Peter Heil Peter Heil PhDPhDVice Vice PresidentPresident
NationalNational DevelopmentDevelopment AgencyAgency, Hungary, HungaryRomeRome, , MayMay 20072007
TwinningTwinning
the experience of Hungarythe experience of Hungary
InstitutionsInstitutions(2007(2007--2013)2013)
ManagingManagingAuthorityAuthority
ManagingManagingAuthorityAuthority
ManagingManagingAuthorityAuthority
ManagingManagingAuthorityAuthority
ManagingManagingAuthorityAuthority
CSF CSF AuthorityAuthority
CertifyingCertifyingAuthorityAuthority
GOVERNMENTGOVERNMENT((MinistersMinisters))
IBIB IBIB IBIB IBIB IBIB IBIBIBIB
AuditAuditAuthorityAuthoritySteeringSteering CommComm. . f.D.Pf.D.P..
NationalNational CouncilCouncil f.D.Pf.D.P..
NationalNational DevelopmentDevelopment AgencyAgency
Twinning projects in HUTwinning projects in HU
Since 1998, starting with 30% of PhareItalian twinnings in HU– Regional Preparatory Programme – 4 M€– Environmental Legislation – 0,75 M€– Traceability of animal transports – 0,080 M€– Certification – 0,25 M€– Fight against smuggling excise goods – 0,085
Co-operation in third countries– Turkish Grand National Assembly
OneOne ofof thethe successsuccess storiesstories::HU00/IB/RPPHU00/IB/RPP Regional Regional PreparatoryPreparatory ProgrammeProgramme
Preparation for NDP 1 – Regional OP
Participants– IT: Ministry of Economy and Finance, Basilicata, Emilia-
Romagna, Friuli-Venezia-Giulia, Piemonte– HU: Ministry for Agr. and Reg. Dev. , 7 Regional Dev.
Agencies
Objectives– Assistance to programming– Institution building at NUTS 2 level– Application of partnership principle– Sustainable training
LexLex 212/1992 212/1992 ofof ItalyItaly-- and Hungaryand Hungary
2 important programmes:–Agrifineur – feasibility studies–FORMEZ – 4 phase training programme
StructuralStructural FundFund TrainingTraining ProgrammeProgrammeofof FORMEZ FORMEZ inin 20032003--20042004
Participants: 50 people from regional level, 20 from Managing Authorities4 phases – the topics:– Overview of the EU Structural Funds and the Italian
experience (Balatonöszöd, Hungary)– Oportunities and tasks of local governments and
microregions – „How to manage the projects?”(Székesfehérvár, Hungary)
– Study trip of Hungarian regional partners in Italian regions – best practices in SF management
– Study trip for staff of Hungarian Managing Autorities(Rome)
MainMain benefitsbenefits forfor HungaryHungary
Advice on drafting national SF legislation
Creating networks of Italian and Hungarian professionals
Hungarian experts getting familiar withthe institutional system of EU funds in anEU 15 member state
Lessons for Managing AuthoritiesLessons for Managing Authorities((i.e. i.e. centralcentral levellevel))
Importance and practice of subsidiarity– Management of regional programmes on NUTS 2 level
Management of TA
Partnership in practice
The working mechanisms of MonitoringCommittee
Management tools - infrastructure and IT
Lessons atLessons at regional regional levellevel??
Italian practice of OP implementation at regional level
Strategy development, definition of priorities, using community initiatives
Idea and management of integrated territorial projects
FutureFuture opportunitiesopportunities
Emphasis on donor Twinning activityGood partnership between the 2 countriesRegular contact with Italian partnersPossible consortia („learning phase”: Hungary as junior partner, now enoughexpertise to lead a consortium)Twinning strategy (under preparation): specify priority areas for Hungary (more targeted participation)Building up close partnership with Italian institutions and regions.
OverwiewOverwiewofof thethe newnew managementmanagement structurestructure
ofof EU EU fundsfunds inin Hungary Hungary
Objectives 2007Objectives 2007--20132013
Increased employment– Employability and activity of workers– Job creation– Improved functioning of labour market mechanisms
Sustainable growth– Competitiveness – Lisbon– Territorial cohesion– Improved framework (legal, administrative)
Horizontal objectives– Sustainability (environment, economic & social balance)– Equal opportunities (cohesion, social justice)
Horizontal goalsHorizontal goals
Sustainability- environmental sustainability- macroeconomic balance- social renewal
Cohesion – creating new opportunities- decreasing territorial differences- social cohesion, social justice
PrioritiesPriorities
Social RenewalSocial Renewal
EducationEducation
Job creationJob creation
HealthHealthEconomyEconomy TransportTransportEnvironment Environment
& Energy& EnergyState State
ReformReformRegionsRegions
6+16+1
Employment & Employment & GrowthGrowth
Physical/Physical/human human
investmentsinvestments
PhysicalPhysical
Social careSocial care
EU cohesion & structural resources: 22.4 billion € + national contributionRural development: 3.4 billion €
Plus private investments!!!
Physical/Physical/humanhuman PhysicalPhysical PhysicalPhysical PhysicalPhysical
Financial Financial TableTable
Projected budgetOperational Programmes
%
Transport 25%
Environment, energy 17%
Human Capital 14%
Social systems 8%
Economic Development 10%
State reform (administration) 2%
7 regions 23%
(Technical Assistance) 1%
TOTAL 100%
InstitutionsInstitutions(2007(2007--2013)2013)
ManagingManagingAuthorityAuthority
ManagingManagingAuthorityAuthority
ManagingManagingAuthorityAuthority
ManagingManagingAuthorityAuthority
ManagingManagingAuthorityAuthority
CSF CSF AuthorityAuthority
CertifyingCertifyingAuthorityAuthority
GOVERNMENTGOVERNMENT((MinistersMinisters))
IBIB IBIB IBIB IBIB IBIB IBIBIBIB
AuditAuditAuthorityAuthoritySteeringSteering CommComm. . f.D.Pf.D.P..
NationalNational CouncilCouncil f.D.Pf.D.P..
NationalNational DevelopmentDevelopment AgencyAgency
ComparisonComparison -- InstitutionsInstitutions
Focus on OP levelIndependence ofministriesMAs with bothstrategic and implementation tasksComplex MA – IB relationsReluctance to addresswider legalenvironment
Priority of governmentstrategyFocus on co-ordinationMAs focussing onstrategy – IBs withmore autonomyStandardisation ofimplementationFocus on performanceState reform
20042004--20062006 20072007--20132013
Objectives of changesObjectives of changes
Enhance coordinationImprove decision-making capacityRevision of the system of accountabilityElimination of loop-holes and duplicationsSimpler, faster proceduresPromotion of use of IT devicesPredictable, one-way financingStakeholder system at all levels
PublicPublic AdministrationAdministration
OperationalOperational ProgrammeProgramme--ssCorrespondence with the New Hungary Development PlanCorrespondence with the New Hungary Development Plan
6. Priority: state reform
Electronic administration OP
ERDF
State reform OP
ESF
Overall objective of the NHDP: long term growth
Specific objective: developing the business environment
Horizontal objectivesSustainable
macro-economySocial
cohesion
Overall objective:Enhancing the performance of public administration
Center of Electronic Administration – Prime Minister’sOfficeStrategic planning and implementation – eAdministrationOP
State Reform CometeeStrategic planning – State Reform OP
National Development Agency – Management AuthorityPlanning (OP level) coordination of implementation and monitoring of implementation
MinistriesPlanning and implementation
StakeholdersStakeholders ofof PublicPublic AdministrationAdministration OPsOPs
StateState Reform OPReform OPFinancial Financial tabletable
0,58% is allocated from the total budget of the New Hungary Development Plan to the State Reform OP
Priority axisTotal funding
(community and national)
Percent
Process renewal and organisation development
94 281 493 55,1 %
Improving the quality ofhuman resources
24 971 597 14,6 %
TA in Objective 2 2 122 139 1,24 %
Improving the capacities ofgovernance and enhancinginnovation
49 254 369 28,79 %
TA 466 908 0,27 %
Total 171 096 507 100 %
In euros, current prices
Improving governance by enhanced strategic managementand project-based functioning in the ministries
Performance related pay in the ministries
Preparing the microregions in order to provide more and better tasks
Better regulation at central level
Re-organising the territorial bodies of the stateadministration at regional level
Renewal of financial and budgetary processes
Simplification of those case processes that are used in largenumbers
StateState Reform OPReform OPAchievementsAchievements toto be be reachedreached untiluntil 20102010
ElectronicElectronic AdministrationAdministration OPOPFinancial Financial tabletable
1,43% is allocated from the total budget of the New Hungary Development Plan to the Electronic Administration OP
Priority axesTotal funding
(community and national)
Percent
Renewal of the internal procedures of the public administration and its services
129 451 477 30,79 %
Developments for improving access to public services
198 356 771 47,19 %
TA in Objective 2 3 596 355 0,86 %
Preferential developments 86 312 531 20,53 %
Technical assistance 2 643 615 0,63 %
Total 420 360 749 100 %
In euros, current prices
Launching electronic health card ensuring electronic authentication
Customers will be able to launch a case eletronically withinthe most required public services and in a majority of these the two way interaction will be available as well
Providing IT support to the planning and monitoring of the central budget
Renewing the most important registers and databases andestablishing the connections among them
Establishment of ASP-centres in order to provide ICT-support to the operation of municipalities and their electronic public services
AchievementsAchievements toto be be reachedreached untiluntil 20102010
Thank you for attention.
Top Related