Download - 2009, Confidential WMHL Ltd Perception is Reality! TMF October 2009.

Transcript
Page 1: 2009, Confidential WMHL Ltd Perception is Reality! TMF October 2009.

© 2009, Confidential WMHL Ltd

Perception is Reality!TMF October 2009

Page 2: 2009, Confidential WMHL Ltd Perception is Reality! TMF October 2009.

© 2009, Confidential WMHL Ltd

Testers Perception• Testing is considered a major area for

improvement in many organisations• And yet, we still feel undervalued?

– We ‘battle’ to get our message across– We continue to improve communications

skills – We obtain certification for greater credibility– We strive for earlier exposure to

stakeholders and management

Page 3: 2009, Confidential WMHL Ltd Perception is Reality! TMF October 2009.

© 2009, Confidential WMHL Ltd

Others Perception• ‘Testing’ slows my project down,

costs too much money and we still have faults in production!

• Still testers ask for more funding, education, people, and so on…..

• Testers give me lots of data, but can’t tell me if it’s OK to go live or even if they’ve finished testing!

Page 4: 2009, Confidential WMHL Ltd Perception is Reality! TMF October 2009.

© 2009, Confidential WMHL Ltd

So What?• OK, so I paraphrase and polarise to

make a point• I hear this all the time though• How much of this sounds familiar to

you?• So, how did we get here?

– If we can understand this question maybe we can find another way

Page 5: 2009, Confidential WMHL Ltd Perception is Reality! TMF October 2009.

© 2009, Confidential WMHL Ltd

Firstly…..• Most people go to work to do a good

job, not to make life difficult for testers• Most people have a focus on making

progress, moving forward, and enhancing the business to the best of their ability

• If others disagree with us, maybe they have a point!

Page 6: 2009, Confidential WMHL Ltd Perception is Reality! TMF October 2009.

© 2009, Confidential WMHL Ltd

My Perception of Testing History

When life was simple!• Mainframes ruled• Developers tested their code

thoroughly– Or they’d lose days out of their schedule

• Test environments were realistic• Project budgets included test activity

Many of today’s senior managers ‘grew up’ in this environment

Page 7: 2009, Confidential WMHL Ltd Perception is Reality! TMF October 2009.

© 2009, Confidential WMHL Ltd

My Perception of Testing History

Then things got harder!• Distributed architecture• Integration with multiple systems• Distributed teams• Test environments not representative• Etc, etc, etc…..• Quality suffered:

– Creation of dedicated tester roles– Independent testing– Testing suppliers, test centres, a whole industry!– Developers given ‘permission’ to abdicate responsibility for

testing

Testing budgets created but project budgets not reduced!

Page 8: 2009, Confidential WMHL Ltd Perception is Reality! TMF October 2009.

© 2009, Confidential WMHL Ltd

My Perception of Testing History

Original view of test maturityMulti-disciplined team

Independent Testers

Specialist testers within the team

New Multi-disciplined team

?

Page 9: 2009, Confidential WMHL Ltd Perception is Reality! TMF October 2009.

© 2009, Confidential WMHL Ltd

And Today!• Did we create a monster?• Is the perception of others our fault? • Are we following the original test

maturity model?– Agile has multi-disciplined teams– Most organisations I talk to are keen to

integrate testers within teams rather than have them independent now

– Are we resisting the inevitable?

Page 10: 2009, Confidential WMHL Ltd Perception is Reality! TMF October 2009.

© 2009, Confidential WMHL Ltd

Where to Next?