HFT Project Overview
CD0 Review
H.G. RitterLBNL
CD0 Review 2
Compelling science
•Elementary charm cross-sections
•Parton energy loss•Charm flow and thermalization
CD0 Review 3
Justification
• In the first part we have shown– Compelling science– Proposed detector can do necessary
measurements• In the second part we will show
– Properties of detector– How we build it– We have the team and the organization
to build it
CD0 Review 4
Major Milestones• List all the previous reviews
CD0 Review 5
Definition
STAR Tracking Upgrade to identify D and B mesons through measurement of the displaced vertex
CD0 Review 6
Optimal technology
• New pixel technology– Resolution– Low material budget
• Proven strip technology– Experience– Cost effective
CD0 Review 7
PIXEL
• 2 layers of 30x30 m pixels at 2.5 and 8 cm radius
• Very thin material budget to limit multiple scattering
• Data reduction and formatting on chip
• Rapid insertion and removal• Precision positioning• Air cooling
CD0 Review 8
PIXEL
CD0 Review 9
Patch for run 11
CD0 Review 10
IST
• One layer of single sided strips (pads) at a radius of 14 cm
• Conventional and proven technology
• MIT expertise
CD0 Review 11
IST
CD0 Review 12
SSD• Existing detector• Needs upgrade and TLC
CD0 Review 13
Collaboration• BNL: C. Chasman, D. Beavis, R. Debbe, J.H. Lee, M.J. Levine, F.
Videbaek, Z. Xu• UCLA: R. Cendejas, H. Huang, S. Sakai, C. Whitten• Kent State: J. Joseph, D. Keane, S. Margetis, V. Rykov, W.M.
Zhang• Prague: M. Bystersky, J. Kapitan, V. Kushpil, M. Sumbera • Strasbourg: J. Baudot, C. Hu-Guo, A. Shabetai, M. Szelezniak,
M. Winter• MIT: J. Kelsey, R. Milner, M. Plesko, R. Redwine, F. Simon, B.
Surrow, G. Van Nieuwenhuizen• LBNL: E. Anderssen, X. Dong, L. Greiner, H.S. Matis, S. Morgan,
H.G. Ritter, A. Rose, E. Sichtermann, R.P. Singh, T. Stezelberger, X. Sun, J.H. Thomas, V. Tram, C. Vu, H.H. Wieman, N. Xu
• Purdue: A. Hirsch, B. Srivastava, F. Wang, W. Xie• U. Washington: H. Bichsel
CD0 Review 14
Management Structure
DOEBNLLBNL
HFT Project ManagementContract Project Manager: HG Ritter (acting) LBNLDeputy, Contract Project Manager: RP Singh LBNL
Deputy, Contract Project Manager: F. Videbaek BNL
Pixel Det.
Wieman LBNL
Anderssen LBNL
IST
B. Surrow MIT
J. Kelsey MIT
Integration
F. Videbaek BNL
J. Kelsey MIT
Software
S. Margetis KSU
STARSpokesperson: T. HallmanUpgrade coord: R. Majka
SSD Liaison
J. Thomas LBNL
Safety CoordinatorTBD
HFT Management Structure
CD0 Review 15
HFT Technical Committee
Ritter - Project ManagerSingh - Deputy Project ManagerMorgan - BudgetVidebaek - IntegrationWieman - PixelAnderssen - Pixel, IntegrationSurrow - ISTKelsey - IST, IntegrationThomas - SSD LiaisonMargetis - SoftwareHallman - STARMajka - STAR
Weekly meetings, change control
CD0 Review 16
Risk Management• APS Sensor depending on Strasbourg pace of
development– Push for early prototype, get involved in
testing and design• Kinematic mount and low weight ladder
challenging– Solve problem in the R+D phase
• SSD is essential– Get involved in upgrade and running of SSD,
design some redundancy into IST• HFT might become operational late
– Build patch to test design and get early measurement
CD0 Review 17
CostWBS Title
Total Budget
Upper Range
1.1 R&D 1,461 1,461
1.2 Pixel Detector 1,963 2,869
1.3 Strip Detector (IST) 2,287 3,112
1.4 Integration 1,662 2,357
1.5 Software 0 0
1.6 Project Management 785 941 Subtotal 8,157 10,741 Contingency - 30% 2,914 4,079 HFT Est. TPC 11,071 14,821
CD0 Review 18
Proposed Schedule
CD0 Review 19
Summary• Compelling Science• A detector
– That can deliver the science– Has the right mix of new and
proven technology • A team and an organization
– That can build the detector– That will extract the science in a
timely fashion
Top Related