Download - Getting to Eddington and beyond in AGN and binaries!

Transcript
Page 1: Getting to Eddington and beyond in AGN and binaries!

Getting to Eddington and beyond in AGN and binaries!

Chris DoneUniversity of Durham

Page 2: Getting to Eddington and beyond in AGN and binaries!

• L/LEdd determined by mass accretion rate onto the black hole

• LMXRB – roche lobe overflow of low mass companion

• HMXRB – wind accretion from high mass companion

• HMXRB – roche lobe overflow from high mass companion

• AGN

Accreting black holes

Page 3: Getting to Eddington and beyond in AGN and binaries!

• L/LEdd determined by mass accretion rate onto the black hole

• LMXRB – roche lobe overflow of low mass companion

• HMXRB – wind accretion from high mass companion

• HMXRB – roche lobe overflow from high mass companion

• AGN

Accreting black holes

Page 4: Getting to Eddington and beyond in AGN and binaries!

• L/LEdd determined by mass accretion rate onto the black hole

• LMXRB – roche lobe overflow of low mass companion

• HMXRB – wind accretion from high mass companion

• HMXRB – roche lobe overflow from high mass companion

• AGN

Accreting black holes

Page 5: Getting to Eddington and beyond in AGN and binaries!

• L/LEdd determined by mass accretion rate onto the black hole

• LMXRB – roche lobe overflow of low mass companion

• HMXRB – wind accretion from high mass companion

• HMXRB – roche lobe overflow from high mass companion

• AGN

Accreting black holes

Page 6: Getting to Eddington and beyond in AGN and binaries!

LMXRB – Transient!• H ionisation instability in disc – eg Lasota 2001• If T(Rout)<H ionisation then disc globally unstable• T(Rout) depends on mass, mass accretion rate and binary size – all

correlated by roche lobe overflow condition!

DGK072 years

Page 7: Getting to Eddington and beyond in AGN and binaries!

• Radius of star depends on type (ie mass)

• Star has to fill roche lobe for mass accretion

• Mass accretion rate from companion depends on type

• Outer edge of disc can’t be larger than ½ size of binary orbit.

• Find all have T(Rout)<H ionisation instability for all low mass companion stars

• See review by Lasota (2001)

Roche lobe overflow

Menou et al 1999

Page 8: Getting to Eddington and beyond in AGN and binaries!

• Peak luminosity depends on how much mass can accumulate in quiescence and how fast it accretes onto black hole

• Lpeak R(out)3/R(out ) R(out)2 King & Ritter 1998

• Main sequence secondary is small so R(out) small so Lpeak<LEdd

Roche lobe overflow

Page 9: Getting to Eddington and beyond in AGN and binaries!

• GRS1915+105 is huge! 33 day period. L/LEDD~1 for 20 years

• GS2023 – went to 2LEdd, then blew its disc apart…

• GX339 and XTEJ1550 are the next biggest but L<LEDD

J. Orosz

LMXRB BH in our galaxy

Page 10: Getting to Eddington and beyond in AGN and binaries!

• Rare systems – most end as NS in population synthesis models

• High mass loss rate from stellar wind, but only capture small fraction so L<<LEdd

Winds fed HMXRB – BH

Page 11: Getting to Eddington and beyond in AGN and binaries!

• Main sequence high mass star. Mass accretion rate from companion is high

• Keeps outer disc temperature in Cyg X-1 above H ionisation so persistent

• HUGE mass transfer as supergiant evolves – SS 433 in our galaxy

• Most ULX in other galaxies

Roche lobe overflow HMXRB-BH

Page 12: Getting to Eddington and beyond in AGN and binaries!

• Main sequence high mass star. Mass accretion rate from companion is high

• Keeps outer disc temperature in Cyg X-1 above H ionisation so persistent

• HUGE mass transfer as supergiant evolves – SS 433 in our galaxy

• Most ULX in other galaxies

Roche lobe overflow HMXRB-BH

Rappaport et al 2005

Page 13: Getting to Eddington and beyond in AGN and binaries!

Intermediate mass BH?

• Ultra - Luminous X-ray sources in spiral arms of nearby starforming galaxies – ULX

• L~1039-40 ergs s-1 so M~10-100 M

for L <LEdd

• Hard for stellar evolution to make BH > 50 M

Gao

et a

l 200

3

Page 14: Getting to Eddington and beyond in AGN and binaries!

• Hard spectra plus soft excess looks like scaled up BHB in LHS?

• IMBH?

• But break above 7keV – NOT like LHS!!!

ULX state ?

Gladstone Roberts & Done 2008

Page 15: Getting to Eddington and beyond in AGN and binaries!

ULX state ?

Gladstone Roberts & Done 2008

Page 16: Getting to Eddington and beyond in AGN and binaries!

ULX state ?

Gladstone Roberts & Done 2008

Page 17: Getting to Eddington and beyond in AGN and binaries!

ULX state ?

Gladstone Roberts & Done 2008

Page 18: Getting to Eddington and beyond in AGN and binaries!

• L/LEdd determined by mass supply

• But ~0.5% of mass in star formation ends up in the black hole to make the M- relation

AGN

Page 19: Getting to Eddington and beyond in AGN and binaries!

BH-Galaxy AND environment•Big black holes live in host galaxies with big bulges!

•Need 0.5% of bulge mass (ie starformation) to end up down the BH

Bla

ck h

ole

mas

s

Stellar system mass

103

109

1061012

Page 20: Getting to Eddington and beyond in AGN and binaries!

Black hole mass

• SMBH grow by gas accretion and BH-BH mergers

• Mergers dominate only highest BH mass (> 109 M) . Spin of 0.7-0.8

• Accretion (thin disk) dominates for lower mass (<108 M)

• Accretion (hot flow) never really dominates

Fanidakis et al 2010

Page 21: Getting to Eddington and beyond in AGN and binaries!

Black hole mass accretion rate

• Not many with L/LEdd>1 in local universe - and they are predominantly low mass BH

• What do they look like?

Fanidakis et al 2010

Page 22: Getting to Eddington and beyond in AGN and binaries!

Disc spectra from 106 M L/LEdd ~1

• Much more soft X-ray flux than expected from either disc or power law

• Enormous soft X-ray excess !!

Jin et al 2011

Page 23: Getting to Eddington and beyond in AGN and binaries!

Disc spectra from 106 M L/LEdd ~1

• Standard SS disc temperature – assumes energy thermalises

• BHB discs - Colour temperature correction as scattering > absorption opacity. Tobs=1.8 Teff

• AGN discs even more scattering dominated as less dense !! Factor 2.4 !!

Done, Davis, Jin, Blaes Ward 2011

Page 24: Getting to Eddington and beyond in AGN and binaries!

Disc spectra from 106 M L/LEdd ~1

• Enourmous soft excess in REJ1034

• But actually a lot of it should be the bare disc!

• Plus a little bit of comptonisation !

• More like disc dominated black holes

Done, Davis, Jin, Blaes Ward 2011

Page 25: Getting to Eddington and beyond in AGN and binaries!

Conclusions• Galactic BHB can’t get to Eddington very easily

• Exceptions are LMXRB in wide binaries with evolved companions – GRS1915+105

• And HMXRB evolving into supergiants – SS 433 and probably ULX.

• And some nearby low mass high mass accretion rate AGN like REJ1034 (QPO AGN).

• Disc in these AGN MUST extend into soft X-rays. Much of soft X-ray excess in these is the bare disc. Then need SMALL comptonisation to get shape of component

Page 26: Getting to Eddington and beyond in AGN and binaries!

Unsolved problems• How does magnetic field stress dissipate and heat the accretion flow?

Can we get as high as ~0.1? Stress HEATS so eventually gives pressure so alpha prescription OK on average??

• What happens to the disc as we go to Eddington and beyond? – How does it stay optically thick up to ~0.5LEdd?

– How important are winds Fgrav=(1- abs/ es L/LEdd) GM/R2

– How important is advection of radiation – and what fraction of this escapes from the plunging region becoming optically thin: not radiatively inefficient?

• How does the B field manage to get the same (approx) vertical flux to launch the same power jet in lots of different BHB?

• How does thin cool disc truncated into hot flow? Simulations??• what are the HF QPOs ?

– method for measuring a*? But LF QPOs probably don’t !!!!

• Can we understand iron line profiles ? And get all methods for measuring a* giving the same answer?