Elements of Economics (Macroeconomics)
(SOEC 2523)
BERNARD NYARKO BOAHENE024 448 49 83
2002-02-02
Course Requirements
• Mid-sem exams• Final exam• Assignments and attendance• Case studies
Lecture 1, 2009-02-02 2
Course Outline
• Macro issues and measurement• Basic model of the determination of GDP in
the short-run• GDP in an open economy with government• GDP and the price level in short-, long-run• Role of money in macroeconomics• Balance of payments and exchange rates• Macroeconomic policy in a n open economy
Lecture 1, 2009-02-02 3
AGENDA
• Economic Advice - The difference between positive and normative statements
• How economists set out their theories
• How economic data are handled• How economic relationships are
represented in diagrams
4Lecture 1, 2009-02-02
Introduction• What make some countries grow richer while others seem to
get poorer?• Why do we sometimes have recessions?• When should the government try to influence markets?• What are the costs and benefits of globalization?• Will some new technology eliminate many jobs?
• In order to get a handle on such big issues, economists have developed ways of
• setting out and testing their theories• using what they have learned in order to provide
advice on how things could be improved
5Lecture 1, 2009-02-02
• We start by discussing an important distinction relating to the types of statements that are used in giving advice
6Lecture 1, 2009-02-02
Positive and Normative Statements
• Economists give advice on wide variety of topics
• Two broad types of statements–POSITIVE AND NORMATIVE
STATEMENTS
7Lecture 1, 2009-02-02
Normative Statement
• NS depends on value judgements• NS involve issues of personal
opinions; and• Cannot be settled by recourse
to facts
8Lecture 1, 2009-02-02
Positive Statements
• Do not involve value judgements• They are statements about–What is–What was or–What will be
• They are statements about facts
9Lecture 1, 2009-02-02
Positive and Normative Statement
• Distinguishing what is true from what we would like to be, or what we feel ought to be, depends to a great extent on being able to distinguish between positive and normative statements
10Lecture 1, 2009-02-02
Positive and Normative Statement
Positive Normative
• Higher interest rates cause people to save more
• High income tax rates discourage effort
• High taxes on cigarettes discourage smoking
• Road use charges would increase traffic
• People are more worried about inflation than unemployment
• The burning of fossil fuels is causing global warming
• People should save more• Governments should tax the rich to
help the poor• Smoking should be discouraged• The tax system should be used to
reduce traffic• Technical change is a bad thing
because it puts some people out of work
• Governments should do more to reduce carbon emissions in order to save the planet from global warming
11Lecture 1, 2009-02-02
Positive and Normative Statements
• To test the ‘positiveness’/’normativeness’ of a statement:– Is the statement only about actual or
alleged facts?
– Are value judgements necessary to assess the truth of the statement?
12Lecture 1, 2009-02-02
AGENDA
• How economists set out their theories
13Lecture 1, 2009-02-02
Economic Theorizing• Why has the computer and internet
revolution of the last few decades not led to an increase in the trend growth rate of most major economies?
• Does globalisation help to raise living standards in the developing countries?
• To address these questions, economists have developed an approach that involves developing theories and building models
14Lecture 1, 2009-02-02
THEORIES
• Theories are constructed to explain things• E.g. what determines the number of eggs
sold at the Makola market in a particular week? (demand theory)
• Theories built around– Definitions (variables)– Assumptions (motives, physical
relationships, conditions of application, direction of causation)
– Predictions (propositions deduced)
15Lecture 1, 2009-02-02
MODELS• Models (economic models) have several
different but related meanings– ‘Model’ may be synonymous to ‘theories’– ‘Model’ may mean a specific quantitative
formulation of a theory– Specific numbers attached to maths relationships defined by
the theory
– ‘Model’ may refer to an application of a general theory in a specific context
– E.g. consumer demand of egg in the Accra market
– ‘Model’ may be an illustrative abstraction, not meant to be elaborate enough to be tested
– E.g. the circular flow of income
16Lecture 1, 2009-02-02
Economic Theorizing• Evidence – economists make use of empirical observation to
test a specific prediction of some theory• Tests – theories tested by confronting its predictions
with evidence
• Economists still disagree after all these processes. Why?– Different benchmarks, short- or long-term
consequences, ignorance of economists, different values of economists, and media bias
Lecture 1, 2009-02-02 17
Agenda
• Economic data
Lecture 1, 2009-02-02 18
Economic Data• Economists seek to explain observations
made of the real world• E.g. why did the price of tomatoes rise in certain years
even though the tomato crop increased
• We will be aware of this issue only if we have numbers for the tomato crop and its price
• Real world observations are also needed to test the predictions of economic theories
• E.g. higher savings resulting from income tax cuts
• To test the predictions there is the need to collect data
19Lecture 1, 2009-02-02
Displaying Data• Tables
• Graph– Cross-sectional – different obs on one variable all
taken in different places at the same time– Time series – obs on one variable at successive points
in time– Scatter diagrams – to show relationship between two
different variables
• Index– (Relative or absolute movements)
20Lecture 1, 2009-02-02
TABLEPrice of cocoa and coffee (average price in each quarter, US cents per kg)
Period Cocoa Coffee
2001 Q1
2001 Q2
2001 Q3
2001 Q4
2002 Q2
100.4
104.5
100.8
121.8
149.0
146.7
146.4
129.6
126.4
136.6
21Lecture 1, 2009-02-02
INDEX
Period Cocoa Coffee Index of coffee prices
2001 Q1
2001 Q2
2001 Q3
2001 Q4
2002 Q2
100.4
104.5
100.8
121.8
149.0
146.7
146.4
129.6
126.4
136.6
(146.7/146.7)*100=100
(146.4/146.7)*100=99.8
(129.6/146.7)*100=88.4
(126.4/146.7)*100=86.2
(136.6/146.7)*100=93.1
22Lecture 1, 2009-02-02
GRAPH
Unemployment for figures for four countries, September 2005
23Lecture 1, 2009-02-02
AGENDA
• Graphing economic relationships
Lecture 1, 2009-02-02 24
Graphing Economic Relationships
• Theories are built on assumptions about relationships between variables
• How are such relationships expressed• When one variable is related to another
in such a way that to every value of one variable, there is only on possible value of the second variable, we say that the second variable is the function of the first
25Lecture 1, 2009-02-02
Graphing Economic Relationships
• Functional relationship can be expressed in – words,
– E.g. when income is zero, the family will spend GHC800 a year (either by borrowing or consuming past savings), and for every GHC1 of income that it obtains it will increase its spending by 80pesewas
– numerical schedule, – mathematical equation– a graph.
26Lecture 1, 2009-02-02
Graphing Economic Relationships
• From graph we obtain slopes– Straight line slope– Nonlinear relationships– Maxima and minima
Lecture 1, 2009-02-02 27