Novak, J. D. (2010). Learning, Creating, and Using Knowledge: Concept Maps as Facilitative Tools in Schools and Corporations. New York, NY: Routledge.
Role in interaction design
• Summarizing design sessions
• Establishing user interface vocabulary
• Building a common understanding in a project team
• Providing input for information architecture
Process
1. Identify a focus question
2. Write down main concepts
3. Choose the most general concept and categorize other concepts under that
4. Connect concepts with linking lines and choose appropriate labels
5. Introduce intermediate concepts when you have more than 4 concepts under any concept
Types of links
• causal (leads to, produces)
• explanation (is a reason for)
• nominal (known as)
• property (consists of, has)
• procedure (results in, done by, way to do)
• probable (likely, always)
• event (comes before)
(Loganathan, 2010)
Concept mapping software
• CmapTools: http://cmap.ihmc.us
• Visual Understanding Environment: http://vue.tufts.edu
Why not mind maps?
• Only one central concept
• No linking labels
• Typically only linear structure
(Nicoguaro, 2011)
References• CmapTools (n.d.). http://cmapskm.ihmc.us/rid=1064009710027_1483270340_27090/CmapTools
%20-%20Concept%20Map%20About%20Concept%20Maps.cmap
• CmapTools (n.d.). http://cmapskm.ihmc.us/rid=1064009710027_279131382_27088/CmapTools%20-%20Bulding%20a%20Concept%20Map.cmap
• Leinonen, T., Purma, J., Põldoja, H., & Toikkanen, T. (2010). Information Architecture and Design Solutions Scaffolding Authoring of Open Educational Resources. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 3(2), 116–128. doi:10.1109/TLT.2010.2
• Loganathan, M. (2010). Concept map vs mind map. http://www.slideshare.net/muralidharanl/concept-map-vs-mind-map-6287765
• Nicoguaro (2011). Mind map guidelines. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:MindMapGuidlines.svg
• Põldoja, H., & Väljataga, T. (2010). Externalization of a PLE: Conceptual Design of LeContract. In The PLE 2010 Conference Proceedings. Barcelona: Citilab.
• Põldoja, H., Väljataga, T., Laanpere, M., & Tammets, K. (2014). Web-based self- and peer-assessment of teachers’ digital competencies. World Wide Web, 17(2), 255–269. doi: 10.1007/s11280-012-0176-2
Photos• Aaron E. Silvers, http://www.flickr.com/photos/silvers/6269204209/
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
Hans Põldoja [email protected]
Interaction Design Methods http://ifi7156.wordpress.com
Tallinn University Institute of Informatics
Top Related