30 May 2007 FICPI Loch Lomond 1
The UK Legal Services Billfred
Tim Roberts© 2007
30 May 2007 FICPI Loch Lomond 2
Subtitle
“I'm from the LSB, and I'm here to help you!”
30 May 2007 FICPI Loch Lomond 3
Bill – vital statistics
123 Pages203 Clauses
24 Schedules (totalling 212 pages)
Never mind the quality, feel the width...
30 May 2007 FICPI Loch Lomond 4
Why, What and How?
• Why a Legal Services Bill? What does it seek to do?
– and to and for whom?• What does it say? How will it work? (if
– Self- regulation – complaints - ABSs
• Who will pay?• What will it mean to the rest of the world?
30 May 2007 FICPI Loch Lomond 5
Why a Legal Services Bill?• “The British legal system is the envy of the world”
(1st popular myth)
•“But it's fuddy-duddy and out-of-date”• (2nd popular myth)
• “There are far too many complaints about lawyers, and they're not dealt with fairly”• “We can fix this by legislation!”
30 May 2007 FICPI Loch Lomond 6
Objectives
A better deal for 'consumers' - through:A fair, rational, effective and uniform system for regulating lawyers
By supervised self-regulationAn efficient and independent complaints systemMore competition – by liberalising rules
30 May 2007 FICPI Loch Lomond 7
From the bill...The Regulatory Objectives (S1)
a) The rule of lawb) Access to justicec) Interests of consumersd) Competitione) Independent strong diverse effective professionf) Public understanding of rights and dutiesg) The 'professional principles' ANDh) The public interest
30 May 2007 FICPI Loch Lomond 8
The Professional Principles
“Authorised persons” should: • Act with independence, integrity and in client's best interests;• Maintain work standardsPersons exercising a right of audience have a duty to the Court to act independently in interests of justiceClients' affairs must be kept confidential
30 May 2007 FICPI Loch Lomond 9
Authorised person?
...is someone authorised to carry out reserved legal activities
And 'reserved legal activities' are...? (s12.1)• Exercising a right of audience• Conducting litigation• Reserved instrument activities (drafting deeds)• Notarial and probate activities• Administering oaths
30 May 2007 FICPI Loch Lomond 10
Who gets regulated?All 'lawyers'... More specifically:
Barristers; Solicitors; Legal executives; Notaries; Licensed conveyancers; Commissioners for Oaths; Immigration advisers (see also Schedules 1- 24)
ANDRegistered patent and trademark attorneys
30 May 2007 FICPI Loch Lomond 11
How will it work?
By supervised self-regulationExisting professional bodies will be appointed
as Front-line Regulators (FLRs)(the Law Society, the Bar Council, CIPA, ITMA...)
FLRs will be overseen by a Legal Services Board (LSB)
30 May 2007 FICPI Loch Lomond 12
Legal Services Board (LSB)
Makes rules for FLRsMust promote the 'regulatory objectives'
Regulation to be 'transparent, accountable, proportionate, consistent'
- and'targeted only at those cases where action is needed'
To have a Consumer Panel – but no Professional Panel
LSB is Regulator of Last Resort
30 May 2007 FICPI Loch Lomond 13
“Approved regulators” (FLRs)
(such as the Law Society, CIPA, etc)
How do you regulate yourself?By separating regulatory and representative
functions“regulatory decisions to be taken as far as as far as possible independentlypossible independently of representative..”
The LSB may not interfere with representationrepresentation
30 May 2007 FICPI Loch Lomond 14
Please explain...• What is 'representation' and what is 'regulation'? Can they be completely separated? Is there anything else?• How independently?
– Different premises?– Different staff?– Different members?– Can 'reps' set policy?
30 May 2007 FICPI Loch Lomond 15
'Regulatory arrangements' (S20)
Arrangements for: Authorising people to carry on reserved legal activities; for indemnification; for compensation;Rules for: practice; conduct; licensing; qualifying (exams);Any other arrangements not made “to represent or promote the interests of persons regulated.. ”
30 May 2007 FICPI Loch Lomond 16
CIPA and ITMAThe Bill appoints both Institutes as FLRsHow will they operate? Extra expense..
Aim: Two FLRs that beat as one! Formally distinct, practically (almost?) identical...
- Common rules- Common membership- Common support- A single practice fee?
How will 'the FLR' relate to the two Institutes?
30 May 2007 FICPI Loch Lomond 17
ComplaintsShould be most efficiently dealt with by the
relevant FLR?This theory disproved by the Law Society
So – FLRs allowed no role in complaints at allAll 'authorised persons' must have complaints
procedureNew “Office of Legal Complaints” (OLC) will
hear all unresolved complaintsLawyer will pay, regardless of finding
30 May 2007 FICPI Loch Lomond 18
ABSs – 'Walmart law'
cAlternative Business StructuresPromoting competition – too many
inhibiting professional rules Cautious partial liberalisation
30 May 2007 FICPI Loch Lomond 19
Licensing of ABSs
Bodies may be licensed to perform reserved legal activities (and other
activities)By the LSB or an approved FLR
Registers of licensed bodies
30 May 2007 FICPI Loch Lomond 20
ABSs must have...
• A Head of Legal Practice– who makes sure the body keeps the legal rules – and reports if it doesn't
• A Head of Finance and Admin– who makes sure the body keeps the accounting rules (and reports if it doesn't)
30 May 2007 FICPI Loch Lomond 21
Ownership of ABSs
(Part-)Owners who are not 'authorised persons' are subject to approval (Sch 13)
Must be 'fit and proper person'; not compromise 'regulatory objectives'OLS will make rules (about probity,
financial position, associates, etc, etc)
30 May 2007 FICPI Loch Lomond 22
Time-line
Passed through House of LordsGoes to Commons in early June
Royal Assent end July (???)Appointments start with Royal Assent
LSB opens for business Spring 2010 (?)OLC opens for business Summer 2010 (?)
30 May 2007 FICPI Loch Lomond 23
Who pays? (and how much?)The legal professions pay- on behalf of their users
- both for FLR (internal) and LSB/OLC (external )
Government will not contribute either to start-up or running costs
Registration fee (now $150) may go to $1500 - $2000
Separate fee for bodies
30 May 2007 FICPI Loch Lomond 24
How will life change?
Two views:
PolyannasCassandras
30 May 2007 FICPI Loch Lomond 25
Polyannas say:
More regulation is a good thing – must encourage higher standards
New bodies will act sensibly and proportionatelyThe new complaints procedure will save effort
The estimated costs are maxima, and anyway not unreasonable - 'rebalancing'
ABSs are a definite advantageWhy all the fuss?
30 May 2007 FICPI Loch Lomond 26
Cassandras say:– The nature of the profession will change - we're losing control of our affairs
– We can't even ensure our independent FLR will act sensibly, let alone the LSB or OLC
– Attorneys don't need to register– The fewer people register, the more the
costs will escalate and fewer still will register
– The complaints system is crazy, as the OLC knows nothing about our business
– ABS regulations will impose extra burdens on existing firms
30 May 2007 FICPI Loch Lomond 27
Who is right?
Time will tell...Some existing attorneys will surely deregister -
(sole practitioners – industry employees)Perhaps not enough to undermine the system
EPAs can practice with minimum of regulation'Professional privilege' may be decisive
30 May 2007 FICPI Loch Lomond 28
What will it mean to the rest of the world?
A more highly regulated UK profession- may be good or bad
Lower costs – because of competition?Higher costs – because of over-regulation?
(effects might spread)Commercial opportunities from ABSs?
Lower CIPA membership fees?
Top Related