1
Colin Chellman and Meryle Weinstein
Research Associates, Institute for Education and Social Policy
and
Leanna Stiefel and Amy Ellen Schwartz
Faculty, Wagner Graduate School
New York University
Education Finance Research Consortium
November 19, 2004
Uncommon Schools, Uncommon Results: Case Studies of Three New York State
Schools Closing Racial Test Score Gaps
2
Research Questions
• What are the differences in school-level test scores by subgroup in New York State?
• How do "schools without gaps" differ from those with gaps?
• What policies and practices might contribute to reducing test score gaps?
3
School Strategies to Eliminate the Gap
• School culture and teacher characteristics
• Leadership
• Use of data
• Parental expectations and involvement in schooling
4
School Culture and Teacher Characteristics
– Small class size and high per-pupil spending– Teacher quality– Integration and student relationships– Expectations of teachers and principals– Diverse faculty and staff
5
Leadership
• Instructional leaders
• Ability to recruit and retain good teachers
• Principal autonomy
6
Use of Data
• Disaggregating student performance to identify low-performing students
• Professional development on how to use data
• Connecting results to instruction
• Use of ongoing assessments
7
Parents and Expectations
• Parental involvement in children’s school
• Parental expectations
• Communicating these expectations to children
8
Quantitative Data: 2000-01 and 2001-02
• New York State School Report Card
• State of Learning/Chapter 655 Report
• Institutional Master File
• School District Fiscal Profiles
9
Quantitative Analysis
• Identify schools accountable for:– White students only– Non-white students only– Both white and non-white students
• Compare results to 2000-01 school year
• Identify schools that showed little disparity in subgroup performance over two years
10
Table 1: Distribution by Racial Accountability Status, 2001-02
4th grade
(n=2,249)
8th grade
(n=1,068)
% Schools
% Students
% Schools
% Students
White accountable only
42.4 34.6 36.7 20.9
Non-white accountable only
23.3 26.5 18.1 17.7
Accountable for both groups
34.4 39.0 45.2 61.4
11
Choosing Case Study Schools
1. Schools accountable for both white and non-white students in 2000-01 and 2001-02 school years– 668 elementary schools
– 424 middle schools
2. Identify schools with small or non-traditional test score gaps between these groups– 45 elementary schools
– 27 middle schools
12
Eliminated:
• schools “sinking all boats”
• less-integrated schools
• schools with the lowest poverty rates
• Asian-dominated schools
13
Qualitative Data
Principal Interviews (n=3)– Educational philosophy
– Academic goals
– Curricula
– Expectations for students
– School organization
– School environment
Teacher Surveys (n=23)– Understanding of
school philosophy
– Perceptions of other teachers, students
– Perceptions of school leadership
– Availability of teacher supports
14
Two studies:
• Bay Area School Reform Collaborative (BASRC, 2003)– Compared schools with and without gaps
• Markow and Scheer, Education Week, 2004 Nationally-representative teacher sample
Qualitative Data, cont’d.
15
Table 2: Teacher Characteristics
Sample1 New York State2
Median years experience 15.7 13.9
Average years at school 7.4 NA
% permanently certified 80.0 72.1
% white 91.3 82.2
Sources: 1) Authors’ survey 2) 2003 State of Learning/Chapter 655 Report
School Culture and Teacher Characteristics
16
Table 3: Student Interaction
% Agree or Strongly Agree
Students from different racial backgrounds frequently hang out together
94.7
Teachers encourage students of different backgrounds to work together on projects or classwork
90.4
Teachers and administrators encourage students of different racial backgrounds to interact outside of class
80.0
School Culture and Teacher Characteristics
17
Table 4: Factors That Explain Achievement Gap
% responding some or a lot
Lack of family support 100
Challenging family conditions 100
Lack of student motivation/effort 100
Lower natural ability 87
Unequal access to quality education 54
Low expectations from teachers 30
Injustice or discrimination 36
School Culture and Teacher Characteristics
18
Table 5: What would work best to reduce test score gaps?
% agreeingIncreased parental involvement 78
Increased student effort 65
Equal academic opportunities 48
More money to schools 39
Good teachers 35
Racial/economic diverse classrooms 13
Solving outside economic issues 13
Other 9
No solution 0
School Culture and Teacher Characteristics
19
Principal Leadership
“People know they can reach me here [at school], or at home, if they have a suggestion…You have to be a risk taker. You’ve got to learn to try things, to see what works for the kids. If the teacher has a good idea, and she’s willing to go for it, I’ll support them if it makes sense because, let them try it. If it doesn’t work, go to plan B.”
Leadership
20
Table 6: Principal Leadership
% Agree or Strongly Agree
Has confidence in expertise of teachers 100.0
Collaborates with teachers and staff 100.0
Understands how children learn 100.0
Promotes parent and community involvement 95.5
Is an effective manager 90.9
Takes a personal interest in the professional development of teachers
90.5
Places needs of children ahead of personal/political interests
86.4
Leadership
21
Data
“I think we probably use data more than most schools… What the district sends us is good, but it’s not really action-able or available. It’s a stack of reports with a bunch of numbers. That’s scary to your typical teacher.”
Data
22
Table 7: Use of Data
Never Yearly Monthly Weekly
Use data to understand skill gaps 4.5 50.0 31.8 13.6
Administer ongoing assessments 0.0 17.4 43.5 39.1
Discuss achievement data with colleagues 0.0 13.0 65.2 21.7
Data
23
Table 9: Expectations
% Agree or Strongly
Agree
Teachers communicate with parents about helping children learn
95.5
Parents understand standards and the expectations teachers hold for children
63.6
I ask parents for their suggestions for working with their child
63.1
Parents and Expectations
24
Parental Involvement
“There’s difficulty in getting the parents to come in because of the nature of our population. We have a large immigrant population… The parents don’t come in because they’re not legal and they have financial problems and family problems. There’s a myriad of difficulties.”
Parents and Expectations
25
Conclusions
• Teachers hold high expectations for all students.
• Principals are strong instructional leaders.• Data from ongoing assessments are used to
target resources where needed most.• Teachers and principals perceive that
parents have high expectations around academic performance for their children.
26
Future Research• Students observation and surveys
– How do students perceive teacher and parent expectations?
– Does diverse student interaction improve study habits?
• Parents– How do parents express expectations for their children?
• Classroom observation– Validate teacher survey response
• Comparison group of schools
Top Related