Rebuttal Letter for “Changes in phytohormonal signaling in response to anthracnose in plants.”
Alden Parker – BS 860, Endocrinology
Dear Dr. Zambito,
Thank you very much for your critique of my review article. As per the Journal of Endocrinology’s “instructions for authors,” I’ve highlighted new text in YELLOW, and revised, or changed (i.e. shortened/deleted) text in GREEN. Moreover, in this submission, I have
1
1
2
3
4
5
6
adhered to all of their formatting guidelines, including: title page, double spacing, continuous line numbering, and page numbers on the bottom left of each page.
As per your requests, I changed my wording in every area you suggested in the abstract and the article. In sections where my meaning was not clear, I attempted to clarify my points (for example see lines 64 – 65 in this document, which you had marked as “?” on page 2 of my first submission).
2
7
8
9
10
11
12
Most importantly, I expanded the JA and SA signaling section to include more information about PAMP/DAMP receptors, the signaling pathways upon receptor activation via PAMP binding, and the JA and SA – mediated responses as a result. I have also trimmed down some of the subsequent hormone sections in order to stay within the word limit.
Overall, I believe this is a much better paper given your critiques and my addendums, so thank you very much for taking the time to thoroughly review my article and to point out areas that could be improved. In writing this review, I really learned a lot about a subject that
3
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
I was veritably ignorant of, and it will absolutely benefit me in my workplace. I would also like to thank you for allowing me to write a more unconventional endocrinology paper on material that we didn’t even come close to covering in the course. I look forward to any and all feedback regarding my final submission.
Best,
4
20
21
22
23
24
25
Alden Parker
423-368-1420
21 S. Wyoming Ave. APT #1
Ardmore, PA 19003
5
26
27
28
29
30
TITLE PAGE:
Changes in phytohormonal signaling in response to anthracnose in plants6
31
32
33
BS 860 – Endocrinology
Corresponding Author: Alden Parker: Master’s Candidate, University of the Sciences in Philadelphia
Email: [email protected]
Postal: 21 S. Wyoming Ave. APT #1, Ardmore, PA 19003
7
34
35
36
37
38
Keywords: phytohormones, anthracnose, disease resistance, plant immunity,
jasmonic acid signaling, jasmonate, salicylic acid signaling, salicylate
8
39
40
41
42
Word Count:
Abstract: 222
Article: 4,780
9
43
44
45
46
10
47
48
49
Abstract: Anthracnose is an infection in plants that causes cankers in tissue due to
chronic inflammatory signaling. Its main cause in agricultural plants is Colletotrichum fungi.
Upon challenge, phytohormones initiate innate inflammatory cascades, which respond by
altering the balance of growth, survival, propagation, and immunity. Because the infection
11
50
51
52
53
can be vertically transmitted, often the best way to stop the disease is to kill infected plants,
so it even has the potential to impact conservation of endangered species. Herein, an
examination of anthracnose resistance in plants is described with particular consideration to
alterations in phytohormonal signaling post-infection, and potential supplements to the
immune response are outlined based on recent findings. Anthracnose is detrimental to the
12
54
55
56
57
58
financial viability of many agricultural entities, so anthracnose resistance has emerged as a
highly sought after trait in agriculture biotechnology. The resistance of Colletotrichum to
fungicides is also examined. Potential genetic therapy targets are proposed to minimize fungi
virulence and harmful inflammatory signaling in order to minimize anthracnose infection in
plants. Finally, exploitation of anthracnose infection for the purpose of enriching therapeutic
13
59
60
61
62
63
agents for human treatment is proposed. Taken together, the findings presented are used to
craft a strategy that utilizes resistance genes in combination with peripheral supplements to
phytohormonal signaling in response to anthracnose infection in an attempt to maximize
resistance as well as crop quality and yield.
14
64
65
66
67
Introduction: 15
68
69
70
Anthracnose, Colletotrichum fungi, and Issues in the field: Anthracnose is considered one of
the most severe pathogens to deciduous trees and an array of agricultural species, including: corn (Huffaker et al.,
2011), hot peppers (Lamsal et al., 2012), beans (Campa et al., 2014), rice (De Vleesschauwer et al., 2014), grapes
(Poolsawat et al., 2013) and more. In short, anthracnose is a broadly used term to mean an infectious agent
(bacterial, viral, but most often fungal) that causes tissue damage local to the site of infection. This damage is often
exacerbated by inflammatory signaling from the host innate immune response, which is largely initiated via plant 16
71
72
73
74
75
76
hormone (phytohormone) signaling (Denancé et al., 2013; Savatin et al., 2014). The concerted effects of the
infection and subsequent inflammation can result in decreased yield, quality issues, growth retardation,
compromised immune responses to other plant pathogens, or responses to stresses, in general, and even the
complete obliteration of entire crop populations (Pakdeevaraporn, 2005). Because anthracnose can be vertically
transmitted due to infection of seeds, often the most effective method of controlling the spread of the disease is to
kill infected plants, which can have a serious impact on the financial viability of many crops, rendering farmers and
17
77
78
79
80
81
82
agricultural corporations unable to garner profits as a result of anthracnose, delaying sustainability. Thus, it is
common practice to implement an integrated pest management strategy to prevent anthracnose infection, which
can include: optimized watering, fertilizing, and fungicide spraying conditions (Kim & Yun, 2013), supplementing
the immune response with “inert” plant pathogens, induced overexpression of particular substances, or treatment
with chemicals to confer enhanced resistance (Lamsal et al., 2012; Kim & Yun, 2013; Kim YC et al., 2014;
Planchamp et al., 2014; Seo et al., 2014; Yun, 2014; Narusaka et al., 2015). While this is an improvement compared
18
83
84
85
86
87
88
to no pest management, it does not address problems that arise with anthracnose infection. Hence, there exists a
need to optimize anthracnose resistance in crop plants.
Anthracnose in crop plants is most often caused by fungal infection of the Colletotrichum genus (Bailey & Jeger,
1992), with multiple strains being able to infect the same host or multiple hosts (Than et al., 2008), resulting in a
variety of individual immune response mechanisms (Campa et al., 2014). Resistance genes to anthracnose have
19
89
90
91
92
93
been found to be monogenic or multigenic (Pakdeevaraporn, 2005). Therefore, it is important to identify
resistance genes against all potential anthracnose agents in a desired crop plant to allow for an optimal breeding
strategy for maximal resistance. Unfortunately, this is an arduous process with significant costs but has the
potential to pay off should a high level of resistance be achieved. Thus, it is worth the expenditure of time and
resources to develop these assays before planting a crop for production.
20
94
95
96
97
98
Interestingly, Colletotrichum express mutualistic lifestyles depending on the particular genotype of the host they
infect, and are thus termed “endophytes.” In this manner, the fungi live symbiotically within the host plant,
oftentimes providing enhanced resistance to peripheral environmental stresses such as drought and herbivores
(Rodriguez & Redman, 2007; Cheplick & Faeth, 2009). It can also be said these parasites are “biotrophic” as
opposed to “necrotrophic” in that they don’t kill their host and then feed on dying plant tissue. In biotrophic cases,
determining the genetic basis for the observed symbiosis could provide a platform for which to design breeding
21
99
100
101
102
103
104
strategies to maximize anthracnose resistance. To that end, many resistance genes have been identified in
different species (Pakdeevaraporn, 2005; Narina et al., 2011; Yang H et al., 2012). Hence, via integrated pest
management field studies combined with genome-wide association studies (GWAS), quantitative trait loci (QTLs)
can be identified for effective breeding strategies for anthracnose resistance, or in some cases, symbiosis, should
the latter be the more viable option for fruit or seed production.
22
105
106
107
108
109
One of the major problems with integrated pest management strategies is that many fungi strains have developed
a high level of resistance to fungicides (Kim S et al., 2014). Therefore, it is worthwhile to examine fungicide
resistance genes within pathogenic fungi to determine if there are better alternatives to the particular fungicide
theoretically being used in pest management. If a problematic fungus has a resistance gene that is not targeted or
accessible by the planned fungicide, then it will remain problematic. Doing this in combination with identifying
23
110
111
112
113
114
fungal-resistance genes in plants will provide for an optimal breeding scenario because resistance in both plants
and fungi are considered.
Arabidopsis thaliana is widely used because of its short life cycle, high number of progeny, and small requirement
for growth space (Koornneef & Meinke, 2010). Thus, it is an advantageous model organism. However, it is a
dicotyledon, so it inherently has limited applicability to monocotyledons like maize, wheat, and rice, all of which
24
115
116
117
118
119
are socio-economic food staples worldwide. Thus, there exists a need to develop other model plants to increase
the comprehensiveness to plants with higher homology to the model plant and to plants where the socio-
economic impact of crop loss is significant. The most obvious monocot that comes to mind would be rice because
of similar factors to why Arabidopsis is such a good model, but there are likely more efficient grass species that
would save on time and money in their growing and maintenance for resistance trials.
25
120
121
122
123
124
Finally, many plants contain biosynthetic compounds that have the potential for therapeutic use in the treatment
of variety human diseases. One of the most famous is aspirin, which is a component of willow tree bark extract
(Wick 2012). It is worth noting that new natural compounds are discovered virtually every day. Should these
compounds have therapeutic potential, the source of the compound instantly becomes a hot commodity. That
said, the source has the potential to be overused, such as the overharvesting of the Pacific yew tree in the case of
the cancer treatment drug taxol, prompting the medical and chemical industry to discover alternative sources of
26
125
126
127
128
129
130
the drug, including: synthesis, semi-sythesis, and cloning-based techniques (Nicolaou et al., 1994). These
techniques often prove costly to develop and difficult to produce a high yield of comparable quality product to the
true biosynthetic compounds, so it often takes years and even decades before a cost-efficient method of high-
quality synthesis is achieved. To counteract the research and development of synthesizing these nature-derived
drugs, a rapid propagation technique is often employed to produce a relatively large number of offspring of the
compound source in a short amount of time. Therefore, if the source plant is susceptible to anthracnose, then it is
27
131
132
133
134
135
136
of utmost importance to include the resistance considerations previously described when formulating a breeding
strategy for large scale therapeutic production of naturally-derived treatments.
Phytohormones and Immune Response Initiation:
28
137
138
139
Many of the adverse effects resulting from anthracnose infection are due to the inflammatory signaling of the host
innate immune response, which is primarily driven by phytohormonal signaling (Denancé et al., 2013; Savatin et
al., 2014). Moreover, there is a disruption in the balance between growth and immune signaling as a result of
infection, often to the detriment of the plant (Denancé et al., 2013). Hence, it is of particular interest to determine
how expression of particular phytohormones is altered after anthracnose challenge, and insight into expression at
local infection sites may elicit a greater understanding of systemic resistance (Vlot et al., 2008; Fu & Dong, 2013).
29
140
141
142
143
144
145
Jasmonic Acid (JA) and Salicylic Acid (SA): Jasmonic acid is involved in light responses and
especially in the production of defense proteins (Antico et al., 2012). JA signaling is hypothesized to be the front
line of defense against necrotrophic pathogens, especially in combination with ethylene (De Vleeschauwer et al.,
2014). There appears to be a high level of crosstalk between JA and Salicylic acid that is highly conserved across a
variety of plant species, and the signaling of each is dependent upon the type of pathogen encountered(De
Vleeschauwer et al., 2014). Both JA and SA have been proposed as signals for systemic acquired resistance (Fu & 30
146
147
148
149
150
151
Dong, 2013). SA is hypothesized to be the primary defense against biotrophic pathogens (De Vleeschauwer et al.,
2014). Thus, plant immunity appears to be a tailored response dependent upon the type of pathogen. Pathogens
express certain chemical markers, pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs), and induce changes in plant
tissue that the plant recognizes as dangerous to self, or damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs).
Therefore, it appears that JA signaling is more crucial to DAMP responses, with SA signaling be the major response
pathway to PAMPs (Denancé et al., 2013). This corresponds to the hypothesis that JA signaling is upregulated for
31
152
153
154
155
156
157
necrotrophic pathogens, and SA signaling is upregulated for biotrophic pathogens. For hemibiotrophic pathogens,
those that begin as biotrophic and develop into necrotrophic, it is likely a combination of JA and SA signaling,
depending on the stage and consequence of infection. It is likely that SA signaling dominates early on in infection,
with a switch in the balance to JA signaling later in infection when tissue starts to become damaged. However, it is
not always as simple as it seems to be.
32
158
159
160
161
162
PAMP receptors are known as pathogen recognition receptors (PRRs). PRRs in plants are much like PRRs in
mammals in that they are primarily protein structures that have an endodomain, ectodomain, and a
transmembrane section that spans both the cell membrane and cell wall (Macho & Zipfel, 2014). Upon PAMP
binding, immediate responses are an increase in ion fluctuation, an oxidative burst, and an activation of mitogen-
associated protein kinases (MAPKs), resulting in an increase in protein phosphorylation (Boller & Felix, 2009). Early
responses are ethylene biosynthesis, PRR endocytosis, and gene activation to increase production of PRRs and
33
163
164
165
166
167
168
defense molecules like SA and JA, depending on the pathogen (Boller & Felix, 2009). Late responses are to inhibit
seedling and whole plant growth in a sequestration of resources to fight off the pathogen (Boller & Felix, 2009).
Upon the increase in JA synthesis, jasmonate ZIM-domain proteins (JAZ), which repress JA signaling under
normal conditions, become ubiquitinated for degradation (Wager & Browse, 2012). This results in the release of a
MYC2 transcription factor that binds to a nuclear receptor, coronatine-insensitive protein 1 (COI1), and drives
34
169
170
171
172
173
production of abscisic acid (ABA), a growth retardant (Smith et al., 2009) and also increases the responses
associated with PRR activation described above (Vasyukova & Ozeretskovskaya, 2009). Mutation of COI1 results in
severe susceptibility to necrototrophic pathogens (Smith et al., 2009).
SA upregulation largely results in cell death at the site of infection but interestingly confers cell survival in
plant tissue distal to the infection site (Gimenez-Ibanez & Solano, 2013). Under normal circumstances, SA levels are
35
174
175
176
177
178
low, and the SA receptor NPR-1 localizes in the cytoplasm by oligomerizing to itself, but upon SA increase,
oxidative stress in the cytosol causes the NPR-1 to monomerize and enter the nucleus where it binds to TGA clade
transcription factors, producing more SA and PRR-activation associated responses (Gimenez-Ibanez & Solano,
2013). Mutation of NPR-1 results in severe susceptibility to biotrophic pathogens (Gimenez-Ibanez & Solano,
2013).
36
179
180
181
182
183
Abscisic Acid (ABA): Abscisic acid is one of the most significant stress and growth regulation plant
hormones. As the balance between growth and stress signaling is disrupted from pathogen infection, ABA
signaling increases with biotic stress, which results in growth retardation (Cutler et al., 2010). ABA was shown to
inhibit pathogen entry through the stomata, promoting resistance, but has also been shown to interfere with other
response pathways (Hwang et al., 2009), decreasing resistance depending on the pathogen type, time of infection
during plant development, and tissue site of infection (Ton et al., 2009). Thus, the true immune function of ABA 37
184
185
186
187
188
189
remains largely unclear because of circumstantial contradictions, but it is clear that its expression level is somehow
involved in the global immune response. Maize root inoculation with rhizobacteria resulted in systemic resistance
to anthracnose infection, which was mediated by a combination of JA and ABA signaling early in development
(Planchamp et al., 2015). This suggests that ABA may play a larger role in innate immunity when the plant is in its
main growth stage, before it has begun to produce fruit in an attempt to propagate itself.
38
190
191
192
193
194
Auxins: Auxins have multifaceted effects in plants, including: cell enlargement, root and flower
initiation, growth regulation in conjunction with other phytohormones, and regulation of expression of other
phytohormones (Zhao, 2010). Similar to ABA, auxins have been shown to have positive or negative effects in
regard to disease resistance (Denancé et al., 2013), and again, it is largely dependent on the pathogen type, time of
infection during development, site of infection, and how other phytohormones are expressed post- infection. It
was shown that an increase of microRNA that targets auxin receptors yields plants that are more resistant to 39
195
196
197
198
199
200
biotrophic infection but less resistant to necrotrophic infection, and a balance between auxin and SA signaling in
response to infection was proposed (Robert-Seilaniantz et al., 2011). Moreover, SA was shown to inhibit pathogen
growth in Arabidopsis by repressing auxin signaling (Wang et al., 2007). Thus, auxin signaling appears to be more
suppressive in pathogen resistance, but its true function is elusive. Given the fact that auxin signaling is highly
involved in cell enlargement, it makes sense that high auxin signaling would allow for easier pathogen entry as the
cell wall loosens. There have not been many studies regarding auxin signaling in response to anthracnose, but
40
201
202
203
204
205
206
since it clearly interacts with expression levels of other immune response hormones and is involved in regulating
the balance between growth and stress, it will be an important system to analyze moving forward.
Cytokinins (CKs): Cytokinins are involved in shoot development and mitosis and are also peripheral
growth regulators, as they are highly concentrated in the shoot apical meristem (Hwang et al., 2012). They are also
highly interactive with auxin signaling in shoot formation during early embryogenesis, but in contrast to auxins,
41
207
208
209
210
211
there is evidence that they suppress immune response to biotrophic pathogens (Walters & McRoberts, 2006),
which anthracnose causing agents sometimes are. Some pathogens secrete cytokinins of their own to disrupt
normal signaling (Hwang et al., 2012), most likely to create a more favorable environment for their own
reproduction. Alterations in CK levels after anthracnose infection have been determined in maize (Behr et al.,
2012), indicating that CK signaling is important for both proper host growth and immune response after
necrototrophic pathogen challenge, but the exact role CK signaling plays has yet to be discovered. Thus, CKs
42
212
213
214
215
216
217
appear to suppress immune signaling in response to biotrophic pathogens while they activate immune response
signaling in response to necrototrophic pathogens, but more studies involving anthracnose are required.
Ethylene: Ethylene is involved in cell growth and shape, and in turn, growth modification in response to
stress. It is highly interactive with other signaling pathways (Yoo et al., 2009). Its role in growth is apparent from
visualizing the hyponastic response, in which submerged plants project long leaves and stems through water to
43
218
219
220
221
222
obtain normal air exchange above the surface, where ethylene is soluble (Polko et al., 2013). Thus, an excess in
ethylene will cause excess growth in an attempt to regain proper balance. Auxins, CK, and stress have been shown
to promote ethylene synthesis, while JA, ABA, and Auxins promote ethylene signaling (Yoo et al., 2009). Ethylene
and JA-dependent defense signaling has been identified in wheat (Gottwald et al., 2012) and kimchi cabbage (Lee
et al., 2014), and plant immune responses are largely thought to be centrally dependent on ethylene, JA, or SA
signaling, or a combination of them depending on the pathogen (Denancé et al., 2013). Supporting the case for
44
223
224
225
226
227
228
ethylene with JA, its biosynthesis pathway was shown to be upregulated upon PAMP recognition (Spanu et al.,
1994). In support of ethylene and SA, ethylene was shown to have two spikes in production in tobacco, a dicot,
after Colletotrichum challenge: one about 24 hours before the necrotrophic phase when cankers began forming,
and another late in the necrotrophic phase when the cankers began to expand (Chen et al., 2003). Thus, there is
evidence that ethylene is produced in direct response to pathogen entry and tissue damage in response to all
45
229
230
231
232
233
pathogens. In general JA and ethylene seem to work in a concerted manner (Gottwald et al., 2012; Lee et al.,
2014), but the relationship between ethylene and SA appears to be more complex and circumstantial.
Gibberellins: Another class of phytohormones newly-found to be involved in JA and SA-dependent
immune signaling is gibberellins (De Bruyne et al., 2014). Gibberellins initiate growth by degrading a group of
growth suppressors called DELLA proteins (De Vleeschauwer et al., 2014). They are mostly involved with seed
46
234
235
236
237
238
germination and early development, but have recently been implicated as players in JA and SA signaling activation
or repression, possibly by their DELLA protein degradation, as DELLA proteins have been implicated in disrupting
the JA/SA signaling balance (Navarro et al., 2008). There appears to be significant crosstalk between JA and
gibberellins, as JA has been shown to increase immunity by inhibiting gibberellins (Yang D et al., 2012). Thus,
gibberellins appear to be inhibitory to plant immunity, largely due to their high level of involvement in driving
growth. Interestingly, gibberellins have been implicated in inhibiting ethylene synthesis and are agonistic to its
47
239
240
241
242
243
244
signaling (Yoo et al., 2009), indicating that they may have a more peripheral effect on immune signaling.
Altogether, gibberellins appear to be involved in immunity tangentially through their high involvement in growth
regulation. Thus, once the balance of growth and stress is disrupted upon infection, gibberellin activity is
decreased, allowing DELLA proteins to inhibit growth and affect the JA/SA signaling balance accordingly to the
given pathogen.
48
245
246
247
248
249
Other phytohormones: The hormones previously mentioned are some of the major effector families
in phytohormonal immunity signaling. Others include brassinosteroids, which are involved in general stress
response (De Vleeschauwer et al., 2014), nitric oxide, which is involved in seed germination and general defense
(Baudouin & Hancock, 2013), and plant peptide hormones, which are primarily involved in intercellular signaling in
growth, development, immunity, and more (Lindsey, 2001; Huffaker et al., 2011).
49
250
251
252
253
254
Regulation & Crosstalk: Obviously, there are many signaling pathways involved in plant immunity,
and they affect each other based on growth, development, survival, fitness, abiotic and biotic stresses, and
reproduction. In the case of anthracnose, the plant must balance fitness with growth and normal signaling
pathways become altered and affect other pathways. In regard to disease resistance, phytohormonal pathways
have the ability to modulate others, with synergism versus antagonism and positive and negative feedback often
coming into play (Derksen et al., 2013). JA and SA signaling have been hypothesized to counteract each other, in 50
255
256
257
258
259
260
general (Navarro et al., 2008; Denancé et al., 2013; Derksen et al., 2013, De Vleeschauwer et al., 2014), but one
does not always affect the other in defense signaling (Huffaker et al., 2011). The antagonistic nature of their
interaction would suggest that activation of one pathway would render a plant more susceptible to infection from
a pathogen that would normally be combated by the other pathway. However, they have also been shown to have
a concerted effect in particular cultivars for anthracnose infection (Lee et al., 2014), which makes sense in the case
of hemibiotrophic pathogens. Thus, the relationship between JA and SA signaling is complex and largely depends
51
261
262
263
264
265
266
on the pathophysiology of the given pathogen. Since there are a variety of causes of anthracnose inducing a variety
of immune responses, a ubiquitous generalization is impossible to make regarding JA/SA signaling.
Outside of JA/SA regulation, other phytohormones have significant interaction in both normal function
and defense signaling. For example, ethylene is required for auxin-regulated root elongation (Swarup et al., 2007).
As for positive feedback, treatment of corn with a defense peptide results in systemic production of more JA,
52
267
268
269
270
271
ethylene, and other defense molecules (Huffaker et al., 2011), and defensin overexpression was shown to enhance
anthracnose resistance by upregulating JA signaling in peppers (Seo et al., 2014). Activation and repression of
signaling pathways is largely driven by nitric oxide signaling, especially in the recognition of DAMPs (Baudouin &
Hancock, 2013). ABA and JA have been shown to antagonize each other, lending further credence to the
hypothesis that ABA contributes to susceptibility to necrotrophic pathogens (Derksen et al., 2013). It makes sense
that ABA and JA would be antagonistic because while healthy, a plant would not want to activate a defense
53
272
273
274
275
276
277
pathway because it would expend resources that would better be used on growth and reproduction. Thus, there is
a myriad of phytohormonal interplay that is dependent upon environmental and biological stresses, and
interactions of different pathways should be carefully considered when examining phytohormone-driven defense
signaling.
54
278
279
280
281
282
Supplementing the Immune Response:
Interestingly, many pathogens have developed the ability to mimic plant hormonal signaling (McSteen &
Zhao, 2008; Hwang et al., 2012; Denancé et al., 2013). For example, gibberellins were first isolated from pathogens
(McSteen & Zhao, 2008). Thus, the pathogen would ideally disrupt normal growth and development signals and
55
283
284
285
286
induce stress signals for the benefit of its own propagation. This contributes to the complexity of studying
phytohormone-driven immune signaling and highlights the ability of foreign molecules to affect the growth/stress
balance and systemic immune response. While this is a strategy that is advantageous for pathogens, it also allows
for supplementation of the immune response with foreign agents to confer disease resistance. Plants have been
shown to have a sensing system for foreign pathogens (Hiruma et al., 2010), much like cognate antigen
presentation in human cells. This, too, can be employed to supplement the immune response, similar to
56
287
288
289
290
291
292
vaccination against disease. These are aspects that should be considered in developing an integrated pest
management strategy (Kim & Yun, 2013).
Treating with or overexpressing native plant molecules to induce defense signaling has been studied
(Huffaker et al., 2011; Seo et al., 2014), and β-Amino-n-butyric acid (BABA) increases anthracnose resistance (Kim
YC et al., 2014), but foreign substances can also be used as immune supplements. Antibiotics from rhizobacteria
57
293
294
295
296
297
application have anti-fungal properties in hot peppers (Lamsal et al., 2012), which is a case of infecting a plant with
a beneficial, inert pathogen to obtain resistance against a virulent one. Similarly, rhizobacteria application also
been shown to increase anthracnose resistance in corn (Planchamp et al., 2015), and myxobacteria application has
shown similar results in peppers (Yun, 2014). Even fungal agents can be used. Yeast cell wall application was shown
to induce phytohormonal defense responses against anthracnose infection by activating JA signaling early and SA
58
298
299
300
301
302
signaling late in the infection cycle (Narusaka et al., 2015). There is a long history of symbiosis upon which both the
plant and fungus are dependent (Rodriguez & Redman, 2007).
It should be noted that application of foreign substances to supplement plant immunity sounds like a
novel idea that could decrease morbidity, but the effect it has on disrupting normal growth should be accounted
for in breeding strategy and in quality and yield. Whether or not these foreign substances end up in edible fruit of
59
303
304
305
306
307
the plant should also be monitored at the risk of introducing potential carcinogens into food. At the very least, it
has the potential to reduce vertical transmission, allowing for an improvement in progeny. Thus, it merits further
investigation.
Sources of Resistance, Fungal and Agricultural:
60
308
309
310
311
Many fungal strains have proven resistant to fungicide application, based on their defensive ATP-binding
cassette (ABC) transporters (Espinel-Ingroff, 2008). The particular transporter was successfully identified in
Colletotrichum acutatum, which causes anthracnose in hot peppers (Kim S, 2014). Hence, ABC transporters can be
potential fungal targets for inhibition via their structural determination and subsequent rational drug design.
Gaining more insight into the evolution and mechanisms of fungicide resistance will provide a platform for which
to prepare for resistance development. Also, deep RNA sequencing of Colletotrichum gramnicola, which causes
61
312
313
314
315
316
317
anthracnose in corn, revealed alternative splicing mechanisms for characterization of gene models (Schleibner et
al., 2014). Thus, there is a basis for which to compare genetic homology across fungal species to identify resistance
genes and expressed molecular targets for fungicide development or drug inhibition in the case of mimicking
molecules. Moreover, profiling the phytohormonal immune responses to different pathogen strains can provide
insight in how best to combat them (Campa et al., 2014).
62
318
319
320
321
322
As there are resistance genes in fungi, so there are resistance genes in plants. Particular cultivars have
been proven to be more resistant to anthracnose, and it is likely due to a genetic basis (Narina et al., 2011; Lee et
al., 2014). Hence, particular resistance genes can be identified via knockout studies and monitoring phytohormonal
signaling as a result. With the genetic basis identified, other species can be screened for homologous resistance
genes, or the resistance genes can be cloned into other species to create highly resistant transgenic plants. Novel
techniques like Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) have also been extensively applied for tagging resistance
63
323
324
325
326
327
328
markers (Yang et al., 2012). Thus, progeny of unknown genotype can be analyzed with seed chip DNA to determine
their resistance profile, saving time and money. Once particular resistance genes are identified, they can be
overexpressed via agrobacteria transformation to confer increased fungal resistance, and this can even be done
across species to induce transgenic resistance (Singh et al., 2015). Clearly, doing the research on both plants and
fungi before diving into the deep end of high-scale field production is a worthwhile venture to the agricultural
64
329
330
331
332
333
biotechnology industry and should be included when developing integrated pest management strategies to
minimize crop loss and cost while maximizing quality, yield, and pathogen resistance.
Conclusion and Future Directions:
65
334
335
336
Monitoring phytohormonal responses to anthracnose-causing pathogens is a viable method of
determining how best to combat the given pathogen. Should a resistant cultivar be identified, it can be propagated
in a controlled environment to prevent vertical transmission, mutagenized and propagated again to produce
mutant progeny. Then the progeny can be challenged with infection, followed by phenotypic, genetic and
phytohormonal analysis of mutants with altered resistance to identify the genetic basis of resistance. The future of
anthracnose resistance lies within reverse genetics studies like these combined with genome-wide association
66
337
338
339
340
341
342
studies between cultivars to determine what the optimal hybrid genome is. This in combination with identification
of fungicide resistance genes in fungi strains will allow for an optimal scenario for financial viability of crop
production.
Rice is emerging as a tractable model for plant studies (De Vleesschauwer et al., 2014), so there is at last a
monocotyledon model for which to compare other crop plants and their resistance profiles to anthracnose
67
343
344
345
346
347
pathogens. That is not to say that Arabidopsis is no longer useful, but that findings using it as a plant model should
be confirmed in rice before applying generalizations regarding phytohormone-driven defense signaling. The future
of developing anthracnose-resistant crops depends on the comprehensive development of a highly homologous
and applicable, relevant model organism with which to conduct studies. While rice is a good start, it is likely that
there are even more advantageous grass types in terms of growth requirements and cost, so grasses with short life
cycles should be examined as a more applicable model organism for comparison to dicotyledons.
68
348
349
350
351
352
353
This is not only applicable to the agriculture biotechnology industry, but it is also pertinent to the medical
world. Many plants that are endangered are so because of their high susceptibility to a given pathogen. If they are
used by humans or animals for some sort of medicinal purpose, this only exacerbates their population issues.
Therefore, integrated pest management combined with propagation and breeding strategies can be implemented
with pathogen resistance in mind. Anthracnose does not always have to be an enemy, either. In terms of
pharmacognosy, anthracnose and other pathogens have the potential to be used to induce an increase in
69
354
355
356
357
358
359
production in stress hormones, which can be used to treat human cancer and other diseases (Fingrut & Flesher,
2002). Moreover, plants under stress produce increase amounts of other non-hormonal therapeutic compounds.
This makes it easier and cheaper to produce hard-to-synthesize natural therapeutics while reducing the impact on
the population source by producing more of the compound from fewer source plants. At this point, such a
technique is merely a theory, but it does have the possibility of being a viable technique. Only through
phytohormonal monitoring post-infection will it be determined if anthracnose infection could be used to induce a
70
360
361
362
363
364
365
higher production of a therapeutic substance. It will also provide greater insight into initiation of innate immunity
in plants, which even though it is a much older pathway than in humans, it is less understood. Given the fact that
the human population is growing, food availability will become a significant issue for much more of the world in
the near future. Thus, determining how to optimally grow grain foods that are highly resistant to stresses of any
kind must be common practice in the future of agriculture.
71
366
367
368
369
370
References:
1. Antico CJ, Colon C, Banks T, & Ramonell KM 2012 Insights into the role of jasmonic acid-mediated
defenses against necrotrophic and biotrophic fungal pathogens. Frontiers in Biology7 48-56.
2. Bailey JA & Jeger MJ 1992 Colletotrichum: Biology, Pathology and Control pp388. Eds JA Bailey & MJ
Jeger. Wallingford: Commonwealth Mycological Institute.
72
371
372
373
374
375
3. Baudouin E & Hancock JT 2013 Nitric oxide signaling in plants. Frontiers in Plant Science4 553.
4. Behr M, Motyka V, Weihmann F, Malbeck J, Deising HB, & Wirsel SGR 2012 Remodeling of cytokinin
metabolism at infection sites of Colletotrichum graminicola on maize leaves. Molecular Plant-Microbe
Interactions25 1073-1082.
5. Boller T & Felix G 2009 A renaissance of elicitors: perception of microbe-associated molecular patterns
and danger signals by pattern-recognition receptors. Annual Review of Plant Biology60 379-406.
73
376
377
378
379
380
381
6. Campa A, Rodríguez-Suárez C, Giraldez R, Ferreira JJ 2014 Genetic analysis of the response to eleven
Colletotrichum lindemuthianum races in a RIL population of common bean. BMC Plant Biology14 115.
7. Cheplick GP & Faeth S 2009 Ecology and Evolution of the Grass-Endophyte Symbiosis. Eds GP Cheplick & S
Faeth. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
8. Cutler SR, Rodriguez PL, Finkelstein RR, & Abrams SR 2010 Abscisic acid: emergence of a core signaling
network. Annual Reviews Plant Biology61 651-679.
74
382
383
384
385
386
387
9. De Bruyne L, Höfte M, & De Vleesschauwer 2014 Connecting growth and defense: the emerging roles of
brassinosteroids and gibberellins in plant innate immunity. Molecular Plant7 943-959.
10. Denancé N, Sánchez-Vallet A, Goffner D, & Molina A 2013 Disease resistance or growth: the role of plant
hormones in balancing immune responses and fitness costs. Frontiers in Plant Science4 155.
11. Derksen H, Rampitsch C, & Daayf F 2013 Signaling cross-talk in plant disease resistance. Plant Science207
79-87.
75
388
389
390
391
392
393
12. De Vleesschauwer D, Xu J, & Höfte M 2014 Making sense of hormone-mediated defense networking: from
rice to Arabidopsis. Frontiers in Plant Science5 611.
13. Espinel-Ingroff A 2008 Mechanisms of resistance to antifungal agents: yeasts and filamentous fungi.
Revista Iberoamericana De Micologia25 101-106.
14. Fingrut O & Flescher E 2002 Plant stress hormones suppress the proliferation and induce apoptosis in
human cancer cells. Leukemia16 608-616.
76
394
395
396
397
398
399
15. Fu ZQ & Dong X 2013 Systemic acquired resistance: turning local infection into global defense. Annual
Review of Plant Biology64 839-863.
16. Gottwald S, Samans B, Lück S, & Freidt W 2012 Jasmonate and ethylene defence gene expression and
suppression of fungal virulence factors: two essential mechanisms of Fusarium head blight resistance in
wheat? BMC Genomics13 369.
77
400
401
402
403
404
17. Hiruma K, Onozawa-Komori M, Takahashi F, Asakura M, Bednarek P, Okuno T, Schulze-Lefert P, & Takano
Y 2010 Entry mode-dependent function of an indole glucosinolate pathway in Arabidopsis for nonhost
resistance against anthracnose pathogens. Plant Cell22 2429-2443.
18. Hwang S, Kim J, Kim YH, & Kim HT 2009 ABA increases susceptibility of pepper fruits to infection of
anthracnose by Colletotrichum acutatum. The Plant Pathology Journal24 400-406.
19. Hwang I, Sheen, J, & Müller 2012 Cytokinin signaling networks. Annual Reviews Plant Biology63 353-380.
78
405
406
407
408
409
410
20. Huffaker A, Dafoe NJ, & Schmelz EA 2011 ZmPep1, an ortholog of Arabidopsis elicitor peptide 1, regulates
maize innate immunity and enhances disease resistance. Plant Physiology155 1325-1338.
21. Kim J & Yun S 2013 A three-year field validation study to improve the integrated pest management of hot
pepper. The Plant Pathology Journal29 294-304.
22. Kim S, Park SY, Kim H, Kim D, Lee SW, Kim HT, Lee JH, & Choi WB 2014 Isolation and characterization of
the Colletotrichum acutatum ABC transporter CaABC1. The Plant Physiology Journal30 375-383.
79
411
412
413
414
415
416
23. Kim YC, Kim YH, Lee YH, Lee SW, Chae YS, Kang HK, Yun BW, & Hong JK 2014 β-Amino-n-butyric acid
regulates seedling growth and disease resistance of kimchi cabbage. The Plant Physiology Journal29 305-
316.
24. Koornneef M & Meinke D 2010 The development of Arabidopsis as a model plant. The Plant Journal61
909-921.
80
417
418
419
420
421
25. Lamsal K, Kim SW, Kim YS, & Lee YS 2012 Application of Rhizobacteria for plant growth promotion effect
and biocontrol of anthracnose caused by Colletotrichum acutatum on pepper. Mycobiology40 244-251.
26. Lee YH, Kim SH, Yun BW, & Hong JK 2014 Altered cultivar resistance of kimchi cabbage seedlings mediated
by salicylic acid, jasmonic acid and ethylene. The Plant Pathology Journal30 323-329.
27. Lindsey K 2001 Plant peptide hormones: the long and the short of it. Current Biology11 R741-R743.
81
422
423
424
425
426
28. Macho AP & Zipfel C 2014 Plant PRRs and the activation of innate immune signaling. Molecular Cell54 263-
272.
29. McSteen P & Zhao Y 2008 Plant hormones and signaling: common themes and new developments.
Developmental Cell14 467-473.
30. Nicolaou KC, Yang Z, Liu JJ, Ueno H, Nantermet PG, Guy RK, Claiborne CF, Renaud J, Couladouros EA,
Paulvannan K, et al. 1994 Total Synthesis of taxol. Nature367 630-634.
82
427
428
429
430
431
432
31. Pakdeevaraporn P, Wasee S, Taylor PWJ, & Mongkolporn O 2005 inheritance of resistance to anthracnose
caused by Colletotrichum capsici in Capsicum. Plant Breeding 124 206-208.
32. Polko JK, Pierik R, van Zanten M, Tarkowska D, Strnad M, Voesenek LA, & Peeters AJ. Ethylene promotes
hyponastic growth through interaction with ROTUNDIFOLIA3/CYP90C1 in Arabidopsis. Journal of
Experimental Botany64 613-624.
83
433
434
435
436
437
33. Narina SS, Buyyarapu R, Kottapalli, Sartie AM, Ali MI, Robert A, Hodeba MJD, Sayre BL, & Scheffler BE 2011
Generation and analysis of expressed sequence tags (ESTs) for marker development in yam (Dioscorea
alata L.). BMC Genomics12 100.
34. Narusaka M, Minami T, Iwabuchi C, Hamasaki T, Takasaki S, Kawamura K, & Narusaka Y 2015 Yeast cell
wall extract induces disease resistance against bacterial and fungal pathogens in Arabidopsis thaliana and
Brassica crop. PLoS One10 e0115864.
84
438
439
440
441
442
443
35. Navarro L, Bari R, Achard P, Lison P, Nemri A, Harberd NP, & Jones JD 2008 DELLAs control plant immune
responses by modulating the balance of jasmonic acid and salicylic signaling. Current Biology18 650-655.
36. Planchamp C, Glauser G, & Mauch-Mani B 2014 Root inoculation with pseudomonas putida KT2440
induces transcriptional and metabolic changes and systemic resistance in maize plants. Frontiers in Plant
Science5 719.
85
444
445
446
447
448
37. Poolsawat O, Mahanil S, Laosuwan P, Wongkaew S, Tharapreuksapong A, Reisch BI, & Tantasawat PA
2013 Inheritance of downy mildew (Plasmopara viticola) and anthracnose (Spaceloma ampelinum)
resistance in grapevines. Genet Mol Res12 6752-6751.
38. Robert-Seilaniantz A, MacLean D, Jikkumaru Y, Hill L, Yamaguchi S, Kamiya Y, & Jones JD 2011 The
microRNA miR393 re-directs secondary metabolite biosynthesis away from camalexin and towards
glucosinolates. Plant Journal67 218-231.
86
449
450
451
452
453
454
39. Rodriguez R & Redman R 2007 More than 400 million years of evolution and some plants still can’t make it
on their own: plant stress tolerance via fungal symbiosis. Journal of Experimental Botany59 1109-1114.
40. Savatin DV, Gramegna G, Modesti V, & Cervone F 2014 Wounding in the plant tissue: the defense of a
dangerous passage. Frontiers in Plant Science5 470.
87
455
456
457
458
41. Schleibner I, Becher R, Hempel M, Deising HB, & Horbach R 2014 New gene models and alternative
splicing in the maize pathogen Colletotrichum gramnicola revealed by RNA-Seq analysis. BMC Genomics15
842.
42. Seo HH, Park S, Park S, Oh BJ, Back K, Han O, Kim JI & Kim YS 2014 Overexpression of a defensin enhances
resistance to a fruit-specific anthracnose fungus in pepper. PLoS One9 e97936.
88
459
460
461
462
463
43. Singh HR, Deka M, & Das S 2015 Enhanced resistance to blister blight in transgenic tea (Camellia sinensis
[L.] O. Kuntze) by overexpression of class I chitinase gene from potato (Solanum tuberosum). Functional
and Integrative Genomics2015 epub ahead of print. doi:10.1007/s10142-015-0436-1
44. Smith JL, De Moraes CM, & Mescher MC 2009 Jasmonate- and salicylate-mediate plant defense responses
to insect herbivores, pathogens, and parasitic plants. Plant Management Science65 497-503.
89
464
465
466
467
468
45. Spanu P, Grosskopf DG, Felix G, & Boller T 1994 The apparent turnover of 1-aminocyclopropane-1-
carboxylate synthase in tomato cells is regulated by protein phosphorylation and dephosphorylation.
Plant Physiology106 529-535.
46. Swarup R, Perry P, Hagenbeek D, Van Der Straeten, Beemster GT, Sandberg G, Bhalerao R, Ljung K, &
Bennett MJ 2007 Ethylene upregulates auxin biosynthesis in Arabidopsis seedlings to enhance inhibition
of root cell elongation. Plant Cell19 2186-2196.
90
469
470
471
472
473
474
47. Than PP, Prihastuti H, Phoulivong S, Taylor PWJ, & Hyde KD 2008 Chilli anthracnose disease caused by
Colletotrichum species. Journal of Zhejiang University Science B9 764-778.
48. Ton J, Flors V, & Mauch-Mani B 2009 The multifaceted role of ABA in disease resistance. Trends in Plant
Science14 310-317.
49. Vasyukova NI & Ozeretskovskaya OL 2009 Jasmonate-dependent defense signaling in plant tissues.
Russian Journal of Plant Physiology56 643-653.
91
475
476
477
478
479
480
50. Vlot AC, Klessig DF, Park SW 2008 Systemic acquired resistance: the elusive signal(s). Current Opinions in
Plant Biology11 436-442.
51. Wager A & Browse J 2012 Social network: JAZ protein interactions expand our knowledge of jasmonate
signaling. Frontiers in Plant Science3 41.ecollection 2012.
52. Walters DR & McRoberts N 2006 Plants and biotrophs: a pivotal role for cytokinins? Trends in Plant
Science11 581-586.
92
481
482
483
484
485
486
53. Wang D, Pajerowska-Mukhtar K, Culler AH, & Dong X 2007 Salicylic acid inhibits pathogen growth in plants
through repression of the auxin signaling pathway. Current Biology17 1784-1790.
54. Wick J 2012 Aspirin: A History, A Love Story. The Consultant Pharmacist27 322-329.
55. Yang D, Yao J, Mei C, Tong X, Zeng L, Li Q, Xiao L, Sun T, Deng X, Lee C, et al. 2012 Plant hormone
jasmonate prioritizes defense over growth by interfering with gibberellin signaling cascade. Proceedings
of the National Academy of Sciences USA109 E1192-E1200.
93
487
488
489
490
491
492
56. Yang H, Tao Y, Zheng Z, Li C, Sweetingham MW, Howieson JG 2012 Application of next-generation
sequencing for rapid marker development in molecular plant breeding: a case study on anthracnose
disease resistance in Lupinus angustifolius L. BMC Genomics13 318.
57. Yoo D, Cho Y, & Sheen J 2009 Emerging connections in the ethylene signaling network. Trends in Plant
Science14 270-279.
94
493
494
495
496
497
58. Yun S 2014 Selection and a 3-year field trial of Sorangium cellulosum KYC 3262 against anthracnose in hot
pepper. The Plant Pathology Journal30 279-287.
59. Zhao Y 2010 Auxin biosynthesis and its role in plant development. Annual Reviews Plant Biology61 49-64.
95
498
499
500
96
60.
97
502
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
Top Related