Sociedade Portuguesa de Inovação
Paris, September, 2005
Intitial Review Process - Highlighted 10 HEI
eLearning Programmes
InnoUniLearning – The Fostering of Innovative eLearning Strategies in Higher EducationSeptember 2005
Introduction
Data Collection
Review Process Methodology
Review Process Results
Agenda
InnoUniLearning – The Fostering of Innovative eLearning Strategies in Higher EducationSeptember 2005
Highlighted 25 HEI eLearning programmes
Select the highlighted 10 institutions and 3 additional institutions per Member State represented by the project partnership.
Review conducted by the Advisory Panel.
Initial Review Process (in progress)
Introduction
Phase 1 (c)
Identified HEIs contacted by partners requesting their participation with regard to the survey questionnaire.
Questionnaire responses reviewed and institutions prioritized based on the developed criteria.
InnoUniLearning – The Fostering of Innovative eLearning Strategies in Higher EducationSeptember 2005
Introduction
Survey Questionnaire
The Questionnaire consists of the following Sections:
Teachers
Learners
Teaching Methodology
Institution
General Comments
InnoUniLearning – The Fostering of Innovative eLearning Strategies in Higher EducationSeptember 2005
Introduction
Survey Questionnaire
Each Section consists of several Criteria
Teachers• Support
• Content• Technology
Learners• Learning Skills • Support
• Services• Technology
Teaching Methodology• Interactivity• Motivation• Assessment
General Comments
Institution• Self Assessment
InnoUniLearning – The Fostering of Innovative eLearning Strategies in Higher EducationSeptember 2005
Data Collection
Survey Conducted by Partners
Period of Data Collection: December
2004 – September 2005
Initial Mailing
Accompanied by telephone
follow-up
InnoUniLearning – The Fostering of Innovative eLearning Strategies in Higher EducationSeptember 2005
Returned Questionnaires
Country Sent ReceivedAustria 13 10France* 18 / 25 20
UK - Open University 15 9UK - Salford 16 11
Portugal 11 7Hungary 7 7
Total* 80/87 64
Data Collection
*The French project partner experienced a high level of interest from the French HEI eLearning community once the community became aware of the project’s objectives. This interest provided an opportunity for additional HEI eLearning programmes to be identified. For this reason the initial total number of 80 HEI eLearning programmes increased to 87.
InnoUniLearning – The Fostering of Innovative eLearning Strategies in Higher EducationSeptember 2005
Lessons Learned – National Experiences Encountered Challenges
Barriers to Overcome
General Comments
Data Collection
Austria
United Kingdom
France
Portugal
Hungary
InnoUniLearning – The Fostering of Innovative eLearning Strategies in Higher EducationSeptember 2005
Lessons Learned - Portugal
Data Collection
InnoUniLearning – The Fostering of Innovative eLearning Strategies in Higher EducationSeptember 2005
Selection Criteria per Country
Lessons Learned - Partners
Austria
France
United Kingdom
Hungary
Discussion
InnoUniLearning – The Fostering of Innovative eLearning Strategies in Higher EducationSeptember 2005
Data Collection
Encountered Challenges
Given Time Frame
Identification of competent contact persons
Barriers to Overcome
Fear to receive a “bad scoring / ranking ” result
General Comments
Some questions were not clear to the interviewed
persons and demanded further explanation
Lessons Learned – Portugal
InnoUniLearning – The Fostering of Innovative eLearning Strategies in Higher EducationSeptember 2005
Review Process Methodology
The survey consisted of two types of questions:
Quantitative and
Qualitative questions
Evaluation
InnoUniLearning – The Fostering of Innovative eLearning Strategies in Higher EducationSeptember 2005
Review Process Methodology
Evaluation
A number of obtainable scores was allocated to each Section
This number was broken down over the different
criteria of each section
Within the different criteria the scores were distributed
over the number of questions
Within each question the scores were allocated to the answers of the
questions
To evaluate the Quantitative and Qualitative Questions:
InnoUniLearning – The Fostering of Innovative eLearning Strategies in Higher EducationSeptember 2005
Review Process Methodology
Example: Allocation of Scores
Evaluation
Teachers Maximum 115 Points(65 Points for Quantitative Questions and 50 Points for Qualitative Questions
• Support-Content Maximum 65 Points(35 Points for Quantitative Questions and 30 Points for Qualitative Questions
• Question 1. Maximum 15 Points• Answer 1 3,75 Points• Answer 2 3,75 Points• Answer 3 3,75 Points• Answer 4 3,75 Points• Answer 5 0 Points• Answer 6 0 Points
InnoUniLearning – The Fostering of Innovative eLearning Strategies in Higher EducationSeptember 2005
Review Process Methodology
Evaluation
Accumulated Scores
Weighted Scores
Ranked Scores
A combination of the Above
Quantitative Questions
The Quantitative Questions were evaluated through:
InnoUniLearning – The Fostering of Innovative eLearning Strategies in Higher EducationSeptember 2005
Review Process Methodology
Evaluation
The partner’s local knowledge / expertise
regarding
The Identified Relevance of the Answers
Within an established Spectrum (0 to 10
for Questions of Sections 1 to 4 and 0 to 15
for Section 5)
Qualitative Questions
The Qualitative Questions were evaluated through:
InnoUniLearning – The Fostering of Innovative eLearning Strategies in Higher EducationSeptember 2005
Review Process Methodology
Teachers 100Learners 100
Teaching Methodology 100Institution 100Teachers 50
Teaching Methodology 10Institution 10
General Comments 30
500
Distribution of Scores by Section
Total
Questionnaire
Quantitative Part
Qualitative Part
Distribution of Scores
Initial Distribution
InnoUniLearning – The Fostering of Innovative eLearning Strategies in Higher EducationSeptember 2005
Review Process Methodology
Distribution of Scores
The OU suggested the following aspects to be considered:
Suggestions of the Open University (OU)
The balance between Sections
The balance within Sections
The balance within Questions & Answers
The relevance of Questions and Answers
in terms of the allocated Scores
InnoUniLearning – The Fostering of Innovative eLearning Strategies in Higher EducationSeptember 2005
Review Process Methodology
Teachers 65Learners 120
Teaching Methodology 105Institution 60Teachers 50
Teaching Methodology 10Institution 10
General Comments 30
450
Distribution of Scores
Total
Questionnaire
Quantitative Part
Qualitative Part
Distribution of Scores
Distribution after Review
InnoUniLearning – The Fostering of Innovative eLearning Strategies in Higher EducationSeptember 2005
Presentation of the Survey Results
&
Overall Discussion on the highlighted 10 HEI
eLearning Programmes
Review Process Results
InnoUniLearning – The Fostering of Innovative eLearning Strategies in Higher EducationSeptember 2005
Porto - Portugal
Edificio “Les Palaces”
Rua Júlio Dinis, no. 242, 208
4050-318 Porto, PORTUGAL
Tel: 22 607 64 00
Fax: 22 609 91 64
TagusPark
Núcleo Central, 232
2780 - 920 Oeiras, PORTUGAL
Tel: 21 421 22 49Fax: 21 421 12 01
www.spi.pt
Lisbon - Portugal
Beijing – P.R.China
China Garments Mansion, No. 99, Rm. 915 Jiaoguo Rd., ChaoYang Dist., Beijing, 100020Tel: 010-65812758Fax: 010-65812758
California - USA2102 Business Center Drive, Suite 220EIrvine, CA 92612 USATel: +1 949 253 5702Fax: +1 949 253 5703
Maryland - USASuite 325 5523 Research Park Drive Baltimore, MD 21228 Tel: 443-543-5530 Fax: 443-543-5533 [email protected]
Top Related