7/30/2019 Annual Conference - WTP Residuals
1/30
Impact of Water Treatment Plant
Residuals on Fixed Film Processes
Sidney Biesterfeld1, Mark Dane2, Richard Dingeman2,
Dan Freeman2, Paul Heppler2,
Kurt Keilbach2, Ernie Oram2, Dr. David Paterniti2,
Dan Wadas2
, and Mike Lutz1
1Integra Engineering, 2City of Boulder 75th Street WWTP
7/30/2019 Annual Conference - WTP Residuals
2/30
2004 Joint Annual Conference
WTP Residuals
Water treatment plants use ferric chloride,ferric sulfate, and alum as coagulants.
Resulting residuals are sometimes dischargedto the sanitary sewer for WWTP co-disposal.
Increases inert fraction of MLSS; alsoincreases total MLSS concentration.
Adds 5-20% to WWTP solids handling costs.
Can increase metals and radionuclide levels.
7/30/2019 Annual Conference - WTP Residuals
3/30
2004 Joint Annual Conference
WTP residuals increase WWTPsolids handling costs
CTP Total WTPResiduals
PercentIncrease
Influent flow, mgd 156.7 0.55 0.3
Mass load, tons/day
Influent BOD 142.5 0.1 0.1
Influent TSS 178.2 22.9 12.8
Primary Sludge 106.8 20.6 19.3
Secondary Sludge 87.6 2.3 2.6
Digester Feed 196.7 25.3 12.9
Digested Sludge 118.0 22.8 19.3
7/30/2019 Annual Conference - WTP Residuals
4/30
2004 Joint Annual Conference
WTP Residuals have beneficialeffects on WWTP operation
Iron based residuals mitigate odors bypreventing H2S formation. Iron sulfide, an insoluble forms instead.
Minimize H2S in anaerobic digester gas.
Improve sludge settleability.
Mitigate struvite formation by precipitatingortho-phosphorus.
May aid in soluble metals and P removal.
Edwards et. al. 1997
7/30/2019 Annual Conference - WTP Residuals
5/30
2004 Joint Annual Conference
75th Street WWTP, Boulder, CO
7/30/2019 Annual Conference - WTP Residuals
6/30
2004 Joint Annual Conference
Too much of a good thing,isnt always
February 2001, the Boulder ReservoirWater Treatment Plant experimentedwith a new operational mode.
WTP residuals were held for an extendedperiod of time to build deep blankets.
New operational mode was not successful.
Excess residuals were discharged toBoulder 75th Street WWTP.
7/30/2019 Annual Conference - WTP Residuals
7/30
2004 Joint Annual Conference
Too much of a good thing,isnt always
Total pounds of iron delivered unknown.
Biological processes were disrupted.
Upper levels of trickling filter rocks werecoated with an orange, gelatinous material.
Still visible after nearly three years.
Final effluent quality was impacted for anextended period; nitrification, TSS, and BOD5
7/30/2019 Annual Conference - WTP Residuals
8/30
2004 Joint Annual Conference
75th Street Plant implementedan aggressive control plan
WTP was issued a pretreatment permitlimiting iron discharge to 400 ppd.
WTP now discharges residuals for threeminutes once every 1.5 hours to minimizeimpact on WWTP operation.
WTP switched from FeCl2 to FeSO4 forcompatibility with WWTP operations.
Control plan limited effects of residuals.
7/30/2019 Annual Conference - WTP Residuals
9/30
2004 Joint Annual Conference
Control strategy was effective,but wasnt science based
Total pounds of iron received prior to upsetwas unknown.
Pretreatment limit set high enough that WTPwould not be impacted.
Anecdotal evidence raised concerns thatpretreatment limit is too high.
Where should the pretreatment limit be set?
7/30/2019 Annual Conference - WTP Residuals
10/30
2004 Joint Annual Conference
Limits should be set to minimizeimpacts on operation.
Coating of trickling filter biofilm whichreduces oxygen transfer.
Phosphorus deficiency in biological processes
due to precipitation of P.
Iron toxicity. 1.84 mg/L Fe impacts activated sludge1
1.68 mg/L Fe drops nitrification rates by 20-34%2
High levels of Fe associated with nitriteaccumulation in activated sludge.3
Ciliated protozoa impacted at 2.0 mg/L Fe4
1. Lees et al. 2001a 2. Lees et al. 2001b3. Clarket al. 2000 4. Abraham et al. 1997
7/30/2019 Annual Conference - WTP Residuals
11/30
2004 Joint Annual Conference
Trickling filters may be moreresistant to toxic effects
Heavy metal toxicityin activated sludgedepends on:
Metal to biomass ratio Temperature
pH
Presence of other
metal ionsPlant specific
Jar testing required.
7/30/2019 Annual Conference - WTP Residuals
12/30
7/30/2019 Annual Conference - WTP Residuals
13/30
2004 Joint Annual Conference
Boulder 75th Street WWTP
Four filters in parallel.
8 feet media depth.
4 - 6 coarse rock media.2 @ 155 feet diameter.
2 @ 200 feet diameter.
HLR = 0.45 gpm/sft.Inf. cBOD5 = 74 + 9 mg/L
7/30/2019 Annual Conference - WTP Residuals
14/30
2004 Joint Annual Conference
Sampling Device providesbiofilms identical to full-scale TF
Two layers of eightslide groups.
Each slide group
contains five slides.
Intact Biofilms
Sampling device
placed on top of TF
media for fourteendays.
7/30/2019 Annual Conference - WTP Residuals
15/30
2004 Joint Annual Conference
Bench-Scale Reactors allow for acontrolled testing regime
7/30/2019 Annual Conference - WTP Residuals
16/30
2004 Joint Annual Conference
Bench-Scale Reactors allow for acontrolled testing regime
Contained 600 mls ofprimary clarifier effluent.
Aerated continuously andstirred.
Added molasses to raiseCOD to 900 mg/L.
Added varying amounts ofWTP residuals to each
reactor.
Two reactors per residualconcentration.
7/30/2019 Annual Conference - WTP Residuals
17/30
2004 Joint Annual Conference
Bench-Scale Reactors
Experiment repeated ontwo different days.
Reactors run for 2.5
hours.Dissolved oxygenmonitored.
Samples collected atstart and every 30minutes for COD andsoluble COD.
Total iron measured atstart and end of reactorruns.
7/30/2019 Annual Conference - WTP Residuals
18/30
2004 Joint Annual Conference
7/30/2019 Annual Conference - WTP Residuals
19/30
2004 Joint Annual Conference
Iron may be partitioning intothe biomass at higher levels
# mLs START Fe, mg/L END Fe, mg/L
1 None 1.20 1.51
2 None 1.18 1.08
3 1 1.91 1.77
4 1 1.81 2.81
5 5 5.06 4.10
6 5 5.44 4.82
7 10 9.26 7.39
8 10 9.25 7.84
9 15 14.22 12.98
10 15 13.39 11.16
7/30/2019 Annual Conference - WTP Residuals
20/30
2004 Joint Annual Conference
Total COD concentrations didnot vary during the test
Six measurements per reactor for atotal of 60 measurements.
Total COD averaged 927 + 30 mg/L
Should not change since soluble COD is
converted into particulate COD(biomass)
7/30/2019 Annual Conference - WTP Residuals
21/30
2004 Joint Annual Conference
Soluble COD removal wasunaffected by Fe up to 15 mg/L
7/30/2019 Annual Conference - WTP Residuals
22/30
2004 Joint Annual Conference
No effect concentration was higherthan previously reported values
Iron toxicity observed at 2.0 mg/L andlower in activated sludge samples.
Researchers used raw chemicals, ferricchloride and ferric sulfate, not WTPresiduals.
Most of iron in WTP residuals is boundas ferric hydroxide; possibly less toxic.
7/30/2019 Annual Conference - WTP Residuals
23/30
2004 Joint Annual Conference
High iron tolerance likely relatedto properties of biofilms
Toxicity in activated sludge is a functionof metal to biomass ratio.
Biofilms have more mass per volumethan activated sludge.
Exopolymers may mitigate toxic effects
by binding to metal ions.
Biofilms known to be more robust.
7/30/2019 Annual Conference - WTP Residuals
24/30
7/30/2019 Annual Conference - WTP Residuals
25/30
2004 Joint Annual Conference
Acute iron toxicitywas not observed
Iron concentrations between 1.2 and 14.2mg/L did not impact soluble COD removal in14-day old biofilms.
Chronic effect levels are typically lower thanacute effect levels.
The 75th
Street WWTP should be able toroutinely accept influent iron up to 14.2 mg/Lwithout impacting rock TF performance.
7/30/2019 Annual Conference - WTP Residuals
26/30
2004 Joint Annual Conference
Current operating practices atWTP protect WWTP biology
At an influent iron concentration of 14.2 mg/Land an average daily flow of 16 mgd,ppd = 1890
Pretreatment permit limit of 400 ppd of WTPresiduals protects WWTP unit processes.
Assumes continuous, not slug loading.Conclusions apply to ferric sludge only.
7/30/2019 Annual Conference - WTP Residuals
27/30
2004 Joint Annual Conference
Future work
Test effects of WTPresiduals on activatedsludge.
Test effects of WTPresiduals on biofilmsat higherconcentrations.
Look at chroniceffects with longertest periods.
7/30/2019 Annual Conference - WTP Residuals
28/30
F loyd Bebler, Ernie Oram
Mark Dane, Richard Dingeman,
Dan Freeman, Paul Heppler,
Kur t Keilbach, Dr. David Paterni ti,
Dan Wadas, and the rest of the
Boulder 75thStreet WWTP staff .
7/30/2019 Annual Conference - WTP Residuals
29/30
Questions?
7/30/2019 Annual Conference - WTP Residuals
30/30
2004 Joint Annual Conference
1. Abraham, J.V., Butler, R.D., and Sigee, D.C. "Ciliate Populations and Metals in an ActivatedSludge Plant." Water Research 31.5 (1997): 1103-1111.
2. Clark, T., Burgess, J.E., Stephenson, T., and Arnold-Smith, A.K. "The Influence of IronBased Co-Precipitants on Activated Sludge Biomass." Process Safety and EnvironmentalProtection 78.5 (2000): 405-410.
3. Edwards, M., Beorn, C., Heppler, P., and Hernandez, M. Beneficial Discharge of Iron Coagulation
Sludge to Sewers.
Journal of Environmental Engineering October (1997): 1027-10324. Genschow, E., Hegemann, W., and Maschke, C. "Anaerobic Treatment of TanneryWastewater: Toxic Effects of Wastewater Constituents and Dosage of Ferric Chloride."Environmental Management and Health 8.1 (1997): 2-3.
5. Gerardi, Michael H. "Effects of Heavy Metals upon the Biological Wastewater TreatmentProcess." Public Works.June (1986): 77-80.6. Johnson, D.K., Carliell-Marquet, C.M., and Forster, C.F. "An Examination of the Treatmentof Iron-Dosed Waste Activated Sludge by Anaerobic Digestion." Environmental Technology
24.8 (2003): 937-945.7. Lees, E.J., Noble, B., Hewitt, R., and Parsons, S.A. "The Impact of Residual Coagulant onDownstream Treatment Processes." Environmental Technology 22.1 (2001): 113-122.
8. Lees, E.J., Noble, B., Hewitt, R., and Parsons, S.A.f1f1. "The Impact of Residual Coagulanton the Respiration Rate and Sludge Characteristics of an Activated Microbial Biomass."Environmental Technology 79.5 (2001): 283-290.f1
References
Top Related