14.05.2014
1
«International Communication»,
Conference, HiOA,13-14. May, 2014
“Multicultural Identity in Teacher Education. Some perspectives from an International class”
Presentation by Geir Hoaas, Oslo,Associate professor, Religion & EthicsFaculty of Education and International Studies
Coordinator for International courses:- Multicultural Identity in a Global World (MCI)- Alternative International period of Practice and Studies in Africa
MCI Course Content
The course is concerned with the topics of
Culture and Identity with special reference to
Childhood and Education, and will address
some basic questions:
— What is Cultural Identity?
— How to live in a changing Globalized World?
— How to develop Multi-cultural Competence?
2005-2014
— TEACHERS: in the fields of Pedagogics, Social Studies, Music, Religion&Ethics, and Intercultural Studies.All of the teachers have many years of international background and experience, in childhood and/or in adult age.
— And where do the students come from?
14.05.2014
2
Students, from 42 countries, 10 -17 countries in each class
Austria 1
Belgium 24
Brazil 2
Bulgaria 1
Burma 1
China 14
Colombia 2
Czech Rep. 11
Denmark 3
England 4
Finland 2
France 4
Georgia 2
Germany 25
Ghana 1
Greece 6
Hungary 12
Iceland 2
Italy 11
Japan 1
Kenya 1
Latvia 1
Libya 1
Lithuania 9
Nepal 1
The Netherlands 35
Nigeria 1
N.Ireland 1
Norway 26
Philippines 1
Poland 3
Portugal 5
Russia 2
South Africa 1
Spain 25
Syria 1
Sweden 1
Switzerland 5
Tunisia 1
Turkey 1
Ukraine 2
USA 8
Total 262 (15-33 in each class)
These fundamental questions will be treated through the
following topics:
—Cultural Identity and Cultural Awareness—Childhood and Identity Construction—Intercultural Communication, theory and practical
experience—Culture and World-view—Culture and Religion—Culture and Ethics—Human Rights and Childhood—Cultural Identity and Racism—Traditions, Festivals, and Rituals—Processes of Globalization—Global Consciousness—Cross-cultural Competence—Social Commitment in a Globalized World
14.05.2014
3
SYLLABUS
Jan.21- May 22
—Week 4: Info, ”Get-to-know”, Intro, Cultural Awareness
—5-8: Classes, Tues – Friday (08:30 – 11:15/13:00)
—9-10: Fieldwork (schools, kindergartens)
—11-13: Classes, Tues – Friday
—14-15: Fieldwork, 3 days a week, + discussion
—(16: Easter-break)
—17-19: Reports and Presentation in class
—20-21: Preparations for Exam, Oral Exam
Other Activities
—Cultural Presentations, all countries, whether 1 or several students, twice a week, 20-25 min.,
—Excursions, from International Office (all faculties), and our own (MCI), average once a week, to:- Museums, concerts, outdoor attractions, sports- Anti-Racist Center, Oslo International Culture Center,
Oslo Red Cross Culture Center.
—Fieldwork-discussions, both before and after thefieldwork-periods, discussing issues observed
—Social gatherings, upon arrival, midwaypresentations, final Goodbye party.
10
14.05.2014
4
Requirements for all students, 20/30 ECTS credit-points:
1. Active participation in classes and discussions
2. Individual or group-presentation of one's own culture
with reference to educational challenges
Exam
Exam portfolio for 30 ECTS credit-points:
1. One paper on a subject treated in the course, ca.2000 words
2. Fieldwork paper, of 6000-7000 words, based on an expanded period of fieldwork, with presentation in class
3. Oral examination based on fieldwork report and course syllabus, primarily on the Required Readings.
4. Total grade for the course, includes both Fieldwork paper and Oral exam
For internal/Norwegian studenter
Norwegian students of MCI follow the same plan as the
external students, with presentations and requirements.
BUT, with following emphasis:
- Leader-practice in 6.sem. of ECE students is integrated in the program, in weeks 2-3 (before start) and weeks 9-10 (Fieldwork for the others).
- The final Fieldwork paper is recognized as their Bachelor-thesis, with a separate grade on the transcript of records.
- The total grade for the whole MCI-course (30 ECTS) consists of the Fieldwork paper and the Oral exam.
14.05.2014
5
Background of MCI-Students
— National: mainly European, but in all classes also some from
Asia, Africa, USA, or Latin-America
— Cultural: consciousness of History and Culture vary much,
some have dramatic events in recent past (Baltics, Czech Rp.)
some have strong cultural identity-markers (language…)
some have a rather indistinct notion of cultural belonging
— Religious: some from «secularized» Europe (Nordic, German)
some from religious schools (Dutch, Belgian)
some from societies dominated by religion (Spanish, Italian)
some from atheistic traditions (Czech R., Hungary, Baltics)
— Secularized Europe
— Religious traditions, background
Culture-presentations in class
What do the students focus on?
- Traditional aspects of their culture: major festivals,
nature, architecture, costumes, food, drinks, and music.
- History, religion and traditional values are in the fore,
rather than raising critical and sensitive issues in their
home-society.
- Symbols: flag, colors, buildings, famous people (royal,
music, arts, sports, science…)
- Modern student environment, what are young people
pre-occupied with, concerned about?
- Some expose their values and world-view, but mostly
indirectly.
14.05.2014
6
Research:Survey amongstudents attendingthe MCI, in the periodof 2005-2009
Value-clause in Norwegian schools
“….The school shall build on respect for human worth,
freedom of speech, loving your neighbour, equality and
solidarity- the way these basic values are expressed in
Christian and humanistic tradition, different religions,
worldviews, and UN`s Declaration on Human Rights.
The school should promote democracy, equality and
scientific way of thinking. Pupils shall develop knowledge,
skills and attitudes for them to be able to cope with their
lives, and to participate in work and community
society……”
— Source: http://www.udir.no/Stottemeny/English/Curriculum-in-English/Curricula-in-English/
14.05.2014
7
A Surprising subject in schools: RLE subject
(Religion, Philosophy of Life, and Ethics):
“The subject shall teach knowledge of Christianity, other world
religions and philosophies of life, and ethical and philosophical
themes. It shall also teach the significance of Christianity as
cultural heritage in our society. For this reason, Knowledge of
Christianity will be a major portion of the learning content of the
subject. This involves allowing for local variations in the scope of
subjects between the main subject areas in order to satisfy
competence aims for the subject.
Religion, Philosophies of life and Ethics is an ordinary school
subject intended to bring all pupils together. The Norwegian
Education Act demands that the teaching of this subject be
objective, critical and pluralistic. This implies that the subject be
taught impartially and based on facts, and that the different world
religions and philosophies of life shall be presented with respect.”
Source: http://www.udir.no/Stottemeny/English/Curriculum-in-English/Curricula-in-English/
Value-clause in Norwegian Kindergartens
“…. The Kindergarten shall be based on fundamental values in the Christian and humanist heritage and tradition, such as respect for human dignity and nature, on intellectual freedom, charity, forgiveness, equality and solidarity, values that also appear in different religions and beliefs and are rooted in human rights... Kindergartens shall promote equality and work against all forms of discrimination.”
Source: http://www.regjeringen.no/upload/KD/Vedlegg/Barnehager/engelsk/Act_no_64_of_June_2005_web.pdf
14.05.2014
8
Nordic «Child-centered Pedagogy»
«Participation», one of the 3 P’s in the CRC
Ethical Values in Kindergartens
- Friendship
- Helpfulness
- Respect
- Tolerance
- Solidarity
- Empathy
Key concepts:
Recognition, Acceptance, Mutuality, Dialogue
—How do we teach these values??
—Democracy?
The fundamental values of
kindergartens
Care, upbringing and learning in kindergartens
shall promote human dignity, equality,
intellectual freedom, tolerance, health and an
appreciation of sustainable development.
(Norwegian Kindergarten Act, Section 2, Content of kindergartens)
30
14.05.2014
9
Participation, elements included from the CRC
—Children in kindergartens shall have the right
to express their views on the day-to-day activities of
the kindergarten.
—Children shall regularly be given the opportunity to take
active part in planning and assessing the activities of
the kindergarten.
—Children’s views shall be given due weight according to
their age and maturity.
(Norwegian Kindergarten Act, Section 3, Children’s right to participation)
Values, Worldview, and Religion
Responses from MCI-students?
Surprise:
- Children’s Participation is not new to many, but the
strong focus and the implementation is unusual.
- Adult-child relationship: the «Acceptance» and
«Recognition» aspect dominates, sometimes turning
into «chaos».
- Few, if any, have a subject in public school like the RLE.
True, some have gone to «religious schools».
- Few, if any, have experienced activities with a religious
touch, in preparing for festivals (Christmas, Easter,
Id-al- Fitr, Divali, Vesak..), including children with
diverse backgrounds
14.05.2014
10
Culture-shock, Re-orientation of Values
CS can be a process from enthusiasm in meeting the new
culture, to frustrations and anger, to disillusion. The
question is whether the U-curve turns upward, taking in
new stimuli, adjusting, accommodating, and finding one’s
own style in the new environment, being relaxed, fitting in.
Shock? For most students it is rather some frustrations
over practicalities, some surprises concerning habits,
customs, and also surprises about different values:
- Outdoor life, closeness to nature, «dangerous play»,
such as climbing in trees and rocks, using sharp tools,
and the little ones taking their nap outside in 5-6 minus
- Adult-child relations, the strong emphasis on Participation
- Religious content visible.-
Summary: MCI-students Attitudes
— Part of the Modern World, Individual freedom, choice, and
deep into «Social Media» as a vital Identity-factor.
— Rather firmly embedded in one’s own culture, traditions, and
Worldview.
— Yet, at the outset, not too conscious of the implications,
something that gradually changes.
— Being exposed to a different society, different education
system, with different values, makes an impact.
— Being exposed to other students with different values, views,
makes an impact.
— «Ethnocentrism», more complex, has nuances
— «Neo-essentialism» or «Chauvinism», too narrow.
— «Acculturation», finding a balance, including both cultural
identity and integrity, as well as openness for changes.
14.05.2014
11
VISIONS!—Building a broad network, utilizing for PR!
—Recruit students from diverse backgrounds!
—Create a socially secure environment!
—An academic exiting environment!
—Open communication between students and
teachers!
—Give a total experience of multiculturalism
from both theory and practice!
Challenges
—Ability in English?
—Academic Traditions, Standard?
—Study-habits?
—Used to being abroad?
—Economy of Student?
—Economy of MCI-course?
14.05.2014
12
Literature, References— P.S. Adler (1998) “Beyond Cultural Identity: Reflections on Multiculturalism” in
Bennett,M.J. Basic concepts of Intercultural Communication. Intercultural Press.
— J.A. Banks (2009) The Routledge International Companion to Multicultural Education,
Routledge, London and New York.
— G. Baumann (1999) The Multicultural Riddle, Routledge, London and New York.
— M.J. Bennett, ed. (1998) Basic Concepts of Intercultural Communication, (pp.215-
224), Intercultural Press, Yarmouth, Maine.
— J.W. Berry, Y.H. Poortinga, M.H. Segall, P.R. Dasen (2002) Cross-Cultural
Psychology, Cambridge University Press.
— H. Bowe, K. Martin (2007) Communication Across Cultures, Cambridge University
Press, Cambridge.
— Ø. Dahl (2001). Møter mellom mennesker. Interkulturell kommunikasjon [Encounter
between people. Intercultural communication], Gyldendal, Oslo.
— J.S. Gundara (2000) Interculturalism, Education and Inclusion, Sage Publications,
Thousand Oaks, CA.
— G. Hoaas (2014) “It Gave Me a New Insight!” Some Perspectives from Students in an
International Course. Universal Journal of Educational Research, vol 2:1, pp.80-89
— G. Hofstede (2001) Culture’s Consequence: Comparing Values, Behavior, Institutions,
and Organizations Across Nations, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.
— M. Jans (2004) “Children as citizens. Towards a contemporary notion of the child
participation”, in Childhood 2004:1, Sage Publications
Literature, References (cont.)
— A.T. Kjørholt (2011) “Rethinking young children’s rights for participation in diverse
cultural contexts”, in M.Kernan & E.Singer (eds) Peer Relationships in Early
Childhood Education and Care. New York. Routledge, pp 38-49 (13pp)
— F.R. Kluckhohn, F.L. Strodtbeck (1960) Variations in Value Orientations, Row and
Peterson, New York.
— S. May (1999) Critical Multiculturalism. Rethinking Multicultural Education and
Antiracist Education, Falmer Press, London.
— M.B. McGuire (2002) Religion. The Social Context, Wadsworth Publ.Co., Belmont.
— B. Parekh (2006) Rethinking Multiculturalism. Cultural Diversity and Political Theory,
Palgrave Macmillan, New York.
— I. Piller (2011) Intercultural Communication. A Critical Introduction, Edinburgh Univ.Pr
— D.C. Pollock, R.E.Van Reken (2009) Third Culture Kids. Growing Up Among Worlds,
Nicholas Brealey Publishing, Boston.
— D.L. Sam, J.W. Berry, eds. (2006) The Cambridge Handbook of Acculturation
Psychology, Cambridge University Press.
— L.A. Samovar, R.E. Porter, E.R. McDaniel (2010) Communication between Cultures,
7th ed., Wadsworth Publ. Comp., Boston.
— N. Smart (1998) The World’s Religions, Cambridge University Press, New York.
— C. Ward, S. Bochner, A. Furnham (2001) The Psychology of Culture Shock,
Routledge, London & New York.
— L. Woodhead, ed. (2009) Religions in the Modern World, Routledge, London & NY.
Top Related