7/30/2019 Final Deontology
1/31
Deontologyor
Duty based Ethics
7/30/2019 Final Deontology
2/31
Classification of Ethical Theories
7/30/2019 Final Deontology
3/31
DeontologyDuty Based Ethics
The word 'deontological' comes from the Greekword deonto, which means 'duty'.
Deontological (duty-based) ethics are concerned
with what people do, not with the consequences of
their actions.
Do the right thing.Do it because it's the right thing to do.
Don't do wrong things.
Avoid them because they are wrong.
7/30/2019 Final Deontology
4/31
Deontology
Under this form of ethics you can't justifyan action by showing that it producedgood consequences, which is why it'ssometimes called 'non-Consequentialist'.
Duty-based ethics teaches that someacts are right or wrong because of the
sorts of things they are, and people havea duty to act accordingly, regardless ofthe good or bad consequences that maybe produced.
7/30/2019 Final Deontology
5/31
The deontological theory states thatpeople should adhere to theirobligations and duties when analyzing
an ethical dilemma.
This means that a person will follow
his or her obligations to anotherindividual or society becauseupholding one's duty is what is
considered ethically correct.
7/30/2019 Final Deontology
6/31
For instance, a deontologist willalways keep his promises to a friendand will follow the law. A person who
follows this theory will produce veryconsistent decisions since they will bebased on the individual's set duties.
7/30/2019 Final Deontology
7/31
Deontologists who exceed their dutiesand obligations, which is called"supererogation" .
For example, if a person hijacked a trainfull of students and stated that oneperson would have to die in order for the
rest to live, the person who volunteers todie is exceeding his or her duty to theother students and performs an act ofsupererogation.
7/30/2019 Final Deontology
8/31
Moral Rules
Deontologists live in a universe ofmoral rules, such as:
It is wrong to kill innocent people
It is wrong to steal
It is wrong to tell lies
It is right to keep promises
7/30/2019 Final Deontology
9/31
Someone who follows Duty-based ethicsshould do the right thing, even if thatproduces more harm (or less good) than
doing the wrong thing.
People have a duty to do the right thing,even if it produces a bad result.
7/30/2019 Final Deontology
10/31
Deontological PhilosophiesThere are numerous formulations of deontological ethics :-
Contemporary deontologyPrinciple of Permissible Harm
Contemporary deontologists include Thomas Nagel, ThomasScanlon, Roger Scruton and Frances Kamm.
The Principle states that one may harm in order to save more ifand only if the harm is an effect or an aspect of the greater gooditself.
For instance, Kamm argues that we believe it would beimpermissible to kill one person to harvest his organs in order tosave the lives of five others
Yet, we think it is morally permissible to divert a runaway trolley thatwould otherwise kill five innocent and immobile people onto a side track
7/30/2019 Final Deontology
11/31
Divine command theory
Although not all Deontologists arereligious, some believe in The 'DivineCommand Theory.
The Divine Command Theory' is acluster of related theories that state
that an action is right if God hasdecreed that it is right.
7/30/2019 Final Deontology
12/31
Divine Command Theory
The Divine Command Theory is a formof deontology because, according to it,the rightness of any action dependsupon that action being performed
because it is a duty, not because of anygood consequences arising from thataction.
If God commands not to covet aneighbor's goods, this theory holds that itwould be immoral to do so, even ifcoveting provides the beneficial outcomeof a drive to succeed or do well.
7/30/2019 Final Deontology
13/31
Kantianism
Immanuel Kant (1724-1804)was arguably one of thegreatest philosophers of alltime.
Kant thought that it waspossible to develop aconsistent moral system byusing reason.
He was of the view that only anaction done for 'a good will'was a right action, regardlessof the consequences.
K ti i
7/30/2019 Final Deontology
14/31
Kantianism
Immanuel Kant
Immanuel Kant's theory of ethics isconsidered deontological for severaldifferent reasons.
First, Kant argues that to act in the morallyright way, people must act from duty.
Second, Kant argued that it was not the
consequences of actions that make themright or wrong but the motives of theperson who carries out the action.
Kant then argues that those things that areusually thought to be good, such
as intelligence, perseverance andpleasure, fail to be either intrinsically goodor good without qualification.
So, for example, the philosopher Kantthought that it would be wrong to tell a lie in
order to save a friend from a murderer.
7/30/2019 Final Deontology
15/31
Kant's Categorical Imperative
The categorical imperative comes in two versionswhich each emphasize different aspects of thecategorical imperative
1. Moral rules must be universalsable
Always act in such a way that you would bewilling for it to become a general law thateveryone else should do the same in the samesituation.
It means that one can't claim that something is avalid moral rule and make an exception to it formyself and my family and friends.
M l l t t h
7/30/2019 Final Deontology
16/31
Moral rules must respect human
beings
The second version of the categoricalimperative reflects this by emphasizing theimportance of treating people properly. It alsoacknowledges the relevance of intention in
morality.
Kant is saying that people should always betreated as valuable - as an end in themselves
- and should not just be used in order toachieve something else. They should not betricked, manipulated or bullied into doingthings.
7/30/2019 Final Deontology
17/31
Here are three examples of treatingpeople as means and not ends:
treating a person as if they were an
inanimate object coercing a person to get what you
want
deceiving a person to get what youwant
7/30/2019 Final Deontology
18/31
The importance of duty
Do the right thing for the right reason,because it is the right thing to do.
If we do something because we know it'sour duty, and if duty is the key element inour decision to act, then we have actedrightly, even if we wanted to do the act or
were too scared not to do it, or whatever.
7/30/2019 Final Deontology
19/31
Deontologist v/sConsequentalists If we compare Deontologists with
Consequentialists we can see thatConsequentialists begin by
considering what things are good, andidentify 'right' actions as the ones thatproduce the maximum of those good
things.
7/30/2019 Final Deontology
20/31
7/30/2019 Final Deontology
21/31
7/30/2019 Final Deontology
22/31
7/30/2019 Final Deontology
23/31
Business Ethics: A Theory-BasedDebate
It was recently reported that GeneralElectric, America's largest corporation,earned global profits of $14.2 billion in
2010.
It was also reported that, thanks to
some innovative accounting and theworld's best team of corporate taxlawyers, GE paid nothing in taxes.
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/03/25/business/economy/25tax.html?_r=2&scp=1&sq=corporate%20taxes&st=csehttp://www.ge.com/http://www.ge.com/http://www.ge.com/http://www.ge.com/http://www.nytimes.com/2011/03/25/business/economy/25tax.html?_r=2&scp=1&sq=corporate%20taxes&st=cse7/30/2019 Final Deontology
24/31
GE cannot consistently will that othersdo as they do - avoid taxes - if this is theresult, so in this case, GE is acting
unethically.
If we consider their maxim as
"benefit shareholders at all costs," it isentirely possible for GE to will thisconsistently in a free market society.
In this case, GE is acting ethically!
7/30/2019 Final Deontology
25/31
In this case, when GE reduces its taxexpenses, it can afford to pay higherstock dividends to its millions of
shareholders.
Yet had GE paid its taxes, the
government could have used therevenue for public goods, like roadsand schools.
7/30/2019 Final Deontology
26/31
The utilitarian calculus favors thesmall good enjoyed by many people(roads and schools) over the slightly
larger good enjoyed by few (dividendsfor shareholders).
Therefore, according to utilitarianism,General Electric is acting unethically.
7/30/2019 Final Deontology
27/31
Lack of Clear Guidance -Deontology
One weakness of this theory is thatthere is no rationale or logical basis fordeciding an individual's duties.
Deontology is not concerned with thewelfare of others.
For instance, if the deontologist whomust be on time to meetings isrunning late, how is he supposed to
drive?
7/30/2019 Final Deontology
28/31
This scenario of conflicting obligationsdoes not lead us to a clear ethicallycorrect resolution nor does it protect thewelfare of others from the deontologist's
decision.
A big disadvantage is that a deontologist
may not violate a duty to prevent severalviolations caused by other people, andthis is often called the "paradox ofdeontological constraints"
7/30/2019 Final Deontology
29/31
Robert Nozickargued that because it islogical to attempt to minimize violationsof rights, deontological ethics istherefore incoherent becausedeontologists constrain themselves fromprohibiting such attempts. He citesthe trolley problem as an example of
how deontological ethics is immoral.
Jeremy Bentham criticized deontologyon the grounds that it is a subjectiveo inion.
7/30/2019 Final Deontology
30/31
Shelly Kagan argues that underdeontology, individuals are boundby constraints (such as the requirement
not to murder), but are alsogiven options (such as the right not togive money to charity, if they do not
wish to).
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shelly_Kaganhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shelly_Kaganhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shelly_Kagan7/30/2019 Final Deontology
31/31
A good example was presented byProfessor Turner, where adeontologist would not kill Hitler
knowing the man would beresponsible for killing millions of otherpeople.
Top Related