I N T H E S E T I M E S I N T H E S E T I M E S I N T H E S E T I M E S I N T H E S E T I M E S I N T H E S E T I M E S
2 0 1 9 A N N U A L R E P O R T 2 0 1 8 A N N U A L R E P O R T 2 0 1 8 A N N U A L R E P O R T 2 0 1 8 A N N U A L R E P O R T
SHOULD WE TAX SODA? P. 14
YOU'RE A SAD MAN, JERRY BROWN P. 12
THE PERILS OF POSITIVE THINKING P. 36
TO CATCH A WAGE THIEF P. 10
+Jessa Crispin on the
problems with sex- positive feminismJA N UA RY 20 1 8
J O I N T H E
NEW POPULISTS
B Y T H E O A N D E R S O N
+The 7,409
people who make this magazine possible
THE BORDER WALL'S BUTTERFLY EFFECT P. 11
TRUMP, OUR UBU ROI-ALTY P. 63
DRINK YOUR COFFEE BLACK-OWNED P. 8
BY THEO ANDERSON
B R E A K I N G T H E
T W O - PA R T Y S Y S T E M
A P R I L 20 1 8
A BLACK LIVES MATTER MEMOIR P. 28
DOES YOUR CARBON FOOTPRINT MATTER? P. 14
APPALACHIANS FOR A SOCIALIZED INTERNET P. 6
OUR FAVORITE BOOKS OF 2017 P. 48
+Gar Alperovitz on
competing visions for our citiesF E B R UA RY 20 1 8
B Y D O U G H E N W O O D & L I Z A F E A T H E R S T O N E
YOUR PENSION ISN'T SAFE WITH WALL STREET
SPACE: THE FINAL SOCIALIST FRONTIER?
+Branko Marcetic on how the DCCC is undercutting progressive candidates
TEACHERS STRIKE BACK P. 6
DEBATING TRUMP'S TARIFFS P. 14
THE REAL VISA ABUSERS P. 30
BARBARA EHRENREICH AND DYING P. 36
An interview with Kim Stanley Robinson An interview with Kim Stanley Robinson
M AY 20 1 8
+Ai-jen Poo on Meryl Streep, Oprah and
domestic workers’ #MeToo moment
SMELLS LIKE TEEN SOCIALISM P. 9
WELCOME BACK, ROSEANNE? P. 41
THE ESSENTIAL URSULA K. LE GUIN P. 45
NEOLIBERALISM AND DEPRESSION P. 36
The billionaires behind the Supreme Court case poised to destroy public-sector unions
— THE — TWO FACES
OF JANUS
M A RC H 20 1 8
+Meet the YIMBYs: The
techie millennials who say the market can fix the housing crisis
DAVID GRAEBER ON BULLSHIT JOBS P. 26
SERFDOM IN THE MAGIC KINGDOM P. 6
LOCKING UP THE MENTALLY ILL P. 38
ZORA NEALE HURSTON'S LOST WORK P. 44
SIGNS OF A PROGRESSIVE SPRING
12 PRIMARIES TO WATCH IN 2018
J U N E 20 1 8
I N T H E S E T I M E S I N T H E S E T I M E S I N T H E S E T I M E S I N T H E S E T I M E S I N T H E S E T I M E S
2 0 1 8 A N N U A L R E P O R T 2 0 1 8 A N N U A L R E P O R T 2 0 1 8 A N N U A L R E P O R T 2 0 1 8 A N N U A L R E P O R T
SELF-DRIVING CARS WILL TRANSFORM OUR URBAN SPACE.
THE QUESTION IS HOW.
WHICH DRIVERLESS FUTURE?
+Victoria Law on why immigrant
detention centers are being sued for human trafficking
JOB GUARANTEE OR UBI? P. 12
OLIVER NORTH: A BAD PENNY P. 48
SHOCK DOCTRINE IN PUERTO RICO P. 7
THE HIPPIE-HILLBILLY ALLIANCE P. 38
J U LY 20 1 8
BELOW THE SURFACEOF ICEExposing the corporations that profit from immigrant detention
+Phyllis Bennis offers a
foreign policy platform for the Left
MEXICO'S NEW PRESIDENT-ELECT P. 7
BERNIE 2020: A DEBATE P. 12
RON DELLUMS REMEMBERED P. 48
CAN UNIONS SOLVE THE HOUSING CRISIS? P. 32
O C TO B E R 20 1 8
LABOR
+BERNIE SANDERS
ON HOW WE CAN STRIKE BACK
SHOULD YOU CALL 911? P. 14
PORTLAND OCCUPIES ICE P. 6
CORN AGAINST KEYSTONE P. 12
OCASIO-CORTEZ SPEAKS P. 7
A F T E R J A N U S • 4 radical new
laws to expand worker power
• The Right's next plot against unions
REBUILDING
AU G U ST 20 1 8
A BRIEF HISTORY OF STRIKES P. 41
SPACE FORCE IS NO JOKE P. 28
RUSSIAGATE IN PERSPECTIVE P. 14
TOXIC HORSE-CULINITY P. 44
TO THE LEFTT H E R A C E
Progressive movements are advancing bold ideas. Potential 2020 candidates are vying to keep up.
N OV E M B E R 20 1 8
+Loretta J. Ross on
what to expect when Roe v. Wade falls
CHICAGO '68 REVISITED P. 30
POST-APOCALYPTIC WEST VIRGINIA P. 36
VOTING RIGHTS BEHIND BARS P. 27
MEXICO'S ALTERNATIVE CURRENCIES P. 11
BY K AT E A RO N O F F
THE RISE OF THEDEMOCRATIC S O C I A L I S T S OF A M E R I C A
S E P T E M B E R 20 1 8
Will it save the climate—or just the fossil fuel industry?
B Y K A T E A R O N O F F
T H E P L A N T O
BL OCK OU TT HE SUN
+Jane Miller ponders sex under socialism
RAISING WAGES BY AN OCTAVE P. 10
FROM HEGEMONY TO SHE-GEMONY P. 32
HOW THE OTHER HALF BANKS P. 28
REDUCING OUR CARBON HOOFPRINTS P. 12
D EC E M B E R 20 1 8
I N T H E S E T I M E S I N T H E S E T I M E S I N T H E S E T I M E S I N T H E S E T I M E S I N T H E S E T I M E S
2 0 1 8 A N N U A L R E P O R T 2 0 1 8 A N N U A L R E P O R T 2 0 1 8 A N N U A L R E P O R T 2 0 1 8 A N N U A L R E P O R T
- 2 -
Dear Reader,In its 42nd year of publication, the magazine you help publish through your donations has continued to fulfill its mission to provide “a forum for debate about the public policies that shape our future.” We do this by introducing progressive policies and ideas into our country’s political conversation. As we see it, In These Times functions as an early and crucial part of a conveyor belt of ideas, helping the progressive movement
put bold reforms on the nation’s agenda. For almost as long as In These Times has been around, we have been a
champion of a once fringe idea that used to be called “socialized medicine.” We regularly provided a forum for those working to build a more just and equitable health care system.
In May 1978, we reported on Stickney Township, a Chicago suburb, that provided “cradle to grave” primary care at three public health clinics.
We covered the proposals of Physicians for a National Health Program, the Chicago-based group established in 1987 to support a single payer national health program. (Quentin Young, the group’s founding director and a long-time supporter of the magazine, was the primary care physician of both our founding editor & publisher James Weinstein and Barack Obama.)
Now, more than 30 years later, those seeds have taken root, and Medicare for All is at the front and center of the debate among the leading contenders in the Democratic presidential primary.
In These Times has been a regular and constant critic of U.S. military interventionism, producing journalism that challenged the imperial adventures
I N T H E S E T I M E S is committed to extending political and economic democracy in the United States and around the world, to reporting
the news in accordance with the highest journalistic standards, to informing and analyzing popular movements for social, racial,
environmental and economic justice, and to providing a forum for debate about the public policies that shape our future.
- 3 -
of one administration after another, beginning with the invasion of Granada in 1983 and on to the CIA’s covert wars in Central America, both Iraq wars, and the never-ending war in Afghanistan, beginning with support of the Mujahideen. Most recently we have helped draw attention to the devastating Saudi-led, U.S. supported war on Yemen, which In These Times has been reporting on since it began in March 2015.
In These Times has also been at the forefront of supporting democratic reforms of our political system.
In the 1980s, we gave early and regular coverage of groups like Public Campaign (now Every Voice) who are working to take corporate money out of elections by advocating for public financing of political campaigns.
Since 1988, In These Times has tirelessly helped publicize the work of FairVote (formerly known as the Center for Voting and Democracy) in its efforts to bring proportional representation voting systems to the fore. What started out as a fringe idea is now being used or has been enacted and waiting first use in 12 states.
From our founding in 1976, In These Times has also been the foremost champion of an inside/outside strategy for electoral politics that harnesses the power of social movements to elect and hold to account progressive elected officials. That strategy is now being embraced by the democratic Left, and is most evident in our home town of Chicago, where this year six members of the Democratic Socialists of America have been elected to the city council.
In the following pages, we provide some 2018 editorial highlights, we report on our circulation growth, we honor the 7,617 readers who contributed last year (including the 251 members of the Publishing Consortium ), and we show how your donations were put to work.
We also pay tribute to the foundations that support us, and at the top of that list is the Puffin Foundation, whose institutional support has been critical in helping us grow our circulation and our reach.
We couldn’t do this without you, and that’s the truth. Thank you for making In These Times possible.
Onward,
Joel BleifussEditor & Publisher
- 4 -
I N V E S T I G A T I V E R E P O R T I N G A T I N T H E S E T I M E S
W ith support from the Leonard C. Goodman Institute for Investigative Re-porting and the Puffin Foundation, in 2018
In These Times continued to publish original inves-tigations that exposed injustice, influenced public discourse and shaped legislative agendas. This year also marked the launch of our Investigative Fellows program, which provides three investigative report-ers (Eli Day, David Dayen and Valerie Vande Panne) with the resources to devote a full year to deep-dive investigations into crucial topics. Some of the 2018 investigative highlights included:
+ THE RIGHT-WING BILLIONAIRES BEHIND THE AS-SAULT ON PUBLIC UNIONS: The biggest blow to public unions in 2018 was unquestionably the Supreme Court ruling in Janus v. AFSCME. While corporate media focused almost universally on the personal story of the worker who brought suit against his union, months before the ruling In These Times published an extensive investiga-
tion by Mary Bottari that exposed the network of right-wing billionaires, conservative think tanks and giant corporations that for years had con-ceived and shepherded this attack on public sec-tor unions. Bottari’s investigation was awarded the March Sidney prize from the Sidney Hillman Foundation. In addition, reporter Lisa Graves conducted an in-depth look at the Koch family’s involvement in Janus, part of the billionaire fam-ily’s 60-year campaign against unions. ( 1 )
+ IMMIGRANT DETAINEES FORCED TO WORK FOR GI-ANT CORPORATIONS FOR $1 A DAY: As the Trump administration ramped up detention of immi-grants to record highs, Victoria Law shined a light on private prisons where detainees were forced to work under appalling conditions for wages as low as $1/day. Law’s reporting also revealed that two companies, CoreCivic and GEO Group, which together donated half a million dollars to Donald Trump’s inaugura-
2 0 18 E D I T O R I A L H I G H L I G H T S
( 2)(1) ( 2 )
- 5 -
tion, reaped nearly $1 billion from U.S. Im-migration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) contracts in 2017 alone, while ICE arrests un-der the Trump administration have soared by 43%. The New York Times invited Law to write an op-ed about the story.
+ PUBLIC PENSION FUNDS’ ROLE IN THE PUERTO RICO DEBT CRISIS: Following-up on our 2017 coverage of Puerto Rico’s dire debt crisis, which was exacerbated by Hurricane Maria and the
Trump administration’s subsequent lack of re-sponse, In These Times revealed a hidden con-flict: State and local pension funds across the United States were complicit in a bid to drain money from Puerto Rico’s pension funds. In 2018, investigative reporter Ethan Corey brought to light the conflict, providing an es-sential resource for the organizations, unions and activists working to pressure public pen-sion funds to divest from the hedge funds at the heart of the crisis. ( 2 )
L A B O R J O U R N A L I S M
F or nearLy a deCade, thanks to a grant from the Public Welfare Foundation, Working In These Times has been recognized as
an essential part of the progressive journalism eco-system, and a singularly unique source for labor re-porting. In 2018, nowhere was that more apparent than in our sustained coverage of the landmark Ja-nus v. AFSCME Supreme Court case. In These Times coverage provided crucial context by situating the case within the ongoing assault on public sector unions, while also helping chart a path forward for the labor movement.
+ REBUILDING LABOR AFTER JANUS: Shortly after the Janus ruling, In These Times published a se-ries of proposals from labor experts on how to tilt the balance of power back to workers. Bill
Fletcher Jr. described how “Just Cause” laws could be used to protect all workers. Shaun Richman explained how a federal “dues check-off ” law could help workers voluntarily donate to unions. And James Gray Pope, Ed Bruno, Pe-ter Kellman made the radical case for doing away with exclusive representation. ( 4 )
+ PLACING LABOR AT THE CENTER OF THE 2020 PRESI-DENTIAL DEBATE: Miles Kampf-Lassin’s interview with Bernie Sanders in the August 2018 issue of In These Times was the first time a prospective 2020 presidential candidate was interviewed ex-clusively and at length on labor issues. (5)
+ R E P O R T I N G F R O M T H E F R O N T L I N E S O F T H E TEACHERS STRIKES: Last year saw an explo-sion of rank-and-file-led teachers’ strikes in Re-
( 4 ) ( 5 ) (6 )
- 6 -
1 8 I N T H E S E T I M E S + N O V E M B E R 2 0 1 8
The foundations of the estab-lished order are cracking. The day after democratic socialist Alexan-dria Ocasio-Cortez won her Demo-cratic primary, the Merriam-Webster Dictionary reported a 1,500 percent increase in searches for the word “socialism” on its website. Overall, socialism and fascism have become
its most-searched words, a tell-ing commentary.
The cornerstone of the pass-ing era is hostility toward taxes, regulation and public investment. The era began with the elec-tion of President Ronald Reagan in 1980, but it was a Democratic president, Bill Clinton, who
expressed its motto most memorably. “The era of big government is over,” Clinton proclaimed in his 1996 State of the Union. The white flag of surrender has f lown over the Democratic Party ever since, with an all-too-brief interlude during Barack Obama’s first presidential campaign.
Perversely, it was a demagogic Republican who sensed the emergence of a new era and rode its cur-rents to the White House. He may be a liar and a
charlatan, but Donald Trump’s election-turning insight was that voters don’t want smaller
government. They want government that works for them—and not for corporations. In addition to xe-nophobia and white Christian nationalism, Trump campaigned on massive infrastructure investment,
B Y T H EO A N D E R S O N
THE RACE TO THE LEFTForget everything you learned about politics in the last 40 years
publican-dominated states across the country. In These Times provided vital coverage of these strikes, with on-the-ground reports and anal-ysis on the uprisings in West Virginia, Oklaho-ma, Colorado, Kentucky, California and Arizo-
na. In all, we published more than 20 stories on this surge of teachers’ strikes, featuring the voic-es of educators, labor activists and movement experts, which provide an unparalleled look into this historic wave of worker militancy. (6 )
E L E C T I O N S A N D P O L I T I C A L M O V E M E N T S
I n These Times Continued to produCe some of the best original reporting on the ongo-ing political revolution within the Democratic
Party, during both the run-up to the 2018 midterms and in its aftermath, as the battle for the White House in 2020 began to take shape.
+ T H E R I S E O F T H E D E M O C R AT I C S O C I A L I STS O F AMERICA: Kate Aronoff took an in-depth, inside look at the explosive growth of the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA) as well as the coun-try’s rapidly changing views on capitalism and socialism, both of which are being driven by an influx of young activists and young lawmakers. In These Times was also one of the first publica-tions to profile a little-known insurgent candi-date from the Bronx, Alexandria Ocasio-Cor-tez, who has become one of the leading voices for progressive politics in the country. ( 7 )
+ C H A L L E N G I N G T H E D E M O C R AT I C PA R T Y F R O M WITHIN: In the January 2018 issue, Theo Ander-son provided one of the first looks at the wave
of left challengers in the 2018 Democratic pri-maries, propelled by groups like Justice Dem-ocrats, Our Revolution and Brand New Con-gress. Anderson highlighted this long-overdue challenge to corporate control of the Demo-cratic Party that set the stage for progressive victories in November. ( 9 )
+ DEFINING THE 2020 PRIMARY: On the heels of the November elections, In These Times was one of the first publications to highlight the emerg-ing field of 2020 candidates vying for progres-sive support, making clear that the early battle for the Democratic nomination would be fought on the Left. Our coverage has continued to focus not on the day-to-day minutiae of the horse race between candidates, but instead has brought to the forefront the big issues at stake: Medicare for All, free public college, expansion of worker rights, comprehensive immigration reform and aggressive action on climate change. ( 8 )
( 8 )( 7 ) ( 9 )
- 7 -
I N F L U E N C I N G T H E D E B A T E
C orporate-owned, for-profit media outlets have a notoriously narrow range of topics that they’re willing to consider, which
creates an environment that stifles out-of-the-box thinking and reinforces the status quo. As a reader-supported, nonprofit publication, In These Times provides a platform for progressive propos-als and progressive thinkers that wouldn’t exist otherwise. Today that’s more important than ever, as people increasingly look for new ideas and new ways to grapple with pressing problems that the defenders of that status quo have failed to address for decades.
+ SHAPING PROGRESSIVE FOREIGN POLICY: In Au-gust, In These Times published “A Bold For-eign Policy Platform for the New Wave of Left Lawmakers” by Phyllis Bennis, a fellow at the Institute for Policy Studies. Bennis argued that progressives running for office on strong domestic platforms should include progres-sive foreign policy proposals just as strong. She outlined in detail what that might look like across multiple fronts, from the Mid-dle East to Russia and beyond. She called for a progressive foreign policy that rejects U.S.
military and economic domination, and in-stead is grounded in global cooperation, hu-man rights, respect for international law and privileging diplomacy over war. ( 1 0 )
+ FIGHTING FOR FELON VOTING RIGHTS: The past few years have seen big setbacks for voting rights, but also key victories. In September, In These Times investigative fellow Eli Day profiled the efforts of activists to restore voting rights to the estimated 6.1 million Americans who are currently barred from voting due to a felo-ny convention. Two months later, Florida voters approved an amendment to the state constitu-tion that would restore voting rights to 1.4 mil-lion former felons. ( 1 1 )
+ REFORMING DEMOCRACY: Our April cover story, “Breaking the Two-Party System” highlighted a number of state-level experiments in electoral reform, in order to create a more inclusive, more representative and more responsive democracy. Featured ideas included proportional represen-tation and multi-member districts, as well as an in-depth looked at ranked choice voting, which was implemented in a Congressional race for the first time in Maine’s November election. ( 1 2 )
M A K I N G A N I M P A C T
T he mission of in These Times is to do more than inform—the goal of our journalism is effect real-world changes that help move us
closer, step by step, to the world we wall want to see. Over the past year, In These Times reporting has been a key part in numerous victories, there-
PH
OTO
S V
IA G
ETT
Y IM
AG
ES
Across the country, a new cohort of progressive Democrats is running for—and winning—elections. Most of these candidates are young, more than usual are people of color and many are women. The stunning victory of democratic socialist
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (above right) in the Democratic congressional primary in New York is perhaps the most well-known, but she is far from alone. Rashida Tlaib (third from right), a Palestinian-American woman in Detroit, just won the Democratic primary for the seat of legendary Rep. John Conyers. Tahirah Amatul-Wadud is running an insurgent campaign for Congress against a longstanding Democratic incumbent in western Massachusetts, keeping her focus on Medicare for All and civil rights. Minnesota State Rep. Ilhan Omar, a former Somali refugee, is running for Keith Ellison’s former congressional seat as an “inter-sectional feminist” and has won both the endorsement of the Democratic-Farmer-Labor Party and the Democratic primary. And there are more.
Many of these candidates highlight their movement ex-perience in their campaigns. They are champions of immi-grant rights, healthcare, student debt organizing and the fight for $15. Intersectionality has grown stronger, as the extremism of Trump’s right-wing racist assault kindles sig-nificant new links among the separate movements focused on racism, women’s rights, immigrant rights, climate, pov-erty, labor rights and other progressive issues.
But we mostly haven’t seen progressive and socialist candidates clearly link domestic issues with efforts to chal-lenge war, militarism and the war economy. There are a few exceptions: Congressional candidate and Hawaii state Rep. Kaniela Ing spoke powerfully about U.S. colonialism in Hawaii, and Virginia state Rep. Lee J. Carter has spoken
strongly against the U.S. bombing of Syria, linking current attacks with the legacy of U.S. military interventions.
It’s not that progressive leaders don’t care about inter-national issues, or that our movements are divided. Nor is it political suicide for candidates or elected officials to stake out progressive anti-war, anti-militarism positions—those positions actually have broad support within both our move-ments and public opinion. It’s just that, too often, foreign policy feels remote from the urgency of domestic crises.
To spark that conversation, here are several core princi-ples to help movement candidates stake out clear positions on foreign policy and connect internationally focused is-sues with locally grounded ones:1. A progressive foreign policy must reject American
exceptionalism and U.S. military and economic domination. Instead, it must be grounded in global cooperation, human rights and respect for international law.
2. Diplomacy must replace military action in every venue, with professional diplomats rather than the White House’s political appointees in charge.
3. There is no military solution to terrorism. The global war on terror must be ended.
4. The war economy has distorted our society at home. We must reverse our spending priorities.
5. U.S. actions—military, economic and climate-related—have been a driving force in displacing people around the world. We have an enormous obligation to provide humanitarian support and refuge for those who have been driven from their homes.
The next two pages highlight specific progressive positions on U.S. engagements around the world.
B Y P H Y L L I S B E N N I S
A Foreign Policy Manifesto for the Left
O C T O B E R 2 0 1 8 = I N T H E S E T I M E S 2 9
( 1 0 ) (11) (12)
- 8 -
by helping rein in systemic abuse on the part of corporations, the Trump administration and the Democratic Party:
+ THWARTING TRUMP’S COAL BAILOUT: On Dec. 6, 2017, InTheseTimes.com published leaked photographs that showed Bob Murray, a coal industry executive whose company stood to benefit greatly from a Department of Energy (DOE) draft rule on grid reliability, privately lobbying Energy Secretary Rick Perry for such a rule. Within 24 hours of publication, the Fed-eral Energy Regulatory Commission decid-ed to postpone its decision pending further review, and on January 8, 2018, the plan was voted down, 5-0. This was a huge victory for clean energy, and for anyone who cares about climate change. It was also a reminder of the power and importance of investigative report-ing. Both the New York Times and the Washing-ton Post cited In These Times’ work. ( 1 3 )
+ TURNING UP THE HEAT ON ICE: Due to U.S. im-migration enforcement’s extensive use of out-sourcing, activists are increasingly targeting the corporations that make immigrant detention possible. David Dayen’s October 2018 cover sto-ry looked “Below the Surface of ICE” to expose the companies that are profiting from immigrant detention, naming more than two dozen pri-vate companies that are complicit in the Trump administration’s crackdown on immigrants. In March of 2019, J.P. Morgan Chase, which has provided at least $254 million in debt financing to two private prison giants mentioned in Day-en’s investigation, CoreCivic and GEO Group,
cut off that money spigot, stating “we will no longer bank the private prison industry.” ( 1 4 )
+ SHINING A LIGHT ON ONE OF AMERICA’S HIDDEN WARS: Throughout 2018, InTheseTimes.com published more than a dozen original pieces on the U.S. involvement in Saudi Arabia’s dev-astating war on Yemen, including reporting by Yemeni journalists on the ground. This relent-less reporting helped bring attention to a pre-viously overlooked war that has created the largest humanitarian crisis in the world. In No-vember, The New York Times Magazine featured the war in Yemen on its cover for the first time, as part of a dramatic shift in the media’s cov-erage. In April of 2019, Congress invoked the War Powers Resolution for the first time in his-tory to end U.S. support for the war. Trump ve-toed the bill, but the effort to end U.S. involve-ment has not let up. (15)
+ REFORMING THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY: In June 2016, In These Times published a special inves-tigation by Branko Marcetic into the secret his-tory of “superdelegates”—712 party officials who had the power to do decide the party nom-ination for president, regardless of who voters chose. Marcetic’s research revealed not just that this system was deeply undemocratic, but that it was intentionally so, in order to prevent insur-gent candidates (like Bernie Sanders) from be-coming the nominee. This investigation helped fuel criticism of the superdelegate system, and in August 2018 the Democratic Party agreed to dramatically reduce the power and influence of “superdelegates” in selecting the party’s presi-dential nominee in 2020 and beyond.
(13) (1 4) (15 )
- 9 -
IN THESE TIMES’ CIRCULATION GROW TH FROM 2010 TO 2018
0
10,000
20,000
40,000
50,000
30,000
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
T HE GROW ING RE ACH OF IN THESE T IMESsinCe 2010, our CirCuLation growth program has been support-ed by a generous grant from the Puffin Foundation. In These Times is now the third largest print mag-
azine in the independent media universe—on the heels of The Nation and Mother Jones, and surpassing The American Prospect, The Pro-
gressive and The New Republic. Similarly, each month hundreds of thousands of people turn to InTheseTimes.com for news and analysis they can’t find anywhere else. Your donations allow us keep our subscription prices low and our online content free and accessible to all, ensuring that In These Times has the greatest reach and impact possible.
- 10 -
F I N A N C I A L S TAT E M E N T SINCOME 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Individual$456,432 $483,012
$222,920 $388,461 $393,407
Publishing Consortium $327,348 $352,244 $399,915
Foundation and Grant Support $532,047 $276,750 $361,500 $367,816 $310,600
TOTAL GENERAL OPERATIONS SUPPORT $988,479 $759,762 $911,768 $1,108,521 $1,103,922
Investigative Institute $60,000 $150,000 $150,000 $286,000 $462,000
Working In These Times $80,000 $80,000 $80,000 $80,000 $80,000
Rural America In These Times $5,550 $25,000 $22,000 $57,000 $11,200
Circulation Growth Programs $0 $0 $138,180 $120,000 $103,867
TOTAL PROGRAM SUPPORT $145,550 $255,000 $390,180 $543,000 $657,067
Subscription Revenue $303,885 $351,192 $451,140 $502,760 $326,493
Advertising Revenue $47,089 $38,718 $43,169 $23,305 $19,143
Bequests $0 $7,401 $1,563 $61,000 $8,300
Other Income 25,283 $25,283 $26,751 $2,643 $10,439
TOTAL $1,510,286 $1,437,356 $1,824,571 $2,241,229 $2,125,364
EXPENSES 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Salaries, Taxes, Benefits, Contractors $767,412 $588,289 $736,365 $874,271 $903,798
Administration $102,315 $70,861 $58,498 $186,532 $73,803
Fundraising Expenses $50,424 $81,004 $90,601 $118,156 $149,136
Production, Distribution and Circulation $444,002 $505,956 $592,745 $771,267 $639,802
Editorial Expenses $138,807 $213,284 $246,940 $239,866 $295,772
TOTAL $1,502,960 $1,459,394 $1,725,149 $2,190,092 $2,062,311
NET INCOME*: $7,326 ($22,038) $99,422 $51,137 $63,053
*For the purposes of this statement, grant funds are counted as income in the year in which they were received, which may not always correspond in full to the year in which they are designated to be spent.
16%SUBSCRIPTION
AND ADVERTISING REVENUE
1%BEQUESTS AND OTHER INCOME
19%FOUNDATION AND GRANT SUPPORT
(88% FROM THE PUFFIN FOUNDATION)
27%LEONARD C. GOODMAN
INSTITUTE FOR INVESTIGATIVE REPORTING AND OTHER PROGRAMS
(WORKING IN THESE TIMES AND RURAL AMERICA IN THESE TIMES)
19%INDIVIDUAL DONATIONS
44%SALARIES, TAXES,
BENEFITS, CONTRACTORS
14%EDITORIALEXPENSES
7%FUNDRAISING
EXPENSES
4%ADMINISTRATION
31%PRODUCTION, DISTRIBUTION, CIRCULATION
19%PUBLISHING CONSORTIUM
DONATIONS
- 11 -
$399,915Total donations from the 251 members
of the Publishing Consortium in 2018
36%of General Operations
Support is from the Publishing Consortium
P U B L I S H I N G C O N S O R T I U M
The Publishing Consortium honors supporters who give $500 or more each year to In These Times (see page 13).
IN THESE T IMES GRE W I T S DONOR BASE AND INCRE ASED CON T R IBU TOR ENG AGEMEN T
16%SUBSCRIPTION
AND ADVERTISING REVENUE
1%BEQUESTS AND OTHER INCOME
19%FOUNDATION AND GRANT SUPPORT
(88% FROM THE PUFFIN FOUNDATION)
27%LEONARD C. GOODMAN
INSTITUTE FOR INVESTIGATIVE REPORTING AND OTHER PROGRAMS
(WORKING IN THESE TIMES AND RURAL AMERICA IN THESE TIMES)
19%INDIVIDUAL DONATIONS
44%SALARIES, TAXES,
BENEFITS, CONTRACTORS
14%EDITORIALEXPENSES
7%FUNDRAISING
EXPENSES
4%ADMINISTRATION
31%PRODUCTION, DISTRIBUTION, CIRCULATION
19%PUBLISHING CONSORTIUM
DONATIONS
2018 INCOME 2018 EXPENSES
1 2Donors in 2018
were new.
out of every x 2
The number of active Sustainers doubled from
2017 to 2018
- 12 -
O U R P L A N S F O R 2 0 19
Now more than ever, we need pubLi-cations that can help orient the progressive movement as it grapples with structural in-equality, endemic racism, global warming and
an economic system that attempts to squeeze the last dollar out of a downwardly mobile populace in thrall to the whims of a market economy. This development has particularly affected our youth, who face a pre-carious future in a world of diminishing opportunity.
ameriCa needs a new new deaL, and here at In These Times we are committed to being part of the movement that makes that possible.
in 2019, we are foCusing on how in these Times can grow its audience and amplify our collective voice in America’s national discourse.
our board of direCtors, under the Lead -ership of Margie Rung, the director of the Center for New Deal Studies at Roosevelt University, has estab-lished a committee to create a strategic business plan that will guide our growth as In These Times confronts the challenges of the 21st century.
I F Y O U H A V E E X P E R I E N C E I N business operations, non-profit management, real estate (our largest capital asset is our building, which was purchased with a grant from our key in-stitutional supporter, the Puffin Foundation), public relations, finance, fundraising, strategic planning, publishing and mar-keting, and if you think you have expertise to contribute, we want to hear from you. Email [email protected].
- 13 -
C H A M P I O N S ( $ 1 0 , 0 0 0 + )
➤➤ Anonymous (2)➤➤ Martha J.
Fleischman➤➤ Leonard Goodman➤➤ Collier Hands➤➤ James Harkin
➤➤ Polly Howells and Eric Werthman➤➤ Beth Maschinot➤➤ A. Paul Olsen➤➤ Adelaide Park
Gomer
➤➤ Abby Rockefeller and Lee Halprin➤➤ Gladys Miller
Rosenstein, Perry Rosenstein and Neal Rosenstein
➤➤ T. M. Scruggs➤➤ Lois Sontag➤➤ David Taber➤➤ Jenny and Trevor
Tomkins
P A R T N E R S ( $ 5 , 0 0 0 + )
➤➤ Anonymous (1)➤➤ Dan Collins
and Samantha Kooney Collins
➤➤ Amy Domini➤➤ Ralph Edgar and
Christine Eakins
➤➤ Nancy Fleck Myers
C O L L E A G U E S ( $ 2 , 5 0 0 + )
➤➤ Anonymous (1)➤➤ Theresa Alt and
Wayles Browne➤➤ Lucy and Peter
Ascoli
➤➤ Maggie Garb➤➤ Christine George➤➤ Francis Hagan➤➤ Lorraine Honig
➤➤ Betsy Krieger and David Kandel➤➤ Kenneth Landau➤➤ Chris Lloyd➤➤ Dorothy Mauser
➤➤ Bruce P. Merrill➤➤ Susan Murray and
Wade Chandler➤➤ Marc Silberman
A L L I E S ( $ 1 , 0 0 0 + )
➤➤ Anonymous (5)➤➤ Stuart Ambler➤➤ Pat Aufderheide➤➤ Paula Baron
➤➤ Kenneth Basom➤➤ Kay Berkson and
Sidney Hollander➤➤ Martha Biondi and
James Thindwa➤➤ Jennifer Boal and
Roland Goff➤➤ M. Nieves Bolaños
2018 PUBLISHING CONSORTIUMIn 2018, the In These Times Publishing Consortium stepped up like never before to help keep the magazine on track, and we are grateful for their support.
- 14 -
A L L I E S ( $ 1 , 0 0 0 + )
➤➤ Elizabeth Brackett and Fred Olson➤➤ Jan Breidenbach
and Dan Stormer➤➤ Nicole Brodeur and
Alex Payne➤➤ Kate
Bronfenbrenner➤➤ Carolyn Byerly➤➤ James Caya➤➤ Mardge Cohen and
Gordon Schiff➤➤ Constance
Cooper and Marc Bastuscheck➤➤ Kevin Creighan➤➤ Lawrence Finch➤➤ Ann French➤➤ Judith Gardiner
➤➤ Kevin George➤➤ Martha Goldin➤➤ Connie and
Kenneth Graham➤➤ Jon Hagler➤➤ Marge Harrison➤➤ Lucy and Rich
Henighan➤➤ Elizabeth
Higginbotham➤➤ Dwayne Huebner➤➤ Rebeca Itzkowich
and John Ireland➤➤ Brian Johnson➤➤ Marilyn Katz➤➤ Bengt Kjellén➤➤ Roberta and Peter
Kovner
➤➤ Lisa Lee➤➤ Karen Liebeman
and Bruce Nissen➤➤ Jane Mansbridge
and Sandy Jencks➤➤ Frances and Peter
Marcuse➤➤ Amy Morton and
Rob Milburn➤➤ Leslie Noblitt➤➤ Laura Orlando➤➤ Maria Pastoor and
John Klein➤➤ Steve Penningroth➤➤ Lois and Donald
Pfost➤➤ Bernadine and
Edward Pillar
➤➤ Harriet and Alexander Pollatsek➤➤ Marjorie Pries➤➤ Barbara Ransby
and Peter Sporn*➤➤ Judith Rhinestine
and Michael Stein➤➤ Frank Roosevelt➤➤ Margaret C. Rung➤➤ Margie Siegel, in
honor of Bill Siegel➤➤ Bette Sikes➤➤ Marta V. Smith➤➤ Ellen Stone-Belic➤➤ Edwin Toolis➤➤ Jon Tullis➤➤ Alisse Waterston
and Howard Horowitz
F R I E N D S ( $ 5 0 0 + )
➤➤ Anonymous (7)➤➤ Paul Baicich➤➤ David Baker➤➤ Stuart R. Bass➤➤ Larry Bassett➤➤ Bob Bazzetta➤➤ Tamara and
Ted Becker➤➤ Edoardo Bellando➤➤ Ruth Benson➤➤ Rodney Bleifuss➤➤ Patti Bleifuss➤➤ Susan Blumenthal
➤➤ Elspeth Bobbs➤➤ Eileen Brenner➤➤ Scott Brizard➤➤ Stephen Bruce➤➤ Paul Bundy➤➤ Robert Burns➤➤ William Nicholas
Burt➤➤ William Carey➤➤ Fritzi Cohen➤➤ David Cooper➤➤ Neal Dahl➤➤ Dorothy Davis
Smith
➤➤ Amy Domini➤➤ Pat and Richard
Doonan➤➤ Monique Morrissey
and Michael Duffy➤➤ Jacquelyn Ellenz
and Steven Snyder➤➤ Harvey Fernbach➤➤ Myron Filene➤➤ Marian and Eugene
Gabrych➤➤ Jay Goldberg➤➤ Jill Gordon
➤➤ Marie Gottschalk➤➤ Dedrea and Paul
Gray➤➤ Jake Greene➤➤ Cliff Hall➤➤ Paul Hanson➤➤ Don Henley➤➤ Merlyn and Josiah
Heyman➤➤ Douglas R.
Howland
- 15 -
F R I E N D S ( $ 5 0 0 + )
➤➤ Gloria Jarecki➤➤ Patricia Jotkoff➤➤ Herschel Kaminsky➤➤ Seena Kohl➤➤ Susan Kornfield➤➤ Robert Kraig➤➤ Nancy Kricorian
and James Schamus➤➤ Lorenzo and Robin
Kristov➤➤ Lillian Laskin➤➤ Dennis Lee➤➤ Bonita and Robert
Levin➤➤ Peter Livingston➤➤ Robin Lloyd
➤➤ Inga Lyngholm➤➤ Ann Markusen and
Rod Walli➤➤ Christopher R.
Martin➤➤ Michael McKeon➤➤ Dave Melchior➤➤ Seamus Metress➤➤ Dan Miller➤➤ Steve Mooser➤➤ George Ashley
Moretz➤➤ Chris Moser➤➤ Luann Mostello and
Art Milholland➤➤ Lawrence Myers➤➤ Teri Nitta and Lewis
Flock
➤➤ Robert Nixon➤➤ Mike Nusbaumer➤➤ Margaret Okuzumi
and Bruce Hahne➤➤ Elizabeth O’Nan➤➤ Mary Padgett➤➤ Diane Percival➤➤ Richard Peterson➤➤ Frances Fox-Piven➤➤ Frances Pohl➤➤ Gordon Quinn➤➤ Elspeth Revere and
Bruce Calder➤➤ Don Rose➤➤ Frank L. Schneider➤➤ David Schweickart➤➤ Brian Sherman
➤➤ Rachel Sherman➤➤ Richard W. Smith➤➤ Jean C. Stanfield➤➤ Nancy and Bill
Steward*➤➤ Susan Stone and
Eric Decker➤➤ Gordon Svoboda➤➤ Ronald Tower➤➤ Judith Turner➤➤ Charlie Varano➤➤ Douglas Wagner➤➤ Barbara Walden➤➤ William Weaver➤➤ Betty Weinstock➤➤ Susan Weltman➤➤ Jack Wuest
F O U N D A T I O N S & O R G A N I Z A T I O N S
➤➤ Apple Inc.➤➤ Bella S. and
Benjamin H. Garb Foundation, Inc.➤➤ Cooper’s Hawk➤➤ Crown Family
Foundation➤➤ Doing Good, LLC➤➤ Driehaus
Foundation➤➤ Elias Foundation➤➤ Foundation for
Sustainability and Innovation
➤➤ GE Foundation➤➤ Google➤➤ Helfrich Family
Fund Charitable Trust➤➤ John D. &
Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation➤➤ Leif Nissen
Foundation➤➤ Park Foundation➤➤ Peggy Meyerhoff
Pearlstone Foundation
➤➤ Piece Pizza➤➤ Professionals
Guild Ohio➤➤ Public Welfare
Foundation, Inc➤➤ Puffin
Foundation Ltd.➤➤ Raygun➤➤ Revolution Brewing➤➤ Rockefeller
Foundation➤➤ Second City➤➤ Solari Inc.
➤➤ Steppenwolf Theatre➤➤ The Brightwater
Fund➤➤ The Hummingbird
Fund➤➤ The Libra
Foundation➤➤ TransUnion➤➤ Voya➤➤ Wiedmann-Elitzik
Charitable Fund
Top Related