Gravity-Independent Locomotion:
Potential Approaches to Robotic Mobility on Asteroid Surfaces
Eddie Tunstel
Space Robotics & Autonomous Control LeadSpace Department
JHU-APL
Planetary Rovers WorkshopIEEE ICRA 2010
May 3, 2010
Anchorage, AK
Luther Palmer III
Assistant Professor, Biomorphic Robotics LabDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering
University of South Florida
EWT-2
Motivation
Continuing campaign of small body exploration Orbit/rendezvous landing/touch-and-
go sampling surface exploration (as precursor mission payloads and as astronaut leave-behinds)
Opportunity to drive convergence of technology from different robotics application domains
Focus is on local mobility in persistent contact with the surface in high priority science regions
Artist’s concept of NEAR Shoemaker on surface of Eros
EWT-3
Technology convergence
Disparate research efforts and missions (e.g., Hayabusa) are maturing enabling technology for asteroid mobility Hopping vehicles and various rover concepts Climbing robots for military recon. and search & rescue
Some point(s) of convergence seems possible now or in the near future for gravity-independent locomotion systems Locomotion without strict dependence on the local
gravity vector for traction or stability and local motion control
EWT-4
Rolling & Hopping
See the paper for this talk for more discussion
T. Kubota and T. Yoshimitsu (ISAS/JAXA) Asteroid Exploration Rover, IEEE ICRA 2005, Planetary Rover Workshop
EWT-5
Surface characteristics
Weak gravity (micro-g to milli-g) makes it difficult to achieve normal forces usually required for stable surface locomotion
A means to traverse subject to low ground contact pressure or to cling or stick the surface is needed
NEAR S/C final Eros landing mosaic
EWT-6
Surface characteristics
EWT-7
M. Yoshikawa et al (JAXA) COSPAR Capacity Building Workshop on Planetary Science, Montevideo, Uruguay, July 2007
EWT-8
Crawling & Climbing
See the paper for this talk for more discussion
R. Wagner (IEEE ICRA 2007Planetary Rover Workshop
LEMUR IIb (JPL)
AWIMR (NGST, JPL, CMU)
ASTRO on microgravity emulation testbed
(Tohoku University)M. Chacin & K. Yoshida
IEEE ICRA 2009
B. Kennedy (CLAWAR 2005
EWT-9
Relevant Climbers for Earth-based applications
Gecko-inspired dry adhesives (potential for rapid, low-energy attachment/detachment on various surfaces)
microspine array, or the single spine or claw (latch onto asperities in the surface or dig into soft substrates)
electroadhesion (electrically controllable adhesion between compliant electrodes and various surfaces)
For Earth applications a remaining challenge is producing a single foot and adhesion paradigm that can climb on a variety of both man-made and natural surfaces
QuickTime™ and aTIFF (Uncompressed) decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
EWT-10
Relevant Climbers for Earth-based applications
DIGbot videos
QuickTime™ and aTIFF (Uncompressed) decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
EWT-11
CHALLENGES
Mechanics of controlled ballistic hopping on rotating asteroids and in non-uniform gravity fields
Landing after hopping in such a way as to avoid rebound
Maintaining grip or temporary anchoring while controlling force for closure and compliance
Determining, updating and maintaining knowledge of rover position
Testing and verification of gravity-independent locomotion systems
J. Bellerose & D. Sheeres (U. Mischigan, Ann Arbor)
EWT-12
Conclusions
Technical challenges can be met with recent technological advances in robotics research
The space of candidate technologies is rich Earth-based research is advancing useful designs
and capabilities (dry adhesive, electroadhesion, and gripping spine)
More attention from the space robotics community is warranted to provide the most capable solutions for science support
Conceivably, solutions for small body mobility would also be applicable for hard-to-access terrain (e.g., cliff faces, crater walls, and caves) on larger
planetary bodies.
Top Related