eEvidence
Dr Ian WaldenInstitute of Computer and Communications Law,
Centre for Commercial Law Studies, Queen Mary, University of London
Baker & McKenzie
iccl
@cc
ls.e
duic
cl@
ccls
.edu
Introductory RemarksIntroductory Remarks
Why should we be interested?– to enforce rights (civil law)– to regulate activities/actors (administrative law) – to protect society (criminal law)
Evidential Issues– admissibility– probative value
Electronic Evidence Model Law– Commonwealth Technology Model Laws– UNCITRAL Model Law on Electronic Commerce (1996), Art.
9
Electronic Evidence Model LawElectronic Evidence Model Law
iccl
@cc
ls.e
duic
cl@
ccls
.edu
Interpretation (Article 2)Interpretation (Article 2)
‘Data’– not necessarily information
‘Electronic record’– ‘computer system or other similar device’
– ‘can be read or perceived’ Computer and Computer Related Crimes Bill, art. 13(1)(d):
‘intelligible’
‘Electronic record systems’ ‘Legal proceedings’
– civil, criminal or administrative
iccl
@cc
ls.e
duic
cl@
ccls
.edu
AdmissibilityAdmissibility
Common law and civil law systems– investigative v adversarial
Real or hearsay– Sophocleous v Ringer [1988] R.T.R. 52– e.g. UK: Criminal Justice Act 2003
‘business’ documents
Special rules for computer-derived?– Article 3
“..on the sole ground that it is an electronic record..”
– UK: omnia praesumuntur rite esse acta
iccl
@cc
ls.e
duic
cl@
ccls
.edu
Probative valueProbative value
Article 5, Authentication– Link person/material test
e.g. Caffrey (2003)
– Computer source test <A HREF..>, <IMG SRC...>
– Accountability Acquisition test
– e.g. Lotus ScreenCam Chain of custody test
Evidential presumptions?– e.g. banker’s books, copyright ©
iccl
@cc
ls.e
duic
cl@
ccls
.edu
‘‘Best Evidence’ RuleBest Evidence’ Rule
Article 6– proof of the integrity of the electronic record system
– printout
UNCITRAL, art. 9(1)(b)– “if it is the best evidence that the person adducing it could
reasonably be expected to obtain, on the grounds that it is not in its
original form.”
UK Law– “The time has now come when it could be said with confidence that
the best evidence rule, long on its deathbed, has finally expired” (Springsteen v Flute International (2001)
iccl
@cc
ls.e
duic
cl@
ccls
.edu
IntegrityIntegrity
Article 7, Presumption of integrity– (a) ‘operating properly’
at ‘material times’ UK: Civil Evidence Act 1968, s. 5
– (b) adverse party
– (c) person not party to the proceedings “...recorded or stored in the usual and ordinary course of
proceedings…”
iccl
@cc
ls.e
duic
cl@
ccls
.edu
‘‘Operating Properly’Operating Properly’ Scope
– Shephard [1992] 1 All ER 225
Networks– Cochrane (1993) CLR 48
Improper use – ex parte Levin [1996] 3 WLR 657
– Computer and Computer Related Crimes Bill, art. 20
Material time – Connolly v Lancashire County Council (1994) RTR 79
Not operating properly – DPP v McKeown & Jones [1997] 1 WLR. 295
iccl
@cc
ls.e
duic
cl@
ccls
.edu
Role of StandardsRole of Standards
Article 8, Standards– re: admissibility
E.g. BSI BIP 0008: 2004– Code of Practice for Legal admissibility and evidential
weight of information stored electronically Information management policy Duty of care Procedures and processes Enabling technologies Audit trails
iccl
@cc
ls.e
duic
cl@
ccls
.edu
AdmissibilityAdmissibility
Article 11– “...expressly agreed at any time…”
e.g. contractual agreement
– limitation re: criminal proceedings
Article 12– electronic signatures
– verification purpose
Other IssuesOther Issues
iccl
@cc
ls.e
duic
cl@
ccls
.edu
Forensics: Obtaining DataForensics: Obtaining Data
Intangible nature of evidence– difficult to obtain – vulnerable to challenge
retrieval, analysis, presentation
Source– claimant, defendant, third-party (e.g. ISP)– stored (e.g. search & seizure ) or in transmission (e.g.
interception)
New powers– Computer and Computer Related Crimes Bill
iccl
@cc
ls.e
duic
cl@
ccls
.edu
Moving EvidenceMoving Evidence
Issues of Mutual Legal Assistance– Convention-based, Commonwealth scheme
In respect of proceedings or an investigation – from abroad
admissibility issues ‘specialty’ principle
– from here ‘dual criminality’ principle applicable where it involves the
use of search and seizure powers Computer and Computer Related Crimes Bill, art. 15,
Production of data
iccl
@cc
ls.e
duic
cl@
ccls
.edu
DisclosureDisclosure
Duty to disclose– right of fair trial
– e.g. material generated during the investigation
Issues with computer-derived evidence– provision of copy or right of inspection
large volumes of material
– apply for permission not to disclose in the public interest e.g. “techniques and methods relied upon by a police officer in
the course of a criminal investigation..”
iccl
@cc
ls.e
duic
cl@
ccls
.edu
Expert WitnessesExpert Witnesses
Duties– R v Reading Justices, ex parte South West Meat Ltd.
[1992] Crim LR 672
– UK: Criminal Justice Act 2003, s. 2
Reports and response reports Mutually agreed issues Use of analytical tools
– Golizadeh [1995] Crim LR 232
iccl
@cc
ls.e
duic
cl@
ccls
.edu Mode of trial
– magistrates, crown
Terminology– agreed glossary of terms
Use of technology– ‘A Guide to the Electronic Presentation of Evidence
(EPE) at Trial (Court Service, July 2002)
Court PresentationCourt Presentation
iccl
@cc
ls.e
duic
cl@
ccls
.edu
Concluding remarksConcluding remarks
Top Related