8/11/2019 47666566 Defamation
1/27
Defamation
Dr. Mrinal Chatterjee
8/11/2019 47666566 Defamation
2/27
What is Defamation Defamation or taking away the fame
from someone, is an offencepunishable with imprisonment fromthe earliest times of civilgovernment.
Kautilyas Artha Sastra mentions itand has prescribed punishment.
8/11/2019 47666566 Defamation
3/27
8/11/2019 47666566 Defamation
4/27
Defamation laws in India There is no separate law of
defamation in India.
The Indian Penal Code (IPC) has foursections (Section 499-502) whichdefine elaborately what constitutesdefamation and what the defencesand punishments are.
8/11/2019 47666566 Defamation
5/27
8/11/2019 47666566 Defamation
6/27
Ingredients of Defamation An imputation concerning the person
must have been made Such imputation must have harmed, or
there is reason to believe that it has thetendency to harm, the reputation of theperson concerning whom it is made.
Imputation means an accusation against a personand implies an allegation of fact and not merely aterm of abuse or insult. To put it simply, imputationmeans to accuse someone for committing someirregularities with suggestion of proofs.
8/11/2019 47666566 Defamation
7/27
Kinds of Defamation Two kinds
Verbal- slander
Written- libel
Both the offences are punishable underthe same section of IPC
8/11/2019 47666566 Defamation
8/27
Civil and Criminal action Defamation gives rise to civil and
criminal action The object of civil action is to
adequately compensate the persondefamed; the object of criminalaction is to punish the offender.
There is no civil action if defamationis of the spoken word.
8/11/2019 47666566 Defamation
9/27
Civil and criminal liability Intention is irrelevant in civil liability for
defamation. Truth of the statement is completedefence to a civil action for defamation
In criminal law intention is essential for liability.Good faith is a defence in criminal law. But truthas such is no defence in criminal proceedingsexcept under the first exception to Sec. 499 ofIPC. It is necessary to prove further that thedefamatory publication is for the public good.
8/11/2019 47666566 Defamation
10/27
Not alternative, but cumulative The aggrieved person can bring a
civil suit and also make a complaintbefore a criminal court at the sametime.
8/11/2019 47666566 Defamation
11/27
Journalistic Defences
Justification Fair comment
Privilege Apology
8/11/2019 47666566 Defamation
12/27
Journalistic Defences: Justification
Justification: the statement is true. Truth of the
imputation by itself is not sufficient in a
criminal proceeding. Public good must havebeen involved. But in a civil suit truth is acomplete defence.
8/11/2019 47666566 Defamation
13/27
Journalistic Defences: Fair comment
Fair comment Fair comment on a matter of public
interest does not amount to libel. In a plea
of fair comment three points arise:1. The comment relates to a matter of public
interest2. It is only a comment and not a statement
of fact3. The comment is fair.
8/11/2019 47666566 Defamation
14/27
Journalistic Defences: Privilege
Absolute Privilege Reports of Parliamentary proceedings and
State legislature are protected by Art 361 A Qualified Privilege
Newspaper report of court proceedings Publication of statements relating to affairs
of the state and reports of public meetingsare also given qualified privilege.
8/11/2019 47666566 Defamation
15/27
Journalistic Defences: Apology No good journalist likes to tender
apology.
Therefore is the need to be carefulbefore publishing the report.
8/11/2019 47666566 Defamation
16/27
Good faith and Public good Good Faith: A news story is deemed to be
done in good faith if it is done honestlyand due care has been taken in
ascertaining facts and figures. Public Good: A news story is said to be
for public good if it has rendered orsought to render some benefit to thesociety
8/11/2019 47666566 Defamation
17/27
Who may file complaints? Normally only the agg r ieved p erso n* Or somebody on behalf of as minor, idiot,
infirm person or a woman observingpurdah, etc. Sec. 199(1)
Sec 199(2) offers an exception in the case ofdignitaries such as President, Vice-President,Governor, Minister, and Public servants. Thereis special procedure laid down in such casesand the public prosecutor is permitted to makea complaint.
Aggrieved person postulates that the person is orare identifiable.
8/11/2019 47666566 Defamation
18/27
Who may be sued? The proprietor, Editor, Author,
Publisher and Printer of a newspaperor journal would be jointly andseparately liable for any defamatorymatter published. The aggrievedperson may sue any one of themsingly.
8/11/2019 47666566 Defamation
19/27
Liabilities of different persons Reporter: is liable like printer, publisher,
editor, if he sends some work which isdefamatory in character.
Editor: is individually liable for any illegalmatter published in his paper, magazine,etc.
Publisher: is liable for anything publishedin his paper, magazine, etc which isdefamatory.
8/11/2019 47666566 Defamation
20/27
Liabilities of different persons Printer: is individually liable for
printing of objectionable matter.
Proprietor: can be made liable forany matter published in his paper,magazine, etc only if there's positiveproof that he was responsible forpublishing it or for its selection forpublication.
8/11/2019 47666566 Defamation
21/27
Liabilities of different persons Author:of an article or book, is
primarily liable for any illegality inthe work like obscenity, defamation.
Contributor: would be liable if thearticle contributed by him have legaldiscrepancy.
8/11/2019 47666566 Defamation
22/27
Liabilities of different persons News - Vendor / Bookseller: Under Civil
Law a Bookseller is not liable fordefamatory publication of material sold by
him unless he actually knew it wasdefamatory, or he could have with duediligence, come to know that it wasdefamatory. Under Criminal Law IPC Sec502, he shall be liable only if he knewabout defamatory property of the materialhe sold at the time of selling it.
8/11/2019 47666566 Defamation
23/27
Time frame Complaint should be lodged within
three years of the date ofcommission of the offence.
Except where the delay has been condonedu/s 471 of the Cr.PC
In case of dignitaries, publicservants, etc. the limitation for filingthe complaint by the PublicProsecutor is six months.
8/11/2019 47666566 Defamation
24/27
Punishment for Defamation Simple imprisonment for a term
which may extend to two years orfine or both. Sec. 500
Printing (Sec. 501) and Sale (Sec.502) of defamatory matter attractsame punishment.
8/11/2019 47666566 Defamation
25/27
Damages in a civil suit Damages depend on the assessment
of the reputation of that person bythe judge.
Principles laid down by case laws: Nature of imputation Mode of publication Social standing of the defamed person Mitigating circumstances
8/11/2019 47666566 Defamation
26/27
8/11/2019 47666566 Defamation
27/27
Further Information
Defamation in the IPC Bare act http://statutes.agc.gov.sg/non_version/cgi-
bin/cgi_getdata.pl?actno=1872-REVED-
224&doctitle=PENAL%20CODE%0A&date=late&segid=888373003-003424 Information Technology Act, 2000 Cyber
defamation http://www.cca.gov.in/documents/act2000mod.
Top Related