7/27/2019 debate stock issues.pdf
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/debate-stock-issuespdf 1/24
Basic Positions Affirmative
Supports the resolution
7/27/2019 debate stock issues.pdf
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/debate-stock-issuespdf 2/24
Basic Positions Affirmative
Supports the resolution
Proves the Status Quo (present system) isbad
7/27/2019 debate stock issues.pdf
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/debate-stock-issuespdf 3/24
Basic Positions Affirmative
Supports the resolution
Proves the Status Quo (present system) isbad
Presents the Need for Change (Case)
7/27/2019 debate stock issues.pdf
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/debate-stock-issuespdf 4/24
Basic Positions Affirmative
Supports the resolution
Proves the Status Quo (present system) isbad
Presents the Need for Change (Case)
Presents their Plan for Change (Plan)
7/27/2019 debate stock issues.pdf
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/debate-stock-issuespdf 5/24
Basic Positions Affirmative
Supports the resolution
Proves the Status Quo (present system) isbad
Presents the Need for Change (Case)
Presents their Plan for Change (Plan) Shows an advantage/solution to their Plan
(Advantages)
7/27/2019 debate stock issues.pdf
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/debate-stock-issuespdf 6/24
Basic Positions Negative
Negates the Resolution
7/27/2019 debate stock issues.pdf
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/debate-stock-issuespdf 7/24
Basic Positions Negative
Negates the Resolution
Argues that there is no reason to change
7/27/2019 debate stock issues.pdf
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/debate-stock-issuespdf 8/24
Basic Positions Negative
Negates the Resolution
Argues that there is no reason to change
Argues the Affirmative Plan will not work
7/27/2019 debate stock issues.pdf
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/debate-stock-issuespdf 9/24
Basic Positions Negative
Negates the Resolution
Argues that there is no reason to change
Argues the Affirmative Plan will not work
Argues the Affirmative has not met its
responsibilities
7/27/2019 debate stock issues.pdf
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/debate-stock-issuespdf 10/24
Basic Positions Negative
Negates the Resolution
Argues that there is no reason to change
Argues the Affirmative Plan will not work
Argues the Affirmative has not met its
responsibilities Argues the Affirmative would be worse
than the Status Quo (the present system)
7/27/2019 debate stock issues.pdf
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/debate-stock-issuespdf 11/24
Stock Issues in Debate Harm: What’s the problem
7/27/2019 debate stock issues.pdf
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/debate-stock-issuespdf 12/24
Stock Issues in Debate Harm: What’s the problem
Significance: How big is the problem?
7/27/2019 debate stock issues.pdf
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/debate-stock-issuespdf 13/24
Stock Issues in Debate Harm: What’s the problem
Significance: How big is the problem?
Quantitative
7/27/2019 debate stock issues.pdf
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/debate-stock-issuespdf 14/24
Stock Issues in Debate Harm: What’s the problem
Significance: How big is the problem?
Quantitative
Qualitative
7/27/2019 debate stock issues.pdf
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/debate-stock-issuespdf 15/24
Stock Issues in Debate Harm: What’s the problem
Significance: How big is the problem?
Quantitative
Qualitative
Inherency: Why does the problem exist?
7/27/2019 debate stock issues.pdf
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/debate-stock-issuespdf 16/24
Stock Issues in Debate Harm: What’s the problem
Significance: How big is the problem?
Quantitative
Qualitative
Inherency: Why does the problem exist?
Structural: A law or ruling that causes theharm
7/27/2019 debate stock issues.pdf
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/debate-stock-issuespdf 17/24
Stock Issues in Debate Harm: What’s the problem
Significance: How big is the problem?
Quantitative Qualitative
Inherency: Why does the problem exist?
Structural: A law or ruling that causes the harm
Attitudinal: The attitudes of policy makers/businesses, etc. cause the harm
7/27/2019 debate stock issues.pdf
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/debate-stock-issuespdf 18/24
Stock Issues in Debate Harm: What’s the problem
Significance: How big is the problem?
Quantitative Qualitative
Inherency: Why does the problem exist?
Structural: A law or ruling that causes the harm
Attitudinal: The attitudes of policy makers/businesses, etc. cause the harm
Gap: No laws or rulings exist to solve the problem
7/27/2019 debate stock issues.pdf
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/debate-stock-issuespdf 19/24
Stock Issues in Debate Harm: What’s the problem
Significance: How big is the problem?
Quantitative Qualitative
Inherency: Why does the problem exist? Structural: A law or ruling that causes the harm
Attitudinal: The attitudes of policy makers/businesses, etc. cause the harm
Gap: No laws or rulings exist to solve the problem
Existential: The problem exists; no cause has been
found.
7/27/2019 debate stock issues.pdf
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/debate-stock-issuespdf 20/24
Stock Issues
Solvency
Proof that the action of the affirmative plan
will solve the problem
7/27/2019 debate stock issues.pdf
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/debate-stock-issuespdf 21/24
Stock Issues
Solvency
Proof that the action of the affirmative plan
will solve the problem *Topicality *A Voting Issue
7/27/2019 debate stock issues.pdf
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/debate-stock-issuespdf 22/24
Stock Issues
Solvency
Proof that the action of the affirmative plan
will solve the problem *Topicality *A Voting Issue
For the affirmative: an unstated conditionof the affirmative plan being a part of theresolution
7/27/2019 debate stock issues.pdf
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/debate-stock-issuespdf 23/24
Stock Issues
Solvency Proof that the action of the affirmative plan
will solve the problem
*Topicality *A Voting Issue For the affirmative: an unstated condition
of the affirmative plan being a part of the
resolution For the negative: an issue to bring up
when the aff. plan is not part of theresolution
7/27/2019 debate stock issues.pdf
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/debate-stock-issuespdf 24/24
To Review the Basic Voting
Issues: Significance
Harms Inherency
(Topicality)
Solvency
Top Related