7/22/2019 Ethics in Government Procurement1314 2
1/106
1
Ethics in Government Procurement
Presented by Paul EmanuelliCounsel
Province of Ontario
7/22/2019 Ethics in Government Procurement1314 2
2/106
Paul Emanuelli 2
Disclaimer(This is Not Official Policy)
This discussion (a) does not reflect the views of any past orpresent employers or clients and (b) is for general informationand reference purposes only.
These materials include a consolidation of independentlywritten original works including content excerpted from theforthcoming book entitled Government Procurement to be
published in 2005 by LexisNexis Butterworths.
Comments can be directed [email protected]
Paul Emanuelli, 2000-2005. All rights reserved.
mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]7/22/2019 Ethics in Government Procurement1314 2
3/106
Paul Emanuelli 3
Ethics in Government Procurement
Introduction
The Ethics Revolution
Public Policy OptionsEthics and Current Practices
The Clean Tender Doctrine
Governing Principles in Conflict of Interest
Six Conflict of Interest Case Studies
7/22/2019 Ethics in Government Procurement1314 2
4/106
Paul Emanuelli 4
Introduction(Ethics Scandal Rocks Prime Ministers Office)
An election was imminent. The opposition wason the verge of seizing key seats in Ontario andQuebec. The government was under threat of
losing its grip on power. It was in desperateneed of campaign funds. A private companymade a generous $360 000.00 contribution tothe campaign war chest that helped bankroll thegovernments successful re-election bid. Afterthe election that company was awarded alucrative government construction contract.
7/22/2019 Ethics in Government Procurement1314 2
5/106
Paul Emanuelli 5
Introduction(Ethics Scandal Rocks Prime Ministers Office)
A scandal erupted when news of the dealbecame public. With the details appearing in the
opposition-friendly papers, the Prime Ministerwas in damage control mode. He struck a royalcommission to investigate the matter. But itwas too late. The damage was done. The dealfell through and the government was forced to
resign.
7/22/2019 Ethics in Government Procurement1314 2
6/106
Paul Emanuelli 6
Introduction(The More Things Change)
The government contract in question was therailway construction deal awarded to theCanadian Pacific Railway Company. The year
was 1873. The Prime Minister was John A.Macdonald.
As the Pacific Scandal illustrates, governmentprocurement controversies can bring down the
best of them. Even the Fathers ofConfederation were not immune.
see P.B. Waite, Pacific Scandal, The Canadian Encyclopedia, Year 2000 Edition (1999)
7/22/2019 Ethics in Government Procurement1314 2
7/106
Paul Emanuelli 7
Introduction(Good Government: A Fundamental Principle)
The paramount importance of good governmentis firmly entrenched in our political fabric.Reactions to spending improprieties run as deepin our political psyche as the memories runlong. Public officials who run on the wrong sideof these rules do so at their peril. Today,computer and advertising contracts may havereplaced railway construction deals as the
subject of controversy, but accountability forproper government spending remains a matterof national importance.
7/22/2019 Ethics in Government Procurement1314 2
8/106
Paul Emanuelli 8
The Ethics Revolution(Business Scandals and Public Inquiries)
Today its no coincidence that major tradetreaties like the Agreement on Government
Procurement, the North American Free TradeAgreement and the Agreement on InternalTrade all have government procurementchapters aimed at promoting open, ethical andtransparent practices and that statutes like theU.S. Sarbanes-Oxley Actput a new premium on
the accountability of publicly traded companies.The ethics revolution has arrived.
7/22/2019 Ethics in Government Procurement1314 2
9/106
Paul Emanuelli 9
The Ethics Revolution(SOX A Response to Business Scandals)
The full title of Sarbanes-Oxley is An Act toprotect investors by improving the accuracyand reliability of corporate disclosures made
pursuant to the securities laws, and for otherpurposes. The long title reflects the bigproblem that shook investor confidence as thetechnology boom of the nineties burst into the
business scandals of the new millennium. Thescope of Sarbanes-Oxley is broad. Its
implications are as far reaching as they arecomplex.
7/22/2019 Ethics in Government Procurement1314 2
10/106
Paul Emanuelli 10
The Ethics Revolution(Ripple Effects in an Interconnected Economy)
Canadian purchasers are feeling the ripple
effects as U.S. suppliers adapt to stringent new
revenue recognition requirements. These rippleeffects are an inevitable result of our
increasingly inter-connected global economy.
In turn, government suppliers may be feeling
the effects of increased concerns over ethics in
government procurement.
7/22/2019 Ethics in Government Procurement1314 2
11/106
Paul Emanuelli 11
The Ethics Revolution(SOX A Response to Gatekeepers Falling Down on the Job)
Sarbanes-Oxley represents a significant increase inregulation and includes a broad range of rulesregarding corporate oversight boards, auditorindependence, internal corporate governance, publicdisclosure responsibilities and conflict of interest. AsU.S. Securities Exchange Commissioner Cynthia A.Glassman stated in Washington D.C. on April 7,2003 in a speech to the National Economists Club:
Sarbanes-Oxley was enacted last summer in response to financial
frauds at Enron, WorldCom and other corporations and the realizationthat many of the gatekeepers responsible for preventing fraud hadfallen down on the job.Congress recognized that dramatic steps wereneeded to right the system and restore investor confidence.
7/22/2019 Ethics in Government Procurement1314 2
12/106
Paul Emanuelli 12
The Ethics Revolution(The Naked Truth: Transparency Is Key)
As a means of increasing investor confidenceby promoting the disclosure of more accurateinformation, the Sarbanes-Oxley regime draws
significant attention to how companies reporttheir revenues. As Glassman stated in London,England on February 17, 2004:
clarity and transparency promote better behaviour. People
think twice about what they are doing if the naked truth isstaring themand the rest of the worldin the face.
7/22/2019 Ethics in Government Procurement1314 2
13/106
7/22/2019 Ethics in Government Procurement1314 2
14/106
Paul Emanuelli 14
The Ethics Revolution(Delivering the Verdict)
Ebbers guilty on all 9 counts
In a decision sure to unnerve other CEOs accused of ignoringcriminal misbehaviour, a jury in Manhattan declared former
WorldCom CEO Bernie Ebbers guilty Tuesday of being part of ahuge accounting fraud at the company now known as MCI.
The guilty verdictson all nine countswere the biggest victoryto date for federal prosecutors since they began cracking down onhigh-level white-collar crime after the collapse of Enron in 2001.
Ebbers will likely get up to 25 years in prison under federalsentencing guidelines, which could effectively turn the penaltyinto a life sentence for the 63-year-old WorldCom founder.
USA Today, March 15, 2005
7/22/2019 Ethics in Government Procurement1314 2
15/106
Paul Emanuelli 15
The Ethics Revolution(Financing in a Fishbowl)
After Bernie, Whos Next?
Ebbers conviction reflects a new calculus for corner-officeoccupants: that corporate crime may finally equate to lengthy
prison terms.
If shareholders lawsuits arentenough to scare execs straight,they also face a raft of new regulations. Under the Sarbanes-Oxley law, chief executives must now personally sign-off onfinancial statements. Auditors are poking around with greater
impunity, and public companies must certify that theyredocumenting and testing internal accounting procedures,resulting in anunprecedented level of scrutinyfor investors,according to a recent report by Huron Consulting.
Time Magazine, March 28, 2005
7/22/2019 Ethics in Government Procurement1314 2
16/106
Paul Emanuelli 16
The Ethics Revolution(Laying Down the Law)
Ebbers' sentence a strong deterrent
Last weeks sentencing of former WorldCom boss BernardEbbers to 25 years in prison closes the legal book on the
network industry's most notorious and damaging case ofaccounting fraud, pending the inevitable appeals.
One law professor says recent moves by prosecutors to goafter corporate criminals, as well as legislation such asSarbanes-Oxley, designed to keep public companies' accountingbooks in order, are deterrents to white-collar crime.
Network World, July 18, 2005
http://www.networkworld.com/news/2005/071805-ebbers.html
7/22/2019 Ethics in Government Procurement1314 2
17/106
Paul Emanuelli 17
The Ethics Revolution(Advanced Studies in Business Ethics)
Ebbers' sentence a strong deterrent
Casesinvolving Enron, WorldCom and Tyco have increased awarenessof corporate governance and business ethics among companies, says
David Balderson, director of Corporate Learning Services, a division ofNew York University's School of Continuing and Professional Studies.Balderson's group developed MCI's ethics training in 2003, which allemployees are required to complete. Since then, Balderson says thenumber of companies that seek such training has grown exponentially.
In fact, NYU says it just got an RFP from a Fortune 100 company with
more than 20,000 employees to create an ethics-training program.
Ebbers is scheduled to report to federal prison Oct. 12.
Network World, July 18, 2005
http://www.networkworld.com/news/2005/071805-ebbers.html
7/22/2019 Ethics in Government Procurement1314 2
18/106
7/22/2019 Ethics in Government Procurement1314 2
19/106
Paul Emanuelli 19
The Ethics Revolution(Sponsorship Scandal A Big Hit in Quebec)
In Quebec, the sponsorship scandal gave new meaningto studiesin fiscal federalism:
Inquirydrives TV ratings, newspaper sales
Theinquiry has become an unprecedented TV hitRDI, theprovincesFrench-language equivalent to CBC Newsworld, has seen its ratings soarfrom 25,000 to 185,000 a day.
Meanwhile, the commissions clerks are clearly expecting another
blizzard of evidence. They have brought in more bookshelves, to add tothe ever-growing tower of evidence.
Toronto Star, March 26, 2005
7/22/2019 Ethics in Government Procurement1314 2
20/106
Paul Emanuelli 20
The Ethics Revolution(City Hall Paper Chase)
Shocking city probe wraps up
As documented in the Toronto Sun, initial estimatespredicated that the Toronto Computer Leasing
Inquiry would involve just one filing cabinet ofdocuments and 40 days of hearings.
At the end of the day, hearings lasted 2.5 years,cost $19.2 million, involved 64 lawyers, and saw
124,000 pages of filed documents.
Toronto Sun, January 28, 2005
7/22/2019 Ethics in Government Procurement1314 2
21/106
Paul Emanuelli 21
The Ethics Revolution(Meanwhile in other news)
While the Toronto Computer Leasing Inquiry andthe Sponsorship Scandal may have received themost media attention, they are far from the only
recent government procurement stories to make thenews.
The following survey of articles provides asampling of other recent stories that illustrate the
increasing scrutiny placed on governmentprocurement by the media.
7/22/2019 Ethics in Government Procurement1314 2
22/106
Paul Emanuelli 22
The Ethics Revolution(Procurement Rules Too Complex for Taxman)
Taxman breaking own rules: CanadaRevenue Agency found to be ignor ing
purchasing regs
Procurement rulesare seen by many in theorganization as unduly cumbersome and mayfrequently be overlookedManagers complained therules are complexanddifficult to understand.
Barrie Examiner, February 15, 2005
7/22/2019 Ethics in Government Procurement1314 2
23/106
Paul Emanuelli 23
The Ethics Revolution(Mailman Slips Up On Tender Deadline)
Union urges Canada Post
to clean up procurement
Following a July 2004 audit by Deloitte & Touche, theCanadian Union of Postal Workers called on CanadaPost to deal with its procurement irregularities. As
purchasing b2b reported:
Theauditfound Canada Post failed to comply with policy on 355 outof 599 transactionsIn one case, the winning supplier submitted its bidtwo months after the competition had closed
purchasing b2b, May 2005
7/22/2019 Ethics in Government Procurement1314 2
24/106
Paul Emanuelli 24
The Ethics Revolution(BC Bid Shopping)
Bid Shopping by ministry held nefariousconduct, basis for $100,000 damages
As reported inLawyers Weekly on August 20, 2004, the BC
government was ordered to pay $100,000 in damages afterengaging in post-close bid shopping. In its July 2004
judgment in Stanco Projects Ltd. v. British Columbia, theBC Supreme Court stated:
A tendering authority ought not to be entitled to contemporaneously purport toadhere to the tendering model and enjoy the benefits flowing from it and, oncethe bids have been revealed and are under consideration, to unilaterallyimplement the contrasting model of free bargaining.
7/22/2019 Ethics in Government Procurement1314 2
25/106
7/22/2019 Ethics in Government Procurement1314 2
26/106
Paul Emanuelli 26
The Ethics Revolution(A Philadelphia Story)
High-Ranking Philly Official ConvictedPhiladelphias former treasurer [was] convicted inaprobe targeting what U.S. Attorney PatrickMeehancalled a culture of corruption in Philadelphia
city government.Associated Press, May 10, 2005
Judge Suggests New Corruption, Ethics LawDistrict Judge Michael Baylson saidthe trial raised
difficult questions about the policing of governmentofficialsCityand state laws limit the gifts and financialbenefits public employees may receive, but.there isreally no enforcement of those laws whatsoever.
Associated Press, May 10, 2005
7/22/2019 Ethics in Government Procurement1314 2
27/106
7/22/2019 Ethics in Government Procurement1314 2
28/106
7/22/2019 Ethics in Government Procurement1314 2
29/106
Paul Emanuelli 29
The Ethics Revolution(Procurement Law a Growth Area)
'Bitter bidders' now tending to seek redress
This increasingly litigious environment was recently
noted in the Globe and MailsReport on Business:
Welcome to a phenomenon litigators are calling the rise of the "bitterbidder" -- suppliers who are exercising their legal right to a fair andtransparent tendering process. It's all adding up to brisk business forlitigators experienced in the complex and rapidly evolving field of
procurement legislation.
Globe and Mail, August 24, 2005
7/22/2019 Ethics in Government Procurement1314 2
30/106
Paul Emanuelli 30
Policy Options(Filling the Credibility Gap)
While isolated incidents should cast no shadowon decades of work performed by the
procurement professionals who have built a top
tier public procurement system in Canada, thereis an increasing dissonance between that hardearned reputation and public perceptions. Thiscredibility gap needs to be addressed andconfidence in public sector spending reinforced.Public institutions have a broad range of options
for bolstering confidence in public sectorprocurement.
7/22/2019 Ethics in Government Procurement1314 2
31/106
Paul Emanuelli 31
Policy Options(Six Steps to Empowered Procurement)
To build the winning procurement conditions, publicinstitutions should consider the following sixmeasures:
1. create common centralized rules and practices;
2. define clear roles and responsibilities within the organization;
3. establish independent external oversight of procurement activities;
4. promote values-based procurement and internal checks and balances;
5. empower innovation within the organization; and
6. create a broad range of flexible procurement tools.
Paul Emanuelli Practical Considerations, Government Procurement, (Toronto: LexisNexis Butterworths, 2005)
7/22/2019 Ethics in Government Procurement1314 2
32/106
Paul Emanuelli 32
Policy Options(Proactive Leadership and Transparency)
No procurement team can perform to its full
potential unless its management helps establish
winning conditions. The failure to create andmaintain winning conditions can undermine
prudent spending practices, can have an adverse
impact on the reputation of public institutions and
can undermine public confidence in those
institutions.
7/22/2019 Ethics in Government Procurement1314 2
33/106
Paul Emanuelli 33
Policy Options(Proactive Leadership and Transparency)
Proper macro-procurement planning calls for proactiveleadership at the senior levels of a public institution.As Jean Au Yeung, Assistant Director of Hong Kongs
Independent Commission Against Corruption statesgovernments determination and support is the firstand foremost factor in the successful fight againstcorruption. In Hong Kong that determination wasreflected by legislative action that placed a statutory
duty on the Commission to proactively examinegovernment departments and weed out any proceduresthat could be conducive to corrupt practices.
7/22/2019 Ethics in Government Procurement1314 2
34/106
7/22/2019 Ethics in Government Procurement1314 2
35/106
Paul Emanuelli 35
Policy Options(Common Centralized Rules and Practices)
A procurement organization should createconsistency and remove duplication through theimplementation of common centralized governingrules and practices. Striking the delicate balance
between centralization and decentralizationrequires strategic planning and oversight. Whiletotal decentralization can lead to significantinefficiency, duplication, inconsistency and waste,too much centralization can lead to decision-
making gridlock, artificial standardization and theerosion of independent decision-making bysubject matter experts.
7/22/2019 Ethics in Government Procurement1314 2
36/106
7/22/2019 Ethics in Government Procurement1314 2
37/106
Paul Emanuelli 37
Policy Options(Clear Roles Definition)
A procurement organization should promoteaccountability and clarity by establishing a clearand comprehensive set of roles and
responsibilities within the institution including aclear division of roles between: (i) electedofficials; (ii) senior management officialsresponsible for establishing and enforcingcompliance with procurement rules; and (iii) front-line procurement professionals responsible for
specific procurement processes.
7/22/2019 Ethics in Government Procurement1314 2
38/106
Paul Emanuelli 38
Policy Options(Clear Roles Definition)
The Toronto Computer Leasing Inquiry released anine-hundred page multi-volume background
paper (the Toronto Report) that focused onprocurement practices, conflict of interest,lobbying and municipal governance. One of itskey recommendations was the need to clarifyappropriate delegation rules for government
procurement staff and hands-off policies forelected officials.
7/22/2019 Ethics in Government Procurement1314 2
39/106
Paul Emanuelli 39
Policy Options(Clear Roles Definition)
The Toronto Report noted that at City Hall thedividing line is blurred from both the politicaland administrative ends of the spectrum and
emphasised the need to establish an appropriatebalance of roles and responsibilities betweengovernors and managers that is accepted in theoryand implemented in practice.
Background Papers Prepared for the Inquiry by the Executive Research Group
http://www.torontoinquiry.ca/gg/index.html
7/22/2019 Ethics in Government Procurement1314 2
40/106
Paul Emanuelli 40
Policy Options(Independent External Oversight)
A procurement organization should establishtransparent practices which include: (i) external
oversight mechanisms that provide checks-and-balances to guard against inefficiencies andabuses; and (ii) clear rules aimed at protecting theintegrity of the procurement process by addressingissues such as conflict of interest, unfair advantage
and the lobbying of public officials to influencecontract award decisions.
7/22/2019 Ethics in Government Procurement1314 2
41/106
7/22/2019 Ethics in Government Procurement1314 2
42/106
Paul Emanuelli 42
Policy Options(Independent External OversightSpecial Offices)
As the U.S. Center for Democracy andGovernance states in its Handbook for FightingCorruption, independent government offices such
as inspector generals, ombudsmen and anti-corruption agencies improve accountability byoverseeing government operations. In general,they look into allegations of mismanagement andreview administrative systems to ensure theyadhere to anti-corruption procedures.*
*Center for Democracy and Governance, A Handbook on Fighting Corruption (February 1999)(http://www.usaid.gov/our_work/democracy_and_governance/publications/pdfs/pnace070.pdf), p.10.
http://www.usaid.gov/our_work/democracy_and_governance/publications/pdfs/pnace070.pdfhttp://www.usaid.gov/our_work/democracy_and_governance/publications/pdfs/pnace070.pdf7/22/2019 Ethics in Government Procurement1314 2
43/106
Paul Emanuelli 43
Policy Options(Independent External OversightLegislative Oversight)
In addition to such arms-length oversight bodies,the Center also recognizes the need for legislative
branch oversight of government activities, noting
that such oversight providesa powerful check onexecutive authority, enhancing accountabilitywhere a dominant executive branch mightotherwise operate with impunity.*
* Center for Democracy and Governance,A Handbook on Fighting Corruption (February 1999)(http://www.usaid.gov/our_work/democracy_and_governance/publications/pdfs/pnace070.pdf) ,
p.10.
http://www.usaid.gov/our_work/democracy_and_governance/publications/pdfs/pnace070.pdfhttp://www.usaid.gov/our_work/democracy_and_governance/publications/pdfs/pnace070.pdf7/22/2019 Ethics in Government Procurement1314 2
44/106
Paul Emanuelli 44
Policy Options(Independent External OversightAuditors Report)
Independent oversight is critical to keeping executivepower in check. By way of example, in its November2003 report, the Auditor General of Canada foundthat from 1997 to August 2001:
the federal government ran the Sponsorship Program in a way thatshowed little regard for Parliament, the Financial Administration Act,contracting rules and regulations, transparency, and value for money:
Parliament was not informed of the program's objectives or the resultsit achieved and was misinformed as to how the program was beingmanaged.
7/22/2019 Ethics in Government Procurement1314 2
45/106
7/22/2019 Ethics in Government Procurement1314 2
46/106
Paul Emanuelli 46
Policy Options(Independent External OversightAuditors Report)
Documentation was very poor and there was little evidence ofanalysis to support the expenditure of more than $250 million. Over$100 million of that was paid to communications agencies asproduction fees and commissions.
Oversight mechanisms and essential controls at Public Works andGovernment Services Canada failed to detect, prevent, or reportviolations.
Auditor General of Canada,
Government-Wide Audit of Sponsorship, Advertising, and Public Opinion Research (November 2003)(http://www.oag-bvg.gc.ca/domino/reports.nsf/html/20031103ce.html),
The Sponsorship Program, at 3.1.
http://www.oag-bvg.gc.ca/domino/reports.nsf/html/20031103ce.htmlhttp://www.oag-bvg.gc.ca/domino/reports.nsf/html/20031103ce.htmlhttp://www.oag-bvg.gc.ca/domino/reports.nsf/html/20031103ce.htmlhttp://www.oag-bvg.gc.ca/domino/reports.nsf/html/20031103ce.html7/22/2019 Ethics in Government Procurement1314 2
47/106
7/22/2019 Ethics in Government Procurement1314 2
48/106
Paul Emanuelli 48
Policy Options(Independent External OversightBroader Implementation)
Making the operations of all public institutionsmore transparent and subject to similar
independent oversight can serve as a deterrentagainst procurement irregularities, can help todetect those irregularities when they are presentand can help bolster public confidence ingovernment procurement practices.
7/22/2019 Ethics in Government Procurement1314 2
49/106
Paul Emanuelli 49
Policy Options(Values Based Procurement & Internal Checks and Balances)
A procurement organization should encouragevalues-based procurement by promoting a
culture of ethics within the institution whichincludes: (i) mechanisms for internal regulation,reporting and self-governance; and (ii)measures to protect the security of tenure ofemployees responsible for enforcing internalgovernance rules.
7/22/2019 Ethics in Government Procurement1314 2
50/106
7/22/2019 Ethics in Government Procurement1314 2
51/106
Paul Emanuelli 51
Policy Options(Values Based Procurement & Internal Checks and Balances)
A clear code of conduct is a key component forpromoting a culture of ethics within a procurementorganization. In its Practical Guide to Corruption
Prevention, AustraliasNew South Wales IndependentCommission Against Corruption recognizes that:
a code of conduct is an important management tool which canpositively shape the culture of an organization. Many organizations havefound that adopting a clearly defined approach to ethical issues improves
the organizations reputation, helps to develop pride among staff and isgood for business.
7/22/2019 Ethics in Government Procurement1314 2
52/106
7/22/2019 Ethics in Government Procurement1314 2
53/106
Paul Emanuelli 53
Policy Options(Empowering Innovation)
A procurement organization shouldempower a culture of innovation andimprovement by ensuring: (i) adequate
staffing and resources to properly manageall phases of the procurement cycle; (ii)adequate training to all levels of
procurement staff; and (iii) sufficientdiscretion to enable procurement staff to
exercise independent judgement indecision-making.
7/22/2019 Ethics in Government Procurement1314 2
54/106
7/22/2019 Ethics in Government Procurement1314 2
55/106
Paul Emanuelli 55
Policy Options(Empowering InnovationIn the Public Interest)
public money is money held in trustfor the benefit of all Canadians. As aconsequence, the government has an
obligation to ensure that the money ismanaged prudently in support of the general
public interest. It also means that thegovernment must seek to obtain maximumvalue for the dollars spent.
Government Spending Should Be Managed With Probity and Efficiency
2000 Report of the Auditor General of Canada
7/22/2019 Ethics in Government Procurement1314 2
56/106
Paul Emanuelli 56
Policy Options(Empowering InnovationCalls for Proper Training)
Collectively, public institutions in Canada
spend billions of dollars annually. It should
be a self-evident proposition that thoseresponsible for spending such vast amounts
of public resources should have access to the
necessary training to ensure value-for-money
and the protection of the public interest.
l
7/22/2019 Ethics in Government Procurement1314 2
57/106
Paul Emanuelli 57
Policy Options(Empowering InnovationCalls for Proper Staffing)
Another critical component of prudentprocurement is the proper allocation of
resources and staff for all phases of theprocurement process. This calls for theallocation of proper resources to the
planning, competition, contract award andcontract management phases of the
procurement cycle.
l O
7/22/2019 Ethics in Government Procurement1314 2
58/106
Paul Emanuelli 58
Policy Options(Creating a Broad Range of Procurement Tools)
A procurement organization should enable
tactical flexibility by establishing a
diverse and varied framework of
procurement tools and by providing
procurement staff the flexibility to
determine which approach best meets their
specific objectives.
P li O i
7/22/2019 Ethics in Government Procurement1314 2
59/106
Paul Emanuelli 59
Policy Options(Creating a Broad Range of Procurement Tools)
Canadian public sector purchasers tend to use the
formal legally binding tendering process as a
preferred method for procuring a wide range ofgoods and services. However, by doing so,
public institutions may in certain circumstances
be incurring unnecessary legal risks or may be
undermining their value-for-money objectives.
P li O ti
7/22/2019 Ethics in Government Procurement1314 2
60/106
Paul Emanuelli 60
Policy Options(Creating a Broad Range of Procurement Tools)
Purchasers should always assess the suitability
of their procurement format to the particular
situation. Determining the appropriate methodof procurement based on a broad range of
options and an analysis of the specific
circumstances is a crucial step in the proper
planning of a procurement strategy.
P li O ti
7/22/2019 Ethics in Government Procurement1314 2
61/106
Paul Emanuelli 61
Policy Options(Creating a Broad Range of Procurement Tools)
As the Toronto Good Government Report states:
The essential theme here is that nosingle purchasing method suits allsituations. In practical terms, this means that a government that relies
almost exclusively on the formal competitive process (i.e. an open,publicly advertised, sealed bid competitive process) for all purchasesover minimum thresholds will not be achieving value for money.Likewise, a government that relies almost exclusively on legitimate butmore informal approaches such as soliciting three quotes from known,competent suppliers will not be demonstrating the values of fairness,
equity, and openness.
Toronto Computer Leasing Inquiry, Toronto Computer Leasing Inquiry Research Paper(December 2003)(http://www.torontoinquiry.ca/gg/cip.html), Procurement,Volume 1: Common Risk Areas,p. 83.
P li O ti
http://www.torontoinquiry.ca/gg/cip.htmlhttp://www.torontoinquiry.ca/gg/cip.htmlhttp://www.torontoinquiry.ca/gg/cip.htmlhttp://www.torontoinquiry.ca/gg/cip.htmlhttp://www.torontoinquiry.ca/gg/cip.htmlhttp://www.torontoinquiry.ca/gg/cip.htmlhttp://www.torontoinquiry.ca/gg/cip.htmlhttp://www.torontoinquiry.ca/gg/cip.htmlhttp://www.torontoinquiry.ca/gg/cip.htmlhttp://www.torontoinquiry.ca/gg/cip.html7/22/2019 Ethics in Government Procurement1314 2
62/106
Paul Emanuelli 62
Policy Options(Creating a Broad Range of Procurement Tools)
Empowered procurement calls for a clearunderstanding of the benefits and legal obligationsthat apply to different procurement formats. Becauseof the inherent legal risks and restrictions created in
a formal legally binding bidding process, purchasersshould make informed decisions to assess whetherthat approach best meets their needs in the specificsituation or whether other open competitive formatsare better suited to their specific objectives. Some
of these different procurement formats are discussedin the subsequent slides dealing with Ethics andCurrent Practices.
7/22/2019 Ethics in Government Procurement1314 2
63/106
Paul Emanuelli 63
Ethics and Current Practices(Current PracticesPublic Policy Principles)
Many ethical procurement norms have alreadybeen entrenched in existing governmentprocurement practices. For example, many publicinstitutions already adhere to the following policy
principles when conducting their procurementprocesses:
o Transparency
o Value-for-money
o Trade liberalization
Ethi d C t P ti
7/22/2019 Ethics in Government Procurement1314 2
64/106
Paul Emanuelli 64
Ethics and Current Practices(Procurement Treaties)
The following trade treaties reflect these principles
by calling for open, competitive and non-
discriminatory government procurement procedures:
o The international Agreement on Government Procurement
(AGP)
o The continental North American Free Trade Agreement
(NAFTA)
o The domestic Agreement on Internal Trade (AIT)
Ethics and Current Practices
7/22/2019 Ethics in Government Procurement1314 2
65/106
Paul Emanuelli 65
Ethics and Current Practices(Measuring Up to International Standards)
Given our increasingly interconnected global
economy and the increased international
attention to transparent governmentprocurement, in the years to come we are
likely to see a proliferation of different
procurement formats tailored to the unique
challenges of particular industries.
7/22/2019 Ethics in Government Procurement1314 2
66/106
7/22/2019 Ethics in Government Procurement1314 2
67/106
Ethi d C t P ti
7/22/2019 Ethics in Government Procurement1314 2
68/106
Paul Emanuelli 68
Ethics and Current Practices(Three Default RFP Formats)
The UN Model Procurement Law recognizes threeequally acceptable RFP formats:
1. Selection Without Negotiation:the Invitation to Tender
style RFP format commonly used in the Canadian publicsector.
2. Selection With Simultaneous Negotiations:allows thepurchaser to negotiate with all bidders.
3. Selection With Consecutive Negotiations:allows thebidder to negotiate with the highest ranked bidder andproceed down the ranking until an agreement is reached.
Ethi d C t P ti
7/22/2019 Ethics in Government Procurement1314 2
69/106
Paul Emanuelli 69
Ethics and Current Practices(Recognized Alternative Formats)
The UN Model Procurement Law also recognizes anumber of legitimate alternative methods of procurementthat can be used in appropriate circumstances:
o Supplier Prequalification
o Alternative RFPo Two-Staged Tender Calls
o Competitive Negotiations (BAFO Process)
o Invitational Tendering
o Low-Value Request for Quotation
o Single-Source Procurements (Direct Awards)
Ethics and Current Practices
7/22/2019 Ethics in Government Procurement1314 2
70/106
Paul Emanuelli 70
Ethics and Current Practices(Law of Tendering vs. Law of Direct Negotiations)
The formal tendering process can create anumber of implied legal obligations that do nottypically apply to traditional negotiations.These additional duties generally arise when a
bidder submits a compliant tender in responseto an irrevocable tender call. When thishappens, the parties are said to create ContractA, the notional pre-execution contract firstrecognized by the Supreme Court of Canada in
1981 in Ontario v. Ron Engineering (RonEngineering).
Ethics and Current Practices
7/22/2019 Ethics in Government Procurement1314 2
71/106
Paul Emanuelli 71
Ethics and Current Practices(Duty of Fairness)
To maintain the integrity of the biddingprocess the courts have also relied on thedoctrine of fairness as a basis for applyingimplied duties to the purchaser:
...in the years since Ron Engineering, the Supreme Courtsmodel has been buttressed by a growing expectation of probityin the pre-award phase of the tendering process. Theunderlying principle has been variously expressed as a standardof good faith, or a duty of fairness or reasonableness...in
whatever form it is cast, the owner is subject to somecommonly acknowledged constraints.
P. Devonshire, Osgoode Hall Law Journal, 1998
7/22/2019 Ethics in Government Procurement1314 2
72/106
Ethics and Current Practices
7/22/2019 Ethics in Government Procurement1314 2
73/106
Paul Emanuelli 73
Ethics and Current Practices(Two Paradigms, Two Distinct Types of Rules)
In its 2000 decision in Martel Building Ltd. v.
Canada, the Supreme Court of Canada
recognized the need for fairness in formaltendering and stated that implying an
obligation to treat all bidders fairly and equally
is consistent with the goal of protecting and
promoting the integrity of the bidding process,and benefits all participants involved.
Ethics and Current Practices
7/22/2019 Ethics in Government Procurement1314 2
74/106
Paul Emanuelli 74
Ethics and Current Practices(Traditional Negotiation Rules)
However, in that same decision, the Supreme
Court refused to add new duties to parties
negotiating commercial contracts outside of the
formal tendering framework. The reasons cited
by the Supreme Court clearly reflect how the
rules that apply to traditional commercial
negotiations are distinct from those that apply
to a formal binding tendering process.
Ethics and Current Practices
7/22/2019 Ethics in Government Procurement1314 2
75/106
Paul Emanuelli 75
Ethics and Current Practices(Avoiding Indeterminate Liability in Negotiations)
The Supreme Court declined to applying a dutyof care to direct commercial negotiations,stating that the scopeof indeterminate liabilityremains a significant concern underlying anyanalysis of whether to extend the sphere ofrecovery for economic loss.* In other words,the Supreme Court was reluctant to expand thescope of potential legal liabilities in situationswhere parties were involved in direct
negotiations.
*Martel Building Ltd. v. Canada(2000-11-30) SCC, para. 57.
Ethics and Current Practices
7/22/2019 Ethics in Government Procurement1314 2
76/106
Paul Emanuelli 76
Ethics and Current Practices(Five Ancillary Policy Reasons)
The Supreme Court offered five compellingancillary policy reasons for not applying a dutyof care to negotiations:
#1: Negotiations an Adversarial Zero-Sum Game
#2: Encourage Independent Market Research
#3: Promote Due Diligence
#4: Use Existing Common Law Remedies
#5: Discourage Litigation
Ethics and Current Practices
7/22/2019 Ethics in Government Procurement1314 2
77/106
Paul Emanuelli 77
Ethics and Current Practices(Selecting the Appropriate Procurement Paradigm)
As the Supreme Court noted in its 1999 decisionin M.J.B. Enterprises Ltd. v. DefenceConstruction (1951) Ltd., the creation ofContract A depends upon whether the partiesintended to initiate contractual relations by thesubmission of a bid in response to the invitationto tender. The Supreme Court reiterated thisconclusion inMartel where it held that whetherthe tendering process creates a preliminary
contract is dependent upon the terms andconditions of the tender call.
Ethics and Current Practices
7/22/2019 Ethics in Government Procurement1314 2
78/106
Paul Emanuelli 78
Ethics and Current Practices(Indicators of Purchasers Intention)
The courts have relied on a number of factors todetermine whether a purchaser intended to createContract A and be bound by the duty of fairness:
the use of traditional tendering terms and phrases
rules with sanctions attached (e.g., late tenders disqualified)
formal compliance standards (e.g., technical compliance)
structured evaluations (e.g., stages, a scoring matrix)
provisions that bind the bidder (e.g., irrevocability period) pre-established performance terms that replace negotiation
7/22/2019 Ethics in Government Procurement1314 2
79/106
Ethics and Current Practices
7/22/2019 Ethics in Government Procurement1314 2
80/106
Paul Emanuelli 80
Ethics and Current Practices(Selecting the Appropriate RFP FormatPolicy Decision)
As recognized by the Supreme Court of Canada,not every type of tender call triggers Contract A.At common law purchasers can elect to govern
themselves by the law of traditional negotiations,as long as they avoid the traditional Contract Aindicators. The negotiated RFP formatsrecognized in the UN Model Procurement Laware compatible with such an approach.
Ultimately, it is up to purchasing institutions toutilize the appropriate RFP format as a matter ofprocurement policy and practice.
Ethics and Current Practices
7/22/2019 Ethics in Government Procurement1314 2
81/106
Paul Emanuelli 81
Ethics and Current Practices(Transparency in Selection of Procurement Paradigm)
The selection of a procurement format shouldbe a conscious, informed and transparentdecision that clearly indicates to bidderswhether the particular process will beconducted under the binding tendering
paradigm or a negotiated paradigm. Once aparadigm is selected, mid-process paradigmshifts between the binding tendering model and
the negotiated model should generally beavoided.
The Clean Tender Doctrine
7/22/2019 Ethics in Government Procurement1314 2
82/106
Paul Emanuelli 82
The Clean Tender Doctrine(Non-Compliant Tenders Are Out of Play)
Over the last quarter century, the clean tenderdoctrine has been one of the most significant legalfactors impacting government procurement. Theclean tender doctrine is shorthand for the legal
principle that restricts the field of play in formalbinding tendering competitions to compliantbidders. Non-compliant tenders are seen to be outof bounds and ineligible for contract award.Purchasers do not typically owe those non-
compliant bidders any tendering law duties andcannot typically compel those non-compliantbidders to honour their tenders.
The Clean Tender Doctrine
7/22/2019 Ethics in Government Procurement1314 2
83/106
Paul Emanuelli 83
The Clean Tender Doctrine(The Three Heads of Clean Tender Doctrine)
The clean tender doctrine has had a widespread effecton the rights of both purchasers and bidders,manifesting itself in the following ways:
Non-Compliance as Bidder Sword: Unsuccessful bidders launchingsuccessful claims against purchasers on the grounds that the contract wasimproperly awarded to a non-compliant competing bidder.
Non-Compliance as Purchaser Shield: Defendant purchaserssuccessfully shifting the issue by showing that the plaintiff bidderstender was non-compliant and the bidder was therefore ineligible for
tendering law remedies.
Non-Compliance as Bidder Shield: Defendant bidders successfullyrelying on their own non-compliance, asserting that they cannot be liablefor failing to honour a tender that was never legally capable ofacceptance.
The Clean Tender Doctrine
7/22/2019 Ethics in Government Procurement1314 2
84/106
Paul Emanuelli 84
The Clean Tender Doctrine(Counter-Assertions of Non-Compliance)
The March 2005 decision of the Alberta Court ofAppeal in Double N Earthmovers v. Edmonton(City)offers a recent case study. In this case the
plaintiff bidder and defendant purchaser bothinvoked the clean tender doctrine in theirrespective appeal and cross-appeal. The caseinvolved a municipal tender call for heavy refusemoving equipment. The plaintiff bidder claimed
that the contract was awarded to a non-compliantcompetitor.
The Clean Tender Doctrine
7/22/2019 Ethics in Government Procurement1314 2
85/106
Paul Emanuelli 85
The Clean Tender Doctrine(Plaintiff Establishes its Compliance)
In its defence, the purchaser asserted that theplaintiff bidders tender was non-compliant.The purchaser argued that the bidders non-
compliance took it out of play and made itineligible for a legal remedy. However, theCourt found that the plaintiff bidder hadsubmitted a compliant tender. Havingestablished its own compliance, the biddersuccessfully circumvented thepurchasersinitialline of defence.
7/22/2019 Ethics in Government Procurement1314 2
86/106
The Clean Tender Doctrine
7/22/2019 Ethics in Government Procurement1314 2
87/106
Paul Emanuelli 87
The Clean Tender Doctrine(A Telecommunications Case Study)
The July 2004 determination of the Canadian
International Trade Tribunal in Bell Mobility v.
Department of Public Works and GovernmentServices offers another example of the clean tender
doctrines impact on procurement disputes. The
case involved a government RFP for the provision
of mobile wireless devices and services.
The Clean Tender Doctrine
7/22/2019 Ethics in Government Procurement1314 2
88/106
Paul Emanuelli 88
(Tender Comes Unwired on a Clerical Error)
The government rejected the Bell Mobility
bid because of a discrepancy between theservice hours required in the RFP and those
proposed in Bells tender. Bell asserted that
this was a mere clerical error that could be
clarified after close.
7/22/2019 Ethics in Government Procurement1314 2
89/106
7/22/2019 Ethics in Government Procurement1314 2
90/106
Governing Principles for Conflict of Interest
7/22/2019 Ethics in Government Procurement1314 2
91/106
Paul Emanuelli 91
Governing Principles for Conflict of Interest
To maintain the integrity of the tendering process,
purchasers should avoid any conflict of interest or
unfair advantage. The following eight governingprinciples were distilled from a number of
tendering cases that considered these issues:
Governing Principles for Conflict of Interest
7/22/2019 Ethics in Government Procurement1314 2
92/106
Paul Emanuelli 92
Governing Principles for Conflict of Interest
1. In order to preserve the integrity of the biddingprocess, all parties should avoid any conflict ofinterest or unfair advantage.
2. Purchasers should ensure that no bidder has aconflict of interest or unfair advantage during atendering process. Purchasers may be compelled
to disqualify a bidder in order to preserve theintegrity of a bidding process.
l f fl f
7/22/2019 Ethics in Government Procurement1314 2
93/106
Paul Emanuelli 93
Governing Principles for Conflict of Interest
3. To better ensure that a decision to disqualify istransparent and defensible, purchasers shouldclearly define the circumstances that they would
consider to be an unfair advantage or conflict ofinterest.
4. A conflict of interest or unfair advantage can
flow from the purchasers conduct, or from thebiddersconduct, or both.
7/22/2019 Ethics in Government Procurement1314 2
94/106
Paul Emanuelli 94
Governing Principles for Conflict of Interest
5. Unfair advantage includes instances where abidder has an inside advantage on account ofaccess to specific information or decision-makersthat other bidders do not have access to.
6. Purchasers should ensure that their evaluationdecisions are made free from bias.
7/22/2019 Ethics in Government Procurement1314 2
95/106
Paul Emanuelli 95
Governing Principles for Conflict of Interest
7. Conflict of interest can arise within thepurchasing institution where a decision makersability to exercise impartial discretion in the publicinterest is compromised by that decision makers
personal interests.
8.Conflict of interest can arise on the part of thebidder in situations that compromise the bidders
ability to fairly engage in a tendering process or toproperly fulfill its duties if it is awarded a contract.
7/22/2019 Ethics in Government Procurement1314 2
96/106
Paul Emanuelli 96
Six Conflict of InterestCase Studies
The following cases provide some examples of theabove noted principles:
1. Wind Power Inc. v. Saskatchewan Power Corp
2. New Brunswick v.Wheeler3. Coughlin & Mayo v. Victoria (City)
4. Re Complaint Filed by Dollco Printing
5. Re Complaint Filed by Consortium Genivar-M3E-UniversiteDOttawa
6. Re Complaint Filed by J. Molson & Associates
#1 Wind Power Inc v Sask Power Corp
7/22/2019 Ethics in Government Procurement1314 2
97/106
Paul Emanuelli 97
#1 Wind Power Inc. v. Sask. Power Corp.(2002-04-10) SKCA
Some of the prevailing public policy principles
regarding ethical government procurement were
illustrated in the May 2002 Wind Power Inc. v.
Saskatchewan Power Corp. decision of theSaskatchewan Court of Appeal:
Theduty to treat all bidders fairly and equally is designed to ensure
that the owner does not extend an unfair advantage to any particular
tenderer in the bidding process. It is said that this policy promotes
economic efficiency and discourages corrupt tendering practices.
#2 New Brunswick v Wheeler
7/22/2019 Ethics in Government Procurement1314 2
98/106
Paul Emanuelli 98
#2 New Brunswick v.Wheeler(1979-03-30) SCC
In its March 1979 decision, New Brunswick v.Wheeler, the SCC determined that the Mayor ofMoncton should be removed from office onaccount of a conflict of interest. The Court notedthat there had been no attempt to conceal theconflict and that the Mayor had proceeded on theadvice from the City Solicitor and the NewBrunswick Department of Justice and that counsel
before us stated that the Mayor signed somecontracts both as Mayor of the city and as anofficer of the contracting company.
#2 New Brunswick v. Wheeler
7/22/2019 Ethics in Government Procurement1314 2
99/106
Paul Emanuelli 99
#2 New Brunswick v.Wheeler(1979-03-30) SCC
The SCC found that this conflict of interest could
not be addressed simply through disclosure:
As I have indicated, qualifications for the election to and the
holding of high office in all levels of government are a matter of
considerable importance in the functioning of the democratic
community. The sanctity of these offices and the strict adherence to
the conditions of occupying those offices must be safeguarded if
democratic government is to perform up to design.
7/22/2019 Ethics in Government Procurement1314 2
100/106
#3 Coughlin & Mayo v. Victoria (City)
7/22/2019 Ethics in Government Procurement1314 2
101/106
Paul Emanuelli 101
#3 Coughlin & Mayo v. Victoria (City)(1893-08-26) BCSC
Having found that there was a conflict of interest,the Court then concluded that the tendering processhad been tainted with illegality:
Upon every principle of justice, the Council should be prohibitedfrom in any way furthering what was thus illegally done. Not onlythe plaintiffs, but the ratepayers at large, are deeply interested inseeing that all contracts, and especially for those for public works,should be entered into on the fairest principles.
7/22/2019 Ethics in Government Procurement1314 2
102/106
7/22/2019 Ethics in Government Procurement1314 2
103/106
7/22/2019 Ethics in Government Procurement1314 2
104/106
#5 Re Complaint Filed by Consortium
Genivar M3E Universite DOttawa
7/22/2019 Ethics in Government Procurement1314 2
105/106
Paul Emanuelli 105
Genivar-M3E-Universite D Ottawa(11 August 2003, PR-2002-074) (CITT)
In it August 2003 determination inRe Complaint Filed byConsortium Genivar-M3E-Universite DOttawa, theCanadian International Trade Tribunal consideredallegations of unfair advantage arising out of a Canadian
International Development Agency procurement. Thecase focused on the association between a consultantretained to advise the government on the procurement andone of the bidders responding to the tender call. TheTribunal found that the consultant, who was associatedwith the bidder in question, had an impact on the
planning of the support project in questionand that theinformation she obtained through that process gave that
bidder an improper advantage.
7/22/2019 Ethics in Government Procurement1314 2
106/106
Top Related