Chapter 12
Innovation & Innovation & StrategyStrategy
To gain an overview of the functioning of the international monetary systemTo understand the nature of foreign exchange operationsTo appreciate the role of global capital markets To identify and assess corporate financing options, including their impacts on managers and stakeholdersTo assess changes in corporate control, including the roles of hedge funds and private equity groups
To evaluate changes taking place in international accounting
Aims of the lectureAims of the lectureTo identify the elements of innovation in the organizational context
To account for national differences in capacity for innovation and technology development
To examine diverse approaches to innovation in terms of corporate strategy and organization
To appreciate the potential of co-operative innovation strategies
To become familiar with ways in which innovation is fostered and managed within the international company
Elements of innovationElements of innovationInnovation covers all activities which yield new or improved products or ways of doing things.
Radical innovation is driven by technology – the systematic application of scientific knowledge to practical purposes.
New products or processes = inventions, for which patent application can be made.
Incremental innovation is associated with continuous improvement.
Innovation is now seen as central to corporate culture, not just R&D departments.
Elements ofinnovation
R&D capabilities,including networks
Corporate culture
Focus on the consumer needs
Patentable inventions –products and processes
Cross-functionalcooperation
Manage-ment of IP rights
Incremental improvementsin products and processes
Elements ofinnovation
R&D capabilities,including networks
Corporate culture
Focus on the consumer needs
Patentable inventions –products and processes
Cross-functionalcooperation
Manage-ment of IP rights
Incremental improvementsin products and processes
Innovation and competitive advantage
Innovation is a core competency and source of competitive advantage.
Catalysts of innovation (Porter):
New technology New or shifting buyer
needs New industry segment Shifting input costs or
availability
Changes in government regulation
Innovation and economic development
Capitalist economic development relies on radical changes which break with the past (Schumpeter’s “Creative destruction” model):
New productsNew methods of productionNew marketsNew forms of industrial organization
Economic development can be depicted in stages, from low innovation-intensive to high innovation-intensive, but...
No two countries present exactly the same pattern.
In Hinduism, the god Shiva is simultaneously the destroyer and the creator, portrayed as Shiva Nataraja (Lord of the Dance), which is proposed as the source of the Western notion of "creative destruction". In The Communist Manifesto, Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels described the tendency of capitalism to constantly reinvent itself.
In western capitalism, "creative destruction" is most associated with Schumpeter, particularly in his 1942 book Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. The most likely source of this can be found in the concept of Business Cycles, as in the long-wave cycle of Nikolai Kondratieff that, Schum-peter believed, were caused by innovations
Creative Destruction: from Nataraja Shiva to Joseph Schumpeter
Stage 1Early development Reliance on natural resources
or low-level, labor-intensive, manufactures for export.
Craft industries, few competencies
Inward investment limited to enclaves of economic activity
Stage 2Investment-based development Increasing expenditure on transport, infra-
structure, utilities, communications, education. Growth in capital-intensive sectors, e.g., chemicals
and moderately knowledge-intensive consumer goods (e.g., electricals).
Increase in FDI
Stage 3Innovation-ledgrowth Growing consumer society. Greater expenditure on
education and communication Promotion of FDI in
innovation-intensive sectors, facilitating spill-over effects and technology transfer
Stage 4Services-led development Focus on direct services of goods with high level of
service content. More cross-border, inter-firm linkages, aiming for
global competitive roles for domestic firms. Increase in outward MNE activity. Aim to attract high-value FDI, e.g., R&D.
National innovation capacityNational innovation capacityWhy have some countries forged ahead in technological innovation, and others have lagged behind?
Huge gap in innovation capacity between the developed and developing countries
Some of the necessary conditions to boost innovation:
Public spending on education, skills, infrastructure
Cultural values associated with entrepreneurial activity
Strengths in science and technology
Nationalinnovation
system
Education& Trainingsystems
R&D intensity
Investment inadvanced telecmmuni-cations infrastructure
Inter-firmrelationships
Industrial structure
Governmentpolicies and the funding of research
Interactions between firms, univer-sities and research centers
Science and techno-logy strengths and weaknesses
Cultural factors like attitudes to learning and entreprise.
•Source: OECD (2007) Main Science and Technology Indicators, www.oecd.org
Figure 12.4: Gross domestic expenditure on R&D as a percentage of GDP in selected countriesNote: For 1975, Germany refers to Western Germany (the Federal Republic of Germany)
•Figure 12.5: The top seven countries in R&D: Breakdown in sector, 2006
Source: UK Department of Trade and Industry (2007) The R&D Scoreboard 2006, www.innovation.gov.uk
Technology transferTechnology gap between developed and developing countries can be partially bridged by technology transfer.Technology consists of both...
Codified knowledge (tangible elements, such as products, designs)
Tacit knowledge (intangible elements, such as skills and know-how)
The greater the extent of tacit knowledge, the more difficult it is for host developing countries to benefit.
Innovation in the organization• Why are some firms and people innovative and others
are not?
• Strategies vary according to the type of business:
• Born-global firm in knowledge-based sector – new products and global ambitions from the outset.
• Research-intensive MNE – usually with strong R&D department, and record of innovative products.
• MNE in consumer mass markets – broadly based strategy and incremental innovation, adapting to new markets.
In-house R&D
Inter-firm cooperation
Technology licenses
Acquisition of specialist firms
Continuous improvement
Cross-functional teams
Patentable inventions/software copyright
Product or service improvements
Cost-saving business process innovations
Incremental innovations in supply chains
Born-global in knowledge-
based sector
Research-based MNE
MNE inconsumer products
mass markets
Innovative outputs
Sources of Innovation
Business type
•Table 12.2: The world’s 20 largest companies by R&D spending, 2006
Source: UK Department of Trade and Industry (2007) The R&D Scoreboard 2006, www.innovation.gov.uk
Co-operative innovation strategies
Some reasons for growth of co-operative strategies:
• Need to reduce costs generally, and curb rising R&D costs in particular
• Shorter product life cycles, and shorter technology life cycles
• Increasing complexity of some products
• Increasing integration of formerly independent sectors
• Collaboration can be to seek complementarities, or to pool skills to speed up the research process
Managing innovationNew ideas from within: what can the management do?
• Foster a culture of openness
• Be willing to change
• Hire creative people
What about external sources of new ideas?
• Co-operative R&D agreements
• Customer-focused innovation
• Innovation from any participant in the supply chain
Managinginnovation
In-house IP management R&D
strategy
Corporateculture
Parent-subsidiaryinteractions
HRpolicies
IP lic
ensin
g
Collaborative
R&D agreements
Networking
Interaction within supply chains
Join
t ven
ture
s
External aspectsInternal aspects
Managing IP rightsIntellectual property rights (IPR) – a source of ownership advantage.
Every product represents a bundle of rights, which must be legally protected and defended, in differing national environments.
The rise in outsourcing, licensing and collaboration in R&D leads to the need for greater attentiveness to who owns what IP rights.
Where IP rights are managed to deliver maximum value to the firm, innovation is at the heart of corporate strategy.
Managing IP (intellectual property)
New productor technological
process
Brandor
logo
Media content,software
Appearance,logos, packaging,
graphics
Patent Trademark Copyright Design right
Licenseto
use
Need arisesautomatically
Need to registerGrant permission
apply
Licenseto
produce
ConclusionsInnovation enhances competitive advantage through both radical and incremental improvements in products and processes.
Reflecting levels of economic development, national environments differ in innovation capacity.
Innovation within the firm is not just about R&D activities, but involves openness to new ideas throughout the organization.
Co-operative innovation strategies complement and enhance the firm’s in-house innovation resources.
Competitive success depends on managing IPR in both the legal and organizational contexts.
Case studies 12.1: Kodak (page 462)
1.What were Kodak’s failings in innovation strategy which led to it being left behind?
Kodak realized that it would have to adapt to the new digital age, but failed to anticipate how quickly digital cameras would replace traditional photography. Even when the price of digital cameras started to fall dramatically, Kodak was still manufacturing huge quantities of film. The new CEO who took over in 2005 immediately called for reduction in manufacturing capacity by two-thirds, but by then, the company was in crisis.
Kodak had an active R&D department, which had been researching digital technology for years, acquiring IP rights along the way. It had long supplied X-ray laboratories and film studios. Its expertise in imaging is now a platform for further expansion. Kodak faced an uphill task in lower-end digital cameras, as it rivals were well established. The new CEO guided its evelopment of printing products, spotting a gap in the market. The digital printing business was thus central to its new strategy. The company is seeking further innovation in the sharing and display of images in different media, such as mobile phones and internet. A partnership with Motorola, the mobile phone company, has been formed to foster these developments. The new products, such as easy-to-use home printers, would be considered a break with its past, but Kodak as a brand has long been had a reputation for catering for family and holiday photo-taking. Its sound reputation, especially in the US, would transfer to the printer activities, which are largely targeted at this same market.
2. In what ways does its new strategy stem from its long-standing business strengths, and in what ways is it breaking with its past?
Kodak’s experience and research in imaging can be a source of competitive advantage in the future. Much of these expertise is in specialist applications, and the company would also need to maintain its competitive position in mass-market products such as low-end cameras. The link with Motorola in technology for sharing images over different media can be a source of competitive advantage in the future.
3.How would you assess Kodak’s core competencies as sources of competitive advantage in the future?
Top Related