Zurich in North America Corporate Broker Advisory Council Mike Golden Head of Distribution...
-
Upload
rosamund-perkins -
Category
Documents
-
view
215 -
download
1
Transcript of Zurich in North America Corporate Broker Advisory Council Mike Golden Head of Distribution...
Zurich in North America Corporate Broker Advisory Council
Mike GoldenHead of Distribution ManagementZurich Global Corporate, North America
© Z
uri
ch A
meri
can
In
sura
nce
Com
pan
y
October 2011 2
WELCOME NEW MEMBERS
Anne Anderson
Sharon Brainard
Brian Elowe
Brian Kelly
Jim Rubel
Brian Wanat
© Z
uri
ch A
meri
can
In
sura
nce
Com
pan
y
October 2011 3
CBAC Agenda - Today
8:15 am Global Corporate Update – Mike Kerner Update from our Customer Council Meeting Q&A
9:15 Global Programs - Facilitated by: Greg Martin & Corrine Kadlec Benefits, Challenges and Solutions
10:30 BREAK
10:50 Information Security & Privacy – Risks, Challenges & Solutions – Catherine Mulligan
11:45 CBAC Session 1 Wrap-up – Mike Golden
11:55 Review afternoon activities & evening events – Brenda Lombardo
© Z
uri
ch A
meri
can
In
sura
nce
Com
pan
y
October 2011 4
CBAC Agenda - Tomorrow
7:00 am Breakfast – Surfside A/B
8:00 CBAC Session 2 – Lori Spoon RafkinAgenda OverviewAction items from yesterday
8:15 Predictive Modeling – Tom Barger
9:00 How has the profile of the buyer changed? Facilitated by Greg Maguire
9:45 CBAC Open Forum / Q&A
10:30 CBAC Closing remarks – Mike Kerner
10:45 BREAK – Dunes Terrace
11:00 General Session – facilitated by Mike GoldenOpen forum / Q&A Panel
11:50 Closing – Randall Clouser
NOON Box Lunches / Departures
© Z
uri
ch A
meri
can
In
sura
nce
Com
pan
y
October 2011 5
Member Tools
“Members-only” web site
BAC Membership Guide
Membership Card
Zurich Global Corporate Update
Mike KernerChief Executive OfficerZurich Global Corporate in North America
© Z
uri
ch A
meri
can
In
sura
nce
Com
pan
y
77
Fall 2011 North America Risk Management Council - Update
September 14th & 15th, 2011 – Lucerne, Switzerland
Immediately preceded Global Risk Management Summit
19 key Global Corporate in North America customers
Agenda developed with customers’ input
Presenters from Europe & North America, including Group Chief Compliance Officer Jason Schupp, Head of Global CAT Management Matthew Jones, Chief Market Strategist Guy Miller, Head of IPZ Sales & Distribution Petra Riga and others
Topics included impact of RMS 11.0 on property underwriting strategy, global economic & market outlook, product recall, international programs, the meaning of Zurich’s brand essence, regulatory & legislative developments, etc.
© Z
uri
ch A
meri
can
In
sura
nce
Com
pan
y
88
Key messages
Despite a year that has already seen unprecedented catastrophes, Zurich has maintained string of 34 profitable quartersWe must execute well to maintain solvency, ensure claims payments, provide reasonable return to shareholders and, most importantly, to provide service under policiesMaintaining conservative investment strategy has contributed to financial strength and stabilityContinue to seek new and expanding opportunities for profitable growth – our goal is to grow market share over the cycleZurich’s core aspiration is to be the best global insurance company serving corporate customers, as measured by our customers, shareholders and employees
INTERNAL USE ONLY 99
2.7
%
0.9
%
3.2
%
2.3
%
2.9
%
-0.7
%
0.6
%
-4.0
%
-6.8
% -4.9
%
-0.7
%
1.6
%
5.0
%
3.7
%
1.7
% 2.6
%
3.1
%
0.4
% 1.3
% 2.5
%
2.8
%
2.2
%
2.1
%
2.3
%
2.2
%
4.1
%
1.1
%
1.8
%
2.5
% 3.6
%
3.1
%
-8%
-6%
-4%
-2%
0%
2%
4%
6%
2
00
0
2
00
1
2
00
2
2
00
3
2
00
4
2
00
5
2
00
6
07
:1Q
07
:2Q
07
:3Q
07
:4Q
08
:1Q
08
:2Q
08
:3Q
08
:4Q
09
:1Q
09
:2Q
09
:3Q
09
:4Q
10
:1Q
10
:2Q
10
:3Q
10
:4Q
11
:1Q
11
:2Q
11
:3Q
11
:4Q
12
:1Q
12
:2Q
12
:3Q
12
:4Q
Real GDP Growth (%)
Recession began in Dec. 2007. Economic toll of credit crunch, housing slump, labor market
contraction has been severe but modest recovery is underway
The Q4:2008 decline was the steepest since the Q1:1982
drop of 6.8%
2011 got off to a sluggish start, but growth is expected to accelerate in the remainder of the year. This is a major positive for insurance demand
and exposure growth.
Market Context - US Real GDP Growth*
* Estimates/Forecasts from Blue Chip Economic Indicators.Source: US Department of Commerce, Blue Economic Indicators July 2011; Insurance Information Institute
INTERNAL USE ONLY 10 10
Market Context – Annual Inflation Rates,(CPI-U, %), 1990–2014F
2.8 2.6
1.51.9
3.3 3.4
1.3
2.5 2.3
3.0
3.8
2.8
3.8
-0.4
1.6
3.1
2.2 2.1 2.2
2.92.4
3.23.0
5.14.9
-1.0
0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11F 12F 13F 14F
Sources: US Bureau of Labor Statistics; Blue Chip Economic Indicators, March 2011 and July 2011 (forecasts).
Annual Inflation Rates (%)
Inflation peaked at 5.6% in August 2008 on high energy and commodity crisis. The recession and the collapse of the
commodity bubble reduced inflationary pressures in 2009/10
Higher energy, commodity and food prices are pushing up inflation in 2011, but not longer term
inflationary expectations.
INTERNAL USE ONLY 11
Cumulative Quarterly Comm Rate Changes, by Account Size: 1999:Q4 to 2011:Q2
Source: Council of Insurance Agents and Brokers; Insurance Information Institute
1999:Q4 = 100
Pricing today is where is was in
Q3:2000 (pre-9/11)
Downward pricing pressure is most pronounced for
larger risks
11
INTERNAL USE ONLY 12
10-year Treasury Notes reached all-time low in August
12
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
5
5.5
Jan-03Apr-03Jul-03Oct-03
Feb-04May-04
Aug-04Dec-04
Mar-05
Jun-05Sep-05Jan-06Apr-06Jul-06Nov-06
Feb-07May-07
Aug-07Dec-07
Mar-08
Jun-08Oct-08
Jan-09Apr-09Jul-09Nov-09
Feb-10May-10
Sep-10Dec-10
Mar-11
Jun-11Oct-11
Jan-12%
Yie
ld
Month - Year
10-yr Treasury Note Returns (as of Aug-26-2011)
12
INTERNAL USE ONLY 13
Global Catastrophe Loss SummaryFirst Half 2011
2011 Is Already (as of June 30) the Highest Loss Year on Record Globally
− Extraordinary accumulation of severe natural catastrophe: Earthquakes, tsunami, floods and tornadoes are the primary causes of loss
$260 Billion in Economic Losses Globally− New record for the first six months, exceeding the previous record of $220B in 2005− Economy is more resilient than most pundits presume
$55 Billion in Insured Losses Globally− More than double the first half 2010 amount− Over 4 times the 10-year average
$27 Billion in Economic Losses in the US− Represents a 129% increase over the $11.8 billion amount through the first half of 2010
$17.3 Billion in Insured Losses in the US Arising from 100 CAT Events− Represents a 162% increase over the $6.6 billion amount through the first half of 2010
13
INTERNAL USE ONLY 14
Criteria Necessary for a “Market Turn”All Four Criteria Must Be Met
Criteria Status Comments
Sustained Period of Large Underwriting Losses
Not Yet Happened
• Apart from Q2:2011, overall p/c underwriting losses remain modest
• Combined ratios (ex-Q2 CATs) still in low 100s (vs. 110+ at onset of last hard market)
• Prior-year reserve releases continue reduce u/w losses, boost ROEs
Material Decline in Surplus/ Capacity
Surplus is At/Near Record High
• Surplus hit a record $565B as of 3/31/11• Analysts est. excess surplus of $75-$100B• Some excess capacity may still remain in reinsurance
markets• Weak growth in demand for insurance is insufficient to
absorb much excess capacity
Tight Reinsurance Market
Somewhat in Place
• Higher prices in Asia/Pacific• Modestly improved pricing for US risks
Renewed Underwriting & Pricing Discipline
Not Broadly Evident
• Commercial lines pricing trends remain negative• Competition remains intense as many seek to
maintain market share• Terms & conditions—no broad tightening
Sources: Barclays Capital; Insurance Information Institute
14
© Z
uri
ch A
meri
can
In
sura
nce
Com
pan
y
1515
Focus on International Business
Latin America Region
Santander acquisition – life, pension and general insurance
Malaysian Assurance Alliance Berhad acquisition
MIA for Brokers
Customer Service Reports
© Z
uri
ch A
meri
can
In
sura
nce
Com
pan
y
1616
The way forward – Customer Centric Operating Model
1. Largely fixed costs2. Variable processes per office & LoB3. Inconsistent customer service4. Role definitions often unclear
1. Mphasis & ZNA service on a variable cost basis2. Management of process steps to drive improvements3. Focus on retaining within GCiNA tasks that add customer value4. Reduce front end footprint to focus on customer facing activities
General Operations Support
Front Office Market Facing & Market Facing UWSS
Centralized and Virtual UWSS within GCiNA
ZNA Service Center
Mphasis
UWSS O.S.S.
Projects &
Initiatives
Governance
SchaumburgSchaumburg
Increasingly standard, simple procedures
2009 2010 - 2011 onwards
Front Office UW & UWSS
© Z
uri
ch A
meri
can
In
sura
nce
Com
pan
y
1717
Reduced fluctuations in results
Reduced fluctuations in results
Balance sheet protectionBalance sheet protection
Protect brand & reputation
Protect brand & reputation
Informed decision making
Informed decision making
Supporting sustainability and profitability
Maintain customer relationships
Maintain customer relationships
Increase transparency
Increase transparency
SC11(V1)Apr/20/10GC/ZCA
Supply chain risk assessment and insurance
© Z
uri
ch A
meri
can
In
sura
nce
Com
pan
y
1818
Reducing risks and costs by integrating technology with insights
SaferSafer
Cost effectiveCost effective
GreenerGreener
Zurich Fleet Intelligence
Q&A
Global Programs – Benefits, Challenges and Solution
Facilitated by: Gregory MartinBroker Relationship Leader Zurich North America
© Z
uri
ch A
meri
can
In
sura
nce
Com
pan
y
8/13/2010 21 2
240 + countries and kingdoms
Conflicting laws and regulations
Various premium and tax requirements
Varying business practices
Various licensing requirements
Increased communication among regulators
TEM24(V1)Oct/28/09GC/ZCA
Complexities of International ProgramsNumerous Variations and Considerations
© Z
uri
ch A
meri
can
In
sura
nce
Com
pan
y
8/13/2010 22 22
Zurich IPZ OperationsInvesting in managing the network
65 dedicated professionals
Worldwide uniform goal setting
Monthly performance
measurements
Worldwide use of International
Program Application
90% of claims managed by our owned network
1,000 Risk Engineers in 37
countries and 50,00 assessments
30,000 policies issued annually
What Our Customers Say
IPZ34(V1)Oct/30/09GC/ZCA
What Our Customers Say
IPZ35(V1)Oct/30/09GC/ZCA
© Z
uri
ch A
meri
can
In
sura
nce
Com
pan
y
8/13/2010 25 25
Our Customers
© Z
uri
ch A
meri
can
In
sura
nce
Com
pan
y
8/13/2010 26
So, how do we get there?
© Z
uri
ch A
meri
can
In
sura
nce
Com
pan
y
8/13/2010 27
Multinational Insurance Application (MIA)
© Z
uri
ch A
meri
can
In
sura
nce
Com
pan
y
8/13/2010 28 28
What are the Risks of Non-Compliance?Argentina imposes fines
© Z
uri
ch A
meri
can
In
sura
nce
Com
pan
y
8/13/2010 29 29
What are the Risks of Non-Compliance?Switzerland & FOPI step in
© Z
uri
ch A
meri
can
In
sura
nce
Com
pan
y
8/13/2010 30
Multinational Insurance Application
© Z
uri
ch A
meri
can
In
sura
nce
Com
pan
y
8/13/2010 31 31
The MIA Process has 3 steps
Map customer’s risk profile and
structure1
Input Output
Devise solution and allocate premiums
2
Calculate & document insurer
premium taxes3
19© Zurich -
LPF
LP D
LPI
LPUSA
Example of a solution
Master Switzer-
land
AUHK
CNDCountries that allow
non-admitted
LP
LPLP
USIR
SK J C
Financial Interest Cover to protect parent‘s
interest in case cover and/or limits can not be
fully exported
LP = Local policy
LP LP LP
EEA => FoSDIC / DIL
2
19© Zurich -
LPF
LP D
LPI
LPUSA
Example of a solution
Master Switzer-
land
AUHK
CNDCountries that allow
non-admitted
LP
LPLP
USIR
SK J C
Financial Interest Cover to protect parent‘s
interest in case cover and/or limits can not be
fully exported
LP = Local policy
LP LP LP
EEA => FoSDIC / DIL
2
Tax
© Z
uri
ch A
meri
can
In
sura
nce
Com
pan
y
8/13/2010 32
MIA - Comprehensive and easy to use
Choose your Line of Business, country of
risk and business scenario
Selected countries displayed
Non-admitted information detailed including variations (regulatory & tax
information)
The data is updated to incorporate any country regulatory changes when identified by our legal network. In addition, MIA data is annually reviewed and maintained.
© Z
uri
ch A
meri
can
In
sura
nce
Com
pan
y
8/13/2010 33 33
Country/Risk Mapping
Countries where non-admitted insurance is permitted for ground-up primary insurance, DIC/DIL and/or excess coverage.
Countries where non-admitted insurance is prohibited for ground-up primary insurance, DIC/DIL and/or excess coverage. The only insurance activity tolerated is by a locally licensed/registered insurance company.
“Red” EEA countries where Freedom of Services (FoS) principles apply – permitting cross border insurance without further regulatory or licensing requirements.
Green Countries
Blue Countries
Red Countries
© Z
uri
ch A
meri
can
In
sura
nce
Com
pan
y
8/13/2010 34 34
Calculate and Document Taxes
Premiums and related taxes must be paid under policies where coverage is being provided
Using the MIA database, we can identify and calculate taxes for 41 Lines of Business in approximately 180 countries
We can provide customers with a report of all premium taxes owed by the insurer that were collected and disbursed to the tax authorities.
TaxReport
TaxReport
© Z
uri
ch A
meri
can
In
sura
nce
Com
pan
y
8/13/2010 35
MIA Demo
© Z
uri
ch A
meri
can
In
sura
nce
Com
pan
y
8/13/2010 36
Customer Service Report
© Z
uri
ch A
meri
can
In
sura
nce
Com
pan
y
8/13/2010 37 37
International Program SystemEnsuring Program delivery & Service Excellence
© Z
uri
ch A
meri
can
In
sura
nce
Com
pan
y
8/13/2010 38 38
NEW Global Customer Service Report Customer Relevant Metrics
Service Metrics are mirrored in new, improved, and consistent Customer Metric report
Supports greater transparency with our brokers and customers
Enables a direct understanding of how our internal (service) performance impacts and influences our customer’s experience
Helps us to communicate with our brokers and customers to find ways they can help us and vice versa.
© Z
uri
ch A
meri
can
In
sura
nce
Com
pan
y
8/13/2010 39
Customer Service Report
1. Introduction Explains terms used and metrics measured in an easy to understand manner
2. Executive Summary 1-page summary, overview of performance results and list of countries helps to quickly focus on hot spots
3. Program Overview Overview of current status of all policies
4. Performance Measure
Every metric is highlighted on 1 page
5. Benchmark Comparison of current performance with prior year and Zurich portfolio
© Z
uri
ch A
meri
can
In
sura
nce
Com
pan
y
8/13/2010 40
Customer Service ReportService Performance Measurements
The report includes the following measurements: Time to receive all information Time to issue policies Time to issue invoices Time to receive premium payments (only for Captive programs)
© Z
uri
ch A
meri
can
In
sura
nce
Com
pan
y
8/13/2010 41
Customer Service ReportProgram Overview
© Z
uri
ch A
meri
can
In
sura
nce
Com
pan
y
8/13/2010 42
Customer Service ReportBenchmark
How did we perform? Overview in comparison to property portfolio 2010
The Benchmark section includes two comparisons:
Performance versus prior year
Performance versus Zurich portfolio (LoB specific)
© Z
uri
ch A
meri
can
In
sura
nce
Com
pan
y
8/13/2010 43
Thank you !
© Z
uri
ch A
meri
can
In
sura
nce
Com
pan
y
October 2011 44
BREAK
Information Security & Privacy
Catherine A. MulliganVP, Underwriting ManagerSpecialty E&OZurich North America
© Z
uri
ch A
meri
can
In
sura
nce
Com
pan
y
October 2011 46
Agenda
Security Breach definedPrivacy Breach definedSecurity & Privacy ExposuresLitigation & Regulatory TrendsData Breach Costs/StatisticsRisk Management TrendsClaim Examples & Costs
© Z
uri
ch A
meri
can
In
sura
nce
Com
pan
y
October 2011 47
What is a Security Breach?
The theft, alteration, or destruction of Electronic Data on a Company’s Computer System;the Unauthorized Access to or Unauthorized Use of the Company’s Computer System;the denial of an authorized user’s access to a Company's Computer System, the participation by a Company's Computer System in a Denial of Service Attack directed against a third party’s Computer System; orthe transmission of Malicious Code from a Company's Computer System to a third party’s Computer System.
© Z
uri
ch A
meri
can
In
sura
nce
Com
pan
y
October 2011 48
Examples of Security Breaches
Network Hack or IntrusionUse of stolen login credentials (most common)Exploitation of “Backdoor” (see below)SQL InjectionOperating System CommandingFootprinting/FingerprintingExploitation of insufficient authentication (no login required)Exploitation of insufficient authorization (weak or misconfigured access control)Denial of Service Attack
Malware Backdoor - Allows remote access/control (most common)Keylogger/Spyware - captures data from user activity Send Data to Additional Site/Entity/PersonDownload/installation of additional malwareRAM Scraper – captures data from volatile memoryPacket Sniffer – capture data from networkWorm – infects other systems via network propagation
© Z
uri
ch A
meri
can
In
sura
nce
Com
pan
y
October 2011 49
What is a Privacy Breach?
Privacy Breachan unauthorized disclosure or loss of:
– Personal Information in the care, custody or control of any Insured or Service Provider; or
– Corporate information in the care, custody or control of any Insured or Service Provider that is specifically identified as confidential and protected under a nondisclosure agreement or similar contract; or
a violation of any Privacy Regulation.
© Z
uri
ch A
meri
can
In
sura
nce
Com
pan
y
October 2011 50
Privacy Breach Examples
Lost/stolen laptops or other portable devicesLost or stolen physical records Improper disposal of sensitive documentsImproper disposal of hardware containing sensitive informationSocial Engineering Misappropriation of trade secrets
© Z
uri
ch A
meri
can
In
sura
nce
Com
pan
y
October 2011 51
Security & Privacy Exposures
Why is this such a hot topic?
Change in Regulatory Environment
Several High Profile, Well-Publicized Incidents over last couple of years
Increased Dependency on Technology
More “Paperless” Work Environments
New Contractual Requirements
© Z
uri
ch A
meri
can
In
sura
nce
Com
pan
y
October 2011 52
Security & Privacy Exposures (cont.)
Over 535 Million records have been breached since January 2005;So far this year:
Almost 417 separate breaches have been recorded;Causes:
– Unintended Disclosure (accidental posting, sent to incorrect party, etc…)
– Hacking or malware
– Payment Card Fraud
– Insider (rogue employee)
– Physical Loss
– Portable device
– Stationary Device
– Unknown
Source: Privacy Rights Clearinghouse (www.privacyrights.org)
© Z
uri
ch A
meri
can
In
sura
nce
Com
pan
y
October 2011 53
Who is at Risk?
IndustriesHospitality (40%)Retailers (25%)Financial Services (22%)Government (4%)Manufacturing (2%)Technology (2%)Healthcare (1%)
Service ProvidersBusiness Process OutsourcersPayrollCall CentersData Processors
Any Organization holding:Sensitive Customer/Patient DataSensitive Employee InformationConfidential Third Party Corporate Information
Source: Verizon 2011 Data Breach Investigations Report
© Z
uri
ch A
meri
can
In
sura
nce
Com
pan
y
October 2011 54
Financial Impact – What will it cost?
Crisis Management Costs to Restore Reputation
Legal, public relations or other service feesAdvertising or related communicationsCustomer Churn/loss of customer confidenceStock devaluation
Forensics InvestigationCosts of Notification
Printing, postage or other communications to customers
Credit/Identity monitoring servicesRegulatory/PCI Fines and PenaltiesLegal Liability
Class action litigationSuits from Customers and Vendors
Risk Management improvementsCost to implement a comprehensive written information security programCost to upgrade network security
Business Interruption LossesLoss of IncomeCosts to Recreate Lost or Stolen DataExtra Expenses– Overtime pay for staff
© Z
uri
ch A
meri
can
In
sura
nce
Com
pan
y
October 2011 55
Litigation and Regulatory Enforcement Trends
Increase in regulatory actions: HIPAA/HITECH relatedOCR and CMS have aggressively enforced the Privacy and Security Rules under HIPAA
Enforcement continues at the state level (AG’s)
Class Actions continue
Emerging theories of liability (does the threat of identity theft equate to actual damages?)
© Z
uri
ch A
meri
can
In
sura
nce
Com
pan
y
October 2011 56
Data Breach Costs
Average Cost of a Breach: $7.2M
$214 per recordDirect costs: $73 Indirect Costs: $141
© Z
uri
ch A
meri
can
In
sura
nce
Com
pan
y
October 2011 57
Data Breach Statistics
Almost 800 cases studied
92% resulting external bad actors (hackers, malware)
17% implicated insiders
86% were discovered by 3rd parties, NOT by the company itself
96% of incidents were avoidable with simple controls
Main attack pathway – web applications (54%)
Hospitality was the largest sector represented by volume
Source: Verizon 2011 Data Breach Investigations Report
© Z
uri
ch A
meri
can
In
sura
nce
Com
pan
y
October 2011 58
Data Breach Statistics (cont.)
Costs Associated with Data Breach Incidents
• Third party mistakes (vendors) • Avg cost per record: $217 v $194 • Due to additional forensics and consulting fees
• Malicious or criminal attack resulting in loss or theft of Personal Information• Avg cost per record: $215 (malicious) v $166 (negligence)
• Lost/stolen laptop or other mobile data device• Generally more expensive than other incidents• Avg cost per victim: $225
• First Time Data Breaches• Avg cost for first time breach: $228 per record• Avg Cost for repeat experience: $198 per record
Source: Ponemon/PGP 2009 Annual Study: Cost of a Data Breach
© Z
uri
ch A
meri
can
In
sura
nce
Com
pan
y
October 2011 59
Data Breach Statistics (cont.)
Mitigating Factors
• CISO leadership during a data breach response reduces the overall cost per record• Avg Cost per record: $157 (CISO) v $236 (non-CISO)
• Quick Response times correlate with higher average notification costs• Avg Cost per record: $219 (quick response) v $196 slower response• Moving too quickly may cause cost inefficiencies during the
detection, escalation and notification phases
• Engagement of outside consultant decreases average costs • Avg Cost per record: $170 (3rd pty) v $231 (in-house)
Source: Ponemon/PGP 2009 Annual Study: Cost of a Data Breach
© Z
uri
ch A
meri
can
In
sura
nce
Com
pan
y
October 2011 60
Risk Management Trends
Shift in Risk Management Practices
Many organizations have shifted the focus from pre-breach risk assessment to post breach reaction procedure – “Checklist Mentality”General lack of awareness of the extremely high costs associated with a breachProtocol for auditing 3rd parties/external organizations is inadequateAwareness has not yet translated to the enterprise level
© Z
uri
ch A
meri
can
In
sura
nce
Com
pan
y
October 2011 61
Claim Examples and Costs
Broome Community College – February 2009Winter/Spring Alumni Magazine was mailed with Social Security Numbers posted on back cover;Approximately 14,000 individuals were affected;
Kaiser Permanente Bellflower Medical Center – May 2009Hospital was fined $250,000 for failing to prevent unauthorized access to patient medical records;Hospital was fined a second time in July 2009 for same violation in the amount of $187,500.
Network Solutions – July 2009573,000 records compromised when hackers broke into Network Solutions’ web servers used to provide e-commerce services to more than 4,000 small business merchants;TransUnion hired to notify merchants and customers; estimated costs are unknown;Network Solutions was PCI-Compliant at the time of the breach;
© Z
uri
ch A
meri
can
In
sura
nce
Com
pan
y
October 2011 62
Questions?
Contact information:
Catherine MulliganVice President, Specialty E&O(212)[email protected]
Tim StapletonAssistant Vice President, S&P Product Manager(212)[email protected]
CBAC Wrap up – Session 1
Mike GoldenHead of Broker Relationship ManagementZurich Global Corporate in North America
Afternoon Activities…grab a lunch and…
Golf – A Scramble start will begin at 1:00 pm. Plan to meet in the lobby of the Beach Resort at 12:15 pm for departure
Sailing – The Catamaran boat will depart from the main resort dock at 1:00 pm and return around 3:00
pm. Plan to meet in the lobby of the Beach Resort at 12:15 pm for transfer to the main resort. Casual attire is recommended.
Tapas Cooking Class – The Tapas Tour hands-on cooking will begin at 1:00 pm and concluded around 3:00 pm. Plan to meet in the lobby of the Beach Resort at 12:30 pm for transfer to the main resort. Casual attire is recommended.
© Z
uri
ch A
meri
can
In
sura
nce
Com
pan
y
October 2011 65
Evening Events…
6:15 pm – Departure for Dinner, meet in lobby6:30 pm – Cocktails, Luca Patio7:30 pm – Dinner, Lucca Garden Room7:40 pm – Awards 8:45 pm – Dessert, Scotch & Cigars, Lucca Patio
Transfer back to beach hotel (3 shuttles)9:15, 9:45 & 10:00
HAVE FUN!
Zurich in North America Corporate Broker Advisory Council
Lori Spoon RafkinBroker Relationship LeaderZurich North America
Friday, October 21Second Session
© Z
uri
ch A
meri
can
In
sura
nce
Com
pan
y
October 2011 68
CBAC Agenda
8:15 Predictive Modeling – Tom Barger
9:00 How has the profile of the buyer changed? Facilitated by Greg Maguire
9:45 CBAC Open Forum / Q&A
10:30 CBAC Closing remarks – Mike Kerner
General Session
10:45BREAK – Dunes Terrace
11:00 General Session – facilitated by Mike GoldenOpen forum / Q&A Panel
11:50 Closing – Randall Clouser
NOON Box Lunches / Departures
Predictive Modeling – How can we partner better together?
Tom BargerAVP, North America ClaimsZurich North America
© Z
uri
ch A
meri
can
In
sura
nce
Com
pan
y
October 2011 70
HISTORY OF ZURICH’S EFFORTS
STRATEGY Long Term Strategic Initiative for U/W, Distribution, and ClaimsActuarial “Center of Excellence” for PM established in 2007Initial Modeling done in UnderwritingClaims Modeling started in 2009:
– WC led
– Goal : reducing total cost of risk, both loss cost side and expense
– Several models operational: Severity, FNOL, NCM assignment
– Deployment running parallel with Workflow Management project (driving down expenses)
8/13/2010 70
© Z
uri
ch A
meri
can
In
sura
nce
Com
pan
y
October 2011 71
PREDICTIVE MODELING:IT’S ALL ABOUT THE DATA
Data Type Source Example
Claim, Claimant data Internal: Claims System
Date of Loss, inc’d $
Claim Text info Internal: Notes Comments, Case summary
Claimant Medicals Internal: Bill Review ICD-9, CPT codes, Pharmaceuticals
Policy Internal: Policy system Employer characteristics
Agent/Producer Internal: Sales system Loss experience
Credit External: 3rd Party Rating, payment history
Prior claims External: 3rd Party Claimant history
Demographic External: 3rd Party, Gov’t
Education, hobbies, income
Environmental External: Gov’t Weather, disease8/13/2010 71
© Z
uri
ch A
meri
can
In
sura
nce
Com
pan
y
October 2011 72
PREDICTIVE MODELING:SOME TECHNICAL ASPECTS
How we built the Claims Models:Uses Generalized Linear Modeling (Multivariate) techniquesExtensive data categorization and refinement
– Trending of loss data by state and type
– Groupings and classification (e.g. ICD-9 codes)
– Roughly 1 million claims in modeling population – Text mining of adjuster notes
Worked with external consultants and data vendorsIncorporates structured claim data, text, policy, and external dataTarget variables include severity, propensity, and duration Lift – what is it ?
8/13/2010 72
© Z
uri
ch A
meri
can
In
sura
nce
Com
pan
y
October 2011 73 7/12/2010 7373 4/27/200902/17/2010
Sample Lift Chart from Model
Actual and predicted are within a +-10% ratio across deciles. As predicted value increases, actual loss severity is well segmented with an overall spread over 350 points.
Lost Time Indemnity Validation Data
-200%
-100%
0%
100%
200%
300%
400%
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Actual RelativityPredicted Relativity
© Z
uri
ch A
meri
can
In
sura
nce
Com
pan
y
October 2011 74
PREDICTIVE MODELING: SOME OPERATIONAL ISSUES
So, Now you’ve got a model. What’s next ? Extensive Testing prior to deployment
– Identifying false positives, etc… for patterns (supplement with rules)
Deployed as part of new FNOL system (Fall, 2010)
– Builds on existing operating model (Rules)Scoring Engine: What’s that?Scores and reason messages available to Claims Professional
– Updated content and display currently in development
– Integrated with Workflow Management efforts How often do you run model ?
– Specific intervals ?
– Specific triggers ?
– How much does score change ?
8/13/2010 74
© Z
uri
ch A
meri
can
In
sura
nce
Com
pan
y
October 2011 75
PREDICTIVE MODELING:HELPING TO REDUCE TOTAL LOSS COSTS
Future plans for Claims Predictive Modeling Work continues on WC:
– NCM referral, Life of claim/development models
– Other applications: Suspicious claims, Recovery, Other lines of business:
– Liability , Auto, & Property
Improving Timing and Delivery of Services to Customers:3,000+ Claims Professionals Award-winning Claims Intake Center200+ Nurses, including Medical Director, U/R physicians300+ Attorneys Recovery, Subrogation, and SIU Specialists
8/13/2010 75
© Z
uri
ch A
meri
can
In
sura
nce
Com
pan
y
October 2011 76
PREDICTIVE MODELING:IMPROVING THE CUSTOMER AND BROKER EXPERIENCE
Driving Value for Customers:Improved service through more precise, timely, and better focused interventionsBetter insights about loss costs and key drivers – helping them better manage risk in their own operations
And for Brokers:Enabling strategic rather than transactional focus with customersLarge-risk customers vs. smaller
– Sophistication, RM staff, support needsEnhancing reach of your data and systems
How can or should we work with Brokers and Customers ?Their efforts ?Specific applications ? Beyond Claims ?
8/13/2010 76
Facilitated by: Greg MaguireHead of Customer, Distribution and MarketingZurich Global Corporate in North America
How has the profile of the buyer Changed?
What role can we play to advance ERM in our customer’s organizations?
© Z
uri
ch A
meri
can
In
sura
nce
Com
pan
y
78
ERM Practices in Large Companies
THE ISSUE
Corporate Boards not walking the ERM talk
Risk Managers playing minor role
THE CHALLENGE
What can we do to advance ERM as an ongoing practice/function within the Corporate segment?
What can we do to advance the position/standing of the Risk Manager within the overall ERM framework?
© Z
uri
ch A
meri
can
In
sura
nce
Com
pan
y
79
OVERVIEW: Greenwich Associates Survey Results & RecommendationsInternet survey of Risk Managers at large U.S. companies in July
2011Questions regarding ERM practices in their companies
Study HighlightsRM’s report that ERM is a widely accepted CONCEPTBut, Board of Directors have failed to provide leadership in establishing effective ERM practices70% of large companies do not have CRO’s with ERM as a primary focus
– 75% of financial companies have CRO’s
– 78% of non-financials do not
40% of large companies lack a “Corporate Risk Committee”– over 80% of companies with more than $5 billion of annual sales have a CRC
Of companies that do have a CRC, about 33% do not include their insurance RM
© Z
uri
ch A
meri
can
In
sura
nce
Com
pan
y
80
Greenwich Associates Recommendations to Corporate Boards
Boards should tap into risk management expertise from external sources such as Insurance Broker and Carriers
– Too much reliance on internal briefings and reports from the CFO regarding risk management
Boards should take full advantage of their own insurance risk professionals
– More than 50% of RM’s do not meet with the Boards to discuss risk issues
© Z
uri
ch A
meri
can
In
sura
nce
Com
pan
y
81
Summary
ERM has gained much traction as a valuable concept in large companies
ERM practices have yet to be embedded consistently across these companies
The role of the Risk Manager in ERM is at a low level
We are in a “Talk the Talk” stage
© Z
uri
ch A
meri
can
In
sura
nce
Com
pan
y
82
Questions for Discussion
ERM – GENERALShould we work to advance ERM as an embedded practice with our customers?
If so, is there value in doing this together as Broker and Insurer?
What actions could be taken?
RISK MANAGERSPerspective: Do Risk Managers want to take a more visible and active role within the ERM framework of their companies?
For those that do, what can we do to help them elevate their roles to become more valuable and strategic within their companies?
Facilitated by: Mike Golden
OPEN FORU
M
Corporate Broker Advisory Council:Closing Remarks
Mike KernerChief Executive OfficerZurich Global Corporate in North America
© Z
uri
ch A
meri
can
In
sura
nce
Com
pan
y
October 2011 85
BREAK (Dunes Terrace)