ElenaBernardiniUniversityofMilanGiovannaColomboUniversityofInsubriaCarmenLombaUniversityofCantabria,SpainSilvanaMangiaracinaCNRBolognaFulviaMerliniIRCCSBurloGarofoloTriesteEmanuelaSecinaroINRIMTorino
ANILDEsurveyoninternationalILLexchanges:resultsandconsiderations
NILDEItaliannetworkandsoftware
forresourcesharingo ILLandDDsupplywebbasedsystem
o 1000librarycommunity,200.000requests/year
o Samevisionandruleso Freeofchargecooperation
2
Intro
94%
5%
1%
NILDElibrariesbycountry
Italy
Spain
Allothers(GRE,CHE,SWE,BRA,LUX,HRV)
3
NILDEInternationalILLrequesttrendo Openingtoworldlibraries(since2011)o Softwarewithmultilingualuserinterfaceo IncreaseinILLexchangeddocuments2011-2016especiallybetweenlibrariesinItalyandSpain
Intro
4
From1858to2002
After2002 Now
INTERLIBRARYLOAN
RESOURCESHARING
RETHINKINGRESOURCESHARING
Intro
“NILDEwithoutborders”surveyNILDEgrows,worldoflibrarieschanges,differentvisionaboutILLexchanges
Needtounderstandmoreinadditiontoquantitativestatistics
ILLSurvey?Whynot?
“NILDEwithoutborders”survey
PURPOSE: investigate current resource sharing practicesand interlibrary loanprocedures/policiesnotonly inNILDElibraries network but also in external NILDE libraries inEuropean-Mediterraneancontext.
AIMS: collect feedback/results forpromoting internationalcooperationandexpandingNILDEservices.
BACKGROUND:lookatpreviousanglo-americaninternationalALA-RUSA-STARS2007,2011,2015ILLsurveysandcasestudies
5
Intro
SurveyMETHOD1TARGET✔NILDElibraries(includingSpanishREBIUNandotherforeignlibraries)mailinglist
✔OtherlibrariesoutsideNILDEnetworkItalian(AIB,Gidif,SiDocumenta),spanish(GTBIB,BIB-MED)mailinglistsandEuropeanlibrariesandlibrarynationalassociationscontacts
6
Method
NILDERECIPIENTS Non-NILDERECIPIENTSNILDE,REBIUNandotherassociated,foreignlibraries
AIB,Gidif,SiDocumenta,SpanishGTBIBandBIB-MED,otherlibrariescontactsandlibrarynationalassociationsmailinglists
SurveyMETHOD2
SOFTWARE opensourceweb-surveyapplicationmadeavailableandhostedbyUniversityofCantabria,Spainwww.LimeSurvey.org/
SURVEYLAYOUTAnonymousmultilingualquestionnaire(Italian,Spanish,English),total23questions(onlyafewrequired)andafinalenquiryforadditionalcomments
SURVEYDISTRIBUTIONInvitationswithwebsurveylinkdistributedviaemailmessagetoallmailinglistson19June2017tofillinuntil18thJuly2017.
7
Method
SurveyparticipationSurveyopened801timeswith401completedsurveys.Uncompleted:surveybreakoff,differentbrowserslayout,respondents’levelsofcomputerandwebuse,technicalfailures(undelivered)
8
Results
69%
11%
12%
5%3%
Librarycategories
University
PublicResearchInstitution
PublicInstitution
PrivatenoprofitInstitution
Other
69%Universityrepresentedthemostcommontypeoflibraryresponding
77%NILDEassociatedlibraries
10
Results
Volumeofinternationallendingrequestsappearshigherthanborrowing
SurveyinternationalILLrequests
Yes70%
No30%
Lending
Yes63%
No37%
Borrowing
Doesyourlibrarysend/receiveinternationalILL-DDrequests?
11
250
150
79 71
25 16 13 6 5 4 2 20
50
100
150
200
250
300
EU Center&SouthAmerica
NorthAmerica
ExtraEU Oceania Russia Asia Africa China MiddleEast
India Other
WhichgeographicareasdoesyourlibraryreceiveinternationalILL-DDrequestsfrom?
232
8464
4729
12 10 6 4 3 2 10
50
100
150
200
250
EU NorthAmerica
ExtraEU Center&SouthAmerica
Oceania Russia Asia MiddleEast
China Africa India Other
WhichgeographicareasdoesyourlibrarysendinternationalILL-DDrequeststo?
Lending&borrowingtopcountries
Results
EuropeandAmerica(North,CentralandSouth)
Returnablesrequests
12
Results
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
0 1-20 20-50 50-150 150-300 >300%ofrespo
nses
Numberofrequestsin2016
InternationalILLrequests(books)receivedin2016
Lending
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
0 1-20 20-50 50-150 150-300 >300
%ofrespo
nses
Numberofrequestsin2016
InternationalILLrequests(books)sentin2016
Borrowing
13
Non-returnablesrequests
Themostrespondentshavefewerthan20internationalILLborrowingandlendingrequests
Results
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
0 <20 20-50 50-100 150-300 >300
%ofrespo
nses
Numberofrequestsin2016
Internationallendingrequestsreceived(copies)in2016
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
0 <20 20-50 50-100 150-300 >300
%ofrespo
nses
Numberofrequestsin2016
Internationalborrowingrequestssent(copies)in2016
Lending Borrowing
14
Typeofpayment
IFLAvouchersarethemostpopularkindofpaymentrequestedbylendingandborrowinglibrariesOther • Creditcard
• OCLCIFM• DepositAccount
Results
47%
53%
DoesyourlibraryrequireafeeforinternationalILL-DDservice?
yesNo
0% 10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%
IFLAVoucher
Banktransfer
Internationalpostalorder
Other
Paymentacceptedbyyourlibrary(L)
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70%
IFLAVoucher
Banktransfer
Other
Paymentrequiredtoyourlibrary(B)
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% 50%
Documentunavailable,lost
Copyright/embargo
Wrongbibliographicalreferences
borrowedbook
Other
MaincausesofnotsuccessfulprocessingofinternationalILL
15
• feeandpaymentobstacles• ILLservicenotprovided• Nofailedrequest
SurveyRESULTSUnfulfilledinternationalinterlibrary
exchangescauses
16
WouldyourlibraryagreetofreeILLexchangewithforeignlibraries,askingforacompensationattheendoftheyearafteraspecifiedmaximumnumberofdocumentssupplied?
SurveyRESULTS
Availabilitytofreecooperation
Resourcesharingandfreeofchargecooperationattitude
88%
12%
Yes
No
Commentsandsuggestionsthe most tell us about ILL difficulties, ILL delivery andprocedures, catalogueholdings visibility, copyright andDDclauses,systemsinteroperability:MylibrarycannotimplementaninternationalILLservicebecauseofinsufficientstaffandorganization”DeliveryandILLreceptionstimeisconditionedbypostandcustomoffice”Respondentsask:ElectronicIFLAvouchers-Simplifythetransitfromcustoms(US,butalsoSwitzerland)-Allowingdifferentpaymentoptions-Publishersagreementsclausesallowingdocumentdelivery
17
Results
Commentsnegativeperceptionso Nonsignificantprogressinresourcesharingofreturnableitems✔visiblebutundeliverable✔fearofloss✔limitede-lending(i.e.e-bookslicensingrestrictions)
Commentspositiveperceptionso increasingexchangesofnonreturnableitems(articles)o successfulexperienceso innovativesolutionsproposed✔e-lendingsolutionssoftwareorpublisheragreements✔Localconsortiaorcooperationnetworksoflibraries
18
Conclusions
Conclusions1
o NILDEwidelydisseminatedinITALYo Availabilityoffreecooperation(88%yes,12%no)o NeedstoextendinterlibrarycooperationHighernumberofinternationalILLtransactionsbetweenneighboringgeographiccountries(mainlyITALY,SPAIN,thenotherEUcountries)
o Internationallendingandborrowingcommonobstacles✔returnablespayment,shippingcosts✔copyrightconcernfornon-returnables
19
Conclusions
Conclusions2
Suggestionsaboutinterlibrarycooperationandresourcesharing:✔freeservicefornon-returnablesdocument(scannedanddigitizeddocumentshavenoshippingcosts)✔ collaborative collection development to fight lack offundsandfinancialcrisis✔ simplifypaymentmethod (adoptionofelectronic IFLAvouchers…)
20
Conclusions
Similaritieswithotherinternationalsurveys(ALA-RUSA-STARSsurveys)andcasestudies• CountriesofILLexchanges:Themajorityofinternational
borrowingandlendingcountriesareinNorthAmericaandinEurope.
• Materialsdifficulttoobtain:olderandrare,thesisandlocaldissertations,e-books.
• Barriers/obstacles:shippingcosts,uncertaintyaboutlicensingande-lending
• Paymentmethod:IFLAvouchers
21
Conclusions
Differenceswithotherinternationalsurveys(ALA-RUSA-STARSsurveys)andcasestudies• LowervolumeofinternationalILLrequests:Themostrespondentshavefewerthan20internationalILLrequestsper year borrowing and lending returnables and non-returnables(othersurveysfewerthan100)
• ILLRequestprocessingsystem:NILDE(othersurveysOCLC)
22
Conclusions
ResourceSharingisnotonlyabout"papers"butalsoabout"people"
ElenaBernardini GiovannaColombo
CarmenLomba SilvanaMangiaracina
FulviaMerlini EmanuelaSecinaro
23
Conclusions
NILDEInternationalizationWorkingGroup
24
ColomboGiovanna(CBNNILDE-UniversityofInsubria)DeFilippisPatrizia(CBNNILDE–UniversityofCampania)MaimoneAnsaldoPattiLoriana(CBNNILDE–UniversityofMessina)MangiaracinaSilvana(CBNNILDE–CNRLibraryBologna)SecinaroEmanuela(CBNNILDE-I.N.RI.MTorino)TugnoliAlessandro(CBNNILDE-CNRLibraryBologna)BaePeter(PrincetonUniversity,USA)BernardiniElena(UniversityofMilan)ÇelikbaşSema(IstanbulTechnicalUniversity)ChiandoniMarco(UniversityofTrieste)LombaCarmen(UniversityofCantabria,Spain)MainardiAndrea(UniversityofPavia)MulondoAllan(MaxPlanckInstituteLuxembourgforProceduralLaw)ReuspiFranco(UniversityofGenoa)
Thankyouforyourattention!
Anyquestion?Contactinfo:[email protected](onbehalfofNILDEInternationalizationWorkingGroup)
25
Conclusions
Top Related