Dr. Isaiah Owiunji
Energy and Climate Programme Coordinator
WWF Uganda Country Office
Balancing Biodiversity Conservation and
Extractive Industry Development in Uganda
Presentation Outline
• Introduction to extractive industry (EI) and
biodiversity conservation (BC)
• Why concerns on EI and BC
• What are the implications of EI on BC
• What needs to be done to ensure the
balance between EI and BC
• Concluding remarks
The balance between extractives and biodiversity
• The co-existence of extractive industries and biodiversity conservation is a worldwide challenge because of the risks posed by the industry to the environment and human communities
• This is because the sector creates significant opportunities in the near term while significant risks are postponed for the future generations presenting a difficult choice for policy makers
What is an Extractive Industry
Extractive Industry
• An extractive industry can be defined as a process that involves different activities which lead to the extraction of raw materials from the earth (such as oil, gas, metals, mineral and aggregates), processing and utilization by consumers (UNCTAD 2012).
• These processes take place within host countries and home countries of operating companies, as well as consuming markets
• The extractive industry has a number of phases during its development (exploration, appraisal, development, operational and decommissioning) all of which are associated with certain environmental and social impacts (Ali and O'Faircheallaigh, 2007).
What is Biodiversity Conservation?
Biodiversity Conservation
• Biodiversity is defined as variability among living organisms from all sources including inter alia, terrestrial, marine and other aquatic ecosystems and the ecological complexes of which they are part. This includes diversity within species, between species and of ecosystems (Convention on Biological Diversity, 2010).
• Biodiversity conservation is the active management of the biosphere to ensure the survival of the maximum diversity of species and the maintenance of genetic variability within species. It includes the maintenance of biosphere function e.g. nutrient cycling and ecosystem function.
• The term also includes the concept of sustainable resource use so that the environment may yield the greatest sustainable benefit to current generations while maintaining its potential to meet the needs and aspirations of future generations.
Extractive Industry
Development Process
Energy Companies Shareholders Employees Contractors
International Institutions Development partners Development Banks
Host Communities Indigenous people Employees Suppliers Customers Community activists
Government Executive Parliament Participating Entities Local Governments
Civil Society Organisations NGOs CBO, Universities Research Institutions Industry Associations
Key Stakeholders of Energy Development
(Source: Owiunji 2013)
What are the concerns for development of Extractives on Biodiversity Conservation in E. Africa?
• Much of Uganda’s current efforts to manage the impacts of petroleum development through a programme which runs up Entitled Strengthening the Management of the Oil and Gas Sector in Uganda funded by the Norwegian Government.
• The programme has been running since 2006
• The programme is based on the objectives of the National Oil and Gas Policy (NOGP) for Uganda, which is to ensure that oil and gas activities are undertaken in a manner that conserves the environment and biodiversity (Ministry of Energy and Mineral Development, 2010a).
• The relevant activities of the programme for the management of the environment are contained under the resource and the environmental management pillars.
• The main activities include: – The need to put in place a new legal and regulatory framework
– Introduce a new institutional framework and enhance existing frameworks to manage the petroleum sector.
– Develop envioronmental tools e.g. SEA, Oil contingency plan,
• The programme aims at building capacity of institutions to ensure efficient and effective implementation, and improve coordination among the participating institutions and application of environmental management practices
Environmental Pillar Institutions
(Government Regulators)
Development Partners, Civil Society Organisations, Host Communities, Private
Sector, Media
Multi Institutional Environmental Monitoring Committee
(Government Regulators + one CSO)
The Executive, Line Ministries, Parliament
Ministry of Water and
Environment
Relationship Among Stakeholders for Management of an Environmental Challenge in a Typical Energy
Development Programme in Uganda
(Source: Modified after MEMD 2013)
LJ/KF
10
Extractive industry development decisions h
igh
lo
w
ability to influence
years 0 10 30+
produce an
operation
consistent
with scope,
cost &
schedule
finalize
project
scope, cost
& schedule
& obtain
funding
determine project feasibility & alignment with
business strategy
capital value process
appraise operate execute define select
select
the
preferred
project
option(s)
evaluate to ensure
performance to
specs &maximum
return to
shareholders
decision point
credit: BP A
bout
here
What has been the relationship between Extractives and Biodiversity Conservation Globally?
• The history of extractives has been characterised by conflicts with environmentalists and indigenous communities world wide.
• In many cases, the development of extractives has resulted in irreversible environmental damage and severe social disruption because there is a tendency for both extractive companies and host governments to downplay environmental concerns because of the highly lucrative business
• Moreover, destruction of biodiversity can disrupt ecosystems which in turn can impact negatively on the human communities that dependent on such systems.
• However, humans and biodiversity can co-exist side by side on the planet if there is genuine respect for the natural world and the living things in it.
• It is important that humans must recognise their responsibility not to harm or interfere with a viable life community of wild animals and plants as they also provide for our wellbeing
• The care for the environment is an ethics issue, so to kill or otherwise harm creatures is morally wrong and can only be justified if we have no feasible alternative
What are the concerns for development of Extractives on Biodiversity Conservation in E. Africa?
• Absence or outdated environmental policies and legislation for management of extractives – The legislation to manage and regulate the industry and the environment
are still in a state of evolution
– The relevant pieces of legislation will need to be set within the wider legislative context arising from the emerging issues such as oil and gas
– Even where environmental policies and legislation exist, there have been challenges with implementation
– There is very little monitoring of the adequacy of the implementation of the environmental legislation to address impacts of extractives
– Uganda is a signatory to numerous international agreements and conventions, but their status of implementation is not clear
• Weak capacity of environmental institutions to cope with the current interest in the development of extractives – The capacity of environmental institutions and other key stakeholders in
the sub sector have not been systematically built to deal with extractive industry developments (Norad Fund does not support long-term courses)
– Much of the funding for management of impacts of extractives and development of tools is donor funded (NORAD in Uganda, USAID, WB)
What are the concerns for development of Extractives on Biodiversity Conservation in A. Graben?
• Limited knowledge and skills to adequately understand, monitor and manage impacts of petroleum development on wildlife and communities
– No long-term research being undertaken
– Lack of labs and equipment
– Irregular monitoring activities by environmental institutions
• Overlapping of sensitive ecosystems with the extractive industry fields and challenges of infrastructure development
– The Albertine Graben in Uganda is a very sensitive environment
– The coastal E. Africa (coastal forests and coral reefs)
– Fragile Turkana ecosystems
• Ineffective implementation of environmental tools – E.g. SEA in some of the countries are done after the petroleum activities were already
started
– EIA review process is also weak and not systematic
• Lack of coordinated and systematic approach to data collection for monitoring
– Data collection is done in piece without robust and standard methods of data collection used in terms of Spatial coverage, parameters covered, frequency etc
– There are issues of quality control of field activities and data management
• Resistance from MWE and MEMD to make available information especially those generated by extractive companies especially in Uganda
Mineral Investment Opportunities –
cont’d
17
Uranium Over 30 Uranium targets have been identified and 10
targets are priority for follow up
A. Kei and Midigo-Kaya Basin, Arua district.
B. Acha-Alo basin-Pakwach district.
C. Zipia, Bibia, Pekelle -Ayugi Basin-Adjumani district
D. Naam-Okora, Ogli and Wol (Pager-Agago-Ogel Basin)-Kitgum district.
E. Karongo-Waki Basin- Masindi
F. Bulyango, Kigozi-Kiizi Basin-Kabarole district.
G. Mpanga-Kahambu Basin Kyatwa (Ndale) -Mpaga Basin, Kyakutama- Basin-Kabarole district.
H. Rubindi, Kashongi -Nyabishekye Basin, Mirama Kababo Basin – Mbarara distrtict.
I. Kinyasano, Nyakibale (Rukungiri District), Kagamba, Ntugamo, Rubare Ntungamo District), Gayaza, Kahirimbi- Mbarara district.
J. Mabale, Kagadi, Isunga, Pachwa, Kabwoya-Hoima district. Courtesy of MEMD
Tororo Cement-
Limestone
Tororo Cement-
Limestone
Jan Mangal (u) Ltd-Gold
Greenstone resources Ltd.-gold
Ataco services Ltd.-
Gypsum
Kilembe Mines- Cu,
Co, Limestone
Anglo Ugandan
Corporation-Gold
Kisita Mining company
limited-gold
Hima cement Limited-
Limestone
Mining cadastre map showing Mining Leases
18
Osukulu
Phosphat
e
Courtesy of MEMD
Simba Mines Ltd.-Gold
First Mining (u) Ltd.-Tin
Zarnack Holdings-Tin
Muhindo enterprise -
koalin
Uganda International Mining –iron ore
Berkley reef -
Wolfram
Great lakes-iron ore Kigezi steel –
Iron ore
Krone Uganda Ltd.-Wolfram
19
Mining cadastre map showing Mining Leases in SW Uganda
Courtesy of MEMD
Mineral Investment Opportunities –
cont’d
20
Directorate of Geological Survey and Mines
Geothermal energy
4 Main areas under
exploration are:
Buranga, Katwe,
Kibiro, Panymur – All in
Western Rift Valley.
Courtesy of MEMD
Environmental Impacts of Petroleum Development (1)
Project Stage Project Activity Potential Biodiversity
Impacts
Pre-bid phase -Business assessment
-Assessment of environmental and
social risks
- No impact
Exploration and
appraisal phase
(Seismic, drilling
appraisal)
-Provision of access
-Workers camps
-Use of resources
-Clearing of lines
-Mobilisation of drill rig
-Drilling
-Well testing and flaring
-Etc
-Footprint impacts
-Disturbance of fauna
-Noise impacts
-Physical disturbance
-Contamination of soils,
surface & groundwater
-Landscape modification
- Introduction of invasive
spp
Development
phase
(Construction)
-Camps, access
-Resource use
-Movement of vehicles and heavy
machinery
-Acquisition of land
-Habitat loss
-Soil erosion
-Land take
-Contamination of soils,
surface & groundwater
-Landscape modification
Environmental impacts of Petroleum development (2)
Project Stage Project Activity Potential Biodiversity
Impacts
Production phase - Footprint
-Visible presence
- Product handling and storage,
- Refining and use of chemicals
-Generation of wastes
-Emissions and noise
-Etc
- Temporary/Permanent
loss of habitat
-Effects on landscape
and visual amenity
- Contamination of soil,
water, air
-Land take
-Displacement
Decommissioning
phase
- Removal of facilities and restoration
Impacts of mineral extraction • Destruction of natural habitat at mining and waste disposal sites.
• Destruction of adjacent habitats arising from influx of settlers.
• Changes in river regime and ecology due to siltation and flow
modification.
• Alteration in water tables and change in landform.
• Land degradation due to inadequate rehabilitation after closure.
• Dangers from failure of structures and dams.
• Drainage from sites (acid mine drainage and mine water).
• Sediment runoff from mining sites.
• Pollution from mining operations in riverbeds (dredging).
• Effluent from mineral processing operations.
• Sewage effluent from the site and oil and fuel spills
• Soil contamination from treatment residues and spillage of chemicals.
• Leaching of pollutants from tailings and disposal areas and
contaminated soils.
• Noxious emissions from minerals processing operations.
• Release of methane from mines
WHAT NEEDS TO BE DONE TO ENSURE
THE BALANCE BETWEEN EXTRACTIVE
INDUSTRY DEVELOPMENT AND
BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION
Factors to Ensure Co-existence between Biodiversity and Extractives (1)
Legislation formulation and implementation
– Formulating comprehensive policies and legislation to manage extractives
– Implementing, monitoring and evaluating the implementation of the policies and
legislation
– Improving institutional coordination and policy coherence across sectoral
ministries of extractives
Strengthening capacity of institutions and proper coordination
– Build the capacity of staff, remunerate and retain the trained staff
– Strengthening capacities of local governments and civil society, including
women’s groups and indigenous peoples’ organizations to engage in
participatory planning, implementation and monitoring of inclusive and
sustainable policies for the management of extractives
– Establishment of partnerships with the private sector, civil society, governments
of extractive countries at the global, regional and national levels to support and
scale-up country-level efforts;
– Define the roles of institutions, improve coordination and provide resources
– Establish infrastructure and procure equipment
– Improve on compliance enforcement and monitoring
Factors to Ensure Co-existence between Biodiversity and Extractives (2)
• Establishment of partnerships with the private sector, civil society,
home governments of extractive companies at the global, regional
and national levels to support and scale-up country-level efforts
– For example ensuring the implementation of America's DoddFrank Act and the
European Union's 'EU Transparency Directive' that make it mandatory for
corporations listed on stock markets in those countries to report on extractive
sector payments to governments
• Ensure environmental funds benefit host communities as well as
management of the environment
• Establish joint venture partnerships with government, extractive
companies and CSOs for information exchange (JVP in Uganda)
• Observing good environmental practice
– Implementing industry and international standards
• Meaningful stakeholder involvement
• Using appropriate technology by extractive companies
Factors to Ensure Co-existence between Biodiversity and Extractives (3)
• Flexibility and use of appropriate technology by
extractive companies:
– i) relocation of workers camps outside the protected
areas,
– ii) transportation of waste outside the protected areas
as soon as drilling activity was completed
– iii) accepting to shift the position of a proposed drilling
site close to a tourism circuit in Buligi Tourism Circuit
– Using drones in sensitive areas
– Using Schlumberger Evergreen Burner
– Using sand holding materials materials such as
‘Neoweb’ (which helps to stabilize soil) and ‘Bidden’
Factors to Ensure Co-existence between Biodiversity and Extractives (4)
East African Gov’ts and Oil companies improve environmental practices
for addressing impacts of extractive development:
Improving the EIA practice by revising the EIA guidelines.
– Implementing the recommendations of the SEAs
– Implementing the recommendation of the monitoring plan, sensitivity atlas
– Develop the oil spill contingency plans and establish implementation funds
– Oil companies undertake voluntary initiatives to improve environmental
performance
Forming Partnerships and/or collaborations between, government, CSO
and extractive:
– Financial support
– Technical advice
– Logistic support/access to property
– Data/information sharing
– Review/benchmarking/assurance
– Convening stakeholders
– A partnership can involve completely independent perspectives
and one partner may publicly disagree with the other
Top Related