Department of Psychosocial Cancer Research
1
Den 3. stressforsknings konference 2006
Mind and cancer
Christoffer Johansen, M.D., Ph.D., DrMedSci.Head, Department of Psychosocial Cancer
ResearchInstitute of Cancer Epidemiology
Danish Cancer Society
Department of Psychosocial Cancer Research
2
Background
• The Department of Psychosocial Cancer Research (2001) utilise the epidemiological
approach and combine register-based research with clinical studies in an effort to study the
association between psychological factors, social factors and cancer
• The department combines various methodological approaches to the subject and
employs a range of persons educated from anthropology to statistics
Department of Psychosocial Cancer Research
3
Current research activities
Home visitEducationRehabilitationInternet groups
Home visitEducationRehabilitationInternet groups
Prognosis
PersonalityDepressionMoodSchizophreniaMajor life eventsPsychoactive drugsReligious belief
PersonalityDepressionMoodSchizophreniaMajor life eventsPsychoactive drugsReligious belief
Cause
Social lifePsychological well-beingDivorce IncomeWorkPsychiatric diseasesDepression Psychoactive drugsScreening for fam. BC
Social lifePsychological well-beingDivorce IncomeWorkPsychiatric diseasesDepression Psychoactive drugsScreening for fam. BC
Effect
Prevention
Smoking in adolescence
Department of Psychosocial Cancer Research
4
The epidemiological approach in psychosocial oncology focus on:
• Risk factors
• Psychosocial effects
• Psychosocial factors as prognostic factors
• Prevention
Background
Department of Psychosocial Cancer Research
6
Background
• Mind is an independent risk factor as well as an independent prognostic factor in cancer
• How is it possible to investigate this paradigm ??
The central paradigm
Department of Psychosocial Cancer Research
8
Background
• Numerous case-control studies, cross-sectional studies and retrospective follow-up studies have demonstrated the central paradigm – but only few acknowledge the limitations of these methods – especially when dealing with our mind
Department of Psychosocial Cancer Research
9
Background
• This retrospective tradition has some ’inborn’ methodological problems:
• Recall bias among cases • Exposure assessment by interview• Exposure assessment after diagnosis• Limited adjustment for biological factors
Department of Psychosocial Cancer Research
10
Background
Time
Exposureby ’mind’ factor
Cancer diagnosisExposureassessment
Basic principles/problems
Department of Psychosocial Cancer Research
11
Risk factors
• Major life events
• Depression• Personality
Department of Psychosocial Cancer Research
12
Johansen C. & Olsen JH. No effect of psychological stress on cancer incidence or
mortality from nonmalignant diseases.
British Journal of Cancer 1997; 75: 144-148
Major life events
Department of Psychosocial Cancer Research
13
Didier Bar - the Loreto Village with the Vesuvio in eruption, Rome, private collection
Department of Psychosocial Cancer Research
15
Etiology considerations
• Latency
• Duration
• Initiation
• Promotion
• Timing
Department of Psychosocial Cancer Research
16
Latency
• The exposure to the diagnosis of cancer in a child and risk for cancer in parents (Johansen & Olsen JH. No effect of psychological stress on cancer incidence or mortality from nonmalignant diseases. British Journal of Cancer 1997; 75(1): 144-148)
• The death of a child and risk for cancer in parents (Li J et al. Cancer incidence in parents who lost a child: a nationwide study in Denmark. Cancer 2002; 95: 2237 – 2242)
• The exposure to various stressful life-events (Bergelt C et al. Stressful life-events and risk for cancer. European Journal of Cancer, in press 2006)
Department of Psychosocial Cancer Research
17
Latency
• The diagnosis of scizophrenia in a child and risk for cancer in parents. (Dalton SO et al. Cancer incidence in parents who experience a child with schizophrenia – a major life event study in Denmark. British Journal of Cancer 2004; 90: 1364 – 66)
• Hospital admission for depression and subsequent risk for cancer (Dalton SO et al. Depression and risk for cancer: a register-based study of patients hospitalized with affective disorders, Denmark, 1969-93. American Journal of Epidemiology 2002; 155: 1088-95)
Department of Psychosocial Cancer Research
18
Duration
• Schapiro I et al. Personality and risk for cancer. American Journal of Epidemiology 2001; 153: 757 – 763.
• Schapiro I et al. Psychic vulnerability and the associated risk
of cancer. Cancer 2002; 94: 3299 – 3306.
• Hansen PE et al. Personality traits, health behavior and risk for cancer: A prospective study of a Swedish twins cohort. Cancer 2005; 103: 1082 – 1091.
• Bergelt C et al. Vital exhaustion and risk for cancer: a prosepctive cohort study on the association between depressive feelings, fatigue and risk for cancer. Cancer 2005; 104: 1288 - 1295
Personality traits
Department of Psychosocial Cancer Research
19
Duration
• A large prospective study of daily job strain among 26 936 women in the American Nurses Health study (Achat 2000)
• Perceived stress of daily activities in a Finnish
cohort of 10 519 women (Lillberg 2001)
• No increased risk for breast cancer
Department of Psychosocial Cancer Research
20
Initiation or Promotion (?)
Time
Initiator establish gene defect
Promotor increase rate of malignant cell division
Cancer diagnosis
Department of Psychosocial Cancer Research
21
Timing
Time
Cancer diagnosisBirth
When is the vulnerable exposure window (?)
Department of Psychosocial Cancer Research
22
Timing
• We currently study the risk of cervical dysplasia among young women exposed the death of one or two parents during childhood and adolescence (Magtengaard 2006)
• We also study the risk for cancer after the death of spouse, divorce or separation (Ross 2007)
Department of Psychosocial Cancer Research
23
Etiology considerations
• Latency
• Duration
• Initiation
• Promotion
• Timing
Department of Psychosocial Cancer Research
24
Depression
S Oksbjerg Dalton, L Mellemkjær, JH Olsen and C Johansen, , PB Mortensen.
Depression and cancer risk: A register-based study of patients hospitalized with affective
disorders, Denmark, 1969-93
American Journal of Epidemiology 2002; 155: 1088-95
Department of Psychosocial Cancer Research
26
Tobacco-related cancer risk
Total First year of follow-up
1 years of follow-up
Obs SIR Obs SIR Obs SIR
Reactive depression 2075 1.13* 184 1.62 1891 1.10*
Tobacco related1 663 1.41* 58 2.03* 605 1.37*
Non-tobacco-related 1412 1.03 126 1.48 1286 1.00
Dysthymia 2285 1.18* 118 1.32* 2167 1.17*
Tobacco related1 714 1.56* 30 1.58* 684 1.56*
Non-tobacco-related 1571 1.06 88 1.25 1486 1.06*
*95% CI excludes 1.001Cancers of the buccal cavity, larynx, lung, esophagus, pancreas, kidney and urinary bladder
Department of Psychosocial Cancer Research
27
Conclusions
This study gives no further support to the hypotheses that depression increases the risk for cancer
The increased risk observed in this study canprobably be ascribed to increased smoking
Department of Psychosocial Cancer Research
28
Personality
Schapiro I, Falgaard Nielsen L, Jørgensen T, Boesen E, Johansen C.
Psychic vulnerability and the associated risk of cancer.
Cancer 2002; 94: 3299-3306
Department of Psychosocial Cancer Research
30
A number of studies have reported that personality influence the risk of cancer
Hagnell 1966, Huggan 1968, Abse et al. 1974, Dattore et al.1980, Kirkcaldy & Kobylinska 1987, Scherg 1987, Grossarth-Maticek et al. 1988, Quander-Blaznik 1991
Department of Psychosocial Cancer Research
31
The Cohort
Invited7734
Participants5812(75%)
Excluded676
(12%)
Study population5136(88%)
Department of Psychosocial Cancer Research
32
Psychic vulnerability
A reaction readiness defined by a low threshold of being influenced and a risk of inexpedient reactions in social interaction or in a psychosomatic direction
Department of Psychosocial Cancer Research
33
Cox proportional hazard analyses included information of:
• Age• Sex• Personality
measurement• Marital status• Social class• Alcohol consumption• Tobacco smoking • Body mass index
Analyses
Department of Psychosocial Cancer Research
34
Variable Multivariate adjusted HR
95% CI
Vulnerability 1.160.85-1.57
Current smokers 1.391.05-1.83
Alcohol consumption> 14 units of alcohol per week
1.501.05-2.15
Adjusted risk of cancer
Department of Psychosocial Cancer Research
35
Discussion
• Exposure information (mind factor) from administrative sources versus based on personal interviews or questionnaires
• Lack of confounder information (biology)
• Recall bias in case control studies – a serious problem
Department of Psychosocial Cancer Research
36
Discussion
• The association between the mind factor and behaviour
• Smoking, alcohol and diet are self-medications in order to cope with major life events, depression and personality
• Policies to prevent smoking and alcohol consumption may focus more on well defined groups at risk for developing these behaviours
Department of Psychosocial Cancer Research
37
Discussion
• Do stress prevent cancer ?
• Nielsen et al. BMJ 2005: High endogenous concentrations of oestrogen are a known risk factor for breast cancer, and impairment of oestrogen synthesis induced by chronic stress may explain a lower incidence of breast cancer in women with high stress.
• Impairment of normal body function should not, however, be considered a healthy response, and the cumulative health consequences of stress may be disadvantageous.
Department of Psychosocial Cancer Research
38
Discussion
Biological mechanism
Mind Immunefunction Cancer
Department of Psychosocial Cancer Research
39
Discussion
• Contrary to the ‘mind – cancer’ hypothesis we did not identify an increased risk for immune system related cancers such as leukemia, lymphoma and liver cancer in any of the studies published so far.
• In addition we did not observe an increased risk for hormone related cancers such as breast cancer or ovary cancer.
Department of Psychosocial Cancer Research
40
Conclusion I
A. The cancer-prone mind model
B. The mind-health behaviour model
Mind Pathophysiological
processes
Impaired immunesystem
Cancer
Mind
Health behaviour Pathophysiological
processes
Cancer
Department of Psychosocial Cancer Research
41
Conclusion I
Stress does not cause cancerIARC 4:
The agent (mixture) is probably not carcinogenic to humans
Department of Psychosocial Cancer Research
42
Conclusion II
Policies to prevent smoking and alcohol consumption may focus more on well defined groups at risk for developing these behaviours
Department of Psychosocial Cancer Research
43
Conclusion III
• Social inequality is probably the ‘new’ risk factor for risk behaviour and thus increased risk for certain lifestyle associated cancer types will be more prevalent in lower social classes compared to higher social classes
• Social class determines survival
Department of Psychosocial Cancer Research
45
Information and contact
www.cancer.dk
Top Related