7/30/2019 e Government and the Rise of Online Political Engagement
1/24
e-Government
And the Ri se of Onl ine Pol it ical Engagem ent
By EJ Odo and KC Kern
May 2013
15.565 Digital Evolution: Managing Web 3.0
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Sloan School of Management
7/30/2019 e Government and the Rise of Online Political Engagement
2/24
Table of Contents
Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 3
Part I: Public Administration and the Internet ..................................................................... 5Public Administration of Internet Infrastructure ............................................................. 5Online Public Services .................................................................................................... 8Transparency, Data, and Access .................................................................................... 10
Part II: Public Empowerment in Political Processes ......................................................... 13
The Arab Spring ............................................................................................................ 14Presidential Campaigning .............................................................................................. 16
Pre-2008 .................................................................................................................... 17
Web 2.0 and the 2008 Presidential Elections ............................................................ 18
Web 3.0 and the 2012 Presidential Elections ............................................................ 19Addressing Inequality .................................................................................................... 21
Conclusion ......................................................................................................................... 23
7/30/2019 e Government and the Rise of Online Political Engagement
3/24
7/30/2019 e Government and the Rise of Online Political Engagement
4/24
of the processes that support business, education, science, healthcare, and government.
Accordingly, government itself has been subject to the impact of information being
shared in new ways and at unprecedented rates. The landscape of politics as a whole is
being reshaped by the influence of the Internet and the effect of online engagement of
citizens, constituents, campaigns, and governing bodies.
This paper will explore selected areas in which the Internet has impacted, is currently
impacting, and will continue to impact government, policy, legislation and politics on
local, regional, federal, and international levels. Particular attention will be given to
emerging Web 3.0 technologies as a framework for influence on the dynamics of
politics and governments of the future.
7/30/2019 e Government and the Rise of Online Political Engagement
5/24
Part I: Public Administration and the Internet
Public administration is the branch of political science dealing with the implementation
of public policy by civil servants in the form of public services. The internet and online
technologies are relevant to public policy decisions and tactics in the contexts of (1)
providing Internet connectivity as a public service, (2) offering other public services via
the Internet (3) enabling transparency and accountability across the public sector.
Public Administration of Internet Infrastructure
For the Internet to be a relevant point in any discussion related to policy and governance,
there must exist an underlying assumption that the internet is at least moderately
available to both a substantial portion of the population and to elected officials and civil
servants.
This assumption, however, cannot always be made. Internet infrastructure is not unlike
many other aspects of national infrastructure in that it requires large-scale planning,
implementation, and maintenance, and is often subsidized if not entirely funded by
taxpayer funds. The precedence of telephone networks and even earlier telegraph
networks provided the starting point for infrastructure needs in the United States.
Governments have historically worked in tandem with private enterprises to build public
infrastructure. Telecom is no exception to this. AT&T, formally known as the American
Telephone and Telegraph Company, dates back to the earliest days of telephony spurred
by Alexander Graham Bell.3
Since then, fiber optic networks have replaced the copper
wire backbone of the US telecom infrastructure, with fiber lines positions strategically
3http://www.corp.att.com/history/
7/30/2019 e Government and the Rise of Online Political Engagement
6/24
along existing railroad lines, with Union Pacific Rail Road Companys routes used most
prolifically.4
On municipal levels, fiber optic rollout initiatives have also come to prominence recently.
The Google Fiberinitiative brings high speed Internet to communities on state-of-the-art
fiber networks promising to deliver unprecedented bandwidth. Current service is limited
to Kansas City, with plans for expansion to Austin, Texas and Provo, Utah.5
The city of
Provo has already invested in fiber lines during a failed municipal telecom initiative
known as iProvo; Google fiber will use the infrastructure already installed by the city
government to deliver its service.6
One particular study examines the establishment of broadband networks in a country that
had virtual nothing to build from: the western African nation of Togo.7 This research is
of particular interest because, unlike nations with more complex histories of internet
infrastructures, this one illuminates the issues arising from a population seeking
telecommunications specifically with the internet in mind. It begins by explaining the
governments interest in such an initiative.
In the past, countries in Africa embraced and embarked on technology policy
planning, often in isolation of larger development goals. This has changed in the
past decade where the drive to mainstream ICTs into development priorities has
pushed toward a better understanding of technologys contributions to economic
and social development.8
These contributions of technology to economic and social development are what bridges
4 http://www.up.com/aboutup/community/telecom/contacts/index.htm5
https://fiber.google.com/about/6
http://www.theverge.com/2013/4/17/4234258/google-fiber-is-coming-to-provo-utah7 Ben Akoh. Supporting Multistakeholder Internet Public Policy Dialogue in a LeastDeveloped Country: The Togo Experience. July 20128
Ibid, p1; emphasis added
7/30/2019 e Government and the Rise of Online Political Engagement
7/24
the gap between the underlying infrastructure deployment undertaken by government,
and the public benefits the government wishes to bring about. The finding of the study
bring to light some critical points about the populations interests regarding a national
Internet infrastructure:
Access to speedy, affordable, quality Internet and online trust and security arefundamental, essential and priority concerns for the growth of the Internet and
for development in Togo.
Gaps are evident on the significance of public informal and formal education,particularly on the benefits of the Internet to sustainable development.
Government is an important and key stakeholder in facilitating Internet publicpolicy in Togo, but all stakeholders are responsible for the evolution of the
Internet Internet access is important for business and education, but the existing cost
negatively impacts entrepreneurial growth.
Government remains a key stakeholder in the development, deployment andmonitoring of broadband and mobile broadband access to all Togolese.
Togolese are ready to conduct and transact business online, but cyber securityand online trust issues remain major deterrents.
Government should play a more active role in creating a public forum forInternet policy dialogue.
The Internet can significantly facilitate education and research, and it is animportant enabler for economic development. 9
In short, the national interests of supporting a national broadband infrastructure centralize
on the points of (1) facilitating business and commerce, (2) enabling widespread public
discourse, (3) empower education and research, and (4) fostering an effective legal
framework to support online services.
Given that a sustainable Internet infrastructure is in place, governments can then begin to
focus on online public services.
9Ibid p 30-31
7/30/2019 e Government and the Rise of Online Political Engagement
8/24
Online Public Services
Governments are notorious for bureaucracy, red tape, long wait-times, and substandard
customer service. The prevalence the Internet offers new opportunities to both improve
the quality and access of their public services and cut costs by implementing online
interfaces for public services. Inasmuch as Web 3.0 constitutes not only reading and
writing, but executingvia web-based tools, online public services connected with
individual citizen records becomes all the more relevant.
The Nebraska department of motor vehicles has championed these kinds of online
services with a program called ClickDMV, through which citizens may process a large
portion of their motor vehicle registration and licensing needs:
The DMV has emphasized online services for individuals. So far this year, 83,615
Nebraskans have used the ClickDMV driver licensing services. [ClickDMV] allows
Nebraskans to renew their driver licenses, obtain duplicates, check current point
totals, reinstate their driving privileges, and request a driving record. Those who live
in Douglas, Lancaster, and Sarpy counties can check the wait times at all the DMV
Examining Stations before leaving home. If the wait is more than 30 minutes, they
can take a number and reserve a spot in line from home.10
It further boasts the broader objective of these types of services in the context of the State
governments mission and objectives:
Nebraskas Department of Motor Vehicles is one more example of how our states e-
government efforts better serve the needs of our citizens.11
The State of Maryland has likewise harnessed the possibilities of the Internet beyond
simply the DMV. In a study seeking to understand the impacts of internet on public
administration, Maryland was cited as being on the forefront of prioritizing online public
10Governor Dave Heineman. Governor's Weekly Column: Click DMV. October 12, 2012
11Ibid
7/30/2019 e Government and the Rise of Online Political Engagement
9/24
services including tax management and business operation with the intent of increasing
IT investment and providing an integrated user experience.
The state of Maryland has invested for several years in providing services by internet
and offers more government services online than any other state (Center for Digital
Government, 2001). Along services on diversified areas, the state of Maryland allows
citizens to request for the opening of businesses by internet and make possible for
companies and citizens pay their taxes on line. Despite all the internet services
developed in tax area, in 2001 the state of Maryland started a project that aims the
provision of 80% of all state public services by internet in three years. The main
focus of Marylands internet portal project is integrate the services and information
provided by internet of all state agencies in order to optimize IT investment and
provide convenient services to citizens (Center for Digital Government, 2001).
According to the deputy manager of IT Department of Maryland state, the citizens
dont really have to know if one or two government agencies is involved in certain
type of service, but that service is provided by the government, so the more integrated
are the internet services provided by agencies, the better for the users.12
Web services offer a unique opportunity for governments to interact with citizens and
corporations also. While many transactions are considered in terms of B2B, B2C, C2C,
etc, the consideration of a government agency (G2B, G2C, etc) has interesting potential.
The state of Oklahoma has implement such a service, in which businesses may process
sales taxes via a web service. High-level instructions explain:
The Streamlined Sales Tax (SST) Implementation Guide allows for two methods of
transferring reports/payments to the member/associate state. These methods are
HTTP(S) POST and/or Web services (SOAP over HTTP transport). The Oklahoma
Streamlined Sales Tax EFile Service provides transmitters a method of submitting
reports/payments via Web services.13
Increased adoption of these services by governments will empower businesses to process
12Moyss De Oliveira Andrade Jnior. The Impacts of Internet on the Public
Administration Citizen Relationship: a Study at Bahias Tax Authority13
Oklahoma State Government. Streamlined Sales Tax Web Services Report/Payment
Transfer Guide.
7/30/2019 e Government and the Rise of Online Political Engagement
10/24
their taxes more effectively, reduce administrative overhead for both sides, and increase
overall tax revenue.
The issue that arises with the streamlining of data-rich transactions is that of visibility and
transparency. Security by obscurity is compounded when the volume of data to sift
through reaches unmanageably high levels. Fortunately, Internet technologies also offer
the means to address this issue with elegance and precision.
Transparency, Data, and Access
In the 1913 book Other People's Money And How the Bankers Use It, US Supreme Court
Associate Justice Louis Brandeis wrote that Sunlight is said to be the best of
disinfectants; electric light the most efficient policeman.14
The electric light he prophetically refers to has staggering application to Internet
technologies. Governments can now be held to a higher level of scrutiny, and their
proceedings can be systematically traced with higher degree of precision. The Sunlight
foundation is a nonprofit, nonpartisan organization that uses the power of the Internet to
catalyze greater government openness and transparency, and provides new tools and
resources for media and citizens, alike.15
One of their products is OpenCongress, which
addresses the issues of legislative obscurity by making it easier to understand, track, and
engage with the U.S. Congress. OpenCongress combines official government data with
news and blog coverage, social networking, and participation tools to [give users] the real
story behind what's happening in Congress.16 While OpenCongress is a third-party
14 Other People's Money And How the Bankers Use It, Chapter 415
http://sunlightfoundation.com/about/16
http://www.opencongress.org/about
7/30/2019 e Government and the Rise of Online Political Engagement
11/24
product, the government itself has produced Congress.gov, a public offering aimed to to
make federal legislative information freely available to the public.17
Mature
governments recognize the increasing difficulty of stealth and obscurity in making
decisions of public import. The internet not only supported the forces that brought about
this change, but also provides the ability for governments to proactively publish
information that can be vetted and validated by juxtaposing it with the findings those
independent groups who likewise are making public data more accessible.
Data protocols associated with the Semantic Web also acquire more opportunities for
use in government and public sector situations. In the United Kingdom, data.gov.uk has
been established to enable the public to become informed about the activities of the
government. This is done through providing linked data representing an array of public
services. The flagship example of the UKs public linked data is the postcode network,
described as follows:
The postcode is captured simply as text. However, enhancing the original data to linkto a postcode URI means the original data has the potential to contain a lot more
information. Once the URIs for each postcode is in place it is a relatively simple
matter of using some simple code to follow that link, dereference the post code URI
and ingest the linked data for that postcode into the triplestore. So just as humans will
follow links between documents on the web to gain more context and information
this simple application has followed links on the linked data web to provide more
context and information. Because the postcode linked data provides a look up
between postcode and region, it was possible to enrich the original data with
knowledge about the ward, district and county (where applicable) for each institution.
This means it is now possible to analyse research funding by local authority area aswell as European region.18
The opportunities for analysis of this linked data are now offered not just to high profile
17http://thomas.loc.gov/home/abt_thom.html
18http://data.gov.uk/blog/what-is-linked-data
7/30/2019 e Government and the Rise of Online Political Engagement
12/24
research institutes, but to the general public as well.
Using the spatial relationships in the Ordnance Survey linked data means it is
possible to start doing more complex analysis. For example, a user could compare
funding in one region with funding in its neighboring regions or use the containment
relationships to aggregate the information up to coarser grained geographies. 19
In more dramatic cases, the Internet has brought about leaks and dissemination of
information that otherwise would have remained classified or otherwise inaccessible.
Julian Assanges WikiLeaks has received attention in the past years for making public
military documents and other government-related information that may have had a
compromising effect on national security and military operations. What makes
WikiLeaks unique is the level of anonymity offered to the informants. There is nothing
modern about espionage, but the Internet offers extra protection for those seeking to
expose information. WikiLeaks explains:
WikiLeaks has combined high-end security technologies with journalism and ethical
principles. Like other media outlets conducting investigative journalism, we accept
(but do not solicit) anonymous sources of information. Unlike other outlets, weprovide a high security anonymous drop box fortified by cutting-edge cryptographic
information technologies. This provides maximum protection to our sources. We are
fearless in our efforts to get the unvarnished truth out to the public. When information
comes in, our journalists analyze the material, verify it and write a news piece about
it describing its significance to society. We then publish both the news story and the
original material in order to enable readers to analyze the story in the context of the
original source material themselves. Our news stories are in the comfortable
presentation style of Wikipedia, although the two organizations are not otherwise
related. Unlike Wikipedia, random readers cannot edit our source documents.20
The availability and access to this kind of information is an unprecedented threat to
unchecked information control that some governments may have at one point hoped for.
19Ibid
20http://wikileaks.org/About.html
7/30/2019 e Government and the Rise of Online Political Engagement
13/24
Abraham Lincolns immortal words about a new birth of freedomand that government
of the people, by the people, for the people21
take on new meaning.
The empowerment of the people is perhaps the most notable effect of the increased use of
the Internet. From the improved ability to organize, to the accelerated methods of
disseminating information, the Internets potential for disruption and innovation have
already been witnessed.
Part II: Public Empowerment in Political Processes
Given the nature of human interaction with the internet, it is important to recognize the
relation between the individual empowerment that user-driven online experiences offers
and citizen-centric political movements.
Previous forms of mass media were often based on a central distribution model, where
TV networks, radio towers, and publishers in large part controlled the content and the
variety of offering available for public consumption. The Internet and new media
offers more customization, more focus on user needs and preferences, and allows each
user to define much of their own experience in media consumption.
The applicability of this contrast to government is clear. Top-down, centrally controlled
governments mirror the former media model, and citizen-driven democracies mirror the
latter model.
An overview of the correlation between Internet access and democracy across political
21Lincoln, A. (1863). The Gettsyburg Address. In The Collected Works of Abraham
Lincoln (234-238). New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers UP.
7/30/2019 e Government and the Rise of Online Political Engagement
14/24
entities reveals scattered results, but a trend line can nonetheless be discerned:22
The impact of Internet access and usage on political matters will hereby be examined on
a number of fronts. First, the influence of social media and connectivity on the recent
grassroots political uprisings known as the Arab Spring. Second, the new online-
driven tactics employed by the Obama campaign to micro-target potential voters. And
finally, addressing the issue of socioeconomic inequality and the solutions that the
Internet might have to offer.
The Arab Spring
The Arab Spring refers a revolutionary movement that swept across the Arab world in
late 2010 and 2011. Countries affected included Tunisia, Egypt, Libya, and Yemen,
Bahrain, Syria, Algeria, Iraq, Jordan, Kuwait, Morocco, and Sudan; and to a lesser extent
in Mauritania, Oman, Saudi Arabia, Djibouti, and Western Sahara. In some cases, entrie
22Davit Chokoshvili. The Role of the Internet in Democratic Transition: Case Study of
the Arab Spring. p 26
7/30/2019 e Government and the Rise of Online Political Engagement
15/24
regimes were deposed. In almost all instances, the revolts were virtually leaderless, and
were organized and promoted through web technologies.
The simultaneity of the Arab Springs revolts is remarkable enough to warrant asking the
questions of: why now? What elements were in place now that were not previously? The
answer perhaps lies in the state of technological progress and adoption in the Arab world.
The Institute of National Securities Studies explains:
With respect to knowledge, the report talked about the technological backwardness of
the Arab world: Internet penetration stood at less than 1 percent. The decade since
then brought about a dramatic change in terms of technology: the internet, satellite
stations, and the social networks brought the middle class the knowledge that thereare other ways to live, and that they deserve more more freedom, more democracy,
more human rights, progress for women, employment, and release from the grip of
tyrants. The Arab revolt of 2011 has been nicknamed the Facebook revolution,
with good reason.23
The mere existence and usage of technology among the general public seemed to be on of
the deciding factors in spurring this kind of political unrest. Other commentators have
underscored the game-changing impact of social media specifically:
The Internet, mobile phones, and social media such as Facebook and Twitter made
the difference this time. Using these technologies, people interested in democracy
could build extensive networks, create social capital, and organize political action
with a speed and on a scale never seen before. Thanks to these technologies, virtual
networks materialized in the streets. Digital media became the tool that allowed
social movements to reach once-unachievable goals.24
While it may be tempting to attribute the entirety of these movements to the internet, it is
important to acknowledge that online connectivity is but one factor among many.
23 Yoel Guzansky and Mark A. Heller. One Year of the Arab Spring: Global and
Regional Implications. The Institute for National Security Studies.
24Philip N. Howard and Muzammil M. Hussain, The Role of Digital Media, Journal of
Democracy 22, no. 3 (2011): 3536.
7/30/2019 e Government and the Rise of Online Political Engagement
16/24
Although new media can plausibly shape contentious politics, they are only one
among a number of important political factors. As this report demonstrates, there
remain massive gaps in our knowledge about their effects at multiple levels and the
interaction among those levels. The suggestions for improved research design and
data in this report are not simply the methodological complaint of academics. If
policymakers hope to act effectively, they need to get the causal mechanisms right orelse risk wasting effort and resources on ineffective actionsor even making things
worse.25
A point for further exploration might be examining these causal mechanisms and
determining which ones are amplified in response to internet activities, and which ones
bear no correlation thereto. Results from this type of study might shed further light into
the question of the pervasiveness of the influence of online interactions on seemingly
independent variables such as popular opinion, voter turnout, citizen engagement, and the
like. In any case, the Arab Spring stands out as a unique and remarkable instance of the
internet playing an important role in influencing politics and government.
Presidential Campaigning
In the political landscape of the United States, web technologies have almost become a
critical tool politicians use as they seek to reach out to the mass population and sell their
ideas in order to gain support and win elections. US presidential elections have
traditionally been very huge undertakings with huge budgets running in the millions of
dollars and with thousands of election staff. The main job of a campaign to sell the
candidate has always also been a huge undertaking as well. Prior to 2000 this had been
done through the traditional means of print and television media. With the advent of
faster computing and the internet we began to more use of web technologies as a means
of communicating with voters.
25Sean Aday, Henry Farrell, Marc Lynch John Sides. Blogs and Bullets New Media in
Contentious Politics. p 26
7/30/2019 e Government and the Rise of Online Political Engagement
17/24
Fig 1: Web Technologies through the Last 4 Presidential Election Cycles
Pre-2008
Prior to the 2004 elections, the web was at its infancy stage and most of the web use was
in the web 1.0 stage. The internet more closely resembled a television and you visited
another site when you wanted to change the channel. It was largely static, informational
and centered around a top down use of the web and its user interface. The first
widespread use of web technologies was in the 2004 elections where candidate Howard
Dean relied heavily on the web to energize large swath of supporters in meetups and
social networks. The internet was essentially used as an information sharing tool. Social
networks like MySpace and Facebook were used by people to share information and
YouTube was used albeit on a smaller scale to publish content. Websites were used to
raise large amounts of money for his campaign. These were essentially web 2.0
technologies that provided attributes and enablers that provided resources over and
beyond what we saw in the 200 elections. Howard Dean was able to rely on people far
and wide to coordinate via the internet and provide help. This web 2.0 space is typically
characterized by mass collaboration like the type we just described and a mashup of
different content and media. Here large numbers of people are willing to meet new
people and share their thoughts and ideas with the public over the internet with new
internet groups. This also facilitates engaging others in the public space and helping to
Internet/Web1.0 EarlyWeb2.0 Web2.0 Web3.0
2000 2004 2008 2012
G.W.Bushvs.AlGore G.W.Bushvs.JohnKerry B.H.Obamavs.JohnMcCain B.H.Obamavs.MittRomney
TraditionalMedia/
Computers/
Telecomms.
Traditional
Media/Computers/
InternetTechnologies
TraditionalMedia/Internet
Technologies/Web2.0
Technologies
TraditionalMedia/Internet
Technologies/Web3.0
Technologies
7/30/2019 e Government and the Rise of Online Political Engagement
18/24
form new ideas as well over this medium.
Web 2.0 and the 2008 Presidential Elections
Prior to the 2008 presidential election,
the Internet was more or less used as an
information sharing portal. However, it
all changed when Barack Obama ran his
campaign and fully embraced the
potential of what web 2.0 technologies
could do to rally communities around his
ideas. Here, web 2.0 got users to play with, create and manipulate content. The user-
oriented and dynamic web environment gave users an opportunity to be active
participants rather than passive receivers of information.
When thinking about the critical drivers for success in an election; campaigning, raising
money and coordinating supporters, we can clearly see how web tools can create a
compelling advantage compared to traditional methods. Obamas campaign essentially
allowed millions of ordinary voters become part of the campaign through blogs,
community groups and mobile applications and this eventually proved decisive as Obama
was able to not only out raise John McCain on the internet but he had millions of
supporters that were willing to knock on doors and get people out on election day. Web
2.0 forever changed the way people viewed the impact of these technologies on
campaigns thereby mainstreaming these ideas.
Fig 2: Web 2.0 in action, Obamas Campaign
Website and Interactive Activity Links
7/30/2019 e Government and the Rise of Online Political Engagement
19/24
Web 3.0 and the 2012 Presidential Elections
Coming off of a huge election victory in 2008, the Obama campaign continued off of
where they left off looking at lessons learned and potential improvements to be made as
they planned his reelection campaign for 2012. They were able to work on some of the
key problems they had in 2008, most notably having too many databases. They had
amassed all this information from 2008 and they sought to try and consolidate and
integrate them. When this was completed, they proceeded to build on the information
they already had and use that information to inform their day to day decision making.
Such is the benefit of web 3.0 as it allows for the aggregation of data such that it can
inform particular behaviors in people or groups which in turn let the campaign fit their
messages to particular groups of people. In the case of the Obama campaign, they were
able to build an enormous cache of data on individuals such that it allowed them to
become small that is to target and
galvanize specific demographics within
high-stakes regions in crucial swing states.
This included making decisions as what ads
what to buy how to buy those ads and on
what television shows and channels. All
these were done via results of the
information gleaned from the data they had
amassed.
As a result of these big data efforts the Obama campaign was able to fit its campaign
better to their constituents in a way the Romney campaign never was able to. They used
Fig 3: Consolidating the Data:Lessons Learned from Past Campaigns
7/30/2019 e Government and the Rise of Online Political Engagement
20/24
information about voters behaviors to build social graphs of people and groups and used
this social graphs to appeal to groups using social triggers that could get them to vote.
These triggers could be for example, understanding that certain constituents in an area
cared a lot about clean energy and thus having to run ads in that particular area that
informed those constituents about its programs for clean energy while in the town a
couple of miles away, running a different sets of ads based on the results of their social
graph.
Another example of a situation in which the Obama campaign effectively used web 3.0
was in the arena of canvassing. It allowed the campaign to interact with canvassers
remotely in real time by providing them with potential voters to go visit and what to
expect in terms of possible sentiments and profiles. It also allowed for real time feedback
on voters sentiments which was relayed back to build on that particular voters profile.
An example of this kind of app is the one shown below.
Fig 4: The Door Knocking App: Coordinators view of canvassing status.
7/30/2019 e Government and the Rise of Online Political Engagement
21/24
It provides canvassers real time view of potential voters and lets canvassers view and
update profiles as they canvass and this information can be shared amongst the workers
making the exercise very efficient.
We witnessed the extensive use of Web.3.0 and big data in the last 2012 presidential
elections and how it created a compelling competitive advantage for the Obama
presidential campaign. The use of Web 3.0 technologies is here to stay in presidential
elections and we expect that more and more campaigns will continue to mine data and
come up with new techniques to better understand their constituents and get them to the
polls to vote. It definitely will revolutionize campaign politics and reward users.
Addressing Inequality
On a global scale, poverty and inequality are still substantive issues that have yet to be
resolved satisfactorily. The internet and the advent of Web 3.0 offers a glimmer of hope
related to shortening the gap between poverty and the middle class.
Researchers at the Economic Policy Institute have noted the potential of broadband
internet on poverty-stricken locales:
The potential economic impact of broadband is substantial, and broadbands faster
and more convenient access to the Internet creates social benefits including high-
speed interactive uses in the K-12 classroom, distance learning, medicine,
telecommuting, and adaptive technology for individuals with disabilities.26
The factors of education alone are noteworthy in the context of empowering citizens who
otherwise would have no other viable recourse to pursue knowledge or acquire skills.
26Caroline J. Tolbert Karen Mossberger. New Inequality Frontier: Broadband Internet
Access. Economic Policy Institute.
7/30/2019 e Government and the Rise of Online Political Engagement
22/24
7/30/2019 e Government and the Rise of Online Political Engagement
23/24
access problems of digital technology gradually shift from the first two kinds of
access to the last two kinds.29
By providing the framework, infrastructure, and incentives for the adoption and usage of
the these types of tools and resources, governments and municipalities can accomplish
the goals of (1) empowering citizens with knowledge and skills, (2) addressing
information inequality and (3) streamlining commercial and civic process.
Conclusion
e-Government in only in its infancy. Public-sector processes and civic bureaucracy of
often in the early laggards segment of adoption curves, but there is still progress. As the
private sector becomes more engaged with Web 3.0 technologies to streamline commerce,
customer outreach, marketing, and analytics, governments at all levels will adopt as well,
in many cases taking the lead from campaign tactics that got government officials elected
in the first place.
The future of the Internet with regards to e-government and public policy could go a
variety of directions. A briefing from the Australian Department of Communications, IT
& the Arts offers the following framework for research and analysis leading to policy
advice and decision-making:
Internet architecture and standards, including structural and institutionalarrangements, the domain name addressing system and the world wide webinterface.
29Furuholt, Bjrn ([email protected]) Department of Information Systems, School
of Management, Agder University College, Norway Kristiansen, Stein
([email protected]) Department of Economics, School of Management, AgderUniversity College, Norway. A Rural-urban Digital Divide? Regional Aspects of Internet
Use in Tanzania.
7/30/2019 e Government and the Rise of Online Political Engagement
24/24
The reliability of the Internet as public and private infrastructure, includingthe likelihood and consequences of failure.
Internet-based economic and commercial developments, including newbusiness models and distribution structures.
Internet-based social developments, including enhanced information andcommunications access.
Digital content issues including both economic and social aspects. The role of the Internet in facilitating innovation and the development of
human capital.30
The overriding themes in this type of framework can be distilled into the following
concepts:
Priority on Infrastructure Standards compliance Effective implementation Quality content and services
Inasmuch as governments and other civic entities follow these guiding principles,
countries, states, municipalities, and campaigns across the world will see increased civic
engagement, higher satisfaction with civil servants, and better data to inform public
policy makers.
30NSF/OECD Workshop proceedings .Social & Economic Factors Shaping the Future of
the Internet. 31 January 2007
Top Related