400 Gigabit Ethernet Call-For-Interest Consensus IEEE 802.3 Ethernet Working Group IEEE 802 March 2013 Plenary, Orlando, FL
1
400 Gigabit Ethernet Call-For-Interest Consensus, V1.0 Orlando, FL, USA
Objective for this Meeting
• To measure the interest in starting a study group to address 400 Gb/s Ethernet interconnect – Defining “Core OTN Transport” beyond the scope of this
effort
• We don’t need to – Fully explore the problem – Debate strengths and weaknesses of solutions – Choose any one solution – Create PAR or five criteria – Create a standard or specification
• Anyone in the room may speak / vote • RESPECT… give it, get it
2 March 19, 2013
400 Gigabit Ethernet Call-For-Interest Consensus, V1.0 Orlando, FL, USA
What Are We Talking About?
3 March 19, 2013
IEEE defined Ethernet ITU-T defined
“Core OTN Transport” carrying Ethernet traffic
X,000 km
• At highest rates Ethernet is becoming dominant traffic for client- and line-side – “Core OTN Transport” is defined by the ITU-T
• Interdependent problems, but not interchangeable solutions
IEEE defined Ethernet
OUR SCOPE OUR SCOPE
400 Gigabit Ethernet Call-For-Interest Consensus, V1.0 Orlando, FL, USA
4
• Presentations – “The Bandwidth Explosion,” David Ofelt, Juniper – “Beyond 100 Gigabit Ethernet, Technical
Challenges,” Mark Nowell, Cisco. – “400 Gigabit Ethernet- Why Now,” John
D’Ambrosia, Dell.
• Straw Polls
Agenda
March 19, 2013
THE BANDWIDTH EXPLOSION
Presented by David Ofelt, Juniper IEEE 802.3 Working Group Orlando, FL, USA March 19, 2013
March 19, 2013 5
400 Gigabit Ethernet Call-For-Interest Consensus, V1.0 Orlando, FL, USA
The Ethernet Eco-System Today
6 March 19, 2013
Consumer
Mobile
Enterprises
Data Centers
Backbone Networks
Internet eXchange and Interconnection Points
400 Gigabit Ethernet Call-For-Interest Consensus, V1.0 Orlando, FL, USA
Changes since 2007 HSSG • Infrastructure / Devices
– Smart Phones – Tablets – Wi-Fi Deployments – 3G / 4G / LTE – 10G Server Deployment – Internet Enabled TV – The “Cloud”
7 March 19, 2013
• Applications – Cloud-based Businesses – Practical Cloud Storage – Ubiquitous Video Streaming – Social Media Explosion – Video Calling Commonplace – New Database Technology – Online Gaming
Compared against a 32 bit laptop*
Device Traffic Multiplier Tablet 1.1
64-bit laptop 1.9
Internet Enabled TV 2.9
Gaming Console 3.0
Internet 3D TV 3.2 *Source: http://www.ieee802.org/3/ad_hoc/bwa/BWA_Report.pdf
400 Gigabit Ethernet Call-For-Interest Consensus, V1.0 Orlando, FL, USA
Highlights since IEEE P802.3ba
8 March 19, 2013
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
40/100 CFI 802.3ba end 802.3ba start
100GE Shipped LTE
Smart Phones Tablets
Streaming Video
Cloud Services
Streaming Games
Stan
dard
s
infra
stru
ctur
e
Dev
ices
Soci
al
netw
orki
ng
Appl
icat
ions
Plat
form
s&
Scie
nce
Internet TV Devices
MMOG
LHC
40G servers
Cloud Storage
10G BASE-T
You Are Here
Year
Social Media… Social Media …Social Media… Social Media …Social Media
400 Gigabit Ethernet Call-For-Interest Consensus, V1.0 Orlando, FL, USA
9 March 19, 2013
2015 Global Users and Network Connections
North America
288 Million Users 2.2 Billion Devices
Western Europe
314 Million Users 2.3 Billion Devices
Central/Eastern Europe
201 Million Users 902 Million Devices
Latin America
260 Million Users 1.3 Billion Devices
Middle East & Africa
495 Million Users 1.3 Billion Devices
Asia Pacific
1330 Million Users 5.8 Billion Devices
Japan 116 Million Users
727 Million Devices
Source: nowell_01_0911.pdf citing Cisco Visual Networking Index (VNI) Global IP Traffic Forecast, 2010–2015, http://www.ieee802.org/3/ad_hoc/bwa/public/sep11/nowell_01_0911.pdf
400 Gigabit Ethernet Call-For-Interest Consensus, V1.0 Orlando, FL, USA
Global Broadband Speed 2010-2015 Average broadband speed will grow 4X; from 7 to 28 Mbps
10 March 19, 2013
North America
3.7-Fold growth 7.5 to 27 Mbps
Western Europe
3.9-Fold growth 9.2 to 36 Mbps
Central/Eastern Europe
3.3-Fold growth 6.1 to 20 Mbps
Latin America
2.9-Fold growth 2.8 to 8 Mbps
Middle East & Africa
2.5-Fold growth 2.8 to 7 Mbps
Asia Pacific
4.6-Fold growth 5.5 to 25 Mbps
Japan 4.1-Fold growth
15.5 to 64 Mbps
Source: nowell_01_0911.pdf citing Cisco Visual Networking Index (VNI) Global IP Traffic Forecast, 2010–2015, http://www.ieee802.org/3/ad_hoc/bwa/public/sep11/nowell_01_0911.pdf
400 Gigabit Ethernet Call-For-Interest Consensus, V1.0 Orlando, FL, USA
Global IP Traffic Growth, 2010–2015 Regional contributions to the Zettabyte journey
11 March 19, 2013
North America
22.3 EB/Month by 2015 26% CAGR, 3X Growth
Western Europe
18.9 EB/Month by 2015 32% CAGR, 4X Growth
Central/Eastern Europe
3.7 EB/Month by 2015 39% CAGR, 5X Growth
Latin America
4.7 EB/Month by 2015 48% CAGR, 7X Growth
Middle East & Africa
2.0 EB/Month by 2015 52% CAGR, 8X Growth
Asia Pacific
24.1 EB/Month by 2015 35% CAGR, 4X Growth
Japan 4.8 EB/Month by 2015 27% CAGR, 3X Growth
Source: nowell_01_0911.pdf citing Cisco Visual Networking Index (VNI) Global IP Traffic Forecast, 2010–2015, http://www.ieee802.org/3/ad_hoc/bwa/public/sep11/nowell_01_0911.pdf
400 Gigabit Ethernet Call-For-Interest Consensus, V1.0 Orlando, FL, USA
Some Interesting Facts & Forecasts • Facebook Facts:*
– Dec 2006 – 12 Million Users – Dec 2010 – 608 Million Users – Oct 2012 – Over 1 Billion Users
• Forecast May 30, 2012** – By 2016 – 1.2 million video minutes traveling Internet every second – “Fixed” video users: 0.792B (2011) to 1.5B (2016) – “Mobile” video users – fastest growing mobile service, 0.271B (2011) to 1.6B (2016) – Desktop videoconferencing users – 26.4M (2011) to 218.9M (2016)
• Forecast Feb 2013 *** – Mobile video to represent 66% of all mobile data traffic by 2017
• YouTube Statistics **** – Every minute - 72 hours of video are uploaded – Each month 4 billion hours of video are watched – 25% of global views come from mobile devices – Traffic from mobile devices tripled in 2011
• Netflix – Oct 28, 2011 – “Netflix represents 32.7% of North America’s peak web traffic”
12 March 19, 2013
• * Facebook Newsroom, Timeline, http://newsroom.fb.com/Timeline. • ** May 30, Press Release, “2012, Cisco VNI Forecast,” http://newsroom.cisco.com/press-release-content?articleId=888280. • *** Visual Networking Index , Cisco, http://www.cisco.com/en/US/netsol/ns827/networking_solutions_sub_solution.html#~forecast, Feb, 2013. • ****Youtube Statistics, http://www.youtube.com/t/press_statistics, data obtained Feb 15, 2013. • ***** Techspot – “Netflix represents 32.7% of North America’s peak Web traffic, Oct 28, 2011, http://www.techspot.com/news/46048-netflix-
represents-327-of-north-americas-peak-web-traffic.html.
400 Gigabit Ethernet Call-For-Interest Consensus, V1.0 Orlando, FL, USA
Today • CERN
– Atlas detector in LHC (Large Hadron Collider) generates ~1 petabyte/sec
– Trigger farm reduces to 450MB/sec • Tens of Gb/s of outbound traffic
to analysis centers
• Genome sequencing – Per-instrument data rate strongly ↗
(~10x over 5 years) – Data costs plummeting vastly
increased data volume – http://www.genome.gov/sequencingc
osts/
• Belle-II – 250PB of experimental data in first 5
years of operation
• Square Kilometer Array (SKA) – ~2800 receivers in telescope array – 2 petabytes/sec to central correlator
• sending @ ~100 Gb/s to analysis centers
Science: Big Data Sources
Source: http://www.ieee802.org/3/ad_hoc/bwa/public/dec11/dart_01_1211.pdf (updated: interview Eli Dart, August 29, 2012)
CERN is “the tip of the iceberg”
Future
March 19, 2013 13
400 Gigabit Ethernet Call-For-Interest Consensus, V1.0 Orlando, FL, USA
Findings of IEEE 802.3 BWA Ad Hoc
14 March 19, 2013
0.01
0.1
1
10
100
2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018 2020
Traf
fic re
lativ
e to
201
0 va
lue
Financial sector fit to Figure 15
CAGR = 95%
Peering fit to Figure 39
CAGR = 64%
IP traffic Figure 2
CAGR = 32%
Science fit to Figure 13
ESnet 2004 to 2011 CAGR = 70%
Cable Figure 20
CAGR = 50%
Figure 15 NYSE historical data
Figure 39 Euro-IX historical data
HSSG tutorial Slide 22 core CAGR = 58%
HSSG tutorial Slide 22 server I/O
CAGR = 36%
Source: http://www.ieee802.org/3/ad_hoc/bwa/BWA_Report.pdf
400 Gigabit Ethernet Call-For-Interest Consensus, V1.0 Orlando, FL, USA
The Server Roadmap
15 March 19, 2013
1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020
100
1,000
10,000
100,000
1,000,000
Rat
e M
b/s
Core Networking Doubling ≈18
mos
Gigabit Ethernet
10 Gigabit Ethernet
40 Gigabit Ethernet
Server I/O Doubling ≈24
mos
100 Gigabit Ethernet
Server Upgrade Path 2014: 40 GbE 2017: 100 GbE
Blade Servers 802.3ba: 10 GbE to 40 GbE 802.3bj: 40 GbE to 100 GbE
Other Future Server I/Os 40GBASE-T 100GbE over MMF
400 Gigabit Ethernet Call-For-Interest Consensus, V1.0 Orlando, FL, USA 16 March 19, 2013
10GbE Server Deployments
0
2
4
6
8
Port
s in
Mill
ions
10GbE Server-class Adapter & LOM Shipments
CREHAN RESEARCH Inc.
2012 Results: +50% Y/Y growth
0
260
520
Server-class Adapter & LOM 10GBASE-T Shipments
Port
s in
Tho
usan
ds
CREHAN RESEARCH Inc.
400 Gigabit Ethernet Call-For-Interest Consensus, V1.0 Orlando, FL, USA
17 March 19, 2013
40GbE Server Deployment Forecast Server-class Adapter & LOM
40GbE Shipments
Port
s in
Mill
ions
0
2
4
6
CREHAN RESEARCH Inc.
Example: Dual port 40GbE server
40 GbE QSFP Ports
Source – Shane Kavanagh, Dell DCS
400 Gigabit Ethernet Call-For-Interest Consensus, V1.0 Orlando, FL, USA
18 March 19, 2013
Center of the Storm – Data Centers
Demand From the North: More Users More Devices
More Bandwidth More applications!
Demand From the South: More Storage More Servers
Faster Storage Faster Servers
East / West Traffic New Applications New Databases New Architectures
East / West Traffic from Next Door!
400 Gigabit Ethernet Call-For-Interest Consensus, V1.0 Orlando, FL, USA
1.E+00
1.E+01
1.E+02
1.E+03
1.E+04
1.E+05
1.E+06
1.E+07
1.E+08
1.E+09
1.E+10
1992 1996 2000 2004 2008 2012 2016 2020
Rm
ax (G
flops
/s)
#1 SuperComputer: Performance Trend
Rmax Expon. (Rmax)
19 March 19, 2013
High Performance Computing
• Increased processing capability will require bigger pipes!
Source: Top500. ORG - http://www.top500.org/statistics/sublist/.
400 Gigabit Ethernet Call-For-Interest Consensus, V1.0 Orlando, FL, USA
Highlights since IEEE P802.3ba
20 March 19, 2013
2012 2013 2014
stan
dard
s
infra
stru
ctur
e
devi
ces
Soci
al
netw
orki
ng
Appl
icat
ions
Plat
form
s&
Scie
nce!
You Are Here
2015 2016 2018 2019 2020 Year
2017
Beyond 100 GbE
■ More users ■ More mobile ■ More video ■ More devices ■ More data ■ More applications ■ More networked science ■ Larger flows ■ 40G & 100G servers
400 Gigabit Ethernet Call-For-Interest Consensus, V1.0 Orlando, FL, USA
Link Aggregation
21
■ Problem: Need to scale the Network (density & cost)
■ Temporary Solution: Link Aggregation
■ Pros: Addresses bandwidth requirements between releases of faster links
■ Cons: ● Non-deterministic performance ● Fastest flow limited to individual link speed ● Exponential bandwidth growth implies:
○ Exponential growth in number of links ○ Growth in operational & management issues
● Doesn’t scale forever.
■ Faster links address these issues and they will be LAGGed!
March 19, 2013
Courtesy, David Ofelt, Juniper.
Physical Mockup: “80xN” LAG using 80 links
• Used 25% of all front panel ports for single “LAG”
• OpEx Challenges BW 100GbE 400GbE
2015 Terabit 10 x 100 3 x 400 2020 10 Terabit 100 x100 25 x 400
400 Gigabit Ethernet Call-For-Interest Consensus, V1.0 Orlando, FL, USA
Unrelenting bandwidth growth everywhere End users / devices! Applications! Video!
Core OTN Transport Beyond scope of this effort
Ethernet Interconnect Must scale to support bandwidth growth Example – Data centers pressured from all directions
E Enabling bandwidth Enables applications Drives bandwidth
Section Summary
22 March 19, 2013
BEYOND 100 GIGABIT ETHERNET TECHNICAL CHALLENGES
Presented by Mark Nowell, Cisco IEEE 802.3 Working Group Orlando, FL, USA March 19, 2013
March 19, 2013 23
400 Gigabit Ethernet Call-For-Interest Consensus, V1.0 Orlando, FL, USA
What Are We Talking About?
24 March 19, 2013
IEEE defined Ethernet ITU-T defined
“Core OTN Transport” carrying Ethernet traffic
X,000 km
IEEE defined Ethernet
OUR SCOPE OUR SCOPE
• At highest rates Ethernet is becoming dominant traffic for client- and line-side – “Core OTN Transport” is defined by the ITU-T
• Interdependent problems, but not interchangeable solutions
Economics & Optimal Solutions are Different
400 Gigabit Ethernet Call-For-Interest Consensus, V1.0 Orlando, FL, USA
CMOS Roadmap
25
■ CMOS IC features have shrunk by ~2x since 100Gb/s MAC/PCS was defined in 802.3ba
■ CMOS International Technology Roadmap for Semiconductors, 2011 Revision Overview:
■ ITRS Sponsoring Industry Associations (IAs): European
Semiconductor IA, Japan Electronics and Information Technology Association, Korea Semiconductor IA, Taiwan Semiconductor IA, (US) Semiconductor IA
March 19, 2013
400 Gigabit Ethernet Call-For-Interest Consensus, V1.0 Orlando, FL, USA
Electrical Signaling Development • 25 Gb/s
– IEEE P802.3bj (NRZ / PAM-4)
– IEEE P802.3bm – OIF CEI-28G – 32G Fibre Channel
• OIF CEI-56G
26 March 19, 2013
Technology Building Blocks (1 of 2)
Courtesy, Ali Ghiasi, Broadcom
Modulation
Courtesy, Mark Bugg, Molex
x16 Connector
400 Gigabit Ethernet Call-For-Interest Consensus, V1.0 Orlando, FL, USA
27 March 19, 2013
Technology Building Blocks (2 of 2)
Courtesy, US Conec
x16 Optical Connector & Cable
Courtesy, Atsushi Takai, Oclaro
300 Pin MSA (x16 interface)
InP Photonics
Courtesy, CyOptics Inc.
Courtesy, Finisar Corp.
Silicon Photonics
GaAs Photonics
Courtesy, Tom Palkert, Luxtera
400 Gigabit Ethernet Call-For-Interest Consensus, V1.0 Orlando, FL, USA
Ethernet Module Electrical Interfaces Industry Development Efforts Past & Possible Future
28 March 19, 2013
2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018 2020
10G
40G (4 X10)
100G (10X10) Gen 1
10G
XFI SFI
XLAUI
CAUI
100G (4x25G) Gen 2
400G (16x25G) Gen1
25G
CEI-28G-VSR* 802.3bm
CAUI-4
400GbE?
Modulation TBD 50
G
CEI-56G-VSR*
TbE (10x100G) Gen 1
100G
?
???
ELEC
TRIC
AL
SIG
NA
LIN
G R
ATE
PER
LA
NE
???
CEI-28G-SR*
* - OIF specification or work under way
802.3ba
Modulation TBD
400G (8X50G) Gen 2
400 Gigabit Ethernet Call-For-Interest Consensus, V1.0 Orlando, FL, USA
RECONCILIATION
An Ethernet Overview of the Problem
29
CGMII
MAC
100GBASE-R PCS
FEC
PMA
PMD
MDI
MEDIUM
Electrical Functions • Increase interface channel count • Increase interface rate • Increase interface modulation order
Media • Increase fiber count • Increase lambda count
Optical Functions • Increase interface channel count • Increase interface rate • Increase interface modulation order
March 19, 2013
PHY
400 Gigabit Ethernet Call-For-Interest Consensus, V1.0 Orlando, FL, USA
MAC Technical Feasibility
30
400 Gb/s and 1 Tb/s first generation implementation, with a separate MAC/PCS device (1 Tb/s interface widths are very challenging)
March 19, 2013
MAC/PCS OPTICS NP 16x25G 40x12.5G
Packet I/F
100x12.5G 40x25G?
Module I/F
400 Gb/s and 1 Tb/s MAC options MAC Rate Node Technology Bus Width Clock Rate Notes 100 Gb/s 45, 40nm ASIC 160 bits 644 MHz
100 Gb/s 45, 40nm FPGA 512 195 MHz
400 Gb/s 28, 20nm ASIC 400 1 GHz
400 Gb/s 28, 20nm FPGA 1024 400 MHz
1 Tb/s 28, 20nm ASIC 1024 1 GHz
1 Tb/s 28, 20nm FPGA 2560 400 MHz Challenging
400 Gigabit Ethernet Call-For-Interest Consensus, V1.0 Orlando, FL, USA
A System Perspective
31 March 19, 2013
MAC
Module
Switch
Backplane
Network Processor
PHY Sample architecture highlights all places that might be needed to support interfaces in a system Next slide shows the impact!
• Interface width is not just a module consideration, but an overall system issue
• Wider interfaces > more pins • More pins > More traces to route
• More power • More cost • More complexity
400 Gigabit Ethernet Call-For-Interest Consensus, V1.0 Orlando, FL, USA
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160
Num
ber o
f Con
nect
ions
(k)
Instances of Interfaces in a System 40 Lane 20 Lane 16 lane 8 Lane
The Impact of the Electrical Interface Width
32 March 19, 2013
Power →
Low
er C
ost → L
ower
Com
plexity → L
ower
1 Port 32 Ports
X16 Width: Historical Maximum Module Interface
400 Gigabit Ethernet Call-For-Interest Consensus, V1.0 Orlando, FL, USA
Optics Electronics
Opt
con
nect
or
Elec
con
nect
or
Definition of these interfaces…
… drives complexity of the module implementation
Example: Anatomy of an Optical Module Implementation
March 19, 2013 33
400 Gigabit Ethernet Call-For-Interest Consensus, V1.0 Orlando, FL, USA
Cost, Power, & Density
BW Demand
Matching Needs with Capabilities Technology Options
“Mature” “Bleeding edge” “Development”.
March 19, 2013 34
The never ending balancing acts!
It’s all going to change with time
Cost, Power Density
400 Gigabit Ethernet Call-For-Interest Consensus, V1.0 Orlando, FL, USA
Potential Technology Axes for increasing Gbit/s in the Optical and Electrical Domains
35 March 19, 2013
Modulation (i.e. Bits per Symbol)
1 (e.g. NRZ)
2 (e.g. PAM4)
4 (e.g. 16QAM)
4 8 16 Space Division Multiplexing (i.e. Multiple Electrical Channels)
12
Signaling Rate (i.e. Gb/s)
10 25 50 100 75
Wavelength Division Multiplexing (i.e. λs )
4 8 12 16
Space Division Multiplexing (i.e. Multiple Optical Fibers)
4 8 16 12
-LR4
XLAUI CEI-28G CEI-56G
P802.3bj
10 x 10
-SR4 -SR10
XLAUI CAUI XSBI
400 Gigabit Ethernet Call-For-Interest Consensus, V1.0 Orlando, FL, USA
Example: Finding a Path to 400Gbit “Gen 1”
36 March 19, 2013
Modulation (i.e. Bits per Symbol)
1 (e.g. NRZ)
2 (e.g. PAM4)
4 (e.g. 16QAM)
4 8 16 Space Division Multiplexing (i.e. Multiple Electrical Channels)
12
10 25 50 100 75
Wavelength Division Multiplexing (i.e. λs )
4 8 12 16
Space Division Multiplexing (i.e. Multiple Optical Fibers)
4 8 16 12
-LR4
XLAUI CEI-28G CEI-56G
P802.3bj
10 x 10
-SR4 -SR10
XLAUI CAUI XSBI
X
X
X
X
X
Signaling Rate (i.e. Gb/s)
400 Gigabit Ethernet Call-For-Interest Consensus, V1.0 Orlando, FL, USA
Example: Finding a Path to 400Gbit “Future”
37 March 19, 2013
Modulation (i.e. Bits per Symbol)
1 (e.g. NRZ)
2 (e.g. PAM4)
4 (e.g. 16QAM)
4 8 16 Space Division Multiplexing (i.e. Multiple Electrical Channels)
12
10 25 50 100 75
Wavelength Division Multiplexing (i.e. λs )
4 8 12 16
Space Division Multiplexing (i.e. Multiple Optical Fibers)
4 8 16 12
-LR4
XLAUI CEI-28G CEI-56G
P802.3bj
10 x 10
-SR4 -SR10
XLAUI CAUI XSBI
X
X
X
X
X
Signaling Rate (i.e. Gb/s)
400 Gigabit Ethernet Call-For-Interest Consensus, V1.0 Orlando, FL, USA
• Time is not on our side: – 2015 Capacity Requirements: 10x 2010: 1 Terabit – 2020 Capacity Requirements: 100 x 2010: 10 Terabit
• Technology for 400 Gigabit Ethernet – Leverage 100GbE building blocks – Plausible implementations for today and next generation – Fits with dense 100GbE technology roadmap
• Not “can it be done” but “can it be done at right cost!” – Power, cost, density
• We believe there is a path forward to cost-effective 400 Gb/s Ethernet!
38 March 19, 2013
Summary
400 GIGABIT ETHERNET - WHY NOW?
Presented by John D’Ambrosia, Dell IEEE 802.3 Working Group Orlando, FL, USA March 19, 2013
March 19, 2013 39
400 Gigabit Ethernet Call-For-Interest Consensus, V1.0 Orlando, FL, USA
Findings of IEEE 802.3 BWA Ad Hoc
40 March 19, 2013
0.01
0.1
1
10
100
2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018 2020
Traf
fic re
lativ
e to
201
0 va
lue
Financial sector fit to Figure 15
CAGR = 95%
Peering fit to Figure 39
CAGR = 64%
IP traffic Figure 2
CAGR = 32%
Science fit to Figure 13
ESnet 2004 to 2011 CAGR = 70%
Cable Figure 20
CAGR = 50%
Figure 15 NYSE historical data
Figure 39 Euro-IX historical data
HSSG tutorial Slide 22 core CAGR = 58%
HSSG tutorial Slide 22 server I/O
CAGR = 36%
Source: http://www.ieee802.org/3/ad_hoc/bwa/BWA_Report.pdf
400 Gigabit Ethernet Call-For-Interest Consensus, V1.0 Orlando, FL, USA
The Future is Here…
41 March 19, 2013
Source: https://labs.ripe.net/Members/fergalc/internet-traffic-during-olympics-2012
2012 Summer Olympics After First Round of Euro 2012 Matches
Source: https://labs.ripe.net/Members/fergalc/internet-traffic-after-first-round-of-euro-2012-matches/AMSIXNL.png
Thanks to Bijal Sanghani, Euro-IX.
400 Gigabit Ethernet Call-For-Interest Consensus, V1.0 Orlando, FL, USA
The Need for 400 Gb/s Ethernet
• Traffic is growing everywhere – More Internet users – More ways to access the internet faster – Higher bandwidth content – New applications enabled – And it goes on
• IEEE 802.3 BWA Forecast – 2015 Capacity, 10x requirements of 2010 - Terabit – 2020 Capacity 100x requirements of 2010 – 10 Terabit
• Time is not on our side…
42 March 19, 2013
400 Gigabit Ethernet Call-For-Interest Consensus, V1.0 Orlando, FL, USA
Summary • Bandwidth – exponential growth continues! • New bandwidth generating applications constantly
being introduced • Higher Speed @ lower cost per bit needed by
Ethernet Interconnect • Past efforts took 3 to 4 years
– 10 Gigabit Ethernet – Ethernet First Mile – 40 Gigabit and 100 Gigabit Ethernet
• We need to begin the process to study the problem
• “The Next Speed is not the Last Speed”
43 March 19, 2013
400 Gigabit Ethernet Call-For-Interest Consensus, V1.0 Orlando, FL, USA
Contributors • Pete Anslow, Ciena • Chris Cole, Finisar • Kai Cui, Huawei • John D’Ambrosia, Dell • Mark Gustlin, Xilinx • Mike Li, Altera • Jeff Maki, Juniper • Andy Moorwood, Infinera • Gary Nicholl, Cisco • Mark Nowell, Cisco • David Ofelt, Juniper • Brian Teipen, ADVA • Jim Theodoras, ADVA • Steve Trowbridge, Alcatel-Lucent • IEEE 802.3 Higher Speed Ethernet Consensus Ad Hoc
44 March 19, 2013
400 Gigabit Ethernet Call-For-Interest Consensus, V1.0 Orlando, FL, USA
Supporters Across the Eco-System (1 of 3) • Ghani Abbas, Ericsson • John Abbott, Corning • Shamim Akhtar, Comcast • Arne Alping, Ericsson • Jon Anderson, Oclaro • Pete Anslow, Ciena • Liav Ben Artsi, Marvell • Andrew Bach, Juniper • Thananya Baldwin, Ixia • Shen Bailin, ZTE • Stephen Bates, PMC-Sierra • Mike Bennett, LBNL • Chris Bergey, Luxtera • Gary Bernstein, Leviton • Ralf-Peter Braun, Deutsche
Telecom • David Brown, Semtech • Matt Brown, Applied Micro • Steve Carlson, High Speed
Design • Martin Carroll, Verizon • Derek Cassidy, BT
45 March 19, 2013
• Dave Chalupsky, Intel • Frank Chang, Vitesse • Che-Hoo Cheng, CUHK/HKIX • Wheling Cheng, Juniper • Derek Cobb, LINX • Chris Cole, Finisar • Kai Cui, Huawei • John D’Ambrosia, Dell • Wael Diab, Broadcom • Chris DiMinico, MC
Communications • Dan Dove, Applied Micro • Mike Dudek, Qlogic • Hesham ElBakoury, Huawei • Arash Farhood, Cortina • Jan Filip, Maxim Integrated • Alan Flatman, LAN Technologies • Harry Forbes, Nexans • Howard Frazier, Broadcom • Galen Fromm, Cray • Ilango Ganga, Intel • Ali Ghiasi, Broadcom
• Mark Gustlin, Xilinx • Marek Hajduczenia, ZTE • Hiroshi Hamano, Fujitsu
Labs • Bernie Hammmond, TE
Connectivity • Adam Healey, LSI • Brian Holden, Kandou Bus,
S.A. • Lu Huang, China Mobile • Xi Huang, Huawei • Alexander Ilin, MSK-IX • Scott Irwin, MoSys • Hideki Isono, Fujitsu Optical
Components • Tom Issenhuth, Microsoft • Jack Jewell, Independent,
CommScope • Mark Jones, Xtera
Communications • Shinkyo Kaku, Allied Telesis • Jonathan King, Finisar • Scott Kipp, Brocade
400 Gigabit Ethernet Call-For-Interest Consensus, V1.0 Orlando, FL, USA
46 March 19, 2013
• Paul Kolesar, CommScope • Masashi Kono, Hitachi • Ryan Latchman, Mindspeed • Greg Lecheminant, Agilent • David Lewis, JDSU • Junjie Li, China Telecom • Mike Li, Altera • Sharon Lutz, US Conec • Valerie Maguire, Siemon • Jeff Maki, Juniper • Edwin Mallette, Bright House
Networks • Roger Marks, Consensii LLC • Arthur Marris, Cadence • Tomizawa Masahito, NTT • Tom McDermott, Fujitsu Network
Communications • John McDonough, NEC • Greg McSorley, Amphenol • Mounir Meghelli, IBM • Rich Mellitz, Intel • Inder Monga, ESnet
• Andy Moorwood, Infinera • Shimon Muller, Oracle • Karl Muth, Texas Instruments • Ed Nakamoto, Spirent • Gary Nicholl, Cisco • Arnold Nipper, DE-CIX • Susumu Nishihara, NTT • Takeshi Nishimura, Yamaichi
Electronics • Mark Nowell, Cisco • David Ofelt, Juniper • Hirotaka Oomori, Sumitomo
Electric • Tom Palkert, Xilinx, Luxtera,
Molex • Pravin Patel, IBM • Martin Pels – AMS-IX • Petar Pepeljugoski, IBM • Jerry Pepper, Ixia • Randy Perrie, OneChip
Photonics • John Petrilla, Avago • Rick Pimpinella, Panduit
• Scott Powell, Clariphy • Rick Rabinovich, Alcatel-
Lucent • Michael Ressl, Hitachi • Jorge Salinger, Comcast • Sam Sambasivan, AT&T • Martin Saner, SNT • Shawn Searles, Independent • Ted Seely, Sprint • Oren Sela, Mellanox • K. Seto, Hitachi Cable • Megha Shanbhag, TE
Connectivity • Song Shang, Semtech • Steve Shellhammer,
Qualcomm • Kapil Shrikhande, Dell • Scott Sommers, Molex • Xiaolu Song, Huawei • Ted Sprague, Infinera • Peter Stassar, Huawei • Henk Steenman, AMS-IX • Andre Szczepanek, Inphi
Supporters Across the Eco-System (2 of 3)
400 Gigabit Ethernet Call-For-Interest Consensus, V1.0 Orlando, FL, USA
47 March 19, 2013
• Daniel Stevens, Fujitsu Semiconductor Europe
• Steve Swanson, Corning • Norm Swenson, Clariphy • William Szeto, Xtera
Communications • Akio Tajima, NEC • Takejiro Takabayashi, JPIX • Tomoo Takahara, Fujitsu Labs • Toshiki Tanaka, Fujitsu Labs • Katsuhisa, Tawa, Sumitomo
Electric • Brian Teipen, ADVA • Jim Theodoras, ADVA • Masahito Tomizawa, NTT • Hidehiro Toyoda, Hitachi • Nathan Tracy, TE Connectivity • Matt Traverso, Cisco • Francois Tremblay, Semtech • Steve Trowbridge, Alcatel-
Lucent • Eddie Tsumura, Sumitomo
Electric
Supporters Across the Eco-System (3 of 3) • Sterling Vaden, OCC • Paul Vanderlaan, Nexan • Arien Vijn, AMS-IX • Xiaofeng Wang, Qualcomm • David Warren, HP • Winston Way, Neophotonics • Cheng Weiqiang, China Mobile • Glenn Wellbrock, Verizon • CK Wong, FCI USA LLC • Chengbin Wu, ZTE • Helen Xuyu, Huawei • Andy Zambell, FCI • Wenyu Zhao, CATR • Pavel Zivny, Tektronix
400 Gigabit Ethernet Call-For-Interest Consensus, V1.0 Orlando, FL, USA
Call-For-Interest
• Should a Study Group be formed for “ 400 Gb/s Ethernet”?
Y: N: A:
49 March 19, 2013
400 Gigabit Ethernet Call-For-Interest Consensus, V1.0 Orlando, FL, USA
Participation
• I would participate in the “400 Gb/s Ethernet” Study Group in IEEE 802.3.
Tally: xx • My company would support participation in the
“400 Gb/s Ethernet” Study Group in IEEE 802.3
Tally: xx
50 March 19, 2013
400 Gigabit Ethernet Call-For-Interest Consensus, V1.0 Orlando, FL, USA
Future Work
• Ask 802.3 on Thursday – Form 400 Gb/s Ethernet SG
• If approved, on Friday – Request 802 EC informed of 400 Gb/s Ethernet SG – First 400 Gb/s Ethernet SG meeting, week of May 2013
IEEE 802.3 Interim.
51 March 19, 2013
Top Related