22
Presentation at thePresentation at the Shaping our Future:Shaping our Future:
Toward a Pan-Canadian E-Learning Toward a Pan-Canadian E-Learning Research Agenda Research Agenda
May 20May 20thth 2008 2008
The Promise and the The Promise and the PotentialPotential
33
LearningLearningTo doTo do
To knowTo know
To beTo be
To live togetherTo live together
Delors’ Four Pillars of Learning
44
Definition of E-learning
The Canadian Council on Learning (CCL) defines e-learning as the :
•“development of knowledge and skills through the use of information and communication technologies (ICTs)
• particularly to support interactions for learning—interactions with content, with learning activities and tools, and with other people”. [1]
[1] J. Rossiter, 2002; also 2005 in an address at the CCL Workshop on e-learning
55
1. To present an overview of the scope and complexity and capability of e-learning, nationally and internationally
2. To review the current state of policy related to e-learning in Canada
3. To outline what challenges need to be addressed to position e-learning as a significant agent in the advancement of current public policy priorities
Objectives of the report
66
Policy Dimensions of E-Learning
CULTURE / CONFIDENCECULTURE / CONFIDENCE
CO
NN
EC
TION
S / A
CC
ES
S
CO
NN
EC
TION
S / A
CC
ES
S
CO
NTE
NT
CO
NTE
NT
LEARNERSLEARNERS
PRACTITIONERSPRACTITIONERSUSERSUSERS
PROVIDERSPROVIDERS
POLICY MAKERSPOLICY MAKERS
FormalFormal((credentializedcredentialized))
NonNon--formalformal(non(non--credentializedcredentialized))
ExperientialExperiential‘‘SelfSelf--directeddirected’’
Teachers, learning technologists, Teachers, learning technologists, instructional designers, counsellorsinstructional designers, counsellors
Education Education And TrainingAnd Training
BusinessBusinessIndustry/Industry/
GovernmentGovernment
Community Community and Cultureand Culture
GovernmentsGovernments
CommunityCommunityIndustryIndustry
PrivatePrivate PublicPublic
77
• The report builds on work undertaken by CCL and the CMEC.
• Studies sponsored by CCL were carried out
by Rossiter (2006), Abrami et al (2006), Fournier (2006) and Charpentier et al (2006).
• Expert Panel (2006)
Background
88
Three Elements:
1. National/International Literature Survey
2. Synthesis of findings from existing CCL studies and initiatives
3. Survey of Current Policies
Scope of the report
99
Policy Survey Methodology
• A total of 183 publicly available e-learning documents were located.
• 106 documents were reviewed using prescriptive and emergent coding techniques.
• A series of interviews (32 in total) were conducted with policy makers, industry sector practitioners, experts and employers.
1010
Literature Survey
National• Canada pioneered building a national
infrastructure and undertaking many exemplary initiatives in the 1990s.
• Canada has developed the technical capacity of ICTs.
• ICTs could play a significant role in achieving public policy priorities.
1111
Literature review (cont’d)
National• ICTs need to be seen as an integral element in
the policy development and implementation process.
• ICTs seen simply as an educational tool marginalizes their potential contribution.
• Canada’s strong education sector and well-educated population consistently gives Canada a top ranking in terms of e-learning and e-economic readiness.
1212
Literature Review (Cont’d)
National • Many of the essential elements are in place
to support e-learning.
• There appears to be a lack of understanding amongst policy makers regarding the potential contribution e-learning could make.
1313
Literature Survey (Cont’d)
International• A growing number of nations recognize the
role that e-learning can play in sustaining their economic, social and cultural development
• Support the effective use of ICTs in support of learning as a strategic national priority
• Recognize that the ubiquitous nature of ICTs make it critical that citizens know how to use them effectively
1414
Overarching Observations from the Literature• Shift of focus and emphasis away
from technology and more on users and learning approaches.
• Recognition of learning as a social/collaborative process involving interaction between users, the content with guidance from facilitators.
1515
Observations (cont’d)
• E-Learning viewed more in terms of ‘Knowledge construction’ not simply ‘Knowledge transfer’.
• Shift from concerns regarding ‘access’ to ‘impacts’.
• Growing support to develop understandings based on research that can guide
policy formation.
1616
Earlier Work: Key Observations/Synthesis
• Canada is starting to trail behind other countries. (Charpentier et al, Expert Panel)
• E-learning is a fundamental tool for lifelong learning. (Rossiter, Fournier, Charpentier)
• E-Learning can be adaptable to the diversity of learning needs and styles of learning. (Fournier, Expert Panel)
• Lack of a National Strategy (Rossiter, Charpentier et al)
1717
Key Observations/Synthesis (Cont’d)
• Need for multi-jurisdictional cooperation and collaboration (CMEC, Expert Panel)
• Need for relevant empirical and longitudinal research (Rossiter, Abrami et al)
• Lack of a portrait of e-Learning in provincial and Federal policies in Canada (Charpentier)
• Need for mechanisms to disseminate research to policy makers and practitioners (Rossiter)
1818
Key Observations/Synthesis (Cont’d)
• Need for a coordinating body that respects the province’s authority and responsibilities for education (Charpentier)
• Need to address organizational change issues as e-learning is incorporated into traditional practice (Rossiter)
• E-Learning needs to be user/learner-centered and results driven (Expert Panel)
1919
Findings
Policy Survey• Policy makers view the benefits of e-learning
primarily in terms of: flexibility/accessibility, meeting social demand, interactivity/communication and learner achievement
• Lack of attention to using e-learning to teach basic skills
• Attention to connectivity to remote learners
2020
Findings (Cont’d)
Policy Survey• Types of learners (special needs, gifted,
aboriginal) were addressed only minimally
• Support for implementation - professional development, web-based resources and logistics support received a great deal of attention
• Use of research to support implementation was limited
2121
Findings (cont’d)
Policy Survey• Intra-jurisdictional cooperation amongst
providers was emphasised
• Minimal attention paid to collaboration among provinces and at the federal level
• Little attention paid to regulation
2222
Findings (Cont’d)
Policy Survey (Cont’d)
•There appears to be little systematic data being gathered on users and non users
•E-learning is just beginning to be seen in strategic terms within institutions
2323
Findings (Cont’d)
Interviews emphasized the following:
Increased collaboration, sharing resources and effective partnerships
Avoiding the limits of jurisdictional boundaries
Long term and sustainable funding
2424
Findings(Cont’d)
Interviews (Cont’d)
Development of e-learning standards
Leadership to manage efforts and costs
A dissemination plan to share information and research
2525
Pathways Worth Exploring
Developing a common framework– Articulating a shared vision
– Nurturing shared leadership focused on creating mechanisms for effective policy and program coordination
– Establishing partnerships between government, institutions, private sector and community groups
– Development of a joint action plan
2626
Pathways Worth Exploring
Forum on E-learning
Representatives from educational institutions, governments, business and industry and community based organizations
Responsible for articulating vision statement, liaising with stakeholders and creating knowledge exchange opportunities
2727
• Development of a data strategy and clearinghouse with a focus on:
– Synthesizing existing research– Generating new evidence– Developing high quality evidence as a
basis for action– Fostering knowledge exchange– Identifying core questions/issues
Pathways worth Exploring (cont’d)
2828
Discussion Questions
• What challenges are seen to advancing along the pathways being proposed?
• Are there means available using ICTs that could assist in moving along these pathways?
• In moving forward where would you begin?
Top Related