mufflers, acoustic linings or shields and building of temporary barriers for noisy construction activities, frequent cleaning and watering of the site, and provision of wheel-washing facilities. We have included in the project estimates the cost to implement these mitigation measures. 21. We have considered the site formation arrangement in the planning and design stages to reduce generation of construction waste where possible. In addition, we will require the contractor to reuse inert construction waste (e.g. excavated materials) on site or in other suitable construction sites as far as possible, in order to minimise disposal of inert construction waste to public fill reception facilities6. We will encourage the contractor to maximise the use of recycled or recyclable inert construction waste, as well as the use of non-timber formwork to further minimise generation of construction waste.
/22. …..
6 Public fill reception facilities are specified in Schedule 4 of the Waste Disposal (Charges for Disposal of
Construction Waste) Regulation (Cap. 354N). Disposal of inert construction waste in public fill reception facilities requires a licence issued by the Director of Civil Engineering and Development.
PWSC(2017-18)37 Page 8
22. At the construction stage, we will also require the contractor to submit for approval a plan setting out the waste management measures, which will include appropriate mitigation means to avoid, reduce, reuse and recycle inert construction waste. We will ensure that the day-to-day operations on site comply with the approved plan. We will require the contractor to separate the inert portion from non-inert construction waste on site for disposal at appropriate facilities. Besides, we will control the disposal of inert construction waste and non-inert construction waste to public fill reception facilities and landfills respectively through a trip-ticket system. 23. We estimate that the Project will generate in total 17 000 tonnes of construction waste. Of these, we will reuse 1 500 tonnes (9%) of inert construction waste on site and deliver 14 900 tonnes (88%) of inert construction waste to public fill reception facilities for subsequent reuse. In addition, we will dispose of 600 tonnes (3%) of non-inert construction waste at landfills. The total cost for disposal of construction waste at public fill reception facilities and landfill sites for the Project is estimated to be $1.2 million (based on a unit charge rate of $71 per tonne for disposal at public fill reception facilities and $200 per tonne at landfills as stipulated in the Waste Disposal (Charges for Disposal of Construction Waste) Regulation (Cap. 354N). HERITAGE IMPLICATION 24. This Project will not affect any heritage site, i.e. all declared monuments, proposed monuments, graded heritage site or buildings, sites of archeological interest and Government historic sites identified by the Antiquities and Monuments Office. LAND ACQUISITION 25. The Project does not require any land acquisition. BACKGROUND 26. We engaged consultants in May 2015 to undertake a technical feasibility study (at a cost of about $10.8 million in MOD prices) to identify a suitable site and to ascertain the technical feasibility of establishing on that site a GFS Division outside the HKIA. Upon confirming the technical feasibility of the Site, we engaged consultants in June 2017 to carry out the detailed design and site investigation works for the Project (at a cost of about $9.4 million in MOD prices). These pre-construction tasks were funded under block allocation Subhead 7100CX “New towns and urban area works, studies and investigations for items in Category D of the Public Works Programme”.
/27. …..
PWSC(2017-18)37 Page 9
27. We upgraded 188GK to Category B in September 2016. 28. No old and valuable trees have been identified in the Site. The proposed works will not involve any tree removal. While no tree planting is proposed due to operational constraints, a green roof of approximately 1 500 m2 is proposed at the office building and hangar for environmental and amenity benefits. 29. We estimate that the proposed works will create about 190 jobs (160 for labourers and 30 for professional or technical staff), providing a total employment of 4 000 man-months.
-------------------------------------- Security Bureau Development Bureau March 2018
排水
口
Outfall
H LT
A
A
A5.6
4.9
5.4
drawing title圖則名稱
A4 297MM X 210MM
Q
'
'
')
6
6
6
�
Z
Z
Z
M
M
M
:
:
[
]
K
K
K
K
j
retlehS noohpyT gnoT nuwK
心中試考駛駕
頭碼眾公塘觀
頭碼
頭碼
輪渡
車汽
頭碼輪渡塘觀
頭
碼
輪
郵
德
啟
rtC tseT gnivirD
reiP yrreF
gnoT nuwK
reiP cilbuP
gnoT nuwK
reiP
reiP yrreF raluciheV
la
nimr
eT
esi
urC
kaT i
aK
塘觀
GNOT NUWK
場
號一
底橋
天轉
反
房泵
水污
163
168
N
SHELTER
TYPHOON
KWUN TONG
CRUISE TER
MINAL
KAI TAK
N
停車場
CAR PARK
升降坪
LANDING PAD
TAKE OFF /
停機坪
PARKING PAD
停機坪
PARKING PAD
下洗氣流屏障
DOWNWASH WALL
直升機庫
(PHASE 1)
RUNWAY PARK
KAI TAK
第一期
啟德跑道公園
840200 E
840250 E
818300 N
818250 N
840250 E8
18350 N
入口
ENTRANCE
HELICOPTER HANGAR
CRUISE TERMINAL
KAI TAK
啟德郵輪碼頭
安全網
SAFETY NET
救護車待命處
STANDBY AREA
AMBULANCE
KEY PLAN索引圖
圖例
LEGEND
屋頂綠化
GREEN ROOF
ANCILLARY FACILITIES
FLIGHT PLANNING CENTRE AND OTHER
AIR COMMAND AND CONTROL CENTRE,
其他輔助設施
飛行指揮和控制中心、航空策劃中心及
附件
一E
NCL
OS
URE 1
工務計劃項目第188GK號 — 政府飛行服務隊啟德分部 — 平面圖
P.W.P. ITEM NO. 188GK - GOVERNMENT FLYING SERVICE KAI TAK DIVISION - LAYOUT PLAN
drawing title圖則名稱
A4 297MM X 210MM
附件
二 (兩
頁中
的第
一頁)
ENCL
OS
URE 2 (P
AGE 1
OF 2)
工務計劃項目第188GK號 — 擬建政府飛行服務隊啟德分部建築效果圖 — 從高空俯瞰
AERIAL VIEW
P.W.P. ITEM NO. 188GK - ARCHITECTURAL RENDERING OF PROPOSED GOVERNMENT FLYING SERVICE KAI TAK DIVISION -
drawing title圖則名稱
A4 297MM X 210MM
附件
二 (兩
頁中
的第
二頁) ENCLOSURE 2 (PAGE 2 OF 2)
drawing title圖則名稱
FRONT VIEW
P.W.P. ITEM NO. 188GK - ARCHITECTURAL RENDERING OF PROPOSED GOVERNMENT FLYING SERVICE KAI TAK DIVISION -
工務計劃項目第188GK號 — 擬建政府飛行服務隊啟德分部建築效果圖 — 正視圖
drawing title圖則名稱
A4 297MM X 210MM
Pip
elin
e
Brothers Point
¤jÆ
Ka Loon Tsuen
¹ÅÀ
( Tai Lam Kok )
±s®Vista Cove
±s¤Vista Cliff
ªÅ¶l
CentreAir
±±¨
Caterin
g Services
Cathay Pa
cific
¥R¹»W¹
¾÷³õº
Þ²
¦a¶Ô³
]´äÀs
GSE Servic
esDra
gonair
Airport
´äÀs
¨®½øÀË
»´ä¸
Engineering
Hong Kong Aircraft¿¯
¹¨Î¬ü
Sky Ch
efsLSG
TowerDra
gonair
CentreVeh
icle Ins
pection
¨tºÊ¶]
¿¯º~²
ï
¶¼¹°ê
®õ
»´ä
AFSC
Àô
Worldwid
e
¯]¦¿®ü
Union TransportationChu Kong Air-Sea
¤¤¯è
CNAC Towe
r
¦è
«n
«
¦è¥_«
¥_
«È
«n
«È
Airport
Authority Bldg
TowerControl
½X®ü¾÷
House
Pump
»´
ä¾
÷³
õ¤
@
¦æ
¬F
Passenger T
erminal 1
HK Internatio
nal Airp
ort
¤G¸¹
«È
World Tra
de
¥@
¶T
Airp
ort T
ower
Terminal 2
Passenger
·|
ªF®ü¤W
¾÷³õ®
China Aircraft
¦³¤¤°ê¸
¥_
½Ã
¬P
Concourse
North Satellite
¤Ñ½
FarmAntenna
ºÞ¨î¤¤¯èªÅ
¿ì¤½³
]¬I
¯èª
Å¥
æ³
q
Air T
raffic C
ontrol C
om
plex
1
2
3
4
15
16
17
1819
2122
2324
2526
2728
30
29
31
32
34
33
3536
70
7169
68
66
6764
65
6362
6061
40
41
42
43
44
45
47
49
48
50
46
521 - 524
511 - 5
13
20
501
504
510
508
66
ĵ¾÷
¯è¼Ð¡]
Navigation Beacon
Aeronautical
Navigation Beacon
Aeronautical
¯è¼Ð¡]
¥|¸¹
°
Car P
ark 4
¤@¸¹°
Car P
ark 1
Regal Airport H
otel
AsiaWorld
-Expo
B
A
´I»¨
¾÷
³ÕĨȬw
µ¾
¤
SkyPla
za
°±¨©¹¤º¦a
»´ä¤Ñ»ÚHK SkyCity Marriott Hotel
Golf Course
SkyCity Nine Eagles
°±¨
¤T
¤G¸¹°Car Park 2
Car P
ark 3
®È¹C¨
®
°ªº¸¤¯è¤
UA IM
AX
¥Á¯è³
Headquarters
CAD
Area
Coach
Stagin
g
ÀÀ
©w
¤§
¶
Proposed Limit of Reclamation
ÀÀ©w¤§¶
Proposed Limit of Reclam
ation
CHEK LAP KOK
¨ªž
¤j¿
©ì¨¾÷º
PlantTre
atmentWast
ewater
¦³¦a
¶Ô³]
LimitedEn
gineering
Ground Su
pport
WEST BROTHER
( TAI MO TO )
¾÷
AIR
PO
RT
³ÕÄASIAWORLD-E
XPO
Airport
Expre
ss
¾÷³
õ
CH
EO
NG YIP R
D
Lawn
¯ó
Lawn
¯ó
Runwa
y
¶]
Runway
¦a
±º
û¸
¾®ü
¤W
±Ï
¾÷³
õ®
³]³
Ƹ
¾÷
¤Á¹
55
17
56
55
17
56
¯è¼Ð¡]
Navigation BeaconAeronautical
¤Ñ¦¨F
´çJetty
¨FSHA CHAU
¤¤¹Bx
¤¤³t
Centre
Express
¶W¯Å¤@
Super T
erminal 1
ªF°
ªF® ±Òª
·sª
ªF²³ßª
¶Pª
¦Vª
Forwar
ding Ce
ntreAirp
ort Frei
ght
9
8
76
5
3
2
1
¾÷¹q
°ê
®
12356
Buildin
gAirport
StoreÜ®w¾÷
Cathay Pacific City
¤¤°ö¸
1
2
3
5
©â¤
HousePump
¦a¤U
5
2
1 ·|
3
Club House
¦í«È
º®
ªï
¸S
ºÖ
¨É
¦à¤Ó
¥
¹l
¦Ü
µ½
²M
±d
®ð¶
·|
åªR®ð
6
8
¬¦¦Ã
¶Ô
³Ç
¼w
Á¾
«H
·ç
»A
Ä_
9
1112
½¬µ
°Ó¶T´äª
Centre
Tradep
ort Logisti
cs
©~
º¡
Ÿ
²Ä¤
ªFîOne Citygate
16
La Rossa
®®
°V½mÂåÀø»
U
A
2930
15
21
88
¼v©¤
°·±dªF
1
DHL Central
Asia H
ub
´°»¨
¤¤¨È
57
6199
1
28
383965
¬¦
¹q̧Ü
¾i
¤@¸¹
¤G¸¹
Termin
al 1
Termin
al 2
¾÷³õª
Å
³f¹°ê®õ
Cargo
Termin
alCat
hay Pa
cific
Hangar 1
¸¾¤@
Ô¾÷
¸¾¤T
Hangar 3
85
152
751
479493
400
77
324
338
749
722
574
287
482
529
75
869
463
320
554
625
492
522
585
506
311
85
152
751
479493
400
77
324
338
749
722
574
287
482
529
75
869
463
320
554
625
492
522
585
506
311
¤Ñ¾Â
Buddha Statue
Tian Tan
BatteryTung ChungªF¯F¤
ªF¯F
FortTung Chung
MonasteryPo Lin
¼s´I
B
A
D
«J¤
¬F©²¸¦
Service
Government Flying
ùº
¤Ñ¦
UAªFî
¤á¥~±ªF
Recreation Camp
Outdoor
Tung Chung
½¬¦Ä_ªL
§â´ä
¤Ñ¦
¥È¾Â
©eªF¯F
®ø¨ªF
ªF¯FËü
Management Centre
Tung Chung Au
®ø¨¨ªž
6B
6A
C
¤åªF¸
Park
Man Tung Road
¯ë
ªª
ªFî¿Õ´
Citygate
Novotel
¬MÆ
ªkµ
µØÄ
©ù©W3
Ping 360
Ngong
Terminal
Ngong Ping©ù©W²
¦xªk
Car Park 1
¤ß¸gWisdom Path
¦P»P
ÁIªk
µØÄ
ĵ
¶ø¹Olympic Green
¤¤¦Û
«C¦¹D
¹FªF¸
©ù
©W
Ngong Ping Villa
ge
Å騤åª
¥«¬FªF
·|ªÀ
ªF¯FÆ
Cable Car Terminal
Tung Chung
¦ËªL
®ü¼é
ºî¦XªÀ°Ï
ªF¯
F¥
Tung C
hung N
orth Park
Ä_½¬
ÃĤ¤Tat Tung Road Garden
¶éªÀ
ĵ¤jÀ¬
ÆF®ü
Ling Tap ¤¤¹
ªF¯F´
Swimming Pool
Tung Chung
¥jª¾÷
¥jŽP¾÷
«C¦~À¹º
Youth Hostel
Car Park 2
¬ö©À±³¯°¨
Memorial Camp
Chan Ma Mee York
´çJetties
Tin Sam
¥Ð
Kau Liu¸û
San Tau
HAU HOK WAN
ÆM´
SHA LO WAN
¨FÁ
POR KAI SHAN
±CÀ
ªF¯Ma Wan Chung
°¨Æ
´Iª ¸Îª
Wong Nai Uk
¶Àª
POK TO YAN
TUNG CHUNG
ªF
Sha Tsui Tau
¨F©
Wong Lung Hang
¶ÀÀ
Hang
New Tung Chung
·sªF
New Village
Tei Po
§C®H
New Village
Ma Wan
°¨ÆW
New Village
Chek Lap Kok
¨ªžP¨
Fui Yiu Ha
¦ÇŽ
Sheung Ling Pei
¤WÀ
Ha Ling Pei
¤UÀ
Wong Ka Wai
¶À®
Lung Tseng TauÀs¤
Ngau Au
¤û
Tung Hing
ªF
Lam Che
ÂÅ
Nim Yuen
¸Z
Shek Lau Po
¥Ûº
Mok Ka
²ö
Chap Mun Tau
¹hª
Shek Mun Kap
¥Ûª
Fong Yuen
ªÚ
WO LIU TUN
¥Ý¼
SHEUNG TUNG AU
Âùª
SHEK SZE SHAN
¥Û·
LANTAU ISLAND
¤jÀ
San Keng
·s
Shek Pik Au
¥Û¾
NEI LAK SHAN
À±°
YI TUNG SHAN
¤Gª
SUNSET PEAK
¤jª
·à¤l
Ϯ
Žg¤
¨FÁ³Æ
ªF³ö
Crescent
Tung Chung
¥Õ¨Pak Sha Tsui
¯èªÅ³
Æ[´SCENIC HILL
»´äª
Å
Air Ca
rgo Te
rminals
Hong K
ong
¨FÁ³Æ
ÂŤÑCoastal Skyline
TUNG CHUNG BAY
( TAI TUNG SHAN )
¨FÁ³
Tsuen
Sha Lo Wan
Fu Tung Estate Yu Tung Court
¸¾÷¿U®
Tank Farm
Aviation Fuel
¬MÆCaribbean Coast
®®À
½àÀ
¤@
¤G
Phase 1
Phase 2
Sha Lo Wan Chung Hau
Sha Lo Wan San Tsuen
®ü³ö
Crescent
Seaview
¤Ú¤
Bus
Depot
Cove
Monterey
¬MÀ
ºû¤g¤ì
Depot
Civil Work
Albany Cove
Carmel Cove
¹L¸ôÆW¾÷³õº
Kwo Lo Wan Office
Airport Authority
ť¤ôÂ
³B²¦Ã
Crystal Cove
¨È¬wªÅ
Asia
Airfreight T
erminal
Le Bleu
¤ôÂÅ¡Le Bleu Deux
®ü¬ÄLa Mer
¦Û°Ê®¤Ñ¤å¥
(¤G)¶h
¶hªF(¤
Yat Tung ( 1 ) Estate
( 2 )Yat Tung
©ù©Ngong Ping Tsuen
¤s
Shan Ha
¡]Åò
( Pa Mei )
°t¤Ser Res
ªF¯
F°
Tung C
hung Ser Res
¤jªF¤s
Ser Res
Tai Tung Shan
¿³«Ø¤¤
under construction
Public Rental Housing
»´ä°Ó¥Î
Aviation Centre
Hong Kong Business
ª@
The Visionary
ªF
TUN
G C
HU
NG
Airport Express
Airport Exp
ressTung C
hung L
ine
Tung C
hung Line
ªF¯
ªF¯
¾÷³
õ
¾÷³õ
HIN
G T
UN
G S
T
CHUNG YAT ST
CH
UNG W
AI S
T
¤À¤ª¹¢
ª¯
ˬ
CH
UN T
UN
G S
T
¶]
8
8
BODHI PATH
µÐ´
»ñ°
¦a¶í¥J
©ù©W©
WONG LUNG HANG COUNTRY TRAIL
¶À
Às
§|
NGONG PING FUN WALKLA
NTAU
TR
AIL
¾÷³
õ½
AIR
PO
RT T
RAIL
¾÷³
õ½
AIR
PO
RT T
RAIL
©ù
©W360
±
NG
ON
G PIN
G 36
0 R
ESC
UE TRAIL
LANTAU TRAIL
»ñ°
»ñ°
TEI TO
NG TSAI COUNTRY TRAIL
©
©¾
¤ì
‹
NEI L
AK S
HA
N C
OU
NT
RY T
RAIL
À±°
¥¹
LANTAU
TRA
IL¿é¤ô
Water Tunnel
ªø
108
449
167
412
108
449
167
412
¯è¼Ð¡]
Navigation Beacon
Aeronautical
©µ¼
MonasteryYin Hing
³À´ò¦ò¬
¤T¤s°
´¼¿
Catc
hwater
¤Þ
¤
¤Þ
¤
Catchwater
San Shek Wan
Nam Tin
«n
San Chau
·s
Tit Tak Shue
ÅK¼
Sai Tso Wan
Ó}¯SHAM WAT WAN
²`©
Sham Wat
²`
CHEUNG SHAN
¶H
¤j
œÆ¥
¬õ¯Hung Fan Shek
ISLA
NDS N
AT
UR
E H
ERIT
AG
E T
R
A
IL-T
AI
O S
ECTIO
N
®¦
µ¾
¥®
¢¤
¿¬
¿é
¤ô
¬F©²º¤pÄ
Skyline
Crestline
¤Ñ
®ü
ÀÜ
½«
Ûp
¶h
®m
©É
»A
Ȉ
¹t
Greenbelt
Greenmont
Greenwood
Greendale
Greenland
Greenish
Greenfield
Greenburg
Greenery
ViewSunrise
ViewMountain
ViewSea
ViewStar
Club Siena
¶¢Graceful±y
Celestial¦wJoyful
¶hPeaceful
Æ[ Æ[
Æ[
Æ[
¤ÎÀË·Ñ®ð
1
2
Pavilion
Barion
Hemex Lustre Premier
ºÑ
€
º¬ »A ¬M
©â¤
©â¤
·|
¬¦
¤p¥@
ºû·s¤jÀ¬
1
3
L20
L16L10
L1
L6
15
9
13
2
1
104
2
90
86
19
2937
49
5767 75
83
5040
30
20
219
201
229
60
91
6876
97 103
86
263259
243
83
81
77
73
95
91
87
269
5070
3822
7
9
13
17
22
2238
48
505835
2515
20
9
1
2
2
12
28
40
1
17
202
232
92
88
82
96
186
291
302
378
125
30
263
6
6
67
172
159
176
108
186
291
302
378
125
30
263
6
6
67
172
159
176
108
Toll Plaza
¤¤¥¡Central Park
6
6
¦Ë¿®ø¨
¦Ë¿Äµ
}¤h¥§¦nDisney's Hollywood Hotel
}ªY´ò¬Inspiration Lake
A
»´ä}¤
Hong Kong Disneyland
ªÀ°Ï
5
5
¦Ì©_µ¼ ©¯
¥v
¦¬
¶O
Toll P
laza
¦¬¶O
Community Hall
´Î²Baseball Field
Bay
Discovery
Auberge
Tsing Chau Tsai
«C¬¤p¿
THE BROTHERS
¤j¤p
Ha Kok Tsui
¤U¨
Cheung Sok
Tsui
ªø¯
CHEUNG SOK
ªø
LUK KENG BAY
³ÀÀ
TAI YAM TENG
¤j³
Tai Tsing Chau
¤j«
YAM TSAI WAN
³±¥
Yam Tsai
³±
Ngong Shuen Au
©ù²
Mong Tung
Hang
±æª
Wan Tuk
ÆW
TSZ KAN CHAU
°ÍÃ
Ta Pang Po
¥´´
Sham Shui Kok
²`¤ªF¸
SAM PAK AU
¤T¥
LAI PIK SHAN
²p¾
SZE PAK AU
¥|¥
TAI SHAN
¤j
Sze Pak
¥|
SZE PAK WAN
¥|¥Sam Pak
¤T
TAI CHE TUNG
¤jà
YI PAK AU
¤G¥
YI PAK WAN
¤G¥
ÃɹHai Kam Tsui
DISCOVERY BAY
¤j¥
( TAI PAK WAN )
Wu Ying Pai
¯QÃ
SAM PAK WAN
¤T¥ Sze Pak Tsui
¥|¥
LAU FA TUNG
ºhª À[
©ú»
½«
®ÉNeo Horizon
TSING CHAU WAN
«C¬
¤pSiu Ho
Penny's Bay
Power Station
Village
Parkridge
Tung Yip Hang
®ü¼áSiena
®ü¼á´òSiena Two
®ü¼á´òSiena One
Headland Village
©ú
Village
Parkland
¦Ë¿tÆW
Greenvale Village
¤pÄ®ÆW
Treatment Works
Siu Ho Wan
¤pÄ®ÆW¦Ã
Treatment Works
Siu Ho Wan Sewage
¬ü°ê¤p
Main Street
USA
©ú¤éTomorrowland
Fantasyland
¤Û·Q
Chianti
©|
ªY¿YAN O WAN
±´ÀI
¥Õ³·³\Ä
®õ¾ð
´äÅK¤pÄMTR Siu Ho Wan Depot
Adventureland
³ÀÀLuk Keng Tsuen
and E
xa
mination C
entre
Vehicle D
ete
ntion P
ound
¤Î
Åç¨
ĵ°
ȳ
B¨
®
¬zAmalfi
²G´âÂ
¤Ï¤æ¤j¥
Toy Story Land
ªY¿Yan O Tuk
EAST BROTHER
( SIU MO TO )
¤Ú¤Bus Depot
¼oª«Â
StationRefuse Transfer
¦ÇºµGrizzly Gulch
ªY¿D°Sunny Bay Ser Res
°gÂ÷Mystic Point
®®Positano
²V¾®
PlantConcrete
SU
NN
Y B
AY
ªY
Airp
ort E
xpress
ªF¯
Dis
neyla
nd R
esort L
ine
Tung C
hung Li
ne
}¤h
¾÷³
õ
©ú
»
SH
AM F
UN
G R
D
8
8
8
8
¤j©W
»È¬
»È¤»È¤
»È
A
B
CD
«³Yick Yuen
»È
ª÷©
±J¬F
·|©x
T
S
M
N
R
P
Q
H
I
G
E
A
F
D
ED
C
C
B
A
§Ù¬
¥
¥
¥ M
F
N
«n
Æ
®ü
±d¼
ClubResidents
©W
»A
¤s
¤j·|
Pine View
Island View
Marine View
Bay View
Clear ViewÆ[
Æ[
Æ[
Æ[
Æ[
Ä_Ä_
Ä_Woodland
WoodgreenWoodbury
Ä_
Ä_Coral
Crystal ±d ±d±dGlamour
BrillianceElegance
®üVista
®ü
®üOnda
Costa
ÄfTwilight
¦°
Áø
±mHaven
Verdant
Jovial
®x
Ä_
Cherish
Blossom
±´³
¤j¦æ
ªá
¹Å
«±´
Serene®ü
®a
ºÑ¥
´f°
ªá±ö
¾û
Staff Quarters
©WÄ
Court
Peng Lai
¤s¤û¬
°ò
©â¤
Â×
ªá·s
D Deck
¼Â×
»¶¶
º±
Ä» ¦
º
´®
¥Û¦Ç
¤Ú¤
»È
1
2 8
15
100
56
48
16 10
15
7
42
46
38
34
30
26
22
18
1410
62
11
1
28
20
12
4
13
21
29
37
41 49
57
4840
32
1
9
1612
21
13
13
25
29
29
37
45
69
5337
33
9
1
1
3 5
9
13
7
13
32
29
26
22
19
16
11
8
7
5 1
45 61
15
19
23
1
3
5
7
8
111
35
7
9
11
6
2
1
9
12 18
22
15
19
21
27
33
47
39
53
61
1725
117
532
49
196
125
132
33
183
116
94
275
200
198
4981
67
465
283
227
299
215
465
766
14
194
383
183
117
532
49
196
125
132
33
183
116
94
275
200
198
4981
67
465
283
227
299
215
465
766
14
194
383
183
³ßÆF¬w
InstitutionCorrectional
Hei Ling Chau
½Ã²
»È•°Æ
´r´º
¸t¥À¯
Monastery
Trappist Haven
¹C¸Marina Club
Silvermine Beach
PlazaDiscovery Bay
°º±
¥_«
Às¥
¤åª
¬x¸
ª÷ª
¤Ñ¦
´r´ºÆW°ª
Discovery Bay Golf Course
Âr¥¬»È•
Ãg±Ày
®ü´º«×
Resort
Seaview Holiday
©e¶m
¬F©²±ö
®ø¨±ö
´åª±ö
¥j¤Ñ¦Z
¶À¤j
¥¿µ½
§´¼¶
Cemetery
Lai Chi Yuen
¦ò®ç·
¤C¸t¥
¦w¸ÆF
©e±öºÛ
®ø¨´r´
³ßÆF¬w
Treatment CentreHei Ling Chau Addiction
¥«¬F
©W
¾À²Åé¨
±ö
°ªº¸¤Golf Club
¤¤±d
ĵ
ĵ
¥È¤»
°V½m¥¿
Retreat Centre
Methodist
ºÞ²«n
¸ê·½ºñ®q
¤À°Ï¤jÀ¬¤j
°K
¼s»È
¤ôRESERVOIR
¤ôRESERVOIR
¯B´
Floatin
g Jettie
s
Floating Jetties¯B´
Tai Pak Tsui
¤j¥
WAN
TSOI YUEN
µæ¶
TAI HO WAN
¤jÄ
¦Ñª
HAI TEI WAN
Ãɦ
NIM SHUE WAN
¸Z¾
Village
Nim Shue Wan
¸Z¾ð
Tin Liu
¥Ð
¤û¬
Pak Mong
¥Õ
ªø¨
TAI LEI
¤j»AÀÜ
ª÷©¤s³
¤jÀ
TUNG WAN
ªF
San Tsuen
Nam Wan
«nÆW
«nÆW¤s
Wai Tsai Tsuen³ò¥
San TsuenWai Tsai Tseng³ò¥J¤
Tsai
Yuen Ling
¤¸À
PENG CHAU
©W
WO SHEUNG AU
¥Ý¤
MONG TO AU
±æ´
¶À¤
ºÛ
ªFÆ ª¯ª
Man Kok
¸U
Man Kok Tsui
¸U¨
SILVER MINE BAY
»È•
Court
Silver Waves»ÈÀ
Chung Hau
¯F
Ngan Wan Estate»ÈÆ
³À¦
Tai Tei Tong
¤j¦ Tsuen
Tsoi Yuen
µæ¶
½¹½
Wang Tong
¾î
Heung
Pak Ngan
¥Õ»
¤«ÀY
Às§
±öºÛ
LIN FA SHAN
½¬ª
Village
Round Table
¶ê®
Wan Tsai
ÆW
Tsuen
Lai Chi Yuen
¯ïªK
Mau Yuen
T
¤ô¤
HEI LING CHAU
³ßÆ
¬F©²Ãz¬
ª¯ª
ºÑ
¯`
Ä_
±d¼Hillgrove Village
®ü¹
®ü³
ÊÀ
ôÁPeninsula Village
ºÑÀCoastline Villa
Âz¦
ºÑ
ªFÆW
®üÂLa Serene
»È
RIVER
SILVE
R
WA
NG T
ON
G RIV
ER
´r´Discovery Bay
¤j°Tai Wai Yuen
¤¤»È
¦Ã¤ô³
Plant
Water Treatment
San TsuenNam Wan Shan Ting
¤jÄ®
Beach Village
Beach Village
Crestmont Villa
Treatment WorksSewage
Silver Mine Bay Beach
LO FU TAU
Sea View Villas®ü´º
´Iº½Regent Villa
ªá®ü
»ÈÄqÆ
Tung Wan Villa
Shan Ting TsuenEstate
Kam Peng
Sea Crest Villa
Bijou Hamlet
¨ôÀ
Tai Ho San Tsuen
Lung Mei Tsuen
Kau Tsuen
Mui Wo
Tseng Tau San Tsuen
Wong Kung Tin
Tung Wan TauKau Shat Wan
Ngau Kwu Long
Cheung Sha Lan
Tsuen
Tai Lung
Wo Tin
Luk Tei Tong
VillageMidvale
VillageParkvale
La Costa
La Vista
»È•°ÆW
¼oª«ÂàTransfer Facility
Government Explosives Depot
Kau Shat Wan
³Â¥Ma Po Tsuen
¸Z®Nim Po Tsuen
·sÀSun Lung Wai
À©Ling Tsui Tau
¤ô°È³B²
¤¤±ö
Silver View
¯F¥
TsuenChung Tsai
¬ü°
Às§Lung Mei Hang
Facility
Refuse Transfer
»È•°ÆW
Ser ResSilver Mine Bay
Water Treatment WorksSilver Mine Bay
·s²Ä
San TsuenTai Yat
±yVilla Bay
WA
NG T
ON
G
RIVER
¾î
ª
¾î
ª
¦Ã¤ô³
Treatment Works
Sewage
¨®
¹À
»ÈÄ
CaveSilver Mine
¤U§Ha Tsuen Long
º®¥
BUTTERFLY HILL
ªê±
SHAN
FU KONG
³]¼oª«
¼oª«Âà
¦n
§
¤Íº
¤Í
¥
¼Ö©´I
©Ä_
©
§Ó¤
©W
¬w
¥
¥Ãª
¥Ã
«
µ
¥
³
¤j
¥Ã
§
«e
µ´¹
¤B¶Q
²Ä¤
¥Ã¶
¥Ã
¥
¦n´
©W¬w¥Ã
¶Q
©
Ȗ
°
LANTAU TRAIL
LA
NT
AU T
RAIL
LANTAU TRAIL
©W
¬w
®
«n¤j
À¬
SO
UTH LA
NTA
U C
OU
NTR
Y TR
AIL
PENG CHAU
FAMIL
Y W
ALK
LANTAU TRAIL
»ñ°
Ȗ
°
»°
®
LANTAU TRAIL
»ñ°
PE
NG C
HA
U FA
MIL
Y WA
LK
LANTAU TRAIL
«n¾ð ¬ã²
»´ä¶
´
¶¹
®
HO
NG
KO
NG O
LY
MPIC TRAIL
¦ÑªêÀY
LO FU T
AU COUNTRY
TRAIL
¦ª
À¹
®
©W´
PENG YU
PATH
¦Û
µM
¾
Â÷
®q¦
Ûµ
¢w
±ö
Pipeline¾É
Pipeline¾É
¿é¤ô
Water T
unnel
post
post
post
post
post
post
post
post
©â¤
40
95
96»ñµ
SIU KAU YI CHAU
¤p¥æ
NGAN CHAU
»È
Tai Wo
¤j
( CHAU KUNG TO )
SUNSHINE ISLAND
©P¤
¤â«FINGER HILL
©W¬w°
Ser Res
Peng Chau
©W¬w®
Pip
elin
e
¾É
¾É Pipeline
10
11
12
13
15
16
17
18
ºñ·|
¦Ã¬¦
¦Ã¬¦
°¨¦æ¤j
19
20
21
22
23
25
ÂŦâBlue Blue Club
5
3
2
8
9
7
6
1
}¤¦æ¬F
26 27
28
2930
31
¤½¸ê¤¤
·|
¥«·|
32
33
35
273
120
69
32
50
187
36
115
±Ï¥°¨ÆW«
°Æ°
¿OÅ¢¬Tang Lung Chau
Lighthouse
¤EÀ¥Û
Youth Camp
°¨®ø¨
4C
post
Hong Kong Disneyland Hotel
»´ä}¤h¥
A
¤Ñ¥j
Ma Wan Park°¨ÆW
ĵ
¦¬¼s
°ÊÃÀ³
¨©¼s
°¨¯èTEEN
°¨ÆW¤Ó¶
Noa
h's
Ark
ª¶
®¿¨
È
´çJetty
TUNG WAN
ªF
MA WAN
°¨
Tin Liu
¥Ð
PAK WAN
TENG
¥_Æ
²H¤
SHEK TSAI WAN
¥Û¥
Ma Kok Tsui
°¨¨
PAK NAI SHAN
¥Õª
NAM WAN
«n
¬hª
TAI LENG TAU
¤jÀ
Tai Pai Tsui
KUNG TSAI WAN
¤½¥
KAP S
HUI M
UN
¨V
¤
San Po Tsui
·sç
Yi Chuen
¤G
NG KWU LENG
¤¹
Kwai Shek
©ä
FA PENG TENG
ªá²
Sam Chuen
¤T
Tso Wan
¯ó
TANG LUNG CHAU
¿OÅ
Ngam Hau Shek
©¥¤Fa Peng
ªá
¥¶ÀY¹
ªFÆ
TUNG WAN TSAI
¥¶ÀY¹
¤j±
°¨ÆW¤
Às½
¥_PAK WAN
LUNG HA WAN
PA TAU KWU
PAK WAN
°¨ÆWªF
Lau Fa Tsuen
¬ÄÄ
Ma Wan
Tung Wan Beach
PA TAU KWU
NAM WAN
¥Ð¼dTin Liu
New Village
Åé¨Tai Yuk Road
˦TO KAU WAN
Ma Wan Main Street
Village
Park Island
°¨ÆW¤jMa Wan Main Street Village North
°¨¤jµó
Ma Wan
Main Street
Village Central
Main Street
Village South
Main Street
Village East
°¨ÆW¤j
°¨¤jµó
°¨º®¥Á
°¨ÆWÁ×
Ma Wan O MeiTyphoon Shelter
TAM SHUI WAN
®üAna Capri
²Ä¤
²Ä¤
²Ä¤Phase 2
Phase 5
Phase 3
²Ä¤
Phase 1
°¨ÆW°Ma Wan Ser Res
Ma WanFishermen's
Village
}¤ DISNEYLAND RESORT
Airport Ex
press
¾÷³õ
¾ôBridge
Tower
¾ôBridge
Tower
8
東涌新市鎮擴展
EXTENSION
NEW TOWN
TUNG CHUNG
在不利天氣情況下的直升機飛行路線
北大嶼航道 –
政府飛行服務隊總部
SERVICE HEADQUARTERS
GOVERNMENT FLYING
SOUTH RUNWAY
南跑道
UNFAVOURABLE WEATHER CONDITIONS
HELICOPTER FLIGHT PATH DURING
NORTH LANTAU EXPRESSWAY -
附件
三 ENCLOSURE 3
北大嶼航道 – 在不利天氣情況下的直升機飛行路線
NORTH LANTAU EXPRESSWAY - HELICOPTER FLIGHT PATH DURING UNFAVOURABLE WEATHER CONDITIONS
Enclosure 4 to PWSC(2017-18)37
188GK – Government Flying Service Kai Tak Division
Breakdown of the estimates for consultants’ fees and resident site staff costs (in September 2017 prices) Estimated
man-months
Average MPS* salary point
Multiplier (Note 1)
Estimated fee
($million)
(a) Consultants’ fees for
contract administration (Note 2)
Professional Technical
-- --
-- --
-- --
2.6 1.8
Sub-total 4.4# (b) Resident site staff (RSS)
cost (Note 3) Professional Technical
135 393
38 14
1.6 1.6
17.0 17.3
Sub-total 34.3 Comprising - (i) Consultants’ fees for
management of RSS 1.2#
(ii) Remuneration of
RSS 33.1#
Total 38.7
∗ MPS = Master Pay Scale Notes 1. A multiplier of 1.6 is applied to the average MPS point to estimate the cost of RSS
supplied by the consultants (as at now, MPS point 38 = $78,775 per month and MPS point 14 = $27,485 per month).
2. The consultants’ staff cost for contract administration is calculated in accordance with
the existing consultancy agreement for the design and construction of 188GK. The construction phase of the assignment will only be executed subject to the Finance Committee’s approval to upgrade 188GK to Category A.
3. The actual man-months and actual costs will only be known after completion of the
construction works.
Remarks The cost figures in this Enclosure are shown in constant prices to correlate with the MPS salary point of the same year. The figures marked with # are shown in money-of-the-day prices in paragraph 11 of the main paper.
Top Related