8/13/2019 10-11 Advancing Justice Slides
1/25
ADVANCING JUSTICE:
A Priority of the Idaho Supreme Court
Presented to the Idaho Institute for Court Management
October 25, 2011Boise, Idaho
1
8/13/2019 10-11 Advancing Justice Slides
2/25
The Idaho Supreme Court
2
Mission Statement of the Idaho Courts
Provide Access to Justice,
Through the Timely, Fair, and Impartial Resolution of
Cases.
8/13/2019 10-11 Advancing Justice Slides
3/25
WHAT IS ADVANCING JUSTICE?
Fundamental commitment to provide timely justice.
Involves a top to bottom systems review.
Includes a critical evaluation of existing time standards.
Includes an assessment of how judges manage their
caseloads.
Other aspects of the Advancing Justice effort include:
Judicial education and training
Data and technology
3
8/13/2019 10-11 Advancing Justice Slides
4/25
One of Many Important Roles of Clerks
in Advancing Justice
Data entry drives internal court functions.
Court data drives local, state, and federal funding
decisions.
Performance Measure Reports are a "public
record of a writing containing informationrelating to the conduct or administration of the
publics business. I.C. 9-337(13).4
8/13/2019 10-11 Advancing Justice Slides
5/25
WHAT IS CASE FLOW MANAGEMENT?
5
8/13/2019 10-11 Advancing Justice Slides
6/25
Definition and Context
Increasing the trial judges control over the timing of acase to prevent unnecessary delay. 2009 Institute forthe Advancement of the American Legal System.
Caseflow Management denotes supervision ormanagement of the time and events involved in themoving of a case through the court system from thepoint of initiation to disposition, regardless of the typeof disposition Solomon and Somerlot
Emphasis is on management, that is, the active oversightof case progress by the court.
6
8/13/2019 10-11 Advancing Justice Slides
7/25
The Critical Role of Judges
According to the ABAs Standards Relating to Court Delay
Reduction:
From the commencement of litigation to its resolution,
whether by trial or settlement, any elapsed time other than
reasonably required for pleadings, discovery and court events,
is not acceptable and should be eliminated. To enable just and
efficient resolution of cases, the court, not the lawyers or
litigants, should control the pace of litigation. A strong judicialcommitment is essential to reducing delay and, once achieved,
maintaining a current docket.7
8/13/2019 10-11 Advancing Justice Slides
8/25
Caseflow Management is alsoA National Priority
the reception and processing of cases [should] be as simple and orderlyas possible, fair consideration [should] be given to each type of case, and all
cases [should] be determined justly, promptly, effectively and efficiently.
American Bar Associations Standards Relating to Court Organization
Fair and expeditious dispute resolution processes, accessible to all, arethe foundation of justice in a free society. Unnecessary delay undermines
public trust in the rule of law, erodes confidence in the court system, and
draws into question the efficacy of courts as an institution of government.
A National Agenda for Prompt and Affordable Justice in the 21stCentury
The most salient factor related to faster disposition times in civil and
felony cases is early and continuous court control. Unlike court size, case
mix, or caseload per judge, the timing and degree of control over caseflow
is largely within the control of the court.
A Pace of Litigation in Urban Trial Courts
8
8/13/2019 10-11 Advancing Justice Slides
9/25
In summary
Efficiency and fairness are not mutually exclusive.
Effective case flow management is not about speed just
for the sake of speed. It is about removing unnecessarydelay while protecting the rights of individual litigants.
Effective caseflow management promotes justice on both
the individual and systemic level by helping to ensureevery litigant receives procedural due process.
NACMs Core Competency Project
9
8/13/2019 10-11 Advancing Justice Slides
10/25
CASEFLOW MANAGEMENT
ITS THE LAW IN IDAHO
10
8/13/2019 10-11 Advancing Justice Slides
11/25
CONSTITUTION OF THE STATE OF IDAHO
ARTICLE I: DECLARATION OF RIGHTS
Section 18. Justice to be freely and speedily administered. Courts of
justice shall be open to every person, and a speedy remedy afforded
for every injury of person, property or character, and right and justice
shall be administered without sale, denial, delay, or prejudice.
11
8/13/2019 10-11 Advancing Justice Slides
12/25
Idaho Rules of CivilProcedure
Rule 1(a). Scope of
rules.These rules shall
be liberally construed tosecure the just, speedy
and inexpensive
determination of every
action and proceeding.
Idaho Criminal Rules
Rule 2. (a) Purpose and
construction. These rules
are intended to provide for
the just determination of
every criminal proceeding.
They shall be construed to
secure simplicity in
procedure, fairness inadministration and
elimination of unjustifiable
expense and delay. 12
8/13/2019 10-11 Advancing Justice Slides
13/25
CANON 3
B. (8) A judge shall dispose of all judicial matters promptly,
efficiently and fairly and shall comply with all constitutional and
statutory provisions and court rules concerning timeliness of
decisions and salary affidavits.
Specifically applicable to Administrative District Judges:
C. (3) A judge with supervisory authority for the judicial
performance of other judges shall take reasonable measures toassure the prompt disposition of matters before them and the
proper performance of their judicial responsibilities.
IDAHO JUDICIAL CANONS
13
8/13/2019 10-11 Advancing Justice Slides
14/25
Why Now?
Unlike budget years of the past, current economic
conditions do not allow us to Human Resource
our way out of the problem.
Trial Judges are being required to more
aggressively employ proven caseflow managementtechniques to meet the ever increasing workload.
14
8/13/2019 10-11 Advancing Justice Slides
15/25
1- FY2009 Budget was set in March of 2008.
2- September 15, 2008, Lehman Bros. Investment Bank filed largest bankruptcy in US history - -
Widely considered to be a major role in the global financial crisis.
3- FY2010 Budget was set in March of 2009.
1
Budget: Facts and Figures.
12 3
15
8/13/2019 10-11 Advancing Justice Slides
16/25
Emergency Surcharge
took affect. April 2010
16
8/13/2019 10-11 Advancing Justice Slides
17/25
**The Emergency Surcharge has a sunset clause of June 30, 2013.
Possible Impact of the loss of the Emergency Surcharge in FY2014
**
17
8/13/2019 10-11 Advancing Justice Slides
18/25
Judicial workloads continue to grow
District Court civil filings have increased by30% since 2006, which can largely be
attributed to the economic decline.
Domestic Relations cases have risen by10% since 2006.
Increase in number of litigants appearingpro se.
18
8/13/2019 10-11 Advancing Justice Slides
19/25
Increased Workload Extends Beyond Case
Filing Numbers
According to Idaho Judges:
There are more time intensive and emotionally demandingcasescases seem to be more litigious. The majority of cases goto hearing.over the past 10 years, the number of complex cases has
increased dramatically.
There have been a lot more contested divorces, primarilyover custody issuesand an increase in disputed propertyclaims. 19
L t L k t 15 Y
8/13/2019 10-11 Advancing Justice Slides
20/25
Caseload and Population Trends for Idaho
Totals Percent Increase
1995* 2000 2005 2010
Between1995-2000
Between2000-
2005
Between2005-2010
TotalIncrease
Population 1,163,000 1,299,551 1,425,862 1,559,796 12% 10% 9% 34%
Total Caseload 363,572 411,802 434,906 462,936 13% 6% 6% 27%
Civil 79,659 96,451 104,322 110,345 21% 8% 6% 39%
Domestic Relations 10,976 12,108 13,560 14,850 10% 12% 10% 35%
Total Criminal and Infraction 154,657 310,419 329,891 329,171 101% 6% 0% 113%
Felony 2,873 6,228 11,082 10,586 117% 78% -4% 268%
Misdemeanor 49,174 86,899 97,889 92,847 77% 13% -5% 89%
Infraction 102,610 217,292 220,920 225,738 112% 2% 2% 120%
Budget and Caseload Trends
1990 2000 Percent Change 2010 Percent Change
Caseloads 385,819 411,802 6.7% 462,936 12.4%
Population 1,006,749 1,299,551 29.1% 1,559,796 20.0%
Caseloads per capita* 38,323 31,688 -17.3% 29,679 -6.3%
Number of Judgeships 107 122 14.0% 138 13.1%
Caseloads per Judge 3,606 3,375 -6.4% 3,355 -0.6%
State general fund budget 788,945,800 1,683,444,800 113.4% 2,506,580,100 48.9%
Judicial general fund budget 14,402,100 22,506,500 56.3% 30,183,200 34.1%
Judicial budget % of State's
budget 1.8% 1.3% 1.2%
*caseload/population *100,000
Includes reopenings and infractions
Lets Look at 15 Years
Some More interesting statistics
20
8/13/2019 10-11 Advancing Justice Slides
21/25
Advancing Justice:
Expectations of Funders
Courts performing traditional court functions well.
Courts helping to solve social problems (e.g. problem-solving courts).
Effective, competent use of technology.
Regular reporting of court performance data.
Consistency in implementation and measurement ofcourt performance.
Transparency and accountability.21
8/13/2019 10-11 Advancing Justice Slides
22/25
Advancing Justice:
Expectations of Court Users
Access to court information.
Timely resolution.
Procedural fairness.
22
8/13/2019 10-11 Advancing Justice Slides
23/25
What is Procedural Fairness in
This Context?
According to Tom Tyler, leading expert on
procedural fairness, people expect:
Neutrality.
Respect.
The chance to be heard.
A trustworthy judge.
23
8/13/2019 10-11 Advancing Justice Slides
24/25
Advancing Justice:
Whats In It For Trial Judges?
Elections/Retention.
Public records requests of performance reports.
More time to spend on tasks that only judges can perform.
Less stressful work environment.
Preserve decisional autonomy.
Ward off unwarranted attacks.
Ability to assess individual performance and progress.
It is the right thing to do.24
8/13/2019 10-11 Advancing Justice Slides
25/25
Advancing Justice:
Whats In It For Court Clerks?
Enhancements to ISTARS.
Additional training.
More efficiency in case processing.
Uniformity in procedures.
Improved working relationships between trial judges and
deputy clerks.
More satisfying work environment.
25
Top Related