CRITICAL THINKING IN THE ICU:
IMPLEMENTING BEST PRACTICES
Your Presenter: Carol Lynn Esposito, Ed.D., JD, MS, RN
• NYSNA is accredited as a provider of continuing nursing
education by the American Nurses Credentialing Center’s
Commission on Accreditation.
• 1.0 contact hours are awarded for this program. In order to
receive contact hours you must stay for the entire
workshop and fill out an evaluation form at the end.
• NYSNA is accredited by the International Association of
Continuing Education and Training (IACET) and is
authorized to issue the IACET CEU. NYSNA is authorized
by IACET to offer .1 CEU for this program.
• NYSNA wishes to disclose that no commercial support was
received.
• Presenters and planners disclose no conflict of interest.
All American Nurses Credentialing Center (ANCC) accredited organizations' contact
hours are recognized by all other ANCC accredited organizations. Most states with
mandatory continuing education requirements recognize the ANCC
accreditation/approval system. Questions about the acceptance of ANCC contact
hours to meet mandatory regulations should be directed to the professional
licensing board within that state.
OBJECTIVES
Discuss best practices in advanced nursing assessment
and critical thinking that can result in positive patient
outcomes in the ICU
Demonstrate critical thinking while considering
variables that will positively influence the patient’s
clinical condition and nursing care planning in the ICU
DEFINITION OF CRITICAL THINKING
FORMAL DEFINITION
Cognitive process during which an individual reviews data and
considers potential explanations and outcomes before
forming an opinion or making a decision.
“Critical thinking in nursing practice is a discipline specific,
reflective reasoning process that guides the nurse in
generating, implementing, and evaluating approaches for
dealing with client care and professional concerns.” NLN
2000
CRITICAL THINKING:
THE ART OF THINKING ABOUT YOUR THINKING
While you are thinking in order to make your thinking better: more clear, more
accurate, or more defensible.
Reasoning process by which individuals reflect on and
analyze their own thoughts, actions, & decisions and those of
others
A NURSE WHO IS A CRITICAL THINKER WILL:
Identify and raise vital questions and problems related to an issue that is presently before them,
formulating the issue clearly and precisely;
Gather and assess relevant information (past and present), using abstract thinking (a chess
move) to interpret the issue effectively and come to a well-reasoned conclusion and/or solution,
testing their reasoning against relevant nursing criteria and standards;
Think open-mindedly within alternative systems of thought (different nursing theories,
interdisciplinary approach, etc), recognizing and assessing, as need be, the assumptions,
implications, and practical consequences of their conclusions; and
Communicate effectively with others in creating and implementing a plan of care to address
healthcare problems
LET’S SUMMARIZE:
CRITICAL THINKING AND NURSING JUDGMENT
Decision making is the skill that separates the professional nurse
from technical or ancillary staff
Critical thinking is NOT a linear step by step process (skills check
list), but a process of looking at what is in front of you now, and
bringing all of your past knowledge and experiences into the
present situation to solve the present problem
Adult thinking and adult education is premised on an active
curiosity toward coming up with the best solution for a situation
ATTITUDES THAT FOSTER CRITICAL THINKING
Independence—don’t rely on computerized drop-downs
Fair-mindedness
Insight into ethnocentricity
Intellectual humility—you don’t always know the answer
Intellectual courage to challenge status quo
Integrity
Perseverance—look to alternatives
Confidence
Curiosity that fosters questioning and good problem solving skills
CRITICAL THINKING IN NURSING….
• Purposeful, outcome-directed
• Based on principles of nursing process and the
scientific method
• Guided by professional standards and code of ethics
• Requires strategies that maximize potential and
compensate for problems
• Constantly reevaluating, self-correcting, and striving
to improve individual practice
HOW DO NURSE'S ACCOMPLISH CRITICAL THINKING?
Learn to be flexible in clinical decision making
Reflect on past experiences and previous knowledge
Get input from others
Identify the nature of the problem
Select the best solution for improving client’s health
Review literature
BEHIND THE SCENES OF CRITICAL THINKING
WHAT IS THE NURSING PROCESS
• Systematic approach that is used by all nurses to gather data, critically examine and analyze the data, identify client responses, design outcomes, take appropriate action, then evaluate the effectiveness of action
• Involves the use of critical thinking skills
• Common language for nurses to “think through” clinical problems
BREAKING DOWN THE NURSING PROCESS EVEN FURTHER, THE
CRITICAL-THINKING PATTERN OF EXAMINATION IN THE DATA
COLLECTION STAGE WOULD LOOK LIKE THIS:
BREAKING DOWN THE NURSING PROCESS EVEN FURTHER, THE CRITICAL-THINKING
PATTERN OF EXAMINATION IN THE NURSING DIAGNOSIS STAGE WOULD LOOK LIKE THIS:
BREAKING DOWN THE NURSING PROCESS EVEN FURTHER, THE
CRITICAL-THINKING PATTERN OF EXAMINATION IN THE GOAL
SETTING STAGE WOULD LOOK LIKE THIS:
BREAKING DOWN THE NURSING PROCESS EVEN FURTHER, THE
CRITICAL-THINKING PATTERN OF EXAMINATION IN THE NURSING
PLANNING AND INTERVENTION STAGES WOULD LOOK LIKE THIS:
CRITICAL THINKING AND THE NURSING PROCESS:
HOW DO THEY RELATE TO ONE ANOTHER?
Identify health care needs
Determine Priorities
Establish goals & expected
outcomes
Provide appropriate
interventions
Evaluate effectiveness
CRITICAL THINKING AND NURSING CARE PLANS:
HOW DO THEY RELATE TO ONE ANOTHER?
Written guidelines for client care
Organized so nurse can quickly
identify nursing actions to be
delivered
Coordinates resources for care
Enhances the continuity of care
Organizes information for change of
shift report
BROKEN DOWN INTO THE ELEMENTS OF THE NURSING PROCESS, THE CRITICAL
THINKING PATTERN OF EXAMINATION WOULD LOOK LIKE THIS.Section Information to Include
Introduction (patient and problem) Data Collection
Identify who the patient is (Age, gender, etc.) Identify what the problem is (What was he/she diagnosed with, or what happened?) Look for abnormal functions Triage the care (What should the nurse focus on or do in successive order? What problems are
immediate—what can wait?) What problems can nursing focus on, what problems can be delegated? What problems require
multi-disciplinary approach?
Pathophysiology Data Collection
Describe the disease (What are the symptoms? What causes it?) What does my past experience tell me about this disease? Do I need to know more?
Health History Data Collection
Describe what health problems the patient has (Has she/he been diagnosed with other diseases?)
What are the risk factors that may contribute to health problems, such as smoking? Detail any and all previous treatments (Has she/he had any prior surgeries or is he/she on
medication?) What are the patient’s strengths, weaknesses?
Nursing Physical Assessment and Issue Identify
What information do I need? How do I get the information I need? Are there other questions I should ask? Data gather. List all the patient’s health stats with specific numbers/levels (Blood pressure,
bowel sounds, ambulation, etc.). Is my data valid? Identify and list actual and potential nursing issues.
Related Treatments Recognize what treatments the patient is receiving because of his/her disease
Nursing Diagnosis & Patient Goal What does the data mean?, Is the data based on fact? What should I do? Identify what the nursing diagnosis should be (What is the main problem for this patient? What
needed to be addressed?) Describe what the goal should be for helping the patient recover (What should the patient
accomplish? What needs to change for the patient? What time frame?)
Nursing Care Plan Outline a care plan—what interventions should be put into action? Is the plan specialized? Ask: is this the best way to deal with the issue?
Nursing Interventions Explain how the nursing goals can be accomplished, and support this with citations (Reference the literature)
Is there a change in status that needs an immediate change in the plan?
Evaluation Explain how effective the nursing intervention was (What happened after the nursing intervention? Did the patient get better?)—What are you going to report? What are you going to chart?
Recommendations Explain what the patient or nurse should do in the future to continue recovery/improvement
Assessment Data• Physical Assessment
• Q & A
Nursing Diagnosis* See: Complete List of NANDA
Nursing Diagnoses online
Planning Nursing Implementation Evaluationand
Documentation
* See Impact of poor
documentation
CASE SCENARIOMaria is a 70-year-old woman who developed 5/10 sub-sternal chest pain (on a 0-10 pain scale) and shortness of breath.
Upon arrival in the ED, Maria was somewhat anxious. The ER nurse assessment included:
Vital signs: 110/70 mm Hg, 92 bpm and regular, afebrile, saturating at 92% on supplemental oxygen.
Weight was 190 pounds; body mass index (BMI), 32. A jugular venous pressure (JVP) at 5 cm above the clavicle and a laterally displaced point of
maximal impulse, S4 and S3, and a 3/6 systolic murmur of mitral regurgitation. Hepatojugular reflux (HJR). 1+ pitting edema to mid shin bilaterally.
She is admitted to a medical floor with an initial diagnosis of congestive heart failure (CHF).
Upon arrival to the floor, she is received with the following orders from the admitting physician:
Heart monitor Insert INT needle Heparin drip at 1200 units per hour VS q 4 hours and prn OOB TID Low Na+ diet Insert foley catheter I & O
The medical admitting nurse assesses the following:
alert and oriented x 3, color pale, skin warm and dry BP 100/60, HR 80 and regular, RR-26, Temp 97 mild oxygen desaturation on room air at 88%. 2+ pedal edema and pedal pulses present (2+ PT and DP) EKG showed normal sinus rhythm with no acute abnormalities abdomen soft and tender
CASE SCENARIOHistory included hypertension for 40 years, mild obesity, and hyperlipidemia. She has a 30-pack year history of smoking and no history of alcohol or illicit drug abuse.
She has no diabetes, kidney disease, or family history of early heart disease. Her medications include hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) 25 mg daily, which she has taken for the last 10 years, and simvastatin 20 mg daily.
Recent history includes one month of progressive dyspnea on exertion, fatigue, abdominal bloating, and lower extremity edema without anginal symptoms, diaphoresis, nausea, palpitations, or dizziness. Over the past week, she had a few episodes of paroxysmal nocturnal dyspnea and orthopnea.
Diagnostic findings included:
an elevated brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) at 1,100 picograms per milliliter serial troponins and other labs were negative chest x-ray revealed an enlarged cardiac silhouette, mild pulmonary edema without effusion,
and consolidation echocardiogram revealed a LVEF of 32%, with dilatation, no wall motion abnormalities serial EKGs were normal
During her hospitalization, Maria received diuretic therapy with improvement in her symptoms. Her BNP dropped to 200 picograms per milliliter; other labs remained stable; oxygen saturation normalized on room air.
At discharge, her exam demonstrated a 10-pound weight loss with resolution of the HJR and lower extremity edema. Cardiac exam was significant for ongoing lateral point of maximal impulse PMI, or apical impulse, 3/6 systolic murmur of mitral regurgitation, and resolution of the S3. The JVP was at the clavicle.
Discharge medications included furosemide 20 mg PO daily, lisinopril 10 mg daily, simvastatin 20 mg daily at bedtime, and carvedilol 3.125 mg twice a day. The side effects and reasons for use for each medication were reviewed.
SMALL GROUP INTERACTIONCalculate how many cc’s/hour the heparin drip should infuse to deliver 1200 units
per hour (the pharmacy sends a heparin drip that contains 25,000 units of
heparin in 250cc D5W).
STOP AND THINKCondition: Heart Failure Assessment
Gender/Age Ethnicity
Legal/Ethical
Socioeconomic
Cultural Considerations
Communication Orientation
Pre/Co-existing conditions
Present Condition Prioritization
Pharmacologic Alternative Therapy Delegation of care
SMALL GROUP INTERACTION
What abnormal assessment findings are present upon admission to the ER?
What abnormal assessment findings are present upon admission to the medical floor?
What potential problems could occur?
What 2 nursing diagnoses can you identify?
What 2 nursing interventions would be appropriate for this patient?
How do you use BNP measurements to guide diagnosis and treatment of heart failure?
The patient was discharged on a diuretic. Why was potassium not started?
Why was a beta-blocker started?
What assessments should be done at the first outpatient visit?
PLEASE FILL OUT YOUR EVALUATION
Top Related