8/2/2019 An approach to large-scale field stress determination.pdf
1/23
An approach to large-scale field stress determination
A.N. GALYBIN*, A.V. DYSKIN, B.G. TARASOV and R.J. JEWELL
The University of Western Australia, Nedlands, WA, 6907, Australia
(Received 15 February 1999; revised and accepted 28 September 1999)
Abstract. The construction of stable structures in rock masses requires knowledge of the in situ
stresses at the scale of excavations. However, the measurements obtained by the conventional overcoring
technique are related to a small scale (centimetres). To extrapolate them to the scales of interest to rock
mechanics (from meters to kilometres) requires a large number of individual stress measurements,followed by statistical analysis to avoid a considerable scatter of the measured values. In this paper, a
method is proposed based on (a) large-scale surface stress and modulus measurements using the
cylindrical jack method complemented by a special measuring scheme and then (b) back analysis for a
given excavation shape. The method allows the simultaneous reconstruction of the stress components at
the scale of excavation. A numerical simulation for a cylindrical excavation in an isotropic rock mass
demonstrates the high accuracy and robustness of the method. The presence of a fractured zone
surrounding the excavation can hamper the stress reconstruction, hence special measures should be taken
to conduct the measurements in competent rock.
Key words: in situ stress, in situ moduli, cylindrical jack, cylindrical excavation, back analysis
Introduction
Knowledge of the stress fields acting in the rock mass corresponding to both the
original (pre-mined) regional stress state and the local stress concentrations caused
by mining is necessary for the control of the fracture processes in existing
excavations and for the design of new ones.A number of direct and indirect methods of stress determination exist; however,
currently the most popular method of in situ stress measurements is the overcoring
method. The method is well established and (in its best variant) allows the
determination of the complete 3-D stress tensor at a single point remote from an
excavation. However, any one particular stress measurement is unlikely to be
representative due to a considerable scatter obtained from different measuring
locations (e.g., Cuisiat and Haimson, 1992). Thus a major drawback in the existing
overcoring technique can be identified as follows: the irrelevance of the resultsobtained by a small measuring device (tens of centimetres) to the scales of interest
for mining operations (from meters to kilometres).
* To whom correspondence should be addressed at: Tel. 61 8 9380 2631; fax: 61 8 9380 1044;e-mail: [email protected]
Geotechnical and Geological Engineering 17: 267289, 1999.
2000 Kluwer Academic Publishers. Printed in the Netherlands.267
8/2/2019 An approach to large-scale field stress determination.pdf
2/23
There are two ways to overcome this problem. The first is to undertake a number
of measurements spread over the area in question from which the mean value of the
stress components can be determined. However the number of measurements
required can be rather large. Indeed, if is the range of the stress variation within the
area and N measurements are conducted at random and at independently chosen
points, then the standard error of the stress reconstruction will be N1/2. In
particular, if the local stresses vary by 100% (which is not unusual given that, at a
contour of a circular hole under uniaxial compressionp, the stress concentration may
vary from p to 3p, i.e., by 400%), measurements atN 100 points are required to
reach an accuracy of 10%. Thus, reaching the proper scale requires a large number
of point measurements and becomes a very expensive exercise.
The second way is to use larger measuring devices. Cuisiat and Haimson (1992)
presented an illustration of how the scatter reduces when the diameter of the drilling
holes in the overcoring method increases. However the possibility of enlarging the
overcoring diameter is restricted. Measurements at the larger scale can, in principle,
be obtained by the flat-jack (slot) method in which the scale of the measurements is
determined by the slot dimensions; the volume of rock involved in the measurement
is of the order of 12 m3 (e.g. Goodman, 1989). However the method is laborious
since in its conventional form each single slot allows the determination of only one
stress component.
A potentially attractive method for obtaining a representative value for stresses ata larger scale is the under-excavation technique (Wiles and Kaiser 1994), in which
the driven excavation itself is used as a measuring device. In this situation the scale
of stress determination corresponds to the dimensions of the excavation. The method
is based on displacement monitoring as the excavation advances and then the
recalculation of the actual in situ stresses by back analysis based on a 3-D elastic
solution.
However, the under-excavation method also has some shortcomings. First, it
requires the knowledge of the rock mass deformation characteristics which areobviously different from the ones obtained in the laboratory. Thus, the determination
of the deformation moduli at the relevant scale remains a problem. This could be
overcome by complementing the displacement monitoring with stress measurements
around the excavation. However, if they were to be obtained by the overcoring
technique, the stresses determined would be at a scale much less than the one
involved in the elastic solution. This would still necessitate a considerable number of
measurements. In addition, the displacement measurements themselves would
require drilling of measuring boreholes ahead of the excavation face which mayinterfere with the mining operations.
A method of large-scale near surface stress measurements has been proposed by
Galybin et al. (1997). The method is based on the cylindrical jack method (Dean and
Beatty, 1968) complemented with a special measuring scheme ensuring the relevant
size of the measurements. In the original variant employed by Dean and Beatty only
268 GALYBIN ET AL.
8/2/2019 An approach to large-scale field stress determination.pdf
3/23
radial displacements were measured and the measuring pins were located relatively
close to the borehole. Shortcomings with the chosen system of measurement have
been identified and include:
1. The relatively close positioning of the measuring pins to each other and to thehole restricted the scale of stress measurements and affected accuracy.
2. The measurement system interfered with the drilling operations and therefore had
to be performed by removable deformometers.
3. Poissons ratio could not be determined and had to be obtained from separate
laboratory tests.
The scheme proposed by Galybin et al. (1997) eliminates these shortcomings and
allows the reconstruction of the deformation characteristics of rock at the scale ofexcavation.
This method is still restricted by the scale of measurement (possibly 12 m) and
also because only near surface measurements may be undertaken. The latter short-
coming is common for all types of near-surface measurements which can recover the
2-D stress tensor related to the surface of measurements. Hence, several measure-
ments from differently oriented surfaces with further calculations are required to
determine all stress components from the back analysis. This will allow a true large-
scale stress reconstruction.
In general, a consistent approach to the determination of the stress state at the large
scale should contain the following stages:
The development of more informative and less expensive methods of stress
measurements in excavations.
The performance of numerical (statistical) and laboratory testing of the proposed
methods of single measurements for determining their accuracy.
The development of the back analysis methods for the determination of the 3-D
stress state at an appropriate scale.
The present study attempts to address all these stages and to outline the problems
that have yet to be solved. It is proposed to use the modified cylindrical jack method
(Galybin et al., 1997) as a basic method for the determination ofin situ stresses and
deformation characteristics of rocks. This method enables the reconstruction of 2-D
stress tensors at the surface of an excavation simultaneously with elastic moduli at
the corresponding scale. The next two sections are devoted to careful analysis of this
method from statistical and instrumental points of view. The theory of stress and
moduli recovery is developed for isotropic and anisotropic rocks. A test on an
aluminium sample modelling a solid isotropic rock is performed and analysed.
Feasibility and accuracy of the stress state reconstruction at the scale of a mine is
then investigated on the basis of back analysis. The necessary corrections due to the
presence of a fracturing zone around the excavations are also discussed.
269LARGE-SCALE FIELD STRESS DETERMINATION
8/2/2019 An approach to large-scale field stress determination.pdf
4/23
Measuring scheme for the cylindrical jack method
Surface stress and modulus measurements
Three characteristics of an in situ stress field can be determined by measurements
near a free excavation surface. They are two principal stresses, 1, 2 (3 0 on the
free surface) and their orientation at the surface. There are also deformation
characteristics of the rock which generally need to be determined. For isotropic
elastic rock there are only two of them: Youngs modulus,E, and Poissons ratio, .
The problem of orthotropic rocks will also be considered in this paper for a particular
case when the surface of measurement is parallel to a plane of symmetry. In this case
one has a 2-D problem in which the number of independent moduli is four(Lekhnitskii, 1968). Therefore, in the case of isotropy, five parameters characterizing
the stress-strain state have to be determined: three dimensional parameters (1, 2and E) and two dimensionless parameters and . This means, that in an ideal
situation five independent measurements should be performed. The minimum num-
ber of independent measurements in the case of orthotropic rocks should obviously
be equal to seven. In both cases at least one of them must have the units of stress,
which provides reconstruction of stress magnitudes and Youngs moduli.
The cylindrical jack method indeed provides an independent measurement ofstress: the jack pressure. However, the variant employed in the 1960s by Dean and
Beatty (1968) had some shortcomings. These mainly arose from the measuring
scheme adopted which was (1) based on monitoring only radial displacements, and
not sufficient to recover Poissons ratio (this would require at least a measurement in
a perpendicular direction); and (2) the measuring pins were located close to the bore-
hole contour, hence the scale of measurement was only of the order of the borehole
diameter.
A new measurement system proposed by Galybin et al. (1997) has been developed
to overcome these shortcomings and thus enables in situ stress and full moduli
determination over a larger scale. The key innovation is the proposed arrangement of
measuring points. It will be described in the next section.
Since a single installation can recover only a 2-D stress tensor related to the
surface of measurements, a number of near surface measurements should be
performed for reconstruction of the complete 3-D stress tensor around an excavation.
For elastic rocks at least two installations on differently oriented surfaces are
required to compute all stress components. Locations of these measurements have to
be chosen to ensure applicability of the correspondent mathematical model to the
stresses recovered. For instance, in rocks consisting of thin horizontal layers it might
be necessary to use both the isotropic and orthotropic models of rocks depending on
the location of the measuring device. On all planes perpendicular to the layers, the
relationships for an orthotropic medium should be applied for calculation of the 2-D
270 GALYBIN ET AL.
8/2/2019 An approach to large-scale field stress determination.pdf
5/23
stress tensor, while on the planes parallel to the layers it is sufficient to employ an
isotropic model.
Existing scheme
Dean and Beatty (1968) used the following scheme:
1. Holes were drilled for pins at the vertices of an octagon.
2. Pins were inserted and deformometers located to measure distances in four radial
directions.
3. The deformometers were removed and a central hole drilled.
4. The cylindrical jack was inserted into the hole and the deformometers reinstalled.
5. Contractions between the radially-situated pins were measured.
6. Changes in radial distances were monitored during pressurizing of the hole.
7. The values of stresses and the shear modulus were obtained from a least squares
analysis of the measurements.
Mathematically the method was based on the Kirsch solution for a circular hole in
an elastic isotropic plane under plane-strain conditions. The changes in displacement
due first to drilling the hole of radius R and then pressurizing it to a pressure Q can
be presented in the following combined form using complex representation:
ur(r, ) iu(r, )R2
2Gr12
2Q
12
2 e2i()1R2
r2e2i() (1)where (r, are the polar coordinates with the origin situated at the hole centre, ur iuis the complex expression for the components of the vector of displacements in polar
coordinates, G is the shear modulus, 34, is Poissons ratio, 1 and 2 are
the remote principal stresses, is the angle between the first principal direction and the
x-axis of the reference coordinate frame, (x,y) as shown in Figure 1.
Equation (1) contains five unknown parameters: moduli of deformability (G, ) andthe characteristics of the in situ stress, (1, 2, ). In order to recover these parameters it
is sufficient, in principle, to perform four independent displacement measurements in
different directions after drilling the hole (Q 0) and at least one measurement (one
displacement component) after pressurizing the hole.
It should also be noted that the difference in the displacements before and after the
pressurizing has the form
[u
r(r, )
iu(
r, )]before [
ur(
r, )
iu(
r, )]after
R2Q
2r (2)
Therefore by knowing the pressure magnitude,p, and the difference of the radial
component of displacement, it is possible to determine the shear modulus directly (see
also Dean and Beatty, 1968), while the tangential component should remain unchanged
which could be used for controlling the quality of measurements.
271LARGE-SCALE FIELD STRESS DETERMINATION
8/2/2019 An approach to large-scale field stress determination.pdf
6/23
Proposed measuring scheme
As one can see from equation (1), if other displacements in addition to radial displace-
ments were measured then it would be possible to determine the second deformation
modulus in isotropic rocks. It will be seen further that this gives a possibility to
determine all elastic moduli in the case of orthotropic rock as well. However, the
measurement of both radial and tangential components of displacement at the excava-
tion surface requires special equipment and is therefore not practical in the current
mining environment.
A more realistic operation is to measure the displacement (elongation/contraction)along a line. The sensitivity and resolution of these measurements should provide
sufficient accuracy. At the moment there are few devices for conducting such measure-
ments in field experiments: optical measurements, vibrating wire strain gauges or
LVDT transducers. In laboratory tests (described later) gauges in the form of pre-bent
steel strips were used. Applicability of all these or other methods to the field conditions
should be carefully investigated.
The minimum number of measurements performed depends upon rock character-
istics. For isotropic rock at least four extensometers oriented in different directions arerequired. This will provide four independent measurements of the deformation change
after the hole is drilled and another four after pressurizing (to provide a four-
fold redundancy to determine the shear modulus). For the determination of the shear
modulus the best orientation of the extensometers would be in radial directions accord-
ing to equation (2). However, as may be seen from equation (1), the radial displacement
Figure 1. Proposed measuring scheme.
272 GALYBIN ET AL.
8/2/2019 An approach to large-scale field stress determination.pdf
7/23
measurements ( const) alone are not sufficient to separate 12 and from their
product. Therefore some measurements are required in directions other than radial.
Equation (1) also shows that if the 2-D in situ stress field is isotropic (12) then
the parameter and, hence, the Poissons ratio will not affect the displacements and
therefore these parameters will not be determinable. This also means that for all stress
fields close to isotropic stress states, the accuracy of the determination of Poissons
ratio will be low. Nevertheless, this does not pose a considerable problem, since in this
case the influence of Poissons ratio on the stress field is minor.
A similar situation can be observed for anisotropic rock as well. The only difference
is that the number of measurements should correspond to the number of elastic moduli.
For orthotropic rock it should be not less than six (performed in different directions
after drilling the hole) plus an extra measurement after pressurizing.
For this reason and because of natural errors, the number of measurements should be
greater than the required minimum in order to provide some redundancy. The measure-
ment system should also not interfere with the drilling and pressurising operations. To
satisfy these constraints, the symmetrical arrangement shown in Figure 1 has been
suggested. In this arrangementNmeasurements are obtained in radial directions (lines
A1C1, A2C2, . . ., ANCN in Figure 1(a)) andNmeasurements in the circumferential
directions (lines B1B2, B2B3, . . ., BNB1 in the figure). The number of measuring
pairs,N, is chosen to satisfy the redundancy requirement and to provide the desirable
accuracy of the stress and moduli determination. The choice of the extensometer baselength is a compromise between the necessity to ensure an appreciable scale of meas-
urements and the sensitivity of the extensometers. The lengths of radial and circum-
ferential gauges may be different. It is anticipated that the best accuracy can be
achieved if the radial gauges are located closer to the hole and hence have their lengths
less than the radial gauges. However the difference in length should not be great to
ensure the same scale level of measured data.
The proposed measuring procedure mainly follows the Dean and Beatty scheme
described above but with the essential difference that extensometers do not have to beremoved during the drilling operations and pressurizing of the hole. This obviously
increases the accuracy.
To avoid the influence of the fractured zone around the excavation, pins should be
inserted deep enough to be located in competent rock, Figure 1(b), otherwise the results
of measurements will reflect properties of the fractured zone only and, thus, cannot be
used directly for recovering the complete 3-D stress tensor.
Procedure of the stress and moduli reconstruction
Variation of the distance between the pins
Let Pm(xm, ym) be coordinates of pins inserted into the rock before drilling the hole
and lmnPmPn be a vector connecting any two pins. Let the displacement vector
273LARGE-SCALE FIELD STRESS DETERMINATION
8/2/2019 An approach to large-scale field stress determination.pdf
8/23
V(x,y) {u(x,y), v(x,y)} after drilling the hole be known at any point (x,y). Then
small length variations, mn, of the vectors lmn can be expressed through the scalar
product
mnVmnlmn (3)
Here
lmn {cosmn, sinmn}, VmnV(Pm)V(Pn) (4)
where ij is the angle between the vector lmn and the positive direction of thex-axis.
For the arrangement shown in Figure 1(a), the relative elongation (contractions)
between pins can be expressed by a single index, k 1 . . .N. Complex coordinates of
the pins are
Ak r1 exp2ikN
, Bk r2 exp2ikN
, Ck r3 exp2ikN
(5)Hence, for circumferential extensometers, Equation (4) takes the form
lk i expi 2k 1N
, VkV(Bk1)V(Bk) (6)Similarly for radial extensometers one has
lkN expi 2kN, VkNV(Ck)V(Ak) (7)
The elongations/contractions between the pins can now be expressed by only one
formula containing conjugated displacement vectors Vk u(xk,yk) iv(xk,yk)
kRe(lkVk), k 1 . . . 2N (8)
The next step is to express the displacement vectors Vk through stress components
and deformation characteristics of rocks. This requires some assumptions about rock
behaviour under loading. It will be assumed further that rocks are linear elastic and
homogeneous and may be either isotropic or orthotropic. This assumption essentially
simplifies the problem of stress reconstruction. In these cases the displacement vector
linearly depends on stress components, hence the deformation properties can be deter-
mined by a certain number of elastic moduli only, but not by a stress-strain curve. The
applicability of these assumptions to a real situation can be justified from the data
obtained during pressurizing the hole. Equation (2) demonstrates this for an isotropic
rock. If the dependence of measured elongations upon the jack pressure is linear then
the shear modulus is obviously constant, otherwise it is a function of the load and,
hence, the assumption of the linear rock behaviour should be discarded.
274 GALYBIN ET AL.
8/2/2019 An approach to large-scale field stress determination.pdf
9/23
Isotropic rocks
For isotropic rock the stress-displacement dependence is given by equation (1). When
new parameters given below are introduced
P21
2,
21
2cos2,
21
2sin2 (8)
the displacement vector in Cartesian coordinates can be expressed as follows
u(x,y) iv(x,y)R2
2Grei P Qe2i( i) 1R2r2e2i( i) (9)
Reconstruction of the shear modulus
First, the shear modulus G can be recovered on the basis ofequation (2). If pressure Q
has been applied to the hole the difference in the extensometers readings would be in
accordance with the displacement field
urQ
2G
R
r, u 0 (10)
whereR is the hole radius. Radial displacements create elongations of radial extens-
ometers (vectorr) and contractions of the circumferential extensometers (vector c).Then the shear modulus can be expressed separately for radial and circumferential data
by the following equation
GrQ
2
R
r3 r1
D
r, Gc
Q
2
R2
r22
d
c(11)
Here D and d are the lengths of the radial and circumferential extensometers
correspondingly, r and c are the mean values of the vectors r and ccorrespondingly.
Equation (11) can be generalized if displacements are continuously monitored dur-
ing pressurizing the hole up to the pressure Q. This can be done by the standard method
of linear regression. In this case, due to a large volume of data involved the shear
modulus is obtained with the greatest accuracy.
Reconstruction of in situ stresses and the Poissons ratio
It is assumed that shear modulus has already been found. In this case the jack
pressure can be assumed to be zero, Q 0. Then the problem contains four unknownparameters: P, , , . The number of readings available is equal to 2N. If the
number of independent readings is much greater than four then the readings are
known with sufficient redundancy, and the problem of simultaneous determination of
the moduli and stresses can be reduced to the problem of minimization of a proper
functional in the space of four variables.
275LARGE-SCALE FIELD STRESS DETERMINATION
8/2/2019 An approach to large-scale field stress determination.pdf
10/23
Let be a vector of readings and W(P, , , ) be the vector of displacements
given by the right-hand side of equation (9) then the problem becomes
F(P, , , ) W(P, , , ) min (12)
Here . . . stands for a norm.
Orthotropic rocks
Orthotropic rocks (foliated rocks or rocks with orthogonal sets of fractures) will now
be considered. In this 2-D consideration, it is assumed that the surface of measure-
ment is parallel to a plane of symmetry (i.e. a fracture or foliation plane). The
reference coordinate system can be introduced such that the x-axis is directed along
the foliation.Displacements in an orthotropic plane with a circular hole or radius r0 can be
expressed through complex potentials 1, 2 as follows (Lekhnitskii, 1968)
u(x, y) 2 Re[p11(x, y)p22(x, y)]
v(x, y) 2 Re[q11(x, y) q22(x, y)](13)
The following combination of the elastic moduli are introduced in equation (13)
pk (2k1)E
11 , qkk1E
11
2k E
12
k 1E12G (1)k 1E12G2
E1
E2
(14)
whereE1,E2 are Youngs moduli along the principal directions of elasticity, 1 is the
Poissons ratio in the x-direction, and G is the shear modulus which characterizes
changes of angles between principal directions.
If the plane is subjected to biaxial compression at infinity (1, 2) and internal
pressure Q inside the hole, the potentials have the following form
k(x, y)Akk(x, y)1, k 1, 2 (15)
Here A1, A2 are constants as follows
A1R
2
(P Q)(i2) ( i)(i2)
12
A2R
2
(PQ)(i1) ( i)(i 1)
12
(16)
Parameters P, and are determined in equation (9). Functions k have the
following form
k(x, y)xky (xky)2 r20(1k)2
r0(1 ik)(17)
276 GALYBIN ET AL.
8/2/2019 An approach to large-scale field stress determination.pdf
11/23
Parameters P, , and any four independent moduli in Hookes law (or their
combinations), form the full set of unknown parameters in the orthotropic case. The
following moduli 1, 2, a11E11 , a121E
11 will be used as independent
parameters in the example later.
Similar to the isotropic case one can minimize the following functional
F(1,2, a11, a12, P,, t) j 2 Re 2
k1
(pkcosj qksinj)Akk,j (18)where j is the angle betweenj-extensometer and the positive direction of thex-axis
of the reference coordinate system, functions k,j are defined as follows
k,jk(xj1, yj1)1k (xj, yj)
1 (19)
It should be noted that for orthotropic rocks, in contrast to the isotropic case, noneof the deformation moduli can be found from a separate test.
Examples of the reconstruction stresses and moduli
Numerical analysis
General
In order to illustrate the proposed technique the following examples are consideredfor both types of rocks (isotropic and orthotropic). In these examples the moduli and
the stress states have been specified, the ideal readings of the extensometers
computed and then distorted by introducing random errors to check how well the
original stress state and the Poissons ratio can be reconstructed using the proposed
method.
In both cases the same 2-D stress tensor has been used for calculation of ideal
readings. The principal compressive stresses at infinity, 132 MPa, 218
MPa, are inclined to the x-axis at an angle 20.The following geometrical parameters were used in both cases as independent
ones: hole radius, R 0.04 m, length of circumferential exensometers (i.e. B1B2,
B2B3 etc), d 0.2 m. The length r2 is to be determined in accordance with the
number of extensometers and their length. For the proposed scheme (Figure 1)r2 is
given by a simple formulae d 2r2sin(/N). Other distances shown in the figure are
r1 r2 d/2, r3 r2 d/2.
The reconstruction was performed with the number of measuring pairs N 5,
6, 7, 8.
Isotropic rocks
The accuracy of the determination of the shear modulus is not analysed here, as it
will obviously be the best one since it uses all 2Nmeasurements for determination of
this single parameter.
277LARGE-SCALE FIELD STRESS DETERMINATION
8/2/2019 An approach to large-scale field stress determination.pdf
12/23
Consider now modelling of the readings. The following moduli are chosen:
E 81.9 GPa, 33.5 GPa which yields 2.11 ( 0.222). These data corres-
pond to granite and were taken from Lama and Vituruki (1978).
The readings are modelled as the ideal ones computed for the above stress states
using equations (6) and (9) and then distorted by adding to each of them an
independently generated random error uniformly distributed within the range of
(10%, 10%). That is if the ideal readings form the vector Y with the components
Yj, then the readings used for the reconstruction will have the components
Yj(1 0.1j) where j, j 1, ..., 2N are independent random variables uniformly
distributed over the interval (1, 1).
For each number of the measuring pairs, 50 sets of readings were independently
generated, and the values of P, , and were reconstructed for every set ofreadings. The averages over 100 sets of readings and the variation coefficients (the
standard deviation over the average) were then computed.
The comparison of principal stresses and the principal direction computed from
the average values of the reconstructed P, , with the original ones are shown in
Table 1. Variation coefficients representing the relative errors of the reconstruction
versus the number of the measuring pairs Nare also shown in Table 1.
For this isotropic case the relative errors in the reconstruction of and , which
are proportional to the differences between the principal stresses, can be high, butreduce with an increase in the number of measurement pairs. On the other hand, the
hydrostatic component of the stress state is reconstructed with high accuracy in all
cases. An examination of the relative errors shows that a reasonable compromise
between the accuracy of reconstruction and the minimization of the number of
measurements can be achieved with N 6.
Orthotropic rock
Similar to the isotropic case, a numerical experiment has been undertaken to estimatethe accuracy of the stress and modulus reconstruction. The assumed moduli correspond
to a schist (Lama and Vituruki, 1978):E1 63.4 GPa, E2 20 GPa, G 7.9 GPa;
the Poissons ratio is 1 0.067.
In contrast to the isotropic case the data for pressurizing the hole has also been
modelled. Two values of the cylindrical jack pressure were used: Q 0 and 10 MPa.
Table 1. Average reconstructed stresses and modulus compared to the original ones.Variation coefficients (%) are given in brackets
N
Number of measurement pairs, N
5 6 7 8
Original
valuesP (MPa) 25.0 (2.0) 25.0 (2.4) 25.0 (1.6) 25.0 (1.5) 25.0 (MPa) 5.28 (8.9) 5.39 (8.0) 5.34 (5.1) 5.41 (4.5) 5.36 (MPa) 4.39 (11.5) 4.54 (6.7) 4.57 (6.9) 4.54 (4.5) 4.50 2.15 (6.9) 2.09 (5.7) 2.09 (5.0) 2.07 (4.7) 2.11
278 GALYBIN ET AL.
8/2/2019 An approach to large-scale field stress determination.pdf
13/23
The function (equation 12) written for the Euclidean norm was minimized using a
procedure built into MATHCAD 6 PLUS with the initial value obtained from the
exact values of the parameters randomly disturbed within 30%. It should be
emphasized that the minimization procedure used is very sensitive to the initial
value, which suggests that a search for a more robust minimization method is
necessary.
For each number of measuring pairs, 50 sets of readings were independently
generated, the values of P, , and 1, 2, a11E1
1 , a121E1
1 were recon-structed for every set of readings. The averages over 50 sets of readings and the
variation coefficients (the standard deviation over the average) were then computed.
The principal stresses and the principal direction computed from the average
values of the reconstructed parameters may be compared with the original ones from
the results presented in Table 2 for different numbers of measuring pairs N.
The variation coefficients representing the relative errors of the reconstruction are
shown in Table 2 in brackets. It can be seen that the errors do not vary much when
N changes from 5 to 8, which suggests that the minimum number of 2*2*5 20
measurements already gives sufficient redundancy to determine the 7 unknown
parameters. It should be noted that reconstruction of the parameter a12(, E11 ) is
subjected to large errors, although the average values are close to the exact ones.
Laboratory test
Aluminium sample
The main aim of laboratory testing was to check the reliability and stability of thegauges and the cylindrical jack during the test. Aluminium was chosen to manu-
facture the sample because its Youngs modulus is close to the moduli of strong solid
rocks. Thus, something similar to hard field conditions were modelled in the
experiment. An aluminium sample having dimensions 0.2 0.2 0.085 m was
tested. The sample had a hole in its centre of radius R 0.0125 m.
Table 2. Average reconstructed stresses and moduli for orthotropic rock compared to the original
ones. Variation coefficients (%) are given in brackets
N
Number of measurement pairs, N
5 6 7 8
Original
valuesi1 2.78 (2.2) 2.75 (1.3) 2.70 (1.8) 2.74 (1.9) 2.7310i2 0.65 (2.9) 0.64 (1.9) 0.65 (2.9) 0.65 (2.6) 0.65
E11 104 (MPa) 1.52 (3.1) 1.60 (3.9) 1.63 (3.1) 1.58 (3.0) 1.58
1E11 105 (MPa) 1.4 (122) 0.85 (186) 0.87 (143) 0.93 (133) 1.08
P (MPa) 25.0 (3.1) 24.8 (2.3) 24.8 (2.4) 25.1 (2.0) 25.0 (MPa) 5.5 (7.5) 5.13 (5.3) 5.24 (7.2) 5.36 (5.4) 5.36 (MPa) 4.7 (8.9) 4.47 (6.5) 4.45 (5.3) 4.47 (5.7) 4.50
279LARGE-SCALE FIELD STRESS DETERMINATION
8/2/2019 An approach to large-scale field stress determination.pdf
14/23
The measuring pins were 2 mm steel bolts screwed into the sample at a depth of
approximately 0.01 m. Twelve pins were inserted in the manner shown in Figure 2.
Six of them were located at a distance r1 r2 0.03 m (inner pins) from the centre
of the hole, another six (outer pins) at the distance r3 0.08 m.
Six circumferential gauges were installed between the inner pins, they had the
length d 0.03 m. Six gauges of length D 0.05 m were installed in the radial
direction between the inner and outer pins.
Each gauge consisted of a bent strip made of spring steel with four tensometersglued on the opposite surfaces (two on each side). One of the strip edges was
sharpened and another had an adjustable screw fixed to it. Each gauge was calibrated
to allow for measurement of strain with an accuracy of 106.
The cylindrical jack was represented by a steel tube with outer diameter of 2 cm
covered by a rubber tube, Figure 2. One end of the steel tube was closed, while
machine oil was pumped through the other end. The steel tube had a number of small
holes through which the oil escaped into the space between the steel and the rubber
tubes. After securing the jack into the hole followed by pumping of oil into the jack,the rubber expanded which created the pressure inside the hole. The pressure used
during the test was up to Q 40 MPa.
The readings of gauges are shown in Figure 3. All circumferential gauges show
negative (compressive) strains with the mean value of1.13*104. Radial gauges
were under tension with the average strain of 0.34*104.
Figure 2. Aluminum sample with cylindrical jack, pins and gauges.
280 GALYBIN ET AL.
8/2/2019 An approach to large-scale field stress determination.pdf
15/23
Determination of the shear modulus and Poissons ratio
An attempt to obtain the shear modulus on the basis of equation (11) leads to the
following values: Gc 3.06*104 MPa and Gr 3.87*10
4 MPa. As one can see, the
difference between the values obtained is 26%. Since the gauges demonstrated quite
stable behaviour during the test, this difference cannot be related to experimental
errors. Rather, it reflects the influence of external boundaries of the sample. Thus a
corresponding correction should be introduced for analysing the response of the
aluminium sample.
For simplicity, instead of the real geometry, a circular ring has been considered. Its
internal radius corresponds to the radius of the hole (0.0125 m). The external radius
has been calculated from the condition that the volumes of the real sample and thecircular ring coincide. Thus, the ratio of the external radius to the radius of the hole
has been found to be equal to 9. This value was used for the further calculation
described below.
For the case of a circular ring with the internal surface subjected to a pressure Q
the displacement field is determined as follows (Muskhelishvili, 1953)
ur
Q
E
1
2 1
r2
R2
r
r2
R2
r
, u
0 (20)
It should be noted that in contrast to the displacement field given in equation 10,
equation (20) depends upon Poissons ratio. This fact enables its reconstruction
directly from the pressurization test alone. The corresponding formulae for the shear
modulus and Poissons ratio assume the form
Figure 3. Deformations of circumferential (d 0.03 m) and radial (D 0.05 m) extensometersafter pressurizing the hole into the aluminum sample to the pressure of 40 MPa.
Numbers refer to microstrains.
281LARGE-SCALE FIELD STRESS DETERMINATION
8/2/2019 An approach to large-scale field stress determination.pdf
16/23
GQ
2
2
2 1
(r3 r1)R2
r3r21
Dd
rd cD1
GHGH
, HQ2
12 1
D2
drr3d cr1D
(21)
For 9 equation (21) give the following moduli of the sample: G 3.3*104
MPa, 0.3, E 2(1)G 8.5*104 MPa.
It should be noted that the shear modulus obtained by equation (21) weakly
depends upon the ratio . With respect to Poissons ratio this dependence becomes
more pronounced. For instance all possible values of: 0 0.5 can be obtained
if varies in the range 6.6 11.4.
Full in situ stress reconstruction
The technique proposed for measurements of surface stress and moduli values can
form the basis for complete, large scale in situ stress reconstruction. Since a single
installation can recover only a 2-D stress tensor related to the surface of measure-
ments, measurements from at least three installations on differently oriented surfaces
are required to compute all stress components. In order to extend these data andrecover the original stress state in the rock mass itself, further computations are
required.
This can be achieved by combining the results of the stress measurements at
different locations on the excavation walls by means of back analysis of the solution
for the excavation. In order to do this, in the case of an elastic rock mass, the
deformation characteristics of the rock mass are required (for an elastic isotropic rock
mass, only the Poissons ratio is needed) and they are obtained simultaneously with
the stress measurements when the proposed method is used. In the case of a non-elastic rock mass a number of additional moduli measurements might be necessary.
The method will be demonstrated for an isotropic rockmass with a cylindrical
tunnel arbitrarily oriented with respect to the principal directions of the original
(natural) stress. In this case the existence of an analytic solution simplifies the
analysis. More general cases of excavation geometry or/and anisotropic rocks will
obviously require numerical calculations. This will make the problem more laborious
because the number of elastic moduli to be determined increases (e.g., for orthotropic
rocks nine elastic moduli characterizing spatial deformations should be determined).The approach to the analysis will nevertheless stay the same.
More severe implications result from the presence of a damaged zone at the
excavation surfaces. The influence of this zone will be discussed in the next section.
It is convenient to introduce a Cartesian coordinate frame Ox1x2x3 with thex3-axis
directed along the generatrix of the tunnel and axes x1 and x2 coinciding with the
282 GALYBIN ET AL.
8/2/2019 An approach to large-scale field stress determination.pdf
17/23
secondary principal directions. Then the original stress tensor has the following
form
11 0 13
0 22 23 (22)
13 23 33
In this case the stress field around the excavation can be presented as a super-
position of the stress fields obtained in plane strain (the response to compressions 11and 22), anti-plane (out-of-plane) strain (the response to shear loads 13 and 23) and
the compression along the excavation axis, 33.
It is also convenient to introduce cylindrical coordinates, (r, , z) such that
x1 rcos,x2 rsin,x3z. Stress components on the excavation wall can then be
expressed as
1122
22211
2cos(2)
z 33z2(13 cos13 sin)
(23)
rrzr 0
The components r, , and, z, as well as Poissons ratio of the rock mass, can
be measured in different points on the excavation wall by the method described in theprevious sections. The components of the stress tensor, equation (22) as well as the
coordinate angle of, say, the first measuring point, 1 (this will serve as a refer-
ence point; the coordinate angles of other measuring points can then be determined
with respect to the first one) are then to be determined from equation (23).
Let non-zero stress components be determined atMdifferent locations given by k,
k 1, . . . M.
k1122
22211
2cos(2
k
)
zk33
k (24)
zk2(13 cosk13 sink)
The coordinate angles k are unknown, but their differences are known and can be
denoted
kk1. (25)
The reference angle 1 remains unknown.
It is now convenient to introduce new parameters characterizing the plane strain
part of the original stress tensor
P2211
2, D
2211
2(26)
System (24) then assumes the form
283LARGE-SCALE FIELD STRESS DETERMINATION
8/2/2019 An approach to large-scale field stress determination.pdf
18/23
kPD cos(2k 2)
zk33P D cos(2k 2) (27)
zk2(13 cos(k)13 sin(k))
Let the surface stresses be determined with sufficient redundancy, i.e. M 3. Theproblem of stress determination can then be reduced to the problem of minimization
of a proper functional in the space of 6 variables
F(P,D,13,23,33,) min (28)
In particular, one can use the following functional
F(P,D,33,13,23,)N
k1
(kPD cos(2k 2))
2
N
k1
(zk33PD cos(2k 2))
2 (29)
Nk1
(zk 2(13 cos(k)23 sin(k)))
2
A numerical experiment has been undertaken to estimate the accuracy of the stress
reconstruction. The following values for stresses were used: 112 MPa, 22
3 MPa, (corresponds to P2.5 MPa and D0.5 MPa), 331 MPa,
13 0.5 MPa, 230.2 MPa and the reference angle chosen was 22.The surface stresses at points k are modelled as the ideal ones computed for the
above stress state using the equations (24)(27) and then distorted by adding to each
of them an independently generated random error uniformly distributed within the
range of 20%. Poissons ratio was 0.3 and was supposed to be known in this
simulation. In real situations Poissons ratio can be determined as an average of the
values reconstructed simultaneously with the stresses at the measuring points.
Functional (29) was minimized using a procedure built into the package MATH-
CAD 6 PLUS. The initial guess necessary for the numerical minimization has beencomputed by using the first three sets of measurements (k 1, 2, 3) to find
parameters P, D, , and then the value obtained for the angle was used to find
parameters 33, 13 and 23 from the first two sets of stress measurements.
For each number of surface measurements, M 3 . . . 16, 200 combinations of
readings were independently generated, and the values ofP were reconstructed. The
averages over 200 sets of readings and the variation coefficients, , (the standard
deviation over the absolute value of the mean, e.g., for a parameter X, XVar(X)/
E(X)) were then computed.Figure 4 shows the mean values and variation coefficients representing the relativeerrors (%) of the reconstruction for all 6 unknown parameters for different numbers
of measuring points.
It can be seen from the plots that the accuracy of reconstruction is quite high given
that the error specified in the stress measurements was very large, 20%. Thus, 7
284 GALYBIN ET AL.
8/2/2019 An approach to large-scale field stress determination.pdf
19/23
Figure 4. Reconstruction of the initial stress state vs. the number of measurements. Each broken line
is the average value of the reconstructed parameter, while horizontal dashed line shows the exact
value. Solid lines show the coefficients of variation which represent the relative error of
reconstruction: (a) the hydrostatic pressure, P; (b) the deviatoric component, D; (c) normal
component, 33; (d) shear component, 13; (e) shear component, 23; (f); the reference angle, .
285LARGE-SCALE FIELD STRESS DETERMINATION
8/2/2019 An approach to large-scale field stress determination.pdf
20/23
points of measurement are normally enough to bring the error of the stress reconstruc-
tion below 20%, while some components are restored with even higher accuracy.
Further increase in the number of measuring points can improve the accuracy even
beyond the accuracy of the original measurements.
Thus, the proposed combined method allows the accurate reconstruction of the full
stress state at the level of the excavation without the shortcomings characteristic of
the under-excavation technique, viz. the necessity to conduct displacement measure-
ments in front of the advancing excavation face.
Effect of the presence of a fractured zone around the excavation
The method has been tested under the assumption that the rock mass is homo-
geneous. However, in some cases the excavation is surrounded by a heavily fractured
zone created either due to the excavation process, or due to deterioration of the rock
adjacent to the excavation walls. In this case the non-homogeneity of the rock mass
can no longer be neglected and its effect should be investigated.
In the simplest case the fractured zone can be modelled by an elastic ring
possessing moduli lower than those of the rock mass. In order to analyse the
possibility of using the method for stress reconstruction in this case, a simpleexample will be considered in which the ambient stress field satisfies the plane strain
conditions and is purely isotropic (i.e., 1122P, 121323 0). The
excavation radius is taken as equal to unity and the external radius of the fracture
zone is taken to be Rd 1 as illustrated in Figure 5. Then by taking the axial
symmetry into account and introducing the unknown contact pressure, pd on the
boundary between the fractured zone and the rock mass, the corresponding complex
potentials can be expressed in the form (e.g., Muskhelishvili, 1953):
(z)P2
, (z)(Ppd)Rd
2
z2(30)
(z)P
2zC1, (z)(Ppd)
Rd2
z2C2 (31)
outside the fractured zone, and
(z)pd
2
Rd2
Rd2 1, (z)p
d
Rd2
Rd2 1
1
z2(32)
(z)pd
2
Rd2
Rd2 1
zC3, (z)pdRd
2
Rd2 1
1
zC4 (33)
inside the fractured zone.
286 GALYBIN ET AL.
8/2/2019 An approach to large-scale field stress determination.pdf
21/23
The displacements outside the fractured zone can be obtained from equation (31)
by acknowledging that the constants C1 and C2 vanish after neglecting the rigid body
movements; i.e.
ur iu1
2
z
r(1) P
2z (Ppd)
R2d
z (34)
The displacements inside the fractured zone are obtained from equation (33) by
taking into account that the terms containing constants C3 and C4 should be zero dueto the axial symmetry; i.e.
ur iu1
2d
R2d
R2d 1
z
r(1d) P
2z (Ppd)
R2d
z (35)
Here d 34d, d and d are the shear modulus and Poissons ratio of the fractured
zone respectively.
Continuity of the displacements allows the determination of the dimensionless
interface pressure qdpd/P
qd(1)(R2d 1)
2R2d 2mR2dd 2m
(36)
where m/d 1.
Figure 5. An example: the elastic model of the fractured zone.
287LARGE-SCALE FIELD STRESS DETERMINATION
8/2/2019 An approach to large-scale field stress determination.pdf
22/23
By substituting equation (36) into equation (32) and equation (35) and using the
Kolosov formulae, one can determine the non-zero stress and displacement compo-
nents at the excavation wall:
contourP 1
2md 2(m 1)R2d
, urcontour 1
d
4d
contour (37)
It can be seen that the proposed method based on the surface stress and modulus
measurements can only recover a certain combination of the unknown ambient stress
P, the fractured zone radius,Rd and the moduli of the rock mass (the surface measure-
ments can only provide the moduli of the fractured zone). The surface displacement is
proportional to the stress, hence measuring it will not contribute to the separation of
the unknown parameters. Therefore, in the case considered the under-excavation
method will not permit stress reconstruction, so using it in combination with the
proposed method can only increase the accuracy of the determination of the fractured
zone moduli.
This example demonstrates that the fractured zone becomes a serious obstacle for
stress reconstruction, which is why it is essential to install the measuring pins and the
cylindrical jack at a depth sufficient to reach the competent rock(Figure 1b).
Conclusions
A method is proposed which is based on (a) large-scale surface stress and modulus
measurements at a number of points in the excavation; and (b) the back analysis for
a given excavation shape. It allows the simultaneous reconstruction of the stress
components at the scale of excavation.
The proposed measuring scheme for near surface reconstruction of 2-D stress
tensor allows the simultaneous determination of the stress components and the elastic
moduli of the rock mass at a scale considerably larger than conventional methods.The accuracy of the reconstruction is not uniform and depends on the number of
pairs of deformation measurement. The analysis suggests that six measuring pairs are
sufficient for reasonable accuracy.
Laboratory test on an aluminium sample demonstrates that resolution of the gauges
used is sufficient for accurate recovery of the small deformations expected in field
conditions, even for the case of strong solid rocks. However, due to the relatively
small dimensions of the laboratory samples the influence of their boundaries
becomes considerable and has to be taken into account.The numerical simulation of the under-excavation method for the case of a
cylindrical excavation in an isotropic rock mass has shown the high accuracy and
robustness of the method. The presence of a fractured zone surrounding the
excavation can hamper the stress reconstruction, hence special measures should be
taken to conduct the measurements in competent rock.
288 GALYBIN ET AL.
8/2/2019 An approach to large-scale field stress determination.pdf
23/23
Acknowledgements
The authors acknowledge the support of the Large Australian Research Council
Grant A89701124. The authors thank Mr Frederic Verheyde for his help in con-
ducting the laboratory test. The third author acknowledges the support of the
Gledden Trust.
References
Cuisiat, F.D. and Haimson, B.C. (1992) Scale effects in rock mass stress measurements. Int. J. Rock
Mech. Min. Sci. & Geomech. Abstr., 29, 99117.
Dean, A.H. and Beatty, R.A. (1968) Rock stress measurements using cylindrical jacks and flat jacks at
North Broken Hill Limited. Broken Hill Mines Monograph No 3, 18. Australian Inst. Min. Metal,
Melbourne.
Galybin, A.N., Dyskin, A.V. and Jewell, R.J. (1997) A measuring scheme for determining in situ stresses
and moduli at large scale. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. & Geomech. Abstr., 34, 157162.
Goodman, R.E. (1989) Introduction to Rock Mechanics. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
Lama, R.D and Vutukuri, V.S. (1978)Handbook of Mechanical Properties of Rocks, vol. II. Trans Tech
Publ., Switzerland.
Lekhnitskii, S.G. (1968)Anisotropic plates . Gordon and Breach, Science Publishers, Inc., New York.
Muskhelishvili, N.I. (1953) Some Basic Problems of the Mathematical Theory of Elasticity . P. Noordhoff
Ltd, Groningen-Holland.
Wiles, T.D. and Kaiser, P.K. (1994) In situ stress determination using the Under-excavation Technique.Parts I, II. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. & Geomech. Abstr., 31, 439446, 447456.
289LARGE-SCALE FIELD STRESS DETERMINATION
Top Related