Gastrointestinal Decontamination: Common Sense vs. Limited Science
Robert S. Hoffman, MDDirector, NYC Poison Center
Associate Professor Emergency Medicine and Medicine
NYU School of Medicine
Common Sense
• There are two ways to prevent the action of poisonings on the alimentary canal:
– Cause them to be rejected upwards or downwards
– Neutralize them
Oliva 1818
Common Sense
• In theory:– The proper use of emesis, lavage,
adsorption, catharsis and/or whole bowel irrigation on a select group of patients should reduce the amount of toxin available for absorption
– The less toxin available, the less toxicity
Common Sense
5
What to Do When Evidence Is Lacking
• “Syrup of ipecac should not be administered routinely in the management of poisoned patients.”
• Gastric lavage should not be employed routinely, if ever, in the management of poisoned patients.
Complications
Kulig: Ann Emerg Med 1985;14:562
• Patients who were lavaged within one hour of ingestion had a clinically significantly improved outcome– Improvement in 16/17 vs 3/5 (p < 0.05)
Pond: Med J Australia 1995;163:345
• Overall deteriorated– Emptied: 6% Not emptied: 9%
• Overall improved– Emptied: 16% Not emptied: 13%
• Presented in 1 hour and deteriorated– Emptied: 10% Not emptied: 12%
• Presented in 1 hour and improved– Emptied: 16% Not emptied: 3% p=0.02
Activated Charcoal
Mechanisms of Action
16
• “Single-dose activated charcoal should not be administered routinely in the management of poisoned patients.
• Based on volunteer studies, the administration of activated charcoal may be considered if a patient has ingested a potentially toxic amount of a poison (which is known to be adsorbed to charcoal) up to one hour previously.”
“In conclusion, based on experimental and clinical studies, multiple-dose activated charcoal should be considered only if a patient has ingested a life-threatening amount of carbamazepine, dapsone, phenobarbital, quinine, or theophylline.”
Complications
Complications
22
Based on volunteer studies, WBI should be considered for potentially toxic ingestions of sustained-release or enteric-coated drugs particularly for those patients presenting greater than two hours after drug ingestion. WBI should beconsidered for patients who have ingested substantial amounts of iron
23
Real 10-Year TrendsTherapeutic Nihilism
• Almost no ipecac use• Significant reduction in orogastric lavage• Less multiple dose activated charcoal
(MDAC)• Less single dose activated charcoal• Some whole bowel irrigation• Overall trend towards non-intervention
25
What Is Poisoned?
Audience Test
• 25 year old man• Presents to the ER 1 hour after ingesting
100 (325 mg) enteric coated aspirin• CC: abdominal pain / looks well• ABG normal, ASA non detectable • What do you do?
It Depends on Who You Ask
• Telephone survey of 99% of North American poison centers and 7 toxicologists who drafted position statements
• Given this case to manage• 36 different courses of action
– Some harmful
– Juurlink DN and McGuigan MA J Toxicol Clin Toxicol 2000; 38(5): 465-470
So What’s New?
Am J Emerg Med
2004:22:548-554
• We found that AC is most effective when given immediately after drug ingestion but has statistically significant effects even when given as long as 4 h after drug intake.
• AC appears to be most effective when given in a large dose
Study Design
• Single blinded (n=422)• Placebo controlled• Single dose AC vs MDAC• Outcomes:
– Deaths– Life-threatening events
MDAC over 72 h reduced the death rate by 69%.
NNT = 18 patients [95% CI 10–90]).
Lancet 2008; 371: 579–87
• Referral patients– Most seen in previous hospital– Many already had GI decontamination– Overall presentation late– Poor supportive care– Not typical pharmaceuticals
41
[Ann Emerg Med. 2007;50:593-600.]
“Despite widespread use of multiple gastric lavages for OP pesticide poisoning across Asia, there is currently no high-quality evidence to support its clinical effectiveness.”
Summary
• Many patients can be managed without GI decontamination
• Position Papers and Consensus Statements are based on poor evidence
• Logic must prevail• Try to identify people who are likely to
benefit from decontamination
Integration
• Where are you on the dose response curve?
• What is the likelihood that there is toxin in your gut?
• What are the risks and benefits of the procedure you are considering?
47
Questions
Top Related