National Impact Assessment Programme (NIAP)
Is Effective EIA practice possible when socio-economic development is slow?
The case of Pakistan
IAIA 2011 Conference, Puebla MexicoSession: Stakeholder Networks and Impact Assessment
Muhammad Irfan TariqCo-Project Manager/Director
Ministry of Environment
National Impact Assessment Programme (NIAP)
Contents of PresentationSocioeconomic Development and EIASocio Economic IndicatorsBackground of Environmental Impact assessment
(EIA)State of Environment in PakistanConstraints to effective EIA implementation in
PakistanSuggested Way Forward
National Impact Assessment Programme (NIAP)
Geographical Location of Pakistan
Population: 177,276,594 Capital: IslamabadBordering Countries: Afghanistan, Iran,
India and ChinaLand Area: 307,374 square miles
(796,095 sq km)Coastline: 650 miles (1,046 km)
National Impact Assessment Programme (NIAP)
Socio economic development and EIASocio-economic advancement has important implications through out the world for the effectiveness with which legislature and institutional regimes are developed and applied for the promotion of environmental management.
National Impact Assessment Programme (NIAP)
Pace of Socio Economic Development in Pakistan
Poverty
Literacy
Economic Development
Economic Growth
Human Development
IndexSocioeconomic indicators
National Impact Assessment Programme (NIAP)
Socio Economic Indicators
Human Development Index (HDI):Developmentincorporates the notion of a measure/measures of humanwelfare. HDI for Pakistan- 0.490 (below the average) Country comparison to the world- 125 Rank (2010)Economic growth: A measure of the value of output ofgoods and services within a time period Pakistan’s GDP growth- 2.7% (2011est) Country comparison to the world- 135 Rank
in health and education
National Impact Assessment Programme (NIAP)
Indicators---- Continued
Economic Development: A measure of the welfare ofhumans in a society. Less than 30% of the budget devoted to infrastructural development and
other needs in health and education
Poverty: The minimum level of income deemednecessary to achieve an adequate standard of living in agiven country. 24% population below poverty line (2005-6) Country comparison to the world- 90 Rank
National Impact Assessment Programme (NIAP)
Indicators---- Continued
Literacy : The ability to read and write at a specified age Literacy rate for total population- 49.9% Country comparison to the world- 194 Rank
Source : CIA World Fact Book ,2010 Human Development Report, 2010
National Impact Assessment Programme (NIAP)
State of Environment- Pakistan
Environmental situation in Pakistan has reached a critical stage. Asper World Bank studies, economic loss due to environmentaldegradation has been increasing exponentially.
200620020020066
National Impact Assessment Programme (NIAP)
Pakistan – Environmental DebtContinued
National Impact Assessment Programme (NIAP)
Background of Environmental Impact assessment (EIA)
Throughout the 1980s many countries decided to establish EIAas an element of Environmental policy and legal requirement forproposed development activities and sustainable development.
Pakistan Environmental Protection Ordinance (PEPO) 1983 Environmental Protection Act 1997 (PEPA’97), IEE / EIA Review Rules 2000. Environmental Policy 2005
It has come a long way since then, but there is still ample scopeto strengthen its practice.
National Impact Assessment Programme (NIAP)
Constraints to effective EIA implementation in Pakistan
EIA system is significantly influenced by socio-economicand political conditions currently existing in the countryand the general attitude towards the environmentalProtection.Following are the major constraints: Political will : Slow socio-economic advancement influences
political will to initiate, implement and enforce appropriate environmental policies and laws
Weak capacities and motivation Inequity and Poverty Influence of Powerful Persons
National Impact Assessment Programme (NIAP)
Constraints……Continued
Low level of environmental awareness Ethnic-territorial conflicts/Emergencies Example: IDPs, 2005 Earthquake & Flood 2010 Legalizing the shadow economy and the
elimination of corruption Federal Vs Provincial Legislation (No Provincial
Acts post promulgation of PEPA 97) Lack of tradition of Planning
National Impact Assessment Programme (NIAP)
Constraints….Continued
Delegation of Authority..what about responsibility? Ignorance of approval procedure established by the PEPA 1997 legislation by project proponents Few well-established consulting companies that are mainly oriented at providing services to the project proponents EIA is considered as one time activity , rather it is a continuous process
National Impact Assessment Programme (NIAP)
Conclusion
• Taking environmental considerations into account in development planning does not imply that the pace of socio-economic progress will be slowed down, and taking environmental considerations into account in the various phases of the project cycle must not be seen as placing undue constraints on a country's development options.
• .
National Impact Assessment Programme (NIAP)
Lack of environmental considerations in our planning processes has hampered socio economic growth as well as slowed down the development activities.
National Impact Assessment Programme (NIAP)
The Way Forward
The EPA should be resourced and strengthened to meet the emerging environmental challenges.
Stringent legal and penal legal mechanism should be developed
Public Awareness Ensure effective enforcement mechanism of EIA
process.
National Impact Assessment Programme (NIAP)
Top Related