Today
Revocation: Unilateral Contracts Counter-offers Battle of the Forms UCC 2-207
2
Revocation: Unilateral Contracts
The Brooklyn Bridge example on p. 233. Offeror terminates when offeree is halfway
across the bridge.
3
Revocation: Unilateral Contracts
Restatement § 36(1). An offeree’s power of acceptance may be terminated by (a) rejection or counter-offer by the offeree.
4
Revocation: Unilateral Contracts
Restatement § 45. Option Contract Created by Part Performance or Tender. (1) Where an offer invites an offeree to accept by rendering a performance and does not invite a promissory acceptance, an option contract is created when the offeree tenders or begins the invited performance or tenders a beginning of it.
5
Acceptance vs. Counter-offer
6
Acceptance vs. Counter-offer
Wholesaler offeror offers retailer offeree “a dozen 22 inch clay pots for $300.” Offeree emails back “Great. I’ll take three dozen.”
Is there a contract?
7
Acceptance vs. Counter-offer
§39. COUNTER-OFFERS. (1) A counter-offer is an offer made by an offeree to
his offeror relating to the same matter as the original offer and proposing a substituted bargain differing from that proposed by the original offer.
8
The “Mirror Image Rule”
§59. PURPORTED ACCEPTANCE WHICH ADDS QUALIFICATIONS. A reply to an offer which purports to accept it but is conditional on the offeror's assent to terms additional to or different from those offered is not an acceptance but is a counter-offer.
9
Acceptance vs. Counter-offer
Wholesaler offeror offers retailer offeree “a dozen 22 inch clay pots for $300.” Offeree emails back “Great. I’ll take three dozen.”
Not having heard from wholesaler, retailer emails back “OK, I’ll take a dozen.”
Is there a contract?
10
Acceptance vs. Counter-offer
§39. COUNTER-OFFERS. (1) A counter-offer is an offer made by an offeree to
his offeror relating to the same matter as the original offer and proposing a substituted bargain differing from that proposed by the original offer.
(2) An offeree's power of acceptance is terminated by his making of a counter-offer, unless the offeror has manifested a contrary intention or unless the counter-offer manifests a contrary intention of the offeree.
11
Acceptance vs. Counter-offer
Restatement § 36. Methods of Termination of the Power of Acceptance(1) An offeree’s power of acceptance may be terminated by
(a) rejection or counter-offer by the offeree
12
Counteroffers: Dataserv Equipment at 247
13
Counteroffers: Dataserv Equipment at 247
Dataserv (seller)
InDepth
Technology (buyer)
14
Counteroffer as Rejection: Dataserv Equipment
Was Dataserv’s response an acceptance of a counteroffer?
15
Counteroffer as Rejection: Dataserv Equipment
If Dataserv didn’t accept the counteroffer, could it go back and accept it later?
16
Counteroffer as Rejection: Dataserv Equipment
Restatement § 38(1). A party’s rejection terminates its power of acceptance. Once rejected an offer is terminated and cannot be accepted without ratification by the other party.
17
Acceptance vs. Counter-offer
Wholesaler offeror offers retailer offeree “a dozen 22 inch clay pots for $300.” Offeree emails back “Great. I’ll take a dozen but I’d really be much happier if you could send me three dozen.”
18
Acceptance vs. Counter-offer
§ 61. Acceptance Which Requests Change of Terms. An acceptance which requests a change or addition to the terms of the offer is not thereby invalidated unless the acceptance is made to depend on an assent to the changed or added terms.
19
The Battle of the Forms
20
Why might this be a problem?
The Battle of the Forms
21
“The sender of the last form … could insert virtually any conditions it chooses into the contract” (254) Ionics
At Common Law
What happens at common law where: There is performance and indisputably a
contract There has been a “Battle of the Forms”
22
The “Mirror Image Rule” at common law
§59. PURPORTED ACCEPTANCE WHICH ADDS QUALIFICATIONS. A reply to an offer which purports to accept it but is conditional on the offeror's assent to terms additional to or different from those offered is not an acceptance but is a counter-offer.
23
The “Mirror Image Rule”
Restatement § 36. Methods of Termination of the Power of Acceptance(1) An offeree’s power of acceptance may be terminated by
(a) rejection or counter-offer by the offeree
24
The Last Shot Doctrine
The Last Shot Doctrine as a corollary of the mirror image rule
25
How is the Last Shot doctrine changed by the “infamous” UCC § 2-207?
26
Ionics at 250
27
Was there a battle of the forms?
If so, was this between merchants?
And what was the dispute?
Ionics at 250
Elmwood
thermostats
Ionics
28
Ionics at 250
29
Applying the last shot doctrine, what is the contract? And who wins as to implied terms? UCC 2-314: a warranty that the goods
shall be merchantable … if the seller is a merchant with respect to goods of that kind
Ionics at 250
How would you apply UCC § 2-207(1) (before the comma) to Ionics?
UCC § 2-207 (1) A definite and seasonable expression of acceptance or a written confirmation which is sent within a reasonable time operates as an acceptance even though it states terms additional to or different from those offered or agreed upon
30
Ionics at 250
Who would win as to implied terms?
UCC § 2-207 (1) A definite and seasonable expression of acceptance or a written confirmation which is sent within a reasonable time operates as an acceptance even though it states terms additional to or different from those offered or agreed upon
31
Ionics at 250
What about the proviso?UCC § 2-207(1) A definite and seasonable expression of acceptance or a written confirmation which is sent within a reasonable time operates as an acceptance even though it states terms additional to or different from those offered or agreed upon, unless acceptance is expressly made conditional on assent to the additional or different terms.
32
Ionics at 250
What about the proviso?UCC § 2-207(1) A definite and seasonable expression of acceptance or a written confirmation which is sent within a reasonable time operates as an acceptance even though it states terms additional to or different from those offered or agreed upon, unless acceptance is expressly made conditional on assent to the additional or different terms.Qu. the Elmwood “Acknowledgement”
33
Ionics at 250
34
In similar circumstances, how did Roto-Lith end up applying the Last Shot doctrine?
What happens then?
UCC § 2-207(1) A definite and seasonable expression of acceptance or a written confirmation which is sent within a reasonable time operates as an acceptance even though it states terms additional to or different from those offered or agreed upon, unless acceptance is expressly made conditional on assent to the additional or different terms.
35
Ionics at 250
36
If Ionics rejects Roto-Lith, could 2-207(2) be helpful?
The additional terms are to be construed as proposals for addition to the contract. Between merchants such terms become part of the contract unless:
(a) the offer expressly limits acceptance to the terms of the offer;
Ionics at 250
37
If Ionics rejects Roto-Lith, could 2-207(2) be helpful?
(a) the offer expressly limits acceptance to the terms of the offer;
Was that the case in Ionics?
Ionics at 250
38
If Ionics rejects Roto-Lith, could 2-207(2) be helpful?
(b) they materially alter it; or
Ionics at 250
39
If Ionics rejects Roto-Lith, could 2-207(2) be helpful?
(b) they materially alter it; or
Was that the case in Ionics?
Ionics at 250
40
If Ionics rejects Roto-Lith, could 2-207(2) be helpful?
The additional terms are to be construed as proposals for addition to the contract. Between merchants such terms become part of the contract unless:
(c) notification of objection to them has already been given or is given within a reasonable time after notice of them is received.
Ionics at 250
41
If Ionics rejects Roto-Lith, could 2-207(2) be helpful?
(c) notification of objection to them has already been given or is given within a reasonable time after notice of them is received.
Was that the case in Ionics?
Ionics at 250
42
So what happens when 2-207(1) and 2-207(2) are both ousted?
Ionics at 250
43
So what happens when 2-207(1) and 2-207(2) are both ousted?
Two possibilities: There is “conduct by both parties
which recognizes the existence of a contract” in 2-207(3)
Or there isn’t
Ionics at 250
44
If there is “Conduct by both parties which recognizes the existence of a contract is sufficient to establish a contract for sale” In such case the terms of the particular
contract consist of those terms on which the writings of the parties agree, together with any supplementary terms incorporated under any other provisions of this Act.
Ionics at 250
45
In such case the terms of the particular contract consist of those terms on which the writings of the parties agree, together with any supplementary terms incorporated under any other provisions of this Act.
And what would this be? See Comment 6
Step-Saver at 260
Is this a contract between merchants?
46
Step-Saver at 260
Wyse/TSL
Mainframe hardwareplus MS software
Step-Saver
47
Shrink-rap Contracts
What did the District Court hold?
48
Shrink-rap Contracts
The District Court: The box-top license as the
crucial Last Shot offer
49
Shrink-rap Contracts
How did the Circuit Court interpret 2-207(1)?
50
Step-Saver
UCC § 2-207(1) A definite and seasonable expression of acceptance or a written confirmation which is sent within a reasonable time operates as an acceptance even though it states terms additional to or different from those offered or agreed upon, unless acceptance is expressly made conditional on assent to the additional or different terms.
51
Shrink-rap Contracts
What about 2-207(1)’s proviso? unless acceptance is expressly
made conditional on assent to the additional or different terms
If the proviso applies, what happens?
52
Shrink-rap Contracts
Is that what Step-Saver did? Offeree must demonstrate an
unwillingness to proceed unless the additional terms are included
53
Shrink-rap Contracts
Am I missing something here? Clause 5: “Opening this package
indicates your acceptance of these terms and conditions. If you do not agree with them you should promptly return the package unopened”?
54
Shrink-rap Contracts
Am I missing something here? “Opening this package indicates your
acceptance of these terms and conditions. If you do not agree with them you should promptly return the package unopened”?
But it did go ahead with the deal (does the proviso mean anything?)
55
Shrink-rap Contracts
Am I missing something here? “best seen as one more form in a
battle of the forms”
56
What about 2-207(b)?
57
2-207(2) The additional terms are to be construed as proposals for addition to the contract. Between merchants such terms become part of the contract unless:
(b) they materially alter it; or Was that the case in Step-Saver?
Shrink-rap Contracts
Material Alteration The merger clause? The warranty exclusion
58
Shrink-rap Contracts
So 207(2) is ousted, and the box-top doesn’t become part of the contract, and we’re back with 207(1) And what happens on remand?
59
Step-Saver
UCC § 2-207(1) A definite and seasonable expression of acceptance or a written confirmation which is sent within a reasonable time operates as an acceptance even though it states terms additional to or different from those offered or agreed upon, unless acceptance is expressly made conditional on assent to the additional or different terms.
60
What’s left of the proviso?
UCC § 2-207(1) A definite and seasonable expression of acceptance or a written confirmation which is sent within a reasonable time operates as an acceptance even though it states terms additional to or different from those offered or agreed upon, unless acceptance is expressly made conditional on assent to the additional or different terms.
61
Hill v. Gateway at 268
62
Hill v. Gateway at 268
Was this between merchants? 2-207(2) The additional terms are to be
construed as proposals for addition to the contract. Between merchants such terms become part of the contract unless:
63
Hill v. Gateway at 268
What is RICO?
64
Hill v. Gateway at 268
What result if Step-saver is applied here? UCC § 2-207(1) A definite and seasonable
expression of acceptance or a written confirmation which is sent within a reasonable time operates as an acceptance even though it states terms additional to or different from those offered or agreed upon, unless acceptance is expressly made conditional on assent to the additional or different terms.
65
Hill v. Gateway at 268
Was there a battle of the forms?
If not, what happens to 2-207 per Easterbrook?
66
Hill v. Gateway at 268
Why did it make sense to enforce the form agreement?
67