Zebra - TRIAD-ES Joint Presentation
-
Upload
zebra-environmental -
Category
Technology
-
view
173 -
download
1
Transcript of Zebra - TRIAD-ES Joint Presentation
High Resolution Site Characterization
Applying Next Generation Tools to Accelerate Site Closure
William M. DavisTriad Environmental Solutions, Inc.
Brad CarlsonZEBRA
• Overview: Need for High Resolution Site Characterization
• Tools for HR Characterization
High Resolution Hydro-geologicMapping Tools
Real-time Analytical ToolsSemi-quantitativeQuantitative
• Strategies for HR Characterization
• Case Studies
• Summary
High Resolution Site Characterization Applying Next Generation Tools
Why are there so many old NAPL sites and why are NAPL sourcesso hard to find?
• Heterogeneity of subsurface geology and hydrogeology
• The nature of NAPL transport
• Need high density data to design remedy
• Need cost effective NAPL source and plume characterization tools
6283 ft MIP/DSITMS @ 83 locations
6283 ft MIP/DSITMS @ 83 locations
High Resolution Site CharacterizationApplying Next Generation Tools
• Apply HR Characterization methods to map mass and hydrogeology
• Knowing mass and hydraulic conductivity allows assessment of flux
• Use flux-informed decision making to target moving mass Focus remedies to reduce volume of treatment and minimize risk Understand endpoints and duration before investing in remedy Reduce total life cycle costs
Return on investment from using HR Characterization– typically 5 to 10x
High Resolution Site CharacterizationApplying Next Generation Tools
SHAREPOINT WEBSITE FOR DATA SHARING
Cross-section from a 2D ECD Fence Slice. Installed MW overlay
ECD Background Slice
Sampling Event DataLithologyOverlay
ECD Graph Overlay
3D ECD Fence Model
Using 3D modeling software, we can generate true 3D Solid Models. This Plan View model was created using ECD data from a recent MIP project . Any orientation can be displayed and cross-sections or fence diagrams can be created.
HRSC Solid Model with Surface Objects
HRSC Model with SubSurface Objects
Electrical Conductivity EC
What is the Membrane Interface Probe?
The Membrane Interface Probe (MIP) is rapid, high-resolution field screening technology that provides information about relative concentrations of VOCs in the subsurface, and the Electrical Conductivity of the soil.
The MIP uses a thin film fluorocarbon polymer membrane approx. 6.35mm in diameter which stays in direct contact with the soil during MIP logging. •The thin film membrane is impregnated into a stainless steel screen which serves as a rigid support for the fluorocarbon polymer. •The down-hole, permeable membrane serves as an interface to a detector at the surface. •Volatiles in the subsurface are getting transferred across the membrane and partition into a stream of carrier gas where they are swept to the detector. The membrane is heated in order to facilitate VOC transfer and self-cleaning.
The MIP System
THE MIP PROBE
EC Dipole
Membrane
Heater Block
FID
PID
ECD
MIP Detection Limits
MIP DETECTORS
Contaminates Detection Limit Carrier Gas
PID BTEX 1 PPM Nitrogen, Helium
FID Methane, Butane NA Nitrogen, Helium
ECD Chlorinateds 250PPB Nitrogen
MIP Log
Hydraulic Profiling Tool (HPT)
• Advance probe at constant rate
• Inject water at low flow rate
• Measure formation pressure response
2 cm/sec
Hydraulic Profiling Tool (HPT)
HPT LOG
EC HPT Press Flow Corr HPTPressure
Est K Abs HydroPressure
HPT Dissipation – Static Water Level
24.4ft24.5ft
THE MiHPT PROBE
EC Dipole
MIP Membrane
Heater Block HPT Screen
The MiHPT System
CPT & CPT/MIP
CPT
CPT Log
Sleeve Friction
Tip Resistance
LithologyDescription
Friction Ratio
Pore Pressure
HPT-GWS A Combined HPT and Groundwater Sampler probe!
HPT-GWS A Combined HPT and Groundwater Sampler probe!
DAKOTA - UVOST/LIF
UVOST/LIF
Hydro-Geology– Cone Penetrometer– Direct-Push Technology– Hydraulic Profiling Tool
Analytical– In-Situ Probes
MIPUVOST
– GC/MS EPA Method 8260b– DSITMS EPA Method 8265
Examples of Real-Time Technologies for High Resolution Site Characterization
High Resolution Site Characterization Applying Next Generation Tools
Discrete sampling combined with ex-situ, on-site analysis
GW and/or soil sampling with on-siteanalysis can produce high density datasets cost effectively.
GW and soil data required to collaborateSemi-quantitative MIP results
Numerous sampling methods includingdirect push and sonic drilling
High through put, real-time analysesusing on-site EPA Methods
High Resolution Site Characterization Applying Next Generation Tools
On-site Analysis of Vapor, Soil and GW Using US EPA Method 8265
Direct sampling ion trap mass spectrometer (DSITMS)
MIP
Very Rapid Analytical Turn AroundSoil and GW in 2-3 min.Vapor in 3-5 min.QuantitativeHigh level QC
Real-time Direct Sampling Ion Trap Mass Spectrometer(DSITMS) Analysis of VOCs in Soil, GW and Vapor
• Basis for US EPA SW846 Method 8265
• Quantitative VOC analyses
LODs ug/kg, ug/L, ug/m3
• Sample turn around times of 2-3 min. (soil and GW)
• Over 80 client samples per day plus QC
• Can be used as MIP detector
Method 5035 MeOH Extract Method 8265 Analysis
High Resolution Site CharacterizationApplying Next Generation Tools
On-site Labs using EPA SW846 Methods
EPA SW 846 Method
Instrument Daily ClientSampleThroughput
Advantages Disadvantages
8021c PT/GC 20 NELAP available, can ID isomers
25 minute run times, subject to overload
8260b PT/GC/MS 20 NELAP available, can ID isomers
25 minute run times, subject to overload
8265 P/DSITMS 80 2-3 minute run times, very rapid recovery from overload
Isomers reported as pair/group
High Resolution Site CharacterizationApplying Next Generation Tools
• Multiple lines of evidence (data)GeologicHydrogeologicContaminant
• High density data setsplan view and vertical
• Adaptive, flexible, dynamic….. sampling plan with clear DQOs • On-site, real-time analysis
• On-site, real-time decisions
• Evolving conceptual site model
Strategies for Cost Effective Site Characterization
High Resolution Site CharacterizationApplying Next Generation Tools
Approach
Triad approach used with full systematic planning, active involvement ofLA DEQ during planning and execution
Real-time geologic data collected using CPT with pore pressure sensor
Real-time measurement of TCE and daughter products by combined CPT/MIP w/ FID/PID/ECD and DSITMS
Direct push soil and GW sampling with on-site soil and GW analysisby EPA Method 8265
Off-site GW analysis by EPA Method 8260 for LA DEQ decisionquality data
Daily posting of field data to password protected, project specific website
Daily updating of evolving Conceptual Site Model
Case Study
TCE Source and Plume Investigation NASA Michoud Assembly Facility
Case StudyTCE Source and Plume Investigation NASA Michoud Assembly Facility
Proposed transects for 190 Tank Farm and RWI
Case StudyTCE Source and Plume Investigation NASA Michoud Assembly Facility
Stratigraphic cross section RWI
Case Study
TCE Source and Plume Investigation NASA Michoud Assembly Facility
DNAPL with stratigraphy in the RWI Area
Case Study
TCE Source and Plume Investigation NASA Michoud Assembly Facility
Case StudyTCE Source and Plume Investigation NASA Michoud Assembly Facility
Conclusions
Project objectives were met:
DNAPL source areas were delineated in three dimensions and DNAPL mass was estimated for the three areas of interest:
Building 103: 65,700 kg TCE, 44,900 L (11,800 gal) 190 Tank Farm: 30,900 kg TCE, 21,200 L (5,600 gal) Rinse Water Imp: 41,900 kg TCE, 29,400 L (7,700 gal)
Mapped boundaries of dissolved phase TCE and daughter products exceeding LA DEQ standards were established
Triad approach managed bothsampling and analytical uncertainty
Collaborative data sets createdstrong/defensible final CSM
Data used for evaluating InterimStabilization Measures and Final Remedies
High Resolution Site CharacterizationApplying Next Generation Tools
Summary• High density data (geologic, hydro-geologic and contaminant distribution) are required to understand DNAPL sites
• Having a full tool box (hydro-geologic and analytical) allows cost effective implementation of dynamic investigations
• Experienced staff must be involved during field execution, both on-site and off-site
High Resolution Site Characterization Applying Next Generation Tools
Summary
• Many tools are available to support high density data collection
• Using available tools, complex NAPL sites can be characterized cost effectively
• The costs associated with creating high density, accurate Conceptual Site Models are repaid multiple times over during site remediation
High Resolution Site Characterization Applying Next Generation Tools
Stratigraphy Contaminant Hydrogeology
CSM viewed as an instrument
TriadInstruments,Inc.
TriadometerModel T2007OperationsManual
Model T2007Operations Man.
Table of Contents
1. DQO process2. Historical info.3. SOPs/QC4. Decision logic5. Data Manag.6. Data Commun.
TriadometerModel T2007
How do you know when enough (data) is enough?
Using the Triadapproach allows thedecision to stoptaking data to be made with confidenceBEFORE youleave the site.
High Resolution Site Characterization Applying Next Generation Tools