Cultural Heritage in REGional NETworksCultural Heritage in REGional NETworks
REGNETREGNET
Project Meeting Content Group
2002-06-24 - 2002-06-26
2
June 2002 REGNET Project Team Meeting Content Group
Detailed agenda 2nd day Detailed agenda 2nd day
Tuesday, 2002-06-25
9:00 - 9:15 Opening
Session 1: Usability Tests
9:15 - 9:30 Introduction
9:30 - 10:30 Working Groups
Usability criteria for the REGNET systemQuestionnaires - questions & task[Card Sorting exercise]
10:30 - 11:00 Coffee break
11:00 - 11:30 Presentation & Discussion
Report by rappateur, agreement
Session 2: Functional Tests
11:30 - 11:45 Introduction
11:45 - 13:00 Working groupsDiscussion (together with technical partners !?
9:00 - 9:15 Opening
Session 1: Usability Tests
9:15 - 9:30 Introduction
9:30 - 10:30 Working Groups
Usability criteria for the REGNET systemQuestionnaires - questions & task[Card Sorting exercise]
10:30 - 11:00 Coffee break
11:00 - 11:30 Presentation & Discussion
Report by rappateur, agreement
Session 2: Functional Tests
11:30 - 11:45 Introduction
11:45 - 13:00 Working groupsDiscussion (together with technical partners !?
„Validation day“
Flexible course of this session!
3
June 2002 REGNET Project Team Meeting Content Group
Detailed agenda 2nd day Detailed agenda 2nd day
Tuesday, 2002-06-25
13:00 - 14:00 Lunch Break
Session 3: Content Tests
14:00 - 14:15 Introduction
14:15 - 15:15 Working groups
Define necessary content quality criteria
15:15 - 16:00 Presentation & Discussion
Report by rappateur, agreement
16:00 - 16:30 Coffee Break
Session 4: Content Collection (Plan) - Other content types
16:30 - 16:45 Introduction
16:45 - 17:15 Working groups
Working on the templates for other objecttypes, Issues to be agreed upon with regard to the collecting of content
13:00 - 14:00 Lunch Break
Session 3: Content Tests
14:00 - 14:15 Introduction
14:15 - 15:15 Working groups
Define necessary content quality criteria
15:15 - 16:00 Presentation & Discussion
Report by rappateur, agreement
16:00 - 16:30 Coffee Break
Session 4: Content Collection (Plan) - Other content types
16:30 - 16:45 Introduction
16:45 - 17:15 Working groups
Working on the templates for other objecttypes, Issues to be agreed upon with regard to the collecting of content
„Validation day“
4
June 2002 REGNET Project Team Meeting Content Group
Detailed agenda 2nd day Detailed agenda 2nd day
Tuesday, 2002-06-25
Session 4: Content Collection (Plan) (cont)
17:15 - 18:00 Presentation & Discussion
Report by rappateur, agreement
18:00 - 18:30 Summary of 2nd day
Session 4: Content Collection (Plan) (cont)
17:15 - 18:00 Presentation & Discussion
Report by rappateur, agreement
18:00 - 18:30 Summary of 2nd day
„Validation day“
What we have prepared:
- Introductions to the methodology- Tools & instruments- Tasks for working groups- Suggestion for task assignment- To Do‘s after Sofia
See set of working materials!
5
June 2002 REGNET Project Team Meeting Content Group
2nd day - High-level planning 2nd day - High-level planning
Session 1: Remaining issues 1st day 11:00 - 12:00
- Data entry - How to proceed?
- Presentation of Object Publisher (Walter)
Session 2 Short overview about validation/task assignment
12:00 - 12.30
- Short overview about the tests to be carried out
- Draft for task assignment
Session 3 Status reports
12:30 - 15:00 Starting with MECH
Common session with technical partners regarding functional testing 15:00 - 16:00
Session 1: Remaining issues 1st day 11:00 - 12:00
- Data entry - How to proceed?
- Presentation of Object Publisher (Walter)
Session 2 Short overview about validation/task assignment
12:00 - 12.30
- Short overview about the tests to be carried out
- Draft for task assignment
Session 3 Status reports
12:30 - 15:00 Starting with MECH
Common session with technical partners regarding functional testing 15:00 - 16:00
6
June 2002 REGNET Project Team Meeting Content Group
Data preparationData preparation
Part 1: Data Entry IssuesObject Publisher
AIT
- Steps, status/available databases- Open issues
11:00 - 12:00
7
June 2002 REGNET Project Team Meeting Content Group
Data entry - Issues, questionsData entry - Issues, questions
- How will the data be processed?
- Is there any effort necessary from the side of the content providers?
- Could you process all data (formats) more or less automatically?
- How should new data be managed (cataloguing, uploading)
- Use the templates Vic provided?
- Any local solution? (CMS)
- When will all databases be available?
The actual process of data conversion seems to be very time-intensive - How could the further process of export be supported by the content providers – which tools/respe. formats?
8
June 2002 REGNET Project Team Meeting Content Group
Data entry - Testing strategyData entry - Testing strategy
Test is needed for:
- Conversion of data (integrity check)
- Content quality criteria
- Tools: Functionality !
9
June 2002 REGNET Project Team Meeting Content Group
Detailed agenda 3nd day Detailed agenda 3nd day
Wednesday, 2002-06-26
Open and remaining issues (3rd Day)
8:30 - 10:45 Open, remaining issues
Consolidation, planning, reporting
Report by rappateur, agreement
10:45 End of content group meeting
Open and remaining issues (3rd Day)
8:30 - 10:45 Open, remaining issues
Consolidation, planning, reporting
Report by rappateur, agreement
10:45 End of content group meeting
10
June 2002 REGNET Project Team Meeting Content Group
Status reportsStatus reports
Status reports[could not be finished during the
meeting]
All partners should send their presentations to AIT for publishing on the web site:
- to prepare review meeting- to give other partners possibility to inform
about status of data generation/data available
11
June 2002 REGNET Project Team Meeting Content Group
Review MeetingReview Meeting
Review Meeting 2002-07-04
Planning: Content related issues WP 2.1
Presentation of content cases (30 minutes)
1. Introduction - Tasks, work done, status (IMAC) 10 minutes
2. Tools for (offline) data entry (TARX) 5 minutes
3. Topic map structuring (TARX) 5 minutes
4. Content Cases 1 - SUL
5. Content Cases 2 - TARX (MECH/GRAN)
6. Content Cases 3 - ICCSTechnical partners should prepare demos using real data.Already fixed for E-Shop (NRM, LMG, GRAN) [ZEUS]
Final preparation(after lunch)
12
June 2002 REGNET Project Team Meeting Content Group
Validation conceptValidation concept
2002-06-26
Validation concept!
13
June 2002 REGNET Project Team Meeting Content Group
UsabilityUsabilityFunctionalityFunctionality
Tasks
ContentContent PerformancePerformance
Does it workas promised?
Does it workas promised?
Schedule Reporting procedures
UserExperts Experts
Can the (end)user work withthe system?
Can the (end)user work withthe system?
Does thecontent meetexpectations?
Does thecontent meetexpectations?
Does it deliver in time, withoutcracking underheavy load?
Does it deliver in time, withoutcracking underheavy load?
Test based onfunctional requirements
Test based onfunctional requirements
User exercises,card sorting,heuristics
User exercises,card sorting,heuristics
Online testsagainst defined quality criteria
Online testsagainst defined quality criteria
Load and stress tests
Load and stress tests
What?
Why?
How?
Validation frameworkValidation framework
14
June 2002 REGNET Project Team Meeting Content Group
Test strategy - overview Test strategy - overview
Interviews/Inspection
Questionnaires
Checklists
Carrying out the tests (1st phase)
Professionals“Administrators”(people who shouldwork with the system)
DevelopersPeople who developed the system and must implement changes
Internal Test User (Consortium)
ExpertsPeople with “special” know-how (e. g. designer which
could judge about special aspects of the system ( e. g. usability)
Validation PM IMAC
Instruments & Guidelines
Results(Reporting workflow)
Effort foreseen: approx. 18 PM [2002-06-30]
15
June 2002 REGNET Project Team Meeting Content Group
Test strategy - overview Test strategy - overview
Carrying out the tests (2nd phase)
Professionals“Administrators”: Customers
End UsersVisitors, cultural workers(e. g. artists)
External Test User
REGNET partners (consortium)
WP 4 Demonstration Phase [ 2002-07-01 - End of the project]
Validation PM TARX
16
June 2002 REGNET Project Team Meeting Content Group
To Do‘s in Sofia and after Sofia To Do‘s in Sofia and after Sofia
Workplan for Sofia
1. Agreement on test user groups (professionals)2. Finalise usability questionnaires 3. Finalise usability criteria (REGNET Usability Index)4. Define content quality criteria5. Evaluate templates for additional object types (Portal)6. Agree upon relevant content for the portal
6. Agreement on test cases - necessary functional tests7. Definition of technical quality criteria (performance criteria/scenarios)
Workinggroups
Plenum/specialworkinggroups
Task assignment and scheduling (high-level planning)
17
June 2002 REGNET Project Team Meeting Content Group
To Do‘s in Sofia and after Sofia To Do‘s in Sofia and after Sofia
Tasks to be assigned (during the meeting)
Performance tests Technical partners
Functional tests Technical/content partners
1. Estimation of total number of test cases => Development of missing test cases
2. Carry out test cases - distribution of work(n test cases per partner)
At the moment: 72 test cases available. Suggestion (to be discussed): 3 partners to carry out the tests at the side of the content providers
Could be the person directly involved in the project
3. Carry out further tests
Estimation: 10 days(for 300 test cases)
Estimation: 0,5 hour pertest case (includingreporting and qualityassurance)
=> 2 days per partner
Common session with technical partners
18
June 2002 REGNET Project Team Meeting Content Group
Tasks to be assigned (during the meeting)
Usability tests Content partners
1. Carry out heuristic evaluation(portal, end user view)
Suggestion (to be discussed): 3 heuristic tests =3 persons = 3 partners
Usability experts / persons with experience incomputers + internet (overview about similar websites projects)
Estimation: 1 dayper day (test), 1day reporting
=> 2 days per partner
Start depends on the status of the portal, thewhole testing process could be seen as a furtherrequirements definition
To Do‘s in Sofia and after Sofia To Do‘s in Sofia and after Sofia
19
June 2002 REGNET Project Team Meeting Content Group
Tasks to be assigned (during the meeting)
Usability tests Content partners
2. Carry out scenario based tests („Tester“ and test person)
Suggestion (to be discussed): 2 tests per partner= approx. 30 tests
For the 1st phase: test persons with professional back-ground within your organisation (experience with thetasks the system is intended to support)
3. Carry out card sorting „experiments“(navigational structure of portal - 1st phase: adminstrative view)
Suggestion (to be discussed): 3 tests per partner, all professional groups represented (equally)
Estimation: 1 dayfor carrying out 2 testsand reporting.
=> 1 day per partner
Estimation: 1 hour per test=> 0,5 days
per partner
To Do‘s in Sofia and after Sofia To Do‘s in Sofia and after Sofia
20
June 2002 REGNET Project Team Meeting Content Group
Tasks to be assigned (during the meeting)
Content tests Content partners
1. Check the integrity of your data(data bases)
Must be done by each content provider with owndata!
2. Check the quality of your data
Must be done by each content provider with owndata!
Estimation: 1 dayper partner
Could not be estimated(depends on the degreeof content quality?)
To Do‘s in Sofia and after Sofia To Do‘s in Sofia and after Sofia
21
June 2002 REGNET Project Team Meeting Content Group
Most important tasksMost important tasks
Expert group for heuristic testing of portalCatalogue of criteria available
Expert group for validation of language(s)Could be done on the basis of the content quality assurance sheets
Partners responsible for functional tests
Assignment of tasks according to the componentspresented
E-Shop/Catalogue ManagementAuction SystemE-PublishingTopic Map (Generator), Viewer?Data GenerationSearch (Multi-Site search?)Portal (Heuristic Evaluation)
22
June 2002 REGNET Project Team Meeting Content Group
Most important tasksMost important tasks
Generate new content
Catalogue of criteria available
Translate existing content
Must be a task of the content providers. Work must be“distributed” according to native language! Suggestion: group of technical and content partner ...
Top Related