COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS BETWEEN NET AND GROSS METERING
BASED FEED-IN TARIFF
SAMARAH QASIM ALI ALASADI
Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS BETWEEN NET AND GROSS METERING
BASED FEED-IN TARIFF
SAMARAH QASIM ALI ALASADI
A project report submitted in fulfilment of the
requirements for the award of the degree of
Master of Engineering (Electrical Power)
Faculty of Electrical Engineering
Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
DECEMBER 2016
iii
“Specially dedicated to
My Beloved Parents Kassim and Sahira and my Sisters Sara and Huda”
iv
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Alhamdulillah, I would like to take opportunity to express my gratitude mostly
to Allah SWT for giving me ability and good health to complete my Master project
without difficulties.
I would like to express my gratitude and appreciation to my supervisor Dr. Md
Pauzi bin Abdullah for the guidance, understanding, comments and invaluable advices
throughout the two semesters upon the completion of this project.
Last but not least, not forgotten to my parents and siblings who are giving
moral support throughout my project and studies.
v
ABSTRACT
Depleting gas and oil have encouraged scientist and governments to seek other
alternatives. Renewable Energy (RE) resources have been the best option as a solution
for the time being issue. In order to achieve rapid development of RE resources usage,
Feed in-Tariff has been introduced and applied. FIT considers as an energy supply
policy that offers a guarantee of payment to RE developers for the electricity the
customers produce. It incentive to encourage uptake of RE technology including
photovoltaic (PV) and wind turbines and other technologies. There are two different
types of metering systems, Gross and Net metering. Gross metering policy is to pay
customers for both RE installation and for the generated electricity weather it has been
consumed or injected directly to the grid. However, Net metering policy only considers
the difference of the injected and the consumed electricity. The customers are paid
only if their electricity consumption is less than their generation. This project compares
the results for Net and Gross metering system for various load cases. The works
presented here include i) review different FIT scheme metering system for various
countries, ii) to make different case studies for different loads scenarios for UTM load
and a typical Malaysian house, in JB, comparing it to a European (Portugal) house and
the analyses is performed by using Homer software. All cases will be considering grid
connecting PV system. The effect of financial factor like payback period, NPC (Vet
Present Cost) and COE (Cost of Electricity) are used in the comparison. Results
showed that Gross metering was preferable for Malaysian domestic or commercial
load because it has less COE, NPC and less payback period comparing to Net metering
system. Qqqqqq qqqqqqqq qq qq qqqq.
vi
ABSTRAK
Semakin berkurangan gas dan minyak telah menggalakkan saintis dan kerajaan
untuk mencari alternatif lain. Tenaga boleh diperbaharui (RE) telah pilihan terbaik
sebagai penyelesaian buat kali menjadi isu. Dalam usaha untuk mencapai
pembangunan pesat dalam penggunaan sumber RE, Feed in-Tariff telah diperkenalkan
dan digunakan. FIT menganggap sebagai dasar bekalan tenaga yang menawarkan
jaminan pembayaran kepada pemaju RE untuk peghasilan elektrik oleh pelanggan.
insentif untuk menggalakkan penggunaan teknologi RE termasuk photovoltaic (PV)
dan turbin angin dan teknologi lain. Terdapat dua jenis sistem pemeteran, iaitu
pemeteran kasar dan pemeteran bersih. Dasar pemeteran kasar adalah untuk membayar
pelanggan untuk kedua-dua pemasangan RE dan penjanaan elektrik sama ada tenaga
elektrik telah digunakan atau disuap secara terus ke grid. Walaubagaimanapun, dasar
pemeteran bersih hanya mempertimbangkan perbezaan tenaga elektrik yang disuap
dan digunakan. Para pelanggan hanya akan membayar jumlah pengunnan tenaga
elektrik jika penggunaan mereka kurang dari penjaan mereka. Projek ini
membandingkan keputusan untuk sistem pemeteran bersih dan kasar bagi pelbagai kes
beban. Kerja-kerja yang dibentangkan di sini termasuk i) kajian skim meter FIT yang
berbeza-beza untuk untuk pelbagai negara, ii) untuk membuat kajian kes yang berbeza
bagi beban yang berbeza senario untuk beban UTM dan sebuah rumah kediaman
Malaysia, di JB, membandingkannya kepada (Portugal) rumah Eropah dan analisis
yang dilakukan dengan menggunakan perisian Homer. Semua kes akan
mempertimbangkan penyambungan grid ke sistem PV. Kesan faktor kewangan seperti
tempoh bayaran balik, NPC (Vet Kos Sekarang) dan COE (Kos Elektrik) digunakan
dalam perbandingan. Hasil kajian menunjukkan bahawa pemeteran Kasar adalah lebih
sesuai untuk beban domestik atau komersial di Malaysia kerana ia mempunyai kurang
COE, NPC dan kurang tempoh bayaran balik berbanding dengan sistem pemeteran
bersih. Ffdffsdfsdfsd fdv dfsd dfdsf ddsf dvdv.
vii
TABLE OF CONTENTS
CHAPTER TITLE PAGE
DECLARATION ii
DEDICATION iii
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS iii
ABSTRACT v
ABSTRAK vi
TABLE OF CONTENTS vii
LIST OF TABLES x
LIST OF FIGURES xii
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS xiii
LIST OF APPENDICES xv
1 INTRODUCTION 1
1.1 Project Overview 1
1.2 Research Problem Statement 4
1.3 Research Objectives 4
1.4 Research Significance 5
1.5 Research Scope 5
1.6 Thesis Outline 5
2 LITERATURE REVIEW 6
2.1 Introduction 6
2.2 Gross Metering System 11
2.3 Net Metering System 12
viii
2.4 Comparison between various countries 15
2.5 Fundamental Formulations and Calculations 17
2.6 Summary 20
3 METHODOLOGY 21
3.1 Introduction 21
3.2 Historical data 21
3.3 Project methodology 23
3.4 Homer Software 25
3.5 FIT Rates and Electric Tariffs 25
3.6 Case Study 27
3.6.1 Case I 27
3.6.2 Case II 28
4 RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS 30
4.1 Introduction 30
4.2 Analysis Results 30
4.3 Case I 31
4.3.1 Scenario I 32
4.3.2 Scenario II 34
4.3.3 Summary of Case I 36
4.4 Case II 39
4.4.1 Scenario I 39
4.4.2 Scenario II 40
4.4.3 Scenario III 41
4.4.4 Scenario IV 41
4.4.5 Scenario V 42
4.4.6 Summary of Case II 44
4.5 Discussion 47
4.6 Summary 48
5 CONCLUSIONS AND FURTHER WORK 50
5.1 Conclusions and Discussion 50
5.2 Recommendations for Future Work 51
ix
REFERENCES 52
Appendices A 54-57
x
LIST OF TABLES
TABLE NO. TITLE PAGE
2.1.1 Types of tools for promoting for RE [3] 9
2.3.1 Net vs Gross metering system [5] 12
2.4.1 Different scenarios with view of LCEO and project lifetime [9] 15
2.4.2 Comparison of different papers for various countries
applying FIT system 16
3.5.1 Fit rate for Solar PV installation [25] 26
3.5.2 Commercial tariffs for grid prices [26] 26
3.6.2.1 UTM load profile of 24 hours of one day 29
4.3.1.1 The results for typical Malaysian house case for
Gross metering system 32
4.3.1.2 Payback period for the typical Malaysian house (gross) 33
4.3.1.3 Results for Net metering system 34
4.3.1.4 Payback period for the typical house (net) 34
4.3.2.1 Results for Gross metering system for a European house 35
4.3.2.2 Results for Net metering system for a European house 35
4.3.2.3 Payback period results for Gross metering system 36
4.3.2.4 Payback period results for Net metering system 36
4.4.1.1 Results for Gross & net metering system 39
4.4.1.2 Payback period results for both schemes 40
4.4.2.1 Results for Gross & net metering system 40
4.4.2.2 Payback period results 40
4.4.3.1 Results for Gross & net metering system 41
4.4.3.2 Payback period results 41
xi
4.4.4.1 Results for Gross metering system 42
4.4.4.2 Results for Net metering system 42
4.4.4.3 Payback period results for Net metering system 42
4.4.4.4 Payback period results for Gross metering system 42
4.4.5.1 Results for Gross metering system 43
4.4.5.2 Results for Net metering system 43
4.4.5.3 Payback period results for Gross metering system 43
4.4.5.4 Payback period results for Net metering system 43
4.4.5.5 Yearly average harmful gases emission 44
xii
LIST OF FIGURES
FIGURE NO. TITLE PAGE
2.1.1 Solar irradiance of all Malaysian cities [2] 7
2.1.2 Average daily radiation (MJ/m2/day) [2] 7
2.1.3 Average daily radiation (MJ/m2/day) [2] 8
3.2.1 World solar irradiance [19] 22
3.3.1 The methodology of the project 24
3.6.6.1 Typical Malaysian house load profile [21] 27
3.6.6.2 Domestic European load profile [22] 28
3.6.2.1 Specifying the location of UTM in JB 29
4.3.1 Typical design using Homer for a typical house in Malaysia/JB 31
4.3.1.2 Results for electricity costs 33
4.3.1.3 Results for electricity production 33
4.3.2.1 Monthly average electricity generation 35
4.3.3.1 The COE comparison of the domestic case (Net) 37
4.3.3.2 The COE comparison of the domestic case (Gross) 37
4.3.3.3 The Payback Period comparison of domestic case (Gross) 38
4.3.3.4 The Payback Period comparison of domestic case (Net) 38
4.4.5.1 Monthly average electricity generation 44
4.4.6.1 The COE comparison of UTM case (Net) 45
4.4.6.2 The COE comparison of UTM case (Gross) 45
4.4.6.3 The NPC comparison of UTM case (Net) 46
4.4.6.4 The NPC comparison of UTM case (Gross) 47
xiii
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS
NPC – Net Present Value
PV – Present Value
COE – Cost Of Energy
RE – Renewable Energy
FIT – Feed-In Tariff
NREPAP – National Renewable Energy Policy and Action Plan
UTM – Universisi Teknologi Malaysia
GWh – Giga Watt hour
MJ – Mega Joule
m2 – Meter square
PV – Photovoltaic
MBIPV – Malaysia Building Integrated Photovoltaic
kW – Kilo Watt
GHG – Green House Gases
TNB – Tenaga Nasional Berhad
RM – Ringgit Malaysia
Pc-Si – poly-crystalline silicon
Mc-Si – mono-crystalline silicon
CIS – Copper-indium-dieseline
A-Si – Amorphous silicon
UKM – Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
RECs – Renewable Energy Certificates
PPA – Purchased Power Agreements
DG – Distributed Generation
xiv
USA – United State of America
EBIT – Earnings before Interest and Taxes
NY – New York
AZ – Arizona
WV – West Virginia
LCOE – Levelised Cost of Energy
K$ – 1000$
NREL – National Renewable Energy Laboratory
HOMER – Hybrid Optimization of Multiple Energy Resources
JB – Johor Bahru
xv
LIST OF APPENDICES
APPENDIX TITLE PAGE
A Create a New HOMER File 54
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION
1.1 Project Overview
The primary solution for the world wide serious issue ’’depleting gas and oil’’ is to
provide a continuous energy supply to cover all needed demand. For any developed county,
energy demand increases rapidly due to huge consumption of the different loads like
commercial and domestic. To overcome this problem, many scientist and researchers found
out that using renewable energy (RE) to provide electricity can be achieved and the technology
has proved that by making wind turbines, PV panels and other RE technologies. Best
alternative resources are RE like solar, wind, tidal, wave, geothermal and biomass. The location
and the potential of these RE are important before installing the system and decide which RE
technology to use.
Different techniques have been used as well not only to encourage investors but also to
encourage people for using RE technology partially to generate electricity for their own usage.
These protocols vary from one country to another by different rules contracts and various
tariffs. Feed-In Tariff (FIT) scheme considered as a good technique to use RE technology and
encourages people to use and install it. There are two schemes for FIT to apply, Gross and Net
metering system.
The recent studies signify the importance of the applying FIT system to supply green
electricity using one scheme depending on the country and the utility contracts. However, each
state or country uses either gross or net metering system.
2
Guaranteed price is set for the RE electricity generation is being performed using FIT
scheme. It will be for long period of time, depend on the country and the utility contract for it,
in order to encourage investment for the use of RE system. China, Germany, Denmark,
Portugal, Spain and many other European countries or the other American continents have
applied FIT scheme with success in prevailing huge amount of solar, biomass and wind energy.
The main advantage of FIT is long-term assurance of financial support which leads to reduce
the investment risks noticeably.
Net metering is a policy that allows customers to use RE system to generate electricity
and sell the extra generation to the grid. It works by using one meter that spin and records the
flow of the energy in both directions. When it spins forward, means the customer is drawing
electricity from the utility grid and when it spins backward then the customer is sending power
to the grid. By the end of the month the customer will be charged for the difference of the
electricity if it consumes more than what it generates. But if it injects power more than needed
then depending on the arrangements in that place it get paid back somehow.
On 2nd April 2010, the FIT was introduced under the National Renewable Energy
Policy and Action Plan (NREPAP) which has been approved by Malaysian cabinet. This
NREPAP is established to enhancing the utilisation of local RE resources to contribute towards
national electricity supply security and sustainable socio-economic development. The FIT
scheme is an enterprise to allow consumer to generate electricity from RE resources and sold
it to the power provider at fixed rates in specific duration. For example, renewable energy for
biogas and biomass, the lifetime agreements is 16 years while for small hydro and solar PV the
agreements is for 21 years. In Malaysia, gross metering is applied. The objectives of FIT
scheme are as follows [1]:
i. To ensure reasonable RE generation is used,
ii. To ease the growth of the RE industry,
iii. To conserve the environment for future generation and
iv. To increase RE contribution in the national power generation.
3
Gross or Net metering systems are two techniques used for calculating the difference
in electricity used, generate from RE installed system and the benefits for the investors. Net
metering considers to pay the customers regarding the difference of the electricity energy
injected to the grid and consumed from utility, whereas Gross metering pay them once for their
installation of RE system and for the injected electricity to the grid.
This project aims to evaluate Fit (gross and net) scheme, pricing (COE and NPC),
payback period and the optimum scheme to use in Malaysia will be considered for different
load scenarios.
1.2 Problem Statement
FIT has been known as an actual solution to make a monthly income. Customers can
generate electricity from RE sources that they installed. Either Net or Gross metering system
is being used, the utility will pay the customer regarding the type of mechanism they are using.
Due to the difference between these two mechanisms, this study will compare between them
by assessing various scenarios of different load profiles. Malaysian and European domestic
load will be studied. Also different scenarios of UTM load profile will be done. All scenarios
based on grid connected PV system. The COE, NPC and payback period will be studied for all
cases using Homer software.
4
1.3 Objectives
In order to achieve the aim, this study has the following objectives:
1. To review different FIT scheme metering system for various countries
2. To apply Gross and Net metering scheme on different types of customers using HOMER
software
3. To analyze and compare for both metering scheme in terms of NPC, COE and payback
period
1.4 Significance of Study
The main superiority of the proposed project is to study the difference of gross and net
metering system and make a comparison of them to decide which pricing mechanism better to
apply in Malaysia.
1.5 Scope of Study
This project provides a comparison between Net and Gross metering system while
considering similar cases applied in several countries. It depends on many factors such as load
profile, tariff structure, solar irradiance, discount rate and other factors. It is important to do
comparative analysis to investigate the preferred metering that would benefit both customers
and utility. In this study, it will be limited to grid connected PV system for domestic and
5
commercial loads. A case of a residential load profile for a typical Malaysian and European
(Portugal) house will be investigated. Installing 4kW of grid connected PV system will be
introduced. COE, NPC and payback period will be considered. Another case is UTM
commercial load, many scenarios will be done considering different PV capacity varies from
27kW to 30MW. Different tariff rates will be considered regarding the each various PV
capacity.
1.6 Project Report Outline
This report is produced in order to fulfil the requirement of master project. The report
is organized in the following ways:
Chapter 1 describes the project introduction, problem statement and objective of the
studies.
Chapter 2 reviewed and summarized the previous studies and works that has been
discussed of other countries regarding feed-in tariff (FiT) scheme, comparison of different
metering systems, Home software and other important parameters.
Chapter 3 covers the project methodology which involves studies in historical data of
using FiTs, solar irradiation, FiT rates and data collection of selected residential house for
Malaysia and Europe, some calculations regarding some parameters to find out and Homer
software for estimate approaches.
Chapter 4 is the project result and discussion. In this chapter, the data projection for the
suggested different loads (Malaysian house, European house and UTM load) scenarios to
evaluate it using Homer software and find out the COE, NPC and payback period. Deciding
which scheme is better by comparing the results that has been performed.
Chapter 5 Concludes the overall project and suggesting for future work.
51
REFERENCES
[1] S.L.Wong, Norzita Ngadi, Tuan Amran Tuan Abdullah, I.M. Inuwa. Recent advances
of feed-in-tariff in Malaysia University Technology Malaysia, Skudai Johor.
[2] Electricity from solar energy in Malaysia written by Christopher. www.christopherteh
.com. (Accessed in June, 2016).
[3] Elizondo and Barroso, 2011. What is best choice of tools tool RE energy?
regulationbodyofknowledge.org. (Accessed in June, 2016).
[4] Feed-in Tariff. www.eia.gov/todayinenergy. (Accessed in April, 2016).
[5] Net Metering Versus Feed in Tariff Grid Connections. www.greenbugenergy.com.
(Accessed in April, 2016).
[6] G. C. Christoforidis et al., "Investigating net-metering variant policies: The case of
Greece," 2015 IEEE 15th International Conference on Environment and Electrical
Engineering (EEEIC), Rome, 2015, pp. 2023-2028.
[7] J. Barros and H. Leite, "Feed-in tariffs for wind energy in Portugal: Current status and
prospective future," Electrical Power Quality and Utilization (EPQU), 2011 11th
International Conference on, Lisbon, 2011, pp. 1-5.
[8] K. Sedghisigarchi, "Residential solar systems: Technology, net-metering, and financial
payback," Electrical Power & Energy Conference (EPEC), 2009 IEEE, Montreal, QC,
2009, pp. 1-6.
[9] T. Georgitsioti, N. Pearsall and I. Forbes, "Simplified levelised cost of the domestic
photovoltaic energy in the UK: the importance of the feed-in tariff scheme," in IET
Renewable Power Generation, vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 451-458, July 2014.
[10] T. Traber, "Impact of market power on price effects of the German feed-in tariff under
the European emission trading system," 2008 5th International Conference on the
European Electricity Market, Lisboa, 2008, pp. 1-6.
[11] A. Campoccia, L. Dusonchet, E. Telaretti and G. Zizzo, "Feed-in Tariffs for Grid-
connected PV Systems: The Situation in the European Community," Power Tech, 2007
IEEE Lausanne, Lausanne, 2007, pp. 1981-1986.
52
[12] Discovery of photovoltaic effect. www.sunenergysite.eu. (Accessed in June, 2016).
[13] History of photovoltaic. www.fsec.ucf.edu (Accessed in June, 2016).
[14] Photovoltaics. www.srec.com.aure. (Accessed in June, 2016).
[15] H. Al-Badi, M. AL-Toobi, S. AL-Harthy, Z. Al-Hosni & A. AL-Harthy, “Hybrid
systems for decentralized power generation in Oman”, International Journal of
Sustainable Energy, Vol. 31, Issue 6, pp. 411-421, 2012.
[16] Solar Panel. www.ebay.com. (Accessed in March, 2016).
[17] Samara Qasim Ali Al-Asadi and Hussein A Kazem, “Feasibility Study of
Photovoltaic/Wind/Battery Hybrid System for Oman”, Engineering Science and
Technology (ESTIJ), Vol. 3, No. 3, 2013, pp. 466-470.
[18] Joel N Swisher, Girberto de Martino Jannuzi, Robert Y. Redlinger, Tools and Methods
for Integrated Resource Planning, UNEP Collaborating Centre on Energy and
Environment, Riso National Laboratory, November 1997.
[19] Amount of solar energy in hours received by earth for the worst month.
www.altestore.com. (Accessed in June, 2016).
[20] Solar Energy. Irradiance and application. www.sarawakenergy.com.my. (Accessed in
June 2016).
[21] W.S. Ho, H. Hashim, M.H. Hassim, Z.A. Muis, N.L.M. Shamsuddin, "Design of
distributed energy system through Electric System Cascade Analysis”, 2012 Applied
Energy 99, PP. 309–315.
[22] E. Eusebio and C. Camus, "Residential PV systems with battery backup power
attained already grid parity?”, 2016 13th International Conference on the European
Energy Market (EEM), Porto, 2016, pp. 1-5.
[23] Homer software. www.homerenergy.com/HOMER_pro.html (Accessed in Oct, 2016).
[24] National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Homer Software facts. www.nrel.gov/homer.
(Accessed in Oct, 2016).
[25] Fit Rates. www.seda.gov.my/fitrates. (Accessed in Oct, 2016).
[26] Tariff rates. www.tnb.com.my/residential/pricing-tariffs. (Accessed in Oct, 2016).
Top Related