Derek Powell CLC24 February 2011
IEC working session: Gauteng
Local Democracy Peace and Human Securitywww.ldphs.org.za
What is wrong with SA local democracy?
Some narratives doing the rounds about the state of local government
– Local government is dysfunctional due to corruption, incompetence, lack of accountability, and poor service delivery
– Violent service delivery protests are a symptom of this collapse– “Service delivery protests” are a socio-economic phenomenon
“driven” by extreme poverty and inequality – The protests challenge the legitimacy of local democracy, which is
excluding rather than including poor communities in particular– National intervention is needed to fix service delivery and public
participation– Protests are a symptom that SA is sliding towards a “a failed state”
(watch out for Tunisia Eqypt!)Local Democracy Peace and Human
security
What do we know and say about these protests?
Municipal service delivery protests
What is the relationship between different protests over different issues in different parts of the country?
Why then do most of the service-delivery related grievances seem to relate to housing (a provincial function)?
The term is not defined, loosely used, and analytically imprecise
Protests are now a socio-economic phenomenon
What does that mean exactly?
What is the start line for this new phenomenon?
How does it differ from historical forms of the phenomenon?
Protests are driven by inequality
What does driven mean? What is the causal link?
Why are there fewer protests in rural areas where inequality is highest?
Isn’t rate-payers withholding rates another form of protest?
National intervention needed?
What part does national policy failure play in this?
Why not more local self-government?
Local Democracy Peace and Human security
Failed/fragile states • Predictive measurements of the riskiest countries vis-a-vis
three main threats:– Deadly internal conflict– Humanitarian disaster– Threat to global security
• Fragility is a condition of collapsing central authority • There are 2 failed states: Haiti, Somalia• On what analytical basis are collapsed states/authoritarian
states compared with open liberal constitutional democracies
Local Democracy Peace and Human security
How do we measure the quality of local democracy?
• Voice and accountability:– World Bank Governance Matters VI– Afro-barometer (Idasa local barometer)
• Institutional features of our local democracy:– Local citizens elect political parties (PR) and individuals (ward based)
to represent them in council (representative democracy)– Major national parties are also major local parties – Citizens have right to participate in local affairs (participatory
democracy)– Councils are held accountable in elections (Consolidation of
democracy)– LG must overcome historical exclusion (Transformative or inclusive
democracy)Local Democracy Peace and Human
security
Indicators?• Citizens satisfaction with local democracy• Registration and turnout rates on election day• Growth in number of parties participating• Citizen participation (?) in participatory structures• Other forms of “Voice” and their impact on
democratic accountability: Violent protests• Inter-communal cooperation between elections
Local Democracy Peace and Human security
General trends in participation and confidence
Low but stable voter turnout 1995/96 (49%) 2000 (49%) 2006 (48%)
Increased representation of women 1995/96 (18.5%) 2000 (28.2%) 2006 (39.7%)
Increased party participation 2000 (79) 2006 (97) – 56 parties represented
Declining public confidence 2006 (44%) 2007 (34%): HSRC.Are municipalities well managed? 2004 (49%) 2007 (41%): Ipsos Markinor
Low public awareness 3 % aware of participatory measures
Provide democratic & accountable government Provide services to meet basic needs Promote social & economic development Involve citizens in the governance of local affairs Promote a safe and healthy environment
Developmental local government:
Sources: IEC, CGTA, HSC, Ipsos- Markinor
Local Democracy Peace and Human security
Important life domains (for elites and public)
Values Elite % Elite rank Public % Public rank
Family 96.7 1 95.6 1Work 82.8 2 77.4 1Religion 55.4 (47) 4 69.9 3Politics 54.8 3 21.7 6Friends 53.8 5 33.9 5Leisure time 42.4 6 37.1 4
Source: Kotze “values and democracy in South Africa: comparing elite and public values”
Local Democracy Peace and Human security
Participatory governance Setting the scene – aided awareness of people, structures, organisations, initiatives
Source: Q.9a (aided)
37
24
16
16
8
2
42
0 10 20 30 40 50
Name of councillor
How to register for local/municipal elections
The Batho Pele principle
Ward number
The approximate date of local governmentelections
The Integrated Development Plan
None of the above
%
Who is particularly unaware?White 64Didn't vote in last local govt. elections 60LSM (7-10) 54Not wanting involvement in municipal decisions 531-2 people 53HH income R10 001+ 53Rented accomm. 52
• More than a third of Tshwane’s citizens is aidedly unaware of their councillor. It appears that more affluent people are less aware of the above than less affluent people. This could be a function of three issues:
• Apathy amongst this group• Limited opportunity to be involved (e.g. meetings not held in area or at inconvenient times)• Limited time
n=1300Of these citizens, 66% have personally met their councillor
Local Democracy Peace and Human security
Meeting%
Attendance (n=1300)
Ward meeting 27
School governing body meetings 15
Street committee or neighbourhood meeting 13
Residents' association meeting 7
Community development forums 6
Community policing forums 3
Mayoral imbizos 3
IDP meetings 1
None of the above/Never 52How does attendance behaviour differ across different segments of citizens?Let's take a look
Source: Q.10a (aided)Read: 27% of the Tshwane citizens have attended a ward meeting
ParticipationActual involvement – attendance of meetings
31% (nett) of the Tshwane population have attended at least one of these meetings – we will henceforth refer to these people as ‘engaged’
More than half of citizens have not attended any of the prompted meetings – this is likely to some degree to be linked to low levels of awareness and high levels of not wanting to be involved
Local Democracy Peace and Human security
Citizens more likely to be engaged % Higher engagement1
Voted 45
Informal 45
5+ people 44
Black 41
Primary school or less 41
R1-R2000 41
R2001-R5000 41
LSM (1-4) 40
LSM (5-6) 40
Unemployed 40
Source: Q.10a (aided)1 A citizen is deemed to be engaged if he/she has attended a ward meeting, mayoral imbizo, community development forum and/or an IDP meeting
ParticipationActual involvement – attendance of meetings (continued)
Average of total pop.: 31% (n=1300)
Again, we see that less affluent people are more likely to be engaged with the City of Tshwane
Local Democracy Peace and Human security
Current state of research on protests
• Little academic research (generally case studies)
• Almost all media analysis is based on media reports and speculation
• Caution in use of statistics is needed • Take citizen grievances as such?
Local Democracy Peace and Human security
• Many outstanding questions about protests:
– How representative are protests (ward, across wards, across municipality)?
– Who are the protesters – What is their average age? Are they voting age?
– How are protests organized?– How do protesters see the relationship between
protests and voting?– Why are some protests violent, and others not?
Local Democracy Peace and Human security
Increasing in frequency and violence
Violent protest (% of total) 2007: 41.6% 2008: 38% 2009: 43.6 % 2010: 54%
Source: CLC research 2010 “The rage, violence and destructiveness” vented in some protests is a symptom of “a more fundamental alienation of people from our democracy” and an “acute sense of marginalization and social exclusion.” (DM CGTA, Yunus Carrim, speech to NCOP 2010)
Protests generally do not correlate with voters punishing parties in elections (Booysen)
Local Democracy Peace and Human security
Highly urbanized provinces (informal settlements in metros) worst affected
Areas with highest poverty are not the main hotspots
Relative poverty a facilitating factor (competition for jobs and resources)Local Democracy Peace and Human
security
The relationship between protests and elections (research by Professor Booysen Wits)
Consolidation of democracy: voters punish parties that don’t perform and reward those that do or can
Three waves of protest:- Before 2006 elections (local grievances – growing discontent- Between 2007-2008 (locals blamed for system wide grievances)- Post 2008 (frustration + attacks on foreign nationals)
Protests supplement not substitute elections as a control - Voter turnout rate is stable despite protests- Same parties are often returned
Local Democracy Peace and Human security
Impacts
Financial Negligible (2-11% withheld)
Social/political Erodes social cohesion
A spark for other forms of protest
Undermines local confidence
Undermines rule of law
Fast facts
Total withheld R10 mill (35 towns)
R3 mill (1 municipality)
+- 50% (2 municipalities)
No. disputes decl. 70 (335 on NTU list)
Business sector? No involvement
Who withholds Not all RA’s
Not all members of RA
Repayment? In some cases
Duration of dispute Between 2-5 years (10 yrs)
A new form of protest in more affluent communities ?
Response to actual service delivery failure
Sewage/sanitation: Raw sewage flowing into rivers, dams and water supply – threatening public health
Potable water: Lack of potable water supply to town due to inadequate maintenance of infrastructure
Electricity cut-offs: Eskom threats to cut off municipalities electricity due to non-payment of account
Source: CLC research 2010
Governance problems: capacity, maladministration, corruption, poor communication and accountability
Local Democracy Peace and Human security
Huge service delivery challenges Poor communication with communities & accountability Problems with the political-administrative interface Fraud and corruption Inter and intra-party issues negatively affecting governance
Responsive, accountable, effective & efficient local government
Sets out 7 outputs that form the basis of the Minister of CGTA’s performance contract with the President and service delivery agreements with MECs
State of Local Government Report (Oct 2009)
Turnaround strategy/ outcome 9 (2010)
Local Democracy Peace and Human security
• CGTA raises idea of single election in 2010
• Three main reasons for idea: – The high costs of running separate elections, – Would improve coordination of policy and implementation– Would facilitate deployment of senior politicians to LG
• Major criticisms of the idea: – Single election would destroy local democracy– Would require major adjustment to financial year, infrastructure planning and
auditing
• Confusing reports on outcome of Summit :– Idea was rejected?– Idea was not discussed?
Review separate election for local government?
Local Democracy Peace and Human security
In conclusion: some thoughts and questions:
- We need media debate and public policy that is better informed by rigorous research, and greater care is needed in making sweeping statements given the gaps in data
- Is there a real local politics and how well do we understand the forces shaping it?
- Is local politics and self-government simply a reflex of national politics?
- Have protests become institutionalized as a form of extracting accountability, and if so what impact does this have on the legitimacy of our local democracy?
- If political and economic power still track historical cleavages, have we experimented enough with local democracy – to incentivize a politics of over-coming cleavages?
Top Related