Clickers in the classroom
Implementing Peer Instruction in Cegep
Nathaniel Lasry, PhDPhysics Dept, John Abbott College
Div of Engineering & Appl. Sc, Harvard
And
Judith Findlay RN, BScNNursing Department, John Abbott College
Spring 2007 2
Cognitive Conflict
Major issue with science instruction As instructors, we approach students as novices Yet, students know A LOT about the world around them BUT, much of this knowledge is inaccurate Eg1: what falls to the ground faster a heavy or light ball? Well, both take the same time! counterintuitive! Eg2: where do plants get the source of matter to grow? NOT from the ground but from air counterintuitive!
Plants are made mostly of C, O, N in air
So its is critical to acknowledge what students think 1st
Learning then occurs through conflict with conceptions Ultimately leading to Conceptual change LEARNING!
Spring 2007 3
Peer Instruction An interactive method developed
by Harvard physicist E. Mazur for large group lectures
Spring 2007 4
THE METHOD
Starts with brief lecture 10-15 min = avg attention span
multiple choice conceptual questions are then presented to the class
Questions have scientifically accurate concepts
AND prevalent student misconceptions Students try to pick out the right answer
from a number of detractors
Spring 2007 5
Real-Time Feedback Students raise a card
A,B,C… The instructor gets
instant feedback Does majority get it?
Yes, proceed to next concept
Majority doesn’t get it Identify most prevalent
misconceptions Address specific
misconceptions
Spring 2007 6
More on Peer Instruction Since the instructor then has instant feedback on
how the class is doing S/he can choose to revisit the concept if the % of
right answers is too Low (<35%) If the % is not too low, then students are asked to
turn to their neighbor and convince them of their answer students revote.
Levels of correct answers increase significantly Best way to learn is often to teach others/ verbalize idea…
Spring 2007 7
Schema of Peer Instruction
ConcepTestStudents Vote
correct ans <35%
Revisit Concept
correct ans: 35%-85%
Peer discussion (2-3min) students try to convince each other
Students revote
Brief lecture (10min)
correct ans >85%
Remaining misconception
explained
Spring 2007 8
Wireless keypad: ‘Clickers’ Harvard students answer by
entering their choice on a 1-way IR remote (PRS)
They can even rate their level of confidence (Hi,Med,Lo)
Ok, its Harvard! (i.e. $$!) Well, costs about 25$/stud JAC Sc Prog has 190 Units Publishers now packaging
clickers with books Quite feasible/affordable
Spring 2007 9
In ClassFeedbackInteraction
Spring 2007 10
Using the clicker Allows instructor to have high quality real-
time feedback Actively engages Students in course
content (without intimidating them) Also, they get to feel what its like to be on
“who wants to be a millionaire” Some have reported increases in
attendance when using the clickers!
Spring 2007 11
Your turn! Testing the method Take your clicker and answer the following
question
Spring 2007 12
2 metal balls are the same size but one weighs twice as much as the other. If they roll off a horizontal table with the same speed, which ball hits the ground closer to the table?
A. Both hit the ground approx at the same distance from the table
B. The heavier ball hits the floor closerC. The lighter ball hits the floor closer
Spring 2007 13
Non-Physics Question Since when has humanity first thought of
Earth as being round?
1) BC 2) 1 – 1000AD 3) 1000- 1400 AD 4) 1400 – 1800 AD 5) 1800+
Spring 2007 14
Hmm…
Spring 2007 15
Since when has humanity first thought of Earth as being round?
A. BCB. 1 – 1000ADC. 1000- 1400 ADD. 1400 – 1800 ADE. 1800+
Spring 2007 16
The John Abbott study A study on Peer Instruction funded by PAREA
was conducted at John Abbott Addressed the following 3 empirical questions:1. Can Peer Instruction be implemented in Cegep?
1. To date, studied mostly in American universities…
2. Is Peer Instruction more effective than traditional instruction in Cegep?
1. Does it increase conceptual learning?2. Does it decrease traditional problem solving skills?
3. Do clickers work better than flashcards?
Spring 2007 17
Study Design Study looked at 3 groups of 1st semester physics
students Gp1: CLICKER Peer Instruction Gp2: FLASHCARD Peer Instruction Gp3: CONTROL group, traditional inst
All students, pseudo-randomly assigned to gps Both Peer Instruction gps taught by me (NL) Control gp taught by other teacher Matched to me by : Gender, Age (+/-3yrs),
Teaching Experience (+/- 1yr) , style (anecdotally)
Spring 2007 18
Results: Is Peer Instruction effective in Cegep?
PI enables significantly more conceptual learning
PI does not reduce traditional problem solving skills
PI quite effective in Cegep!
Spring 2007 19
Results 2: Do clickers work better than flashcards?
No sig difference! Same conceptual
learning Same problem
solving skills Regardless of way
used to answer, PI works.
The technology is not the pedagogy!
Spring 2007 20
Q1: Is Peer Instruction feasiblewithin Cegep context Absolutely Administrators welcomed approach
i.e. found $ to make it happen Well received by colleagues
More than ½ of physics dept now using some form of Peer Instruction in their courses
Well received by students Survey results Computer doodles
Spring 2007 21
Student Survey Results
Spring 2007 22
STUDENTS’ INFORMAL COMMENTS
Spring 2007 23
Spring 2007 24
Spring 2007 25
Spring 2007 26
Spring 2007 27
When I lecture to a large group of students I feel they always pay attention?
A. Strongly AgreeB. AgreeC. NeutralD. DisagreeE. Strongly Disagree
Spring 2007 28
Critical thinking requires integration
Critical thinking in a
clinical setting
Previous experience
Need to ensure it is appropriate
Laboratory
Provides skills, but not the
critical thinking
OSCE
Excellent approach, but only get experience
once per term
Classroom
Large classesLecture format
How do we shake it up?
Clinical setting Can be too much pressure
Try to avoid mistakesBack-up always there
Spring 2007 29
My teaching dilemma How can I get students to “dig deep” in classes
I need to “lecture less” and encourage students to “learn more”
How do I enable students to: Conceptualize (see the big picture instead of small
isolated parts) Analyze (problem solve), case studies to integrate
knowledge (increase critical thinking) Shift from “giving” the information to “getting it”
Collaborate (peer learning, team work)
Spring 2007 30
Nursing Classes Large classes
60-90 students lecture hall
Diverse population Culture Language Wide age group
Feedback Do students “get it”? Do I focus on the critical
areas? Do I worry more about
volume instead of concepts?
Spring 2007 31
Sound familiar?“… they were not all learning what I wanted them to
learn …”
“… one problem … lies in the presentation of the material ... it comes straight out of textbooks and/or lecture notes, giving students little incentive to attend class …”
“… students asked to distribute lecture notes in advance so they didn’t need to spend time copying down notes ... so they could pay more attention to my lecture … then students complained that I was lecturing straight out of my lecture notes …!”
Listen to the Learners Teaching in the InterActive ClassRooms & Studio Jim Boyle, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Strathclyde
Spring 2007 32
What are clickers?
Spring 2007 33
Spring 2007 34
What is CPS?
Equipment is a tool, philosophy of engagement is necessary Preparation is essential
Instructor Restructure classes Re-align course planning Be prepared to not teach “by the book” Assign work ahead of class and develop opportunities in the class
to be interactive Students
Class pre-reading required Participate in class Think about responses and integration and not answer by rote
All New learning opportunity Expect the unexpected
Spring 2007 35
Properly used, clickers can: Engage students Promote active learning Allow for anonymous responses (shy
student, cultural diversity, different ages) Provide feedback visually
Correct answer Level of overall understanding in class
Spring 2007 36
Properly used, clickers can: Surprise instructor and students Immediately deal with misconceptions Assess level of engagement
Response appropriateness Pre-reading complete? Deeper level of thinking engaged?
Take attendance (not necessary) Used easily by faculty
Limited IT savvy required
Spring 2007 37
Why should I use clickers?A. To allow students from different ethnic
groups to participateB. To create an active learning
environmentC. To help the student understand what
they do/do not understandD. All the above
Spring 2007 38
Why use clickers? Increase attention and engage students
“fun” Changes the monotony of passively taking
notes Increases interaction with the instructor
and other students
Spring 2007 39
Do your students come to class prepared (pre-reading done)?
A. YesB. NoC. Don’t know
Spring 2007 40
Do your students expect?A. Notes to be posted on web, course
management systemB. Give them all the information they
need for the TESTC. Both A and B
Spring 2007 41
When can CPS be used in Nursing classroom?
A. At the beginning of the class to see how prepared students are
B. During the lecture to see if the student is understanding the material
C. At the end to give feedback to the teacher and student how much of the information was understood and processed
D. All the above
Spring 2007 42
Jeopardy Style Game
Spring 2007 43
Spring 2007 44
Spring 2007 45
Spring 2007 46
Clicker Pilot Project Used in second semester nursing class
Perioperative client Enteral nutrition Diabetes – jeopardy style game Review class – jeopardy style game
Overall, very positive feedback
Spring 2007 47
Class Demographics
age
over 40 years
36-40 years
31-35 years
26-30 years
21-25 years
under 20
no response
Cou
nt20
10
0
sex
no response
Male
Female
Spring 2007 48
lectures are more interesting
strongly disagree
disagree
no opinion
agree
strongly agree
Cou
nt
40
30
20
10
0
class is a more enjoyable experience
disagreeno opinionagreestrongly agreeC
ount
40
30
20
10
0
Lectures were more interesting with clickers
Class is more enjoyable using clickers
Spring 2007 49
participation in class without embarrassment
disagreeno opinionagreestrongly agree
Cou
nt
40
30
20
10
0
Spring 2007 50
Clickers waste class time
clickers wastes class time
strongly disagree
disagree
no opinion
strongly agree
no response
Cou
nt30
20
10
0
Spring 2007 51
Clickers made this presentation interactive and enjoyable
A. Strongly AgreeB. AgreeC. NeutralD. DisagreeE. Strongly Disagree
Spring 2007 52
I would like to use clickers in my class
A. Strongly AgreeB. AgreeC. NeutralD. DisagreeE. Strongly Disagree