Spotlight
Who gets to shape strategy?Companies are more top-down than bottom-up in their approach to strategy formulation.
72%
A slide show highlighting other fi ndings from the survey can be found at hbr.org/spotlight/eff ective-organization.
How Hierarchy Can Hurt Strategy Execution
Can you state your strategy?A lot of people say they can’t. The situation is particularly bad among those who aren’t involved in strategy development.
In March, we surveyed members of the HBR Advisory Council (a representative group of readers we periodically turn to
for insights) about strategy and execution in their organizations. We asked how well they think strategy is developed, which obstacles prevent implementation, how the downturn has aff ected performance, and so on. A total of 1,075 respondents weighed in. Four data points stand out: First, readers think the biggest execution challenge is making strategy meaningful to frontline workers. Second, a lot of people can’t even tell you what their fi rm’s strategy is. Third, strategy still comes mainly from the top. And fourth, people involved in its development are the most likely to buy in. Those fi ndings suggest that leaders should consider making strategy formulation more bottom-up and should communicate more clearly—throughout the ranks—about what the company is trying to achieve. HBR Reprint R1007E
Do you think your company is good at developing strategy?The answers people give depend on where they sit in the organization.38%
21%
AGREECOMPLETELY
AGREESOMEWHAT
38%OF ALL RESPONDENTS CAN PARTIALLY STATE THE STRATEGY
5%CAN’T STATE IT AT ALL
57%CAN COMPLETELY STATE IT
NOT COMPLETELY
NO
YES
RESPONDENTS INVOLVED IN STRATEGY DEVELOPMENT
48%BELIEVE THEIR ORGANIZATION IS GOOD AT IT33%
BELIEVE THEIR ORGANIZATION IS GOOD AT IT
RESPONDENTS NOT INVOLVED IN STRATEGY DEVELOPMENT
59% Agree at least somewhat with the statement “There is an imaginary line in my company’s organizational chart. Strategy is created by people above the line, while strategy is executed by people below the line.”
74 Harvard Business Review July–August 2010
SPOTLIGHT ON THE EFFECTIVE ORGANIZATION
1252 JulAug10 Advisory Council.indd 741252 JulAug10 Advisory Council.indd 74 6/8/10 1:24:37 PM6/8/10 1:24:37 PM
What is the most important aspect of strategy execution?Most respondents give clear communication top billing. Other high priorities include eff ective leadership and a commitment to putting the right people in the right jobs. The lowest-ranked factor? Encouraging managers to make decisions generally in line with strategy. SOURCE XXX
What are the obstacles to executing strategy?IN THE CURRENT ECONOMY
IMPO
RTA
NCE
OF
OBS
TACL
E
POPULARITY OF RESPONSE
LOW HIGH
HIG
H
Too focused on short-term results
Too focused on tactics rather than strategy
Lack of accountability; lack of measurement
Making it meaningful to frontliners; translating strategy to execution
Inability to respond quickly to opportunities
Confl icting priorities
Too busy; lack of time; resource constraints
72%
23%
SPELLING OUT STRATEGY IN CLEAR LANGUAGE
STEERING MANAGERS TOWARD ALIGNMENT
IN GENERAL
IMPO
RTA
NCE
OF
OBS
TACL
E
POPULARITY OF RESPONSE
LOW
Poor communication of strategy
HIGH
HIG
H
Everyone too busy; lack of time; resource constraints
Resistance to change
Silos or units with competing agendas
Too focused on short-term results
Lack of clear and decisive leadership; leadership actions inconsistent with strategy
Lack of accountability or follow-through; inability to measure impact
Making it meaningful to frontliners; translating strategy to execution; aligning jobs to strategy
Failure to communicate strategy causes frontline workers to invent their own strategy. —Survey respondent
HBR’S READER SURVEY adds support to the notion that companies maintain a sharp divide between strategy and execution. For example, 59% of respondents acknowledge that there’s an imaginary line separating thinkers and doers, and only one-third say that strategy creation is part of everyone’s job.
Given the pervasiveness of the problem, it’s not surpris-ing that 72% of respondents think communicating strategy in clear terms is a top prior-ity in execution. But no set of concrete instructions can cover all strategic situations.
I’ll give you an example. I recently moved to a condo equipped with a high-end appliance that didn’t work properly. The repair people were fl ummoxed; the issue wasn’t covered in their cus-tomer service script. So they invented their own response strategy—which was to present the company as arrogant and full of itself.
How can your fi rm avoid that kind of destructive improvisa-tion in its ranks? By recogniz-ing that everyone is a strategy maker and helping employees develop a deep understanding of the organization’s beliefs. Every worker should have the authority to size up customers individually and provide them with appropriate solutions.
— Roger L. Martin, author of “The Execution Trap,” page 64
Mind the Gap
Thinkers and Doers
July–August 2010 Harvard Business Review 75
HBR.ORG
1252 JulAug10 Advisory Council.indd 751252 JulAug10 Advisory Council.indd 75 6/8/10 1:24:45 PM6/8/10 1:24:45 PM
Harvard Business Review Notice of Use Restrictions, May 2009
Harvard Business Review and Harvard Business Publishing Newsletter content on EBSCOhost is licensed for
the private individual use of authorized EBSCOhost users. It is not intended for use as assigned course material
in academic institutions nor as corporate learning or training materials in businesses. Academic licensees may
not use this content in electronic reserves, electronic course packs, persistent linking from syllabi or by any
other means of incorporating the content into course resources. Business licensees may not host this content on
learning management systems or use persistent linking or other means to incorporate the content into learning
management systems. Harvard Business Publishing will be pleased to grant permission to make this content
available through such means. For rates and permission, contact [email protected].
Top Related