Geo-neutrino: ExperimentsJelena Maricic
Drexel UniversityNeutrino Champagne – LowNu2009
October 20, 2009
ννν ν
νν
νν
BNO
Outline• Geological motivation for geo-neutrinos
• Experimental detection of geo-neutrinos and search for geo-reactor with KamLAND detector
• Prospects for precision measurement of geo-neutrino flux and geo-reactor discovery with current and planned experiments
• Further developments of detection techniques
• Summary
10/20/2009 2J. Maricic, Drexel University
GEOLOGICAL MOTIVATION FOR GEO-NEUTRINOS
Geologists agree! We know more about the Sun than about Earth under our feet
10/20/2009 3J. Maricic, Drexel University
What and How We Learn About Earth Interior?
J. Maricic, Drexel University 4
• Chemical composition:– Depth up to 670 km studied directly: melts or
drilling (12km).– Deep Earth inaccessible. Guess composition by abundances in meteorites and sun. (670-6400km)
• Density profile:– Sound velocities from seismic data – Total mass and moments: infer density profile– Does not resolve chemical composition!
• Geodynamics:– Continental drift energized by internal heat flow– Geomagnetic field attributed to the dynamo effect of the core– Energy source that powers the dynamo not understood!
• Heat flow: – 43-49 TW. Not well constrained due to model dependence (maybe 30-32 TW ?!?)– 17-23 TW are from radioactivity in 40K, 232Th, 238U (trace elements); predominant heat source 10/20/2009
10/20/2009 J. Maricic, Drexel University5
Where are Radioactive Elements Located?
• Based on the Earth’s chemical composition model: – U/Th expected mostly in the crust and mantle– More U/Th expected in the crust than mantle– No U/Th expected in the core, but deep Earth is highly inaccessible. If it is there, does it burn, breed? deep-core fission reactor proposed by M. Herndon as
energy source driving geodynamo – radical hypothesis
• K seems to be under-abundant on Earth:– Some models suggest that it is accumulated in the core
U, Th, K?
Deep core fission reactor?
10/20/2009 J. Maricic, Drexel University6
Direct Measurement of U/Th Content with Geoneutrinos
- Antineutrinos (geo-neutrinos) are emitted in the decay chains of
40K, 232Th, 238U
- Low energy < 3.4 MeV; 232Th neutrinos have lower end point than 238U neutrinos
- Can engage in inverse β-decay reaction- Only U and Th geo-neutrinos can be detected this way
- From the measurement of geo-neutrino flux,
inferences about U/Th content of the entire Earth can be made!
Only good fordetection of neutrinos with energies > 1.8 MeV.
Inv. does not work for 40K!
e p+ e+ + n
Inv. reaction:
10/20/2009 J. Maricic, Drexel University 7
Geo-neutrinos vs. Conventional Geological Tools in Surveying Earth Interior?
Conventional geology uses indirect methods to learn about the Earth’s composition:
- replicated in the laboratory- only the very outside surface layers can be directly sampled- a lot of educated guessing must be invoked to fill in
gaps in the story of Earth’s evolution- meteorite data
Geo-neutrinos provide a direct method – instantaneous information about full radioactive heat production from 232Th and 238U from ENTIREENTIRE Earth.
- 232Th and 238U fluxes provide evidence about the amounts and distribution
(crust, mantle, or even core) of 238U and 232Th - - uniqueunique input in geochemistry and geodynamics.
Existence of geo-reactor neutrinos would provide direct evidence about geo-reactor existence and viable explanation for the energy source of the
geomagnetic field + radical change in planetary chemistry and evolution.
Geo-neutrinos direct evidence for understanding:
- Earth energy budget (heat flow) - Plate tectonics (driving mechanism)- Energy source of geodynamo (geomagnetism) - Chemical composition - Planet formation
EXPERIMENTAL DETECTION OF GEO-NEUTRINOS AND SEARCH FOR GEO-REACTOR WITH KAMLAND EXPERIMENT
How even crude measurement is very exciting
10/20/2009 J. Maricic, Drexel University 8
KamLAND: reactor
vs. geo-neutrinos
• KamLAND – 1 kton scintillator detector • Detects electron anti-neutrinos via inverse beta decay10/20/2009
J. Maricic, Drexel University 9
n
e+γ
γ
γνe
2.2MeV
PromptEvent
Delayed Event
p
200 μs
p
Reactor BackgroundReactor Backgroundwith oscillationwith oscillation
GeoneutrinosGeoneutrinos
10/20/2009 J. Maricic, Drexel University 10
Crust vs. Mantle Geo-Neutrinos at KamLANDCrust vs. Mantle Geo-Neutrinos at KamLAND
JapanTrench
Sea of JapanGeological Setting• Boundary of Continent and Ocean• Island Arc• Zn, Pb, limestone mine (skarn)
KamLAND
KamLAND
Crust thickness:- continental ~40 km- oceanic ~8 km
U, Th are lithophile: strong tendency to leave the mantle andstay in the crustU, Th more abundant in the crust
Sensitivity to mantle Sensitivity to mantle neutrinos small, neutrinos small, due to the vicinity of due to the vicinity of continental crustcontinental crust
S. Enomoto
S. Enomoto
10/20/2009 J. Maricic, Drexel University 11
Local vs. Global Neutrinos at KamLAND
Kamioka MineHida Metamorphic Zone
Japan Island Arc‘Earth around Japan’
KamLAND is looking atKamLAND is looking at‘‘Earth around JapanEarth around Japan’,’,
if local variation is averaged enoughif local variation is averaged enough
Assuming uniform crustal composition(no local variation)!
50% of flux within500 km from KL.Geoneutrinos from the crust dominant!
50% of flux within500 km from KL.Geoneutrinos from the crust dominant!
S. Enomoto
10/20/2009 J. Maricic, Drexel University 12
Expected Neutrino Spectrum at KamLANDExpected Neutrino Spectrum at KamLAND
Expected event rate: U series: 14.9 Th series: 4.0 Reactor (E<3.4MeV): 80.4
Geo-neutrinoanalysis window
Reactor neutrinoanalysis window
U/Th flux smallcomparing to reactorflux and bkgs.
U/Th flux smallcomparing to reactorflux and bkgs.
Reactor
Accidental
(,n)
Total BG
Geoneutrinos + BG
Antineutrinos coming from nuclear reactors around Japan present the largest source of bkg in KamLAND.
*749.14 days of livetime
Poor signal to bkg ratio!
10/20/2009 J. Maricic, Drexel University 13
Analysis Results (749.14 days livetime)Analysis Results (749.14 days livetime)
Comparison of energy spectrum of observed events with expectation.
• 90% confidence interval: 4.5 to 54.2 • 99% C.L. upper limit : 70.7 • Ngeo=0 excluded at 95.3%(1.99σ)
• 90% confidence interval: 4.5 to 54.2 • 99% C.L. upper limit : 70.7 • Ngeo=0 excluded at 95.3%(1.99σ)
Incorporates Th/U = 3.9 constraint
Best fit pointBest fit point
Unbinned spectrum-shape MaximumLikelihood method used for analysis.
Geophysical model GoodAgreement
GoodAgreement
Observed: (25 ) events +19- 18
Confirmation101 years after Rutherford proposed radioactivity as the source of Earth’s heat
10/20/2009 J. Maricic, Drexel University 14
KamLAND KamLAND Results (2008)Results (2008)
- Enlarged fiducial volume (6 m Enlarged fiducial volume (6 m vs. 4.5 m)vs. 4.5 m)
- - Livetime: 1491 days Livetime: 1491 days
- Analysis threshold: 0.9 MeV - Analysis threshold: 0.9 MeV
- Geonu flux from Enomoto - Geonu flux from Enomoto et et alal..
model: 16TW U+Th totalmodel: 16TW U+Th total
- U&Th strongly U&Th strongly anti-correlatedanti-correlated
Events
Model
U/Th
56.6
13.1
Best fitBest fit
U/ThU/Th
2525
3636
Fit with3.9 Fit with3.9 ratio fixedratio fixed
73±2773±27
Model
Data Fit
10/20/2009 J. Maricic, Drexel University 15
Search for Geo-reactor Neutrino Signal at KamLAND
• Reactor anti neutrinos only - above 3.4 MeV• The possible surplus of detected events implies that there may be another
source of antineutrinos that has not been accounted for geo-reactor.• With 2.5 times more data, statistics improved:
68%
90%
First results New results
The best fit value (66) TWand 90% C.L. limit 19 TWwith 515 days of livetime (2005)
The best fit value (04) TWand 90% C.L. limit 6.2 TWwith 1491 days of livetime (2008)
KamLAND Prospects
• Next result – improved geo-neutrino and geo-reactor measurement (prospects – exclude 0 geo-neutrino hypothesis and fully radiogenic heat hypothesis > 3)
• Precision measurement unlikely – can not constrain/differentiate among different geological models
• No discovery level geo-reactor neutrino measurement (5 level)• Low sensitivity to geo-neutrinos from the mantle (in high demand by geologists)
10/20/2009 J. Maricic, Drexel University 16
Scintillator purificationdecreased it - 1/10 or better
Reactor flux~50% in last2 years
PROSPECTS WITH OTHER RUNNING AND PLANNED NEUTRINO EXPERIMENTS
What it takes for precision measurement
10/20/2009 J. Maricic, Drexel University 17
BNO
Locations for Possible Geonu ExperimentsLocations for Possible Geonu Experiments
Color indicates U/Th neutrino flux, mostly from crust
KamLAND(running – 1kton)2700 mwe
Baksan(R&D)
Hanohano(R&D – 10 kton)4000 mwe
EARTH(R&D)
LENA(R&D – 50 kton)SNO+ (soon – 1 kton)5400 mwe
Borexino(running – 300 ton, 3700 mwe)
DUSEL(R&D – 300 kton)4200 mwe
(Fiorentini et al JHEP2004)
Geonu Crust and Mantle Signal at Various Detector Sites
Hanohano HawaiiKamLAND Japan
HanohanoKamLAND
Geoneutrino flux determination – synergy among experiments:
-Continental (KamLAND, SNO+, Borexino, LBNE at DUSEL, LENA, …) geo-neutrino flux from the crust – multiple sites crucial for reliable Earth model
-Oceanic (Hanohano) geoneutrino flux from the mantle
Canada
S. Enomoto M. Chen
Reactor Neutrino Backgrounds
HawaiiHanohano
Commercial nuclear reactor background
JapanKamLAND
Reactor Reactor BackgroundBackgroundwith oscillationwith oscillation
GeoneutrinosGeoneutrinos
KamLAND
Borexino experiment
10/20/2009 J. Maricic, Drexel University 21
• 300 ton liquid scintillator detector (running from 2007)• Mostly sensitive to geo-neutrinos from the crust• Comparable signal from crust and
reactors (Fiorentini et al JHEP2004)
• 5-7 geo-neutrinos/year; 2 years for 3 (Borexino collaboration - European Physical Journal
C 47 21 (2006) - arXiv:hep-ex/0602027)
• Geo-reactor signal: 5-21% of reactor signal (1-6 TW)
SNO+ experiment• 1 kton liquid scintillator detector (will start
2011)• Mostly sensitive to geo-neutrinos from the
crust • Comparable signal from the crust and
reactors• 28-38 events/year (Chen, M. C., 2006, Earth Moon
Planets 99, 221)
• Should measure U/Th ratio of the crust• Geo-reactor signal: 2.7 – 16% of reactor
signal (1-6 TW)
10/20/2009 J. Maricic, Drexel University 22
Hanohano• 10 kton liquid scintillator
detector (R&D)• Very sensitive to mantle
neutrinos• 60 – 100 events/year (J. G. Learned
et al. – ``XII-th International Workshop on Neutrino Telescope'', Venice, 2007)
• Should measure mantle U/Th• 1:1 geo-reactor and man-made
reactor signal ratio• Almost 5 C.L. even for 1 TW gr.
10/20/2009 J. Maricic, Drexel University 23
LENA
• 50 kton liquid scintillator detector (R&D)
• Mostly sensitive to crust neutrinos
• Geo-neutrino signal dominates over reactor signal
• Should measure U/Th ratio in the crust
• 800-1200 events/year (K. A. Hochmuth et al. - Astropart.Phys. 27 (2007) – arXiv:hep-ph/0509136)
• LS loaded with 0.1% Gd• Geo-reactor signal: 6.2 – 37.5%
of reactor signal (1 – 6 TW)10/20/2009 J. Maricic, Drexel University 24
LBNE at DUSEL• 300 kton detector (WCh maybe
loaded with Gd or LS)• If filled with LS – very sensitive
to geo-neutrinos from the crust• Should obtain U/Th in crust• 4800 – 7200 events/year (scaled
from LENA)• Sensitive to geo-reactor even in
the case of Gd loading (4.5 MeV threshold vs. 3.4 MeV)
• Geo-reactor signal: 15 – 92.3 % of reactor signal (1-6 TW)
10/20/2009 J. Maricic, Drexel University 25
POTASSIUM 40What geologists would really like to know
10/20/2009 J. Maricic, Drexel University 26
Measuring Potassium 40 Content• Radiogenic heat from potassium
40 estimated at 3 TW
• Potassium 40 below inverse beta decay threshold
• Neutrino flux overwhelmed by solar neutrinos by 2-3 orders of magnitude
• Other low Qb and low ft elements searched like 106Cd(see M. Chen,
Neutrino Sciences 2005) and many others (Kobayashi et al, Geophys. Res. Lett 18(633) 1991
10/20/2009 J. Maricic, Drexel University 27
IMPROVING DETECTION TECHNIQUE WITH DIRECTIONALITY
Uncovering neutrino detection in scintillation detectors
10/20/2009 J. Maricic, Drexel University 28
Directionality of neutrino in inverse beta decay
• Neutron remembers the direction – useful for geo-neutrino detection
• Rejection of reactor backgrounds• Problems: blurred due to
thermalization, poor reconstruction and gamma diffusion
• Improvement: element with large neutron c-s; heavy particle emission; good vertex resolution
• Li under study at Tohoky University– Transparency– 45% of KL light yield– 7.59% natural abundance - possible enrichement
10/20/2009 J. Maricic, Drexel University 29
n
e+γ
γ
γνe
2.2MeV
PromptEvent
Delayed Event
p
200 μs
p
S. Enomoto
10/20/2009 J. Maricic, Drexel University 30
Summary• Geo-neutrinos provide direct measurement of
radioactive elements and heat produced• Geo-neutrinos are the only chemical probes of
entire planet• KamLAND measured geo-neutrinos at 2 and 4 expected in 2 years• Limit on geo-reactor set by KamLAND at 6.2 TW
(90% C.L.) –range of interest for core• Borexino is operational, while SNO+ soon• Future hopes – detectors in the ocean, very large
LS detectors, several locations, directionality , K40…
10/20/2009 J. Maricic, Drexel University 31
10/20/2009 J. Maricic, Drexel University 32
10/20/2009 J. Maricic, Drexel University 33
Top Related