ACADEMIC WORKSHOP September 18, 2014
Outline 2
13-14 Data Results
Overview of School Improvement Measures
BOE Goal
Identify and close learning gaps, align research
based strategies to improve teaching and learning, and implement and monitor a rigorous curriculum to advance the achievement of all learners using the Professional Learning Communities model.
3
How is Academic Performance Measured?
4
State Progress FHSD Progress
APR • Achievement
Annual Performance Report • Attendance
• Behavior
Academic Achievement Subgroup Achievement College and Career Readiness Attendance Graduation
• Climate
2013-2014 CSIP GOAL 5
GOAL PROGRESS
91.1% MSIP 5 Points
96.8% Met
MSIP 5/APR Background 6
Classification: 2015
Status: Annually
Points Earned:
Status Progress Growth
(ELA and MA)
2020 Target Exceeding Exceeding
On Track On Track On Track
Approaching Approaching Floor
Floor Floor
APR 7
Achievement 8
Points Possible
Points Earned
Method Percent
English Language
Arts 16 16 2020 Target 100%
Math 16 16 2020 Target 100%
Science 16 16 2020 Target 100%
Social Studies
8 6 On Track 75%
Total 56 54 96.4%
Subgroup Achievement 9
Points Possible
Points Earned
Method Percent
English Language
Arts 4 3 On Track 75%
Math 4 3 On Track 75%
Science 4 4 On Track +
Progress 100%
Social Studies
2 1.5 On Track 75%
Total 14 11.5 82.1%
Percent of Students Scoring at Proficient or Advanced
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 FHSD Growth 2013 to 2014
State Growth 2013 to 2014
English Language Arts
66.9% 68.6% 69.8% 70.7% 68.2% -2.5% -2.2%
Mathematics 65.1% 66.3% 67.9% 68.5% 69.4% 0.9% -0.6%
10
St. Charles County Comparisons
English Math Science Social Studies
Francis Howell 389.2 Francis Howell 387.0 Francis Howell 391.3 Wentzville 388.3
Wentzville 383.8 Wentzville 385.6 Wentzville 384.4 Ft. Zumwalt 375.1
Ft. Zumwalt 377.9 Orchard Farm 373.3 Orchard Farm 384.1 Francis Howell 365.4
Orchard Farm 377.0 Ft. Zumwalt 370.0 Ft. Zumwalt 380.4 Orchard Farm 357.8
St. Charles 364.9 St. Charles 356.0 St. Charles 354.2 St. Charles 350.0
11
Low Score Average High Score Color Key
Note: For district comparison purposes, the grade-level MPI figures used in this report include students in district less than one year.
Low Score Average High Score Color Key
Note: For district comparison purposes, the grade-level MPI figures used in this report include students in district less than one year.
14
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014ELA 382.5 383.9 392.8 395.8 383.5MA 377.4 380.9 389.0 389.4 383.2SCI 364.6 368.0 384.1 379.1 366.7
350
355
360
365
370
375
380
385
390
395
400
Elementary MPI 2010 - 2014
ELA MA SCI
15
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014ELA 375.7 380.1 381.4 386.6 380.8MA 369.2 371.6 371.1 375.9 374.8SCI 385.7 389.9 378.4 392.3 379.6
350
355
360
365
370
375
380
385
390
395
400
Middle School MPI 2010 - 2014
ELA MA SCI
16
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014English I 394.1 404.6 393.8 389.7 397.5English II 415.1 427.4 413.9 412.9 421.0Algebra I 388.1 400.1 401.3 380.2 398.9Biology I 401.0 402.9 394.8 437.2 425.6Government 388.4 401.2 382.8 399.5 407.2
350360370380390400410420430440450
EOC MPI 2010 - 2014
English I English II Algebra I Biology I Government
Note: In 2013, the performance event for Algebra I was reinstated. The cut scores for each achievement level were adjusted to reflect these additional points possible.
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 English I 394.1 404.6 393.8 389.7 397.5 English II 415.1 427.4 413.9 412.9 421.0 District ELA* 385.9 391.0 391.5 393.8 389.2
360
370
380
390
400
410
420
430
440
English Language Arts EOC MPI 2010-2014
English I English II District ELA*
* “District ELA” reflects all scores for grades 3-HS.
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Algebra I 388.1 400.1 401.3 380.2 398.9 Algebra II 430.8 Geometry 400.3 District MA* 376.3 380.4 383.8 383.0 387.0
350
360
370
380
390
400
410
420
430
440
450
Mathematics EOC MPI 2010-2014
Algebra I Algebra II Geometry District MA*
* “District MA” reflects all scores for grades 3-HS.
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Biology I 401.0 402.9 394.8 437.2 425.6 District
SCI* 384.3 388.0 386.1 403.8 391.3
350
360
370
380
390
400
410
420
430
440
450Science EOC MPI 2010-2014
Biology I District SCI*
* “District SCI” reflects all scores for grades 5, 8, & BIO.
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Government 388.4 401.2 382.8 399.5 407.2 US History 329.0 323.7 District SS 388.4 401.2 382.6 362.4 365.4
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
Social Studies EOC MPI 2010-2014
Government US History District SS
21
388.8 402.7
387.9
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
2012 - 3rd Grade 2013 - 4th Grade 2014 - 5th Grade
Elementary Communication Arts MPI Cohort
22
384.1 384.4 396.2
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
2012 - 3rd Grade 2013 - 4th Grade 2014 - 5th Grade
Elementary Mathematics MPI Cohort
23
369.2 384.2 381.8
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
2012 - 6th Grade 2013 - 7th Grade 2014 - 8th Grade
Middle School Communication Arts MPI Cohort
24
380.5 390.4
378.5
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
2012 - 6th Grade 2013 - 7th Grade 2014 - 8th Grade
Middle School Mathematics MPI Cohort
College and Career Readiness 25
Indicator Points
Possible Points Earned
Method Percent
3.1-3 ACT, SAT,
COMPASS, ASVAB
10 10 2020 Target 100%
3.4 AP, IB, DUAL
10 10 2020 Target 100%
3.5-6 POST-
SECONDARY PLACEMENT
10 10 2020 Target 100%
Total 30 30 100%
CCR 1-3 ACT, SAT, COMPASS, ASVAB
22.9 22.6
22.8 22.7
23.2
21.6 21.6 21.6 21.6 21.8
21.0 21.1 21.1
20.6
21.0
19.0
19.5
20.0
20.5
21.0
21.5
22.0
22.5
23.0
23.5
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
ACT District Composite Score 2010 - 2014
FHSD State Nation
26
27
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014FHH 79.87% 76.21% 82.65% 81.42% 79.87%FHN 75.22% 72.77% 74.44% 71.88% 74.04%FHC 68.60% 73.54% 72.22% 70.52% 72.53%District 74.36% 74.14% 76.63% 75.11% 75.57%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
% of Grads Taking ACT
FHH FHN FHC District
CCR 4 AP, Dual, IB
9/12/2014
538 480
677 701
849 923
799
1247
1386
1645
0
250
500
750
1000
1250
1500
1750
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Total Students Taking AP Exams v. Number of Exams Written
Students Exams
28
29
57.6
64.0 64.0 67.2 67.4
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Percentage of Exams Scoring 3+
CCR 5-6 Post Secondary Placement 30
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
% Graduates 74.7% 87.1% 82.9% 87.1% 92.0%
Attendance 31
2011 2012 2013 2014
92.4% 93.0% 92.8% 92.9%
Points Possible Points Earned Method Percent
10 10 2020 Target 100%
Graduation 32
4 YEAR GRAD RATE
2011 2012 2013 2014
87.7% 88.9% 91.9% 93.7%
Points Possible Points Earned
Method Percent
30 30 On Track
+ Progress (On Track)
100%
Other District Data 33
Literacy
10+ Absences
Discipline
Reading Levels – Elementary
2010 2011 2012 2013 20143rd 70% 61% 70% 73% 75%4th 71% 75% 73% 76% 80%5th 76% 75% 73% 77% 80%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
Gates At or Above Grade Level
3rd 4th 5th
34
Reading Levels – Middle School
2010 2011 2012 2013 20146th 63% 64% 68% 73% 70%7th 60% 68% 72% 74% 75%8th 75% 75% 77% 78% 77%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
Gates At or Above Grade Level
6th 7th 8th
35
District At or Above Grade Level
67.5% 69.7% 72.2% 75.2% 76.1%
0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
60.0%
70.0%
80.0%
90.0%
100.0%
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
36
37
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014Elementary 21.0% 16.4% 16.1% 17.4% 14.5%Middle School 26.3% 22.4% 19.5% 21.1% 18.6%High School 29.5% 23.7% 22.0% 24.0% 21.7%District 25.0% 20.1% 18.8% 20.3% 17.7%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
10+ Absences Percentage 2010 - 2014
Elementary Middle School High School District
38
2074
2534
1923
1522 1670
1202 1180 1099
949 1037
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
District ISS & OSS 2010 - 2014
ISS OSS
Achievement Summary
ACT AP MAP CA MAP MA Daily attendance Greater than 10 absences Graduation rate Reading levels
Up
Up and Up
Down
Up
Up
Down (improved)
Up
Up
39
Opportunities for Improvement 40
ACT
Math- MS and HS
Social Studies
Subgroup
Transition to common core
Difficult to earn progress due to current achievement
Strengths and Celebrations
Top 7% of districts in the state (single MAP index score)
Top 10 district in St. Louis Region (ELA and Math MAP)
ACT .5 gain to 23.1
Attendance
Graduation Rate
Elementary reading
41
Improvement Strategies In place: 42
ACT prep/ prepare for ACT for all
High quality professional development on PD days focused on curriculum
Middle School math interventions
Addition of Biomedical courses and Computer Science (15-16)
Strategy to decrease “unknowns” on 180 day survey
New core curriculum implementation
PD to increase admin knowledge of quality instruction/curriculum
Improvement Strategies Adjustments:
43
Emphasize Study Island home use
Collaborate district-wide around successful ACT strategies
Provide administrator PD on culturally responsive leadership
44
“Focused, hard work is the real key to success. Keep your eyes on the goal, and just keep taking the next step towards completing it…” John Carmack
Top Related