1
Overview of Recent Workers’ Compensation Research
Findings
Amy Lee, DirectorTexas Department of Insurance, Workers’ Compensation Research and Evaluation
Group
2
This presentation will highlight: • Return-to-work rates using Texas
Workforce Commission (TWC) wage data;
• Updates on WC network participation;
• Recent pharmacy descriptive statistics; and
• Descriptive statistics on recipients of permanent impairment income benefits.
3
Return-to-Work Rates Using
Texas Workforce Commission (TWC)
Wage Data
4
Initial Return-to-Work RatePercentage of Injured Workers Back At Work for the First Time
6 Months to 3 Years Post-Injury
Source: Texas Department of Insurance, Workers’ Compensation Research and Evaluation Group, 2007. Note 1: The study population includes 329,986 workers injured in 2001-2005 who also received temporary income benefits (TIBs).Note 2: Although the increases of initial RTW rates were small, they were statistically significant at the 0.01 significance level. While this reflects a improvement in the percentage of workers who have initially returned to work, the difference is not big enough to conclude that the WC system improved substantially during this time.
Injury Year Within6 Months
Post Injury
Within1 Year
Post Injury
Within1.5 Years
Post Injury
Within 2 Years
Post Injury
Within3 years
Post Injury
2001 70% 79% 83% 85% 88%
2002 71% 80% 84% 86% 89%
2003 72% 81% 85% 87% 90%
2004 74% 83% 86% 88%
2005 75% 84%
5
Sustained Return-to-Work Rate
Injury Year
Within6 Months
Post Injury
Within1 Year
Post Injury
Within1.5 Years
Post Injury
Within 2 Years
Post Injury
Within3 years
Post Injury
2001 61% 68% 73% 76% 80%
2002 62% 70% 74% 77% 81%
2003 64% 71% 76% 79%
2004 66% 73% 78%
2005 68%
Percentage of Injured Workers Back At Work and Remained for ThreeSuccessive Quarters Beginning With the Initial RTW Quarter
6 Months to 3 Years Post-Injury
Source: Texas Department of Insurance, Workers’ Compensation Research and Evaluation Group, 2007.
Note 1: The study population includes 329,986 workers injured in 2001-2005 who also received temporary income benefits (TIBs).
6
Mean and Median Days Off Workfor Injured Workers Who RTW At Some Point Post
Injury, Injury Years 2001-2004
InjuryYear
Mean days off work
Median days off work
2001 150 32
2002 142 32
2003 139 31
2004 111* 26*
Source: Texas Department of Insurance, Workers’ Compensation Research and Evaluation Group, 2007.Note1: The mean and median days off work in 2004 may be under-estimated due to data maturity and should be viewedwith caution.Note2: “Days Off Work” was defined as days from the injury date to the initial RTW date. Please note that these numbers do not take into account any additional time off work that may have occurred after the initial RTW date. Note3: The analysis was based on the claimants who returned to work, and did not include those who did not return by the end of 2006. Injury year 2005 was excluded because of insufficient data.
7
Updates on WC Network Participation
8
Carrier Data Calls• In Sept 2006, March 2007 and November 2007 TDI
issued a data call to the top 13 insurance carrier groups (in terms of premium market share) to ask about WC health care network participation;
• The top 13 groups represent approximately 82% of the WC premium written in Texas;
Network Data Call• In February 2007, October 2007 and February 2008
TDI issued a data call to all WC certified networks;
• Data call included two parts:
1) Info on how many workers have been treated in network;2) Info on how many insurance carriers the network has
contracted with and for how long; and
9
Results of Carrier Data Call• 12 out of 13 carrier groups have contracted with or established a
certified WC network (an increase from 9 in Sept 2006);
• 11 of the 12 carrier groups with a network have already begun offering it to policyholders along with a premium credit;
• Most premium credits offered for network participation are 10-12%;
• Network participation among policyholders varies widely for carriers – as of March 1st, 2007– approx 29,000 policyholders agreed to
participate in networks compared to only 7,500 as of Sept 1st, 2006
– Most of these policyholders (81% were small and mid-sized employers)
– These carriers estimated that the number of claims treated in network would grow to over 100,000 by CY 2009.
10
Results of Network Data Call• 18 of the 31 networks certified by TDI had treated injured
workers as of Feb 1st, 2008;
• A total of 39,991injured workers treated by these 18 networks (2 networks alone treated 77% of these workers);
• About 6 percent of the workers treated in network had legacy claims (i.e., injuries prior to the network cert date);
• About 40 percent of the workers treated in network had “lost-time” claims, meaning at least one day of lost time was recorded
• As of Feb 1st, 9 of the 31 networks certified by TDI did not have any insurance carrier contracts in place;
11
Geographic Distribution of Lost-Time Claims Treated by TDI-Certified Networks as of February 1, 2008
DWC Field Office Percentage of Lost-Time Network Claims
DWC Field Office Percentage of Lost-Time Network Claims
Abilene 1% Lubbock 1%
Amarillo 2% Lufkin 1%
Austin 6% Midland/Odessa 5%
Bryan/College Station 1% Missouri City 1%
Beaumont 1% San Angelo <1%
Corpus Christi 2% San Antonio 10%
Dallas 11% Tyler 3%
Denton 4% Victoria 5%
El Paso 3% Waco 3%
Fort Worth 14% Weslaco 4%
Houston 20% Wichita Falls <1%
Laredo <1%
Source: Texas Department of Insurance, Workers’ Compensation Research and Evaluation Group, 2008.Note: “Lost-time” claims are claims in which at least one day of lost-time was recorded.
12
Pharmacy Descriptive Statistics
13
Distribution of Medical Payments in the Texas Workers’ Compensation System, Service Years 2005 - 2006
Source: Texas Department of Insurance, Workers’ Compensation Research and Evaluation Group, 2008.Note 1: Percent of Total Payments may not add up to 100% because of rounding. Note 2: The California Workers’ Compensation Institute (CWCI) estimates that in 2005 California’s Pharmacy cost was 7 percent of that state’s medical costs.
Medical Type
Service Year2005
Service Year2006
TotalPayments
Percent ofTotal
Payments1
TotalPayments
Percent ofTotal
Payments1
Professional $626,309,000 62% $535,603,000 57%
Hospital $250,938,000 25% $275,923,000 29%
Pharmacy $132,973,000 13%2 $131,647,000 14% 2
Dental $580,000 <1% $1,049,000 <1%
14
Injured Employees Receiving Prescriptions in the Texas Workers’ Compensation System
Prescription Years 2005 - 2006
171,330
171,146(50%)
176,127
168,225(49%)
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
2005 2006
Injured Employees Without Prescriptions Injured Employees With Prescriptions
Source: Texas Department of Insurance, Workers’ Compensation Research and Evaluation Group, 2008.
15
Distribution of Pharmaceutical Utilization and Payments by Injury Year
Prescription Year 2006
Injury Years
% ofInjured
Employees
% ofPrescriptions
% of Drug Days
% ofPayments
1991 - 2000 13% 33% 40% 46%
2001- 2004 15% 28% 31% 29%
2005 14% 15% 14% 11%
2006 58% 24% 15% 13%
Source: Texas Department of Insurance, Workers’ Compensation Research and Evaluation Group, 2008.
16
Distribution of Pharmaceutical Prescriptions by Therapeutic Classification Group
Prescription Year 2006Therapeutic
ClassificationGroup
Number ofPrescriptions
Cum%
TotalPayments
Cum%
ANALGESICS -OPIOID
522,521 32% $43,046,837 33%
ANALGESICS – ANTI- IFLAMMATORY
257,092 48% $18,637,705 47%
MUSCULOSKELETALTHERAPY
225,173 62% $17,141,168 60%
ANTIDEPRESSANTS 99,189 68% $9,164,644 67%
ANTICONVULSANTS 96,298 73% $14,362,712 78%
HYPNOTICS 64,116 77% $6,315,282 82%
ANTIANXIETYAGENTS
40.668 79% $2,030,153 84%
OTHER GROUPS * 343,509 100% $20,948,958 100%
Source: Texas Department of Insurance, Workers’ Compensation Research and Evaluation Group, 2008.Note*: Texas WC prescriptions in 2006 were for 6,001 unique Drug Names from 626 Subclasses. The Subclasses fall into 89 distinct Therapeutic Classification Groups as defined by the Medi-Span classification system
17
Generic Substitution Rate Where Generics Were Available *
Prescription Year 2006
28%
72%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
Brand Name Generic
Source: Texas Department of Insurance, Workers’ Compensation Research and Evaluation Group, 2008.Note* : Approximately 85,000 prescriptions (5 percent) did not have generics available
18
Generic Substitution RatesTherapeutic Classification Groups
Prescription Year 2006
Antidepressants, 50%
Hyponotics, 11%
Other, 55%
Anti-anxiety Agents, 94%
Analgesics -Opioids, 91%
Musculoskeletal Therapeutic Agents, 82%
Anticonvulsants, 55%
AnalgesicsAnti-Inflammatories, 68%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Percentage of Prescriptions
Source: Texas Department of Insurance, Workers’ Compensation Research and Evaluation Group, 2008.
19
Descriptive Statistics on Recipients of Permanent Impairment Income Benefits in
the Texas WC System
20
Five types of income benefits are payable under the Texas Workers’ Compensation Act
• Temporary Income Benefits (TIBs) – paid during the period of temporary disability (lost time from work) while the worker is recovering from an on-the-job injury;
• Impairment Income Benefits (IIBs) – paid to injured workers for permanent impairment (impairment evaluations are currently based on the Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment, 4th Edition, published by the American Medical Association);
• Supplemental Income Benefits (SIBs) – paid to injured workers for ongoing disability after IIBs have been exhausted, with all eligibility for SIBs ending at 401 weeks after the date of injury; Only workers with a 15 percent impairment rating and who are unemployed or underemployed as a result of their work-related injuries are eligible to receive SIBs;
• Lifetime Income Benefits (LIBs) – paid for the life of the injured worker for specific catastrophic injuries as set forth in Section 408.161 of the Texas Labor Code; and
• Death Benefits (DBs) and Burial Benefits – paid to the deceased workers’ spouse or eligible beneficiaries as a result of a death from a compensable injury.
21
Purpose of This Analysis
This study aims to provide basic descriptive information regarding the frequency and amount of Impairment Income Benefits (IIBs) and Supplemental Income Benefits (SIBs) received by injured workers in the Texas workers’ compensation system from 1996 to 2005.
This analysis focuses on IIBs and SIBs since these benefits are paid to severely injured workers who generally have the hardest time going back to work after an injury.
22
Total Number of Injured Workers Who Received IIBs* Injury Years 1996-2005
Source: Texas Department of Insurance Workers’ Compensation Research and Evaluation Group, 2008.Note 1: Injury year 2005 data should be interpreted with caution since data may not be complete.Note 2: Claims that did not have a valid claim, benefit and impairment rating record on file with the Division of Workers’ Compensation were excluded from this analysis.
39,24338,561
37,119 36,608
40,602 40,860
37,288
31,916
27,827
22,814
0
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
30,000
35,000
40,000
45,000
Nu
mb
er o
f In
jure
d W
ork
ers
1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005
Injury Years
*
23
Percentage of Workers Receiving Medical Services in 2003
Who Also Received IIBs or SIBsType of Injured Worker
Percent of Workers
Receiving Medical Services
Average Medical Payment Per Worker
for Services Rendered in 2003
Total Medical Payments for
Services Rendered in 2003
Percent of Total Medical
Payments
IIBs and SIBs Recipients
25% $6,930 $706,735,380 57%
All Other Injured Workers
75% $1,759 $533,691,850 43%
Source: Texas Department of Insurance Workers’ Compensation Research and Evaluation Group, 2008.Note: Medical services include professional and hospital services rendered during 2003. Pharmacy services are excluded from this analysis since pharmacy data was not available for 2003.
24
Average IIBs Duration Per Worker Injury Years 1996-2005
29
2726 26
24
2220
1817
15
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
Ave
rag
e N
um
ber
of
Wee
ks
1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005
Injury Years
*
Source: Texas Department of Insurance Workers’ Compensation Research and Evaluation Group, 2008.Note 1: Injury year 2005 data should be interpreted with caution since data may not be complete.Note 2: Claims that did not have a valid claim, benefit and impairment rating record on file with the Division of Workers’ Compensation were excluded from this analysis.
25
Distribution of Most Recent Impairment Rating Received by IIBs Recipients, Injury Years 1996-2005
0 1 - 5 6 - 10 11 - 14 15 - 20 21 - 50 51 and More
392434% 39% 30% 14% 8% 5% <1% 100%
385613% 39% 30% 14% 8% 5% <1% 100%
371193% 39% 30% 14% 8% 6% <1% 100%
366083% 37% 31% 14% 9% 6% <1% 100%
406022% 38% 33% 13% 9% 5% <1% 100%
408602% 47% 31% 9% 7% 4% <1% 100%
372881% 54% 29% 7% 6% 3% <1% 100%
319161% 58% 27% 6% 5% 3% <1% 100%
278271% 61% 25% 6% 5% 2% <1% 100%
228141% 63% 24% 5% 4% 2% <1% 100%
Total 8111 163128 103307 37790 25118 14698 686 352838
Total
2004
2005
2002
2003
2000
2001
1998
1999
1996
1997
Injury Years
Impairment Ratings
*
Source: Texas Department of Insurance Workers’ Compensation Research and Evaluation Group, 2008.Note 1: Injury year 2005 data should be interpreted with caution since data may not be complete.Note 2: Claims that did not have a valid claim, benefit and impairment rating record on file with the Division of Workers’ Compensation were excluded from this analysis.
26
IIBs Recipients Who Received Statutory Maximum and Minimum Weekly IIBs
• The statutory maximum IIBs benefit payable to injured workers is 70% of the State Average Weekly Wage (SAWW)
• The SAWW for WC purposes is based on 88% of the average weekly wage for all covered employment as calculated by the Texas Workforce Commission (TWC)
• As of 2006, approximately 21% of workers receiving IIBs were capped at the statutory maximum weekly IIBs rate – currently $498/week
• As of 2006, approximately 2% of workers receiving IIBs received the statutory minimum weekly IIBs rate – currently $107/week
• Statutory changes made by HB 7 in 2005 to the calculation of the statutory maximum weekly benefit increased the maximum weekly IIBs payment from $378 in FY 2006 to $498 in FY 2008, which should result in a lower percentage of workers being capped at the statutory maximum in future years
27
Total Number of Injured Workers Who Received SIBs* Injury Years 1996-2004
995 1,002
1,1771,221
1,104
814
562
320
186
0
200
400
600
800
1,000
1,200
1,400
1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004
Injury Years
*
Source: Texas Department of Insurance Workers’ Compensation Research and Evaluation Group, 2008.Note 1: Injury year 2004 data should be interpreted with caution since data may not be complete. Injury Year 2005 was excluded from this analysis since few workers injured in 2005 have exhausted their IIBs and are eligible to receive SIBs.
Note 2: Claims that did not have a valid claim, benefit and impairment rating record on file with the Division of Workers’ Compensation were excluded from this analysis.
28
SIBs Recipients Who Received Statutory Maximum SIBs
• The statutory maximum SIBs benefit payable to injured workers is 70% of the State Average Weekly Wage (SAWW)
• The SAWW for WC purposes is based on 88% of the average weekly wage for all covered employment as calculated by the Texas Workforce Commission (TWC)
• As of 2006, approximately 19% of workers receiving SIBs are currently capped at the statutory maximum weekly SIBs rate – currently $498/week
• There is currently no minimum weekly SIBS rate payable to injured workers
• Statutory changes made by HB 7 in 2005 to the calculation of the statutory maximum weekly benefit increased the maximum weekly SIBs payment from $378 in FY 2006 to $498 in FY 2008, which should result in a lower percentage of workers being capped at the statutory maximum in future years
29
Estimated Number and Percent of SIBs Recipients Who Reached 401 Weeks Statutory Benefit Maximum
Duration, Injury Years 1996-2000
Injury Years Number of SIBs Number of Workers Reached
401 weeks
Percent
1996 995 95 10%
1997 1002 87 9%
1998 1177 106 9%
1999 1221 116 10%
2000 1104 52 5%*
Source: Texas Department of Insurance Workers’ Compensation Research and Evaluation Group, 2008.
Note 1: Injury year 2000 data should be interpreted with caution since data may not be complete. Injury Years 2001-2004 was excluded from this analysis since workers injured in 2001-2004 have not had the opportunity to receive 401 weeks of SIBs.
Note 2: Claims that did not have a valid claim, benefit and impairment rating record on file with the Division of Workers’ Compensation were excluded from this analysis.
30
Upcoming Research Reports• Update on claim and medical denial rates;
• Update on use of medical peer reviews (results from recent data call);
• Analysis of access to care for non-network claims;
• Update of employer participation estimates in the Texas WC system and employee coverage rates;
• Next WC network report card (due in Sept);
• Biennial report on impact of HB 7 on affordability and availability of WC insurance for Texas employers (due December 1, 2008);
• Biennial report on impact of HB 7 on medical costs, quality of care and medical dispute resolution (due December 1, 2008).
Top Related