YOUR LOGOYOUR LOGO

March 9, 2015

Lead Partner Mid Year Update Presentation – PPSD School Board

YOUR LOGO

Our greatest appreciation, thanks, and hats off to our partners:

“Only by binding together as a single force will we remain strong and unconquerable.”

- Chris Bradford

JSEC Staff & Students MPHS Staff & Students CHS Staff & Students

YOUR LOGO

Important Considerations

In three years, despite…

We still have…

AMO Changes

Change in metrics from NECAP to

STAR

Transition from Paper Pencil to

Technology Assessments

ELA Curriculum Change to

Springboard

Competing Needs for

Technology Hardware

YOUR LOGO

Current Data-Driven Conclusions (2014-2015)

ALL ON TRACK

STAR Math Scores

Math 1st Time Credit Acquisition

Accelerated Math

Intervention

Instructional Practices

Mathematics data for STUDENTS and ADULTS is aligned across all four measures as they are

mostly “on track” by the various goals established.

MIXED RESULTS

STAR ELA Scores

ELA 1st Time Credit Acquisition

Reading Plus

Instructional Practices

English Language Arts data for STUDENTS and ADULTS is NOT entirely aligned across all four

measures as they vary based on measure examined.

YOUR LOGO

ACADEMIC UPDATES

YOUR LOGO

CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOL

Oct. 2011: Actual

BaselineOct.

2012:Actual

Oct. 2013:Actual

NECAP ELA Proficiency Overall

(11th grade; teaching year)

50.5 48.4 55.9

NECAP Writing Proficiency Overall

(11th grade; teaching year)

24 34 42

NECAP Math Proficiency Overall

(11th grade; teaching year)

3.8 1.9 5.8

MOUNT PLEASANT HIGH SCHOOL

Oct. 2011: Actual

BaselineOct.

2012:Actual

Oct. 2013:Actual

NECAP ELA Proficiency Overall

(11th grade; teaching year)

34 44.9 44.5

NECAP Writing Proficiency Overall

(11th grade; teaching year)

12 14 24

NECAP Math Proficiency Overall

(11th grade; teaching year)

5.3 10.9 7.3

JSEC HIGH SCHOOLOct. 2011:

ActualBaseline

Oct. 2012:Actual

Oct. 2013:Actual

NECAP ELA Proficiency Overall

(11th grade; teaching year)

42.4 41.7 51.2

NECAP Writing Proficiency Overall

(11th grade; teaching year)

31 34 40

NECAP Math Proficiency Overall

(11th grade; teaching year)

6.9 2.3 5.6

NECAPRECAP

YOUR LOGO

MPHS Reading Plus

The average comprehension rate for

the 9th grade is 81%

The average comprehension rate for the 10th grade is 83%

228 Active Students

62% (142 students) of student are currently meeting their weekly goals of completing two See Readers

51 students have already made at least 1 level gain (increased by one grade level) in their reading thus far this school year

35.8 is the average number of See Readers completed per student

YOUR LOGO

MPHS STAR Reading Data (Proficiency)

YOUR LOGO

MPHS STAR Reading Data

MPHS Performance Measures

2012-2013Actual

[Benchmark]

2013-2014Actual

[Benchmark]

2014-2015Actual

Change*

STAR Reading % Below Benchmark N/A

BOY: 89%MOY: 87%EOY: 87%

BOY – EOY: 2% reduction

BOY: 89%MOY: 87%

2% reduction

Ninth Grade N/A

BOY: 88%MOY: 86%EOY: 86%

BOY – EOY: 2% reduction

BOY: 88%MOY: 87%

1% reduction

Tenth Grade N/A

BOY: 90%MOY: 85%EOY: 85%

BOY – EOY: 5% reduction

BOY: 91%MOY: 88%

3% reduction

Eleventh Grade N/A

BOY: 92%MOY: 90%EOY: 90%

BOY – EOY: 2% reduction

BOY: 88%MOY: 83%

5% reduction

Twelfth Grade N/A

BOY: 87%MOY: 86%EOY: 88%

BOY – EOY: 1% increase

BOY: 90%MOY: 88%

1% reduction

*Target growth rate for STAR is a minimum of a 7% reduction in students that score “Below Benchmark” between BOY and EOY.

YOUR LOGO

JSEC Reading Plus

The average comprehension rate for

the 9th grade is 73%

The average comprehension rate for the 10th grade is 80%

222 Active Students

37% (89 students) of student are currently meeting their weekly goals of completing two See Readers

51 students have already made at least 1 level gain (increased by one grade level) in their reading

16.6 is the average number of See Readers completed per student

YOUR LOGO

JSEC STAR Reading Data

YOUR LOGO

JSEC STAR Reading Data

JSEC Performance Measures

2012-2013Actual

[Benchmark]

2013-2014Actual

[Benchmark]

2014-2015Actual

[Target]

STAR Math % Below Benchmark5 N/A

BOY: 89%MOY: 89%EOY: 87%

BOY – EOY: 2% reduction

BOY: 89%MOY: 89%No Change

Ninth Grade N/A

BOY: 87%MOY: 90%EOY: 85%

BOY – EOY: 2% reduction

BOY: 91%MOY: 93%

2% increase

Tenth Grade N/A

BOY: 88%MOY: 88%EOY: 81%

BOY – EOY: 7% reduction

BOY: 89%MOY: 88%

1% reduction

Eleventh Grade N/A

BOY: 86%MOY: 89%EOY: 87%

BOY – EOY: 1% increase

BOY: 86%MOY: 86%

No Change

Twelfth Grade N/A

BOY: 93%MOY: 87%EOY: 94%

BOY – EOY: 1% increase

BOY: 91%MOY: 90%

1% reduction

*Target growth rate for STAR is a minimum of a 7% reduction in students that score “Below Benchmark” between BOY and EOY.

YOUR LOGO

Central Reading Plus Data

The average comprehension rate

for the 9th grade is 77%

The average comprehension rate for the 10th grade is 83%

394 Active Students

37% (166 students) of student are currently meeting their weekly goals of completing two See Readers

230 students have already made at least 1 level gain (increased by one grade level) in their reading

38 is the average number of See Readers completed per student

YOUR LOGO

Central STAR Reading Data

YOUR LOGO

CHS STAR Reading Data

CHS Performance Measures

2012-2013Actual

[Benchmark]

2013-2014Actual

[Benchmark]

2014-2015Actual

[Target]

STAR Math % Below Benchmark5 N/A

BOY: 87%MOY: 87%EOY: 87%

BOY – EOY: No Change

BOY: 91%MOY: 87%

4% reduction

Ninth Grade N/A

BOY: 87%MOY: 88%EOY: 88%

BOY – EOY: 1% increase

BOY: 93%MOY: 89%

4% reduction

Tenth Grade N/A

BOY: 90%MOY: 90%EOY: 86%

BOY – EOY: 4% reduction

BOY: 90%MOY: 86%

4% reduction

Eleventh Grade N/A

BOY: 88%MOY: 84%EOY: 88%

BOY – EOY: No Change

BOY: 90%MOY: 88%

2% reduction

Twelfth Grade N/A

BOY: 83%MOY: 83%EOY: 84%

BOY – EOY: 1% increase

BOY: 91%MOY: 87%

4% reduction

*Target growth rate for STAR is a minimum of a 7% reduction in students that score “Below Benchmark” between BOY and EOY.

YOUR LOGO

MPHS Accelerated Math Intervention

October November December January February0

2

4

6

8

10

12

5

6

8

9

10

Average Number of Objectives Mastered

Month

Nu

mb

er o

f O

bje

ctiv

e

YOUR LOGO

MPHS STAR Math Data

YOUR LOGO

MPHS STAR Math Data

MPHS Performance Measures

2012-2013Actual

[Benchmark]

2013-2014Actual

[Benchmark]

2014-2015Actual

[Target]

STAR Math % Below Benchmark5

BOY: N/AMOY: 70%EOY: 66%

BOY: 70%MOY: 62%EOY: 55%

BOY – EOY: 5% reduction

BOY: 66%MOY: 62%

4% reduction

Ninth Grade BOY: N/AMOY: 69%EOY: 68%

BOY: 80%MOY: 72%EOY: 63%

BOY – EOY: 7% reduction

BOY: 74%MOY: 66%

8% reduction

Tenth Grade BOY: N/AMOY: 70%EOY: 66%

BOY: 64%MOY: 59%EOY: 45%

BOY – EOY: 19% reduction

BOY: 76%MOY: 76%No Change

Eleventh Grade BOY: N/AMOY: 72%EOY: 64%

BOY: 68%MOY: 59%EOY: 52%

BOY – EOY: 16% reduction

BOY: 60%MOY: 59%

1% reduction

Twelfth Grade N/A

BOY: 65%MOY: 55%EOY: 60%

BOY – EOY: 5% reduction

BOY: 61%MOY: 57%

4% reduction

*Target growth rate for STAR is a minimum of a 7% reduction in students that score “Below Benchmark” between BOY and EOY.

YOUR LOGO

JSEC Accelerated Math Intervention

October November December January February0

2

4

6

8

10

12

5

6

8

9

10

Average Number of Objectives Mastered258 Students

Month

Nu

mb

er o

f O

bje

ctiv

e

YOUR LOGO

JSEC STAR Math Data

YOUR LOGO

JSEC STAR Math Data

JSEC Performance Measures

2012-2013Actual

[Benchmark]

2013-2014Actual

[Benchmark]

2014-2015Actual

[Target]

STAR Math % Below Benchmark5

BOY: N/AMOY: 67%EOY: 61%

BOY: 66%MOY: 63%EOY: 58%

BOY – EOY: 8% reduction

BOY: 68%MOY: 60%

8% reduction

Ninth Grade BOY: N/AMOY: 71%EOY: 66%

BOY: 79%MOY: 78%EOY: 79%

BOY – EOY: No Change

BOY: 71%MOY: 61%

10% reduction

Tenth Grade BOY: N/AMOY: 63%EOY: 54%

BOY: 64%MOY: 61%EOY: 59%

BOY – EOY: 5% reduction

BOY: 75%MOY: 63%

12% reduction

Eleventh Grade BOY: N/AMOY: 65%EOY: 61%

BOY: 59%MOY: 51%EOY: 45%

BOY – EOY: 14% reduction

BOY: 59%MOY: 60%

1% increase

Twelfth Grade N/A

BOY: 62%MOY: 63%EOY: 52%

BOY – EOY: 10% reduction

BOY: 64%MOY: 53%

11% reduction

*Target growth rate for STAR is a minimum of a 7% reduction in students that score “Below Benchmark” between BOY and EOY.

YOUR LOGO

Central Accelerated Math Intervention

September October November December January February0

2

4

6

8

10

12

1

3

7

9

10 10

Average Number of Objectives Mastered1064

Month

Nu

mb

er o

f O

bje

ctiv

es

YOUR LOGO

Central STAR Math Data

YOUR LOGO

CHS STAR Math Data

CHS Performance Measures

2012-2013Actual

[Benchmark]

2013-2014Actual

[Benchmark]

2014-2015Actual

[Target]

STAR Math % Below Benchmark5

BOY: N/AMOY: 67%EOY: 61%

BOY: 64%MOY: 61%EOY: 62%

BOY – EOY: 2% reduction

BOY: 65%MOY: 48%

17% reduction

Ninth Grade BOY: N/AMOY: 70%EOY: 62%

BOY: 73%MOY: 66%EOY: 66%

BOY – EOY: 7% reduction

BOY: 67%MOY: 50%

13% reduction

Tenth Grade BOY: N/AMOY: 60%EOY: 55%

BOY: 58%MOY: 60%EOY: 61%

BOY – EOY: 3% increase

BOY: 65%MOY: 48%

12% reduction

Eleventh Grade BOY: N/AMOY: 70%EOY: 67%

BOY: 56%MOY: 56%EOY: 53%

BOY – EOY: 3% reduction

BOY: 60%MOY: 44%

16% reduction

Twelfth Grade N/A

BOY: 68%MOY: 61%EOY: 64%

BOY – EOY: 4% reduction

BOY: 71%MOY: 50%

21% reduction

*Target growth rate for STAR is a minimum of a 7% reduction in students that score “Below Benchmark” between BOY and EOY.

YOUR LOGO

LEADING STUDENT INDICATORS

YOUR LOGO

MPHS Student Leading Indicators

Leading Indicators Baseline Data Performance Benchmarks

Performance Measures 2011-2012

2012-2013Actual

[Benchmark]

2013-2014Actual

[Benchmark]

2014-2015Current[Target]

Student Attendance Data* 82.9% 87.4%

[84%]88.3%[85%]

85.5%[86%]

Chronic-Excessive

Absence Rate**57.1% 49.0%

[55.1%]42.0%

[53.1%]42.4%

[51.1%]

Out-of-School Suspensions** 188 164 129 102

[94]

*Student Attendance is for ALL students thus includes those students that enroll AFTER the contractually inclusive (Lead Partner Metrics) date of 9/19/2014.** Chronic Absences and Out-of-School Suspensions include ONLY those students that fall within the contractual inclusion date of enrollment by 9/19/2014.

YOUR LOGO

MPHS 1st Time Credit Acquisition

JSEC Leading Indicators Baseline Data Performance Benchmarks

First Time Credit

Acquisition Rate

2011-20122012-2013

Actual[Benchmark]

2013-2014Actual

[Benchmark]

2014-2015Projected*

Algebra I 52% (62/119) 68% (110/161)77% (170/222)

71.9%

Geometry 78% (122/156) 86% (179/209)84% (84/100) 75.4%

Intro to Literature 80% (117/146) 87% (223/257)

90%(129/144) 86.0%

World Literature 81% (224/277) 86% (124/145)89% (196/220) 77.6%

*2014-2015 rate shown is the percentage of those students projected to attain first time credit. The goal for 2014-2015 is 80%.

Unit Recovery has commenced to accelerate first time credit acquisition.

YOUR LOGO

JSEC Student Leading Indicators

Leading Indicators Baseline Data Performance Benchmarks

Performance Measures 2011-2012

2012-2013Actual

[Benchmark]

2013-2014Actual

[Benchmark]

2014-2015Actual

[Target]

Student Attendance Data1 82.8% 83.8%

[84%]82.7%[85%]

83.2%[86%]

Chronic-Excessive

Absence Rate256.8% 59.7%

[53.8%]59.7%

[50.8%]50.5%

[47.8%]

Out-of-School Suspensions3 389 235 330 125

[194]

*Student Attendance is for ALL students thus includes those students that enroll AFTER the contractually inclusive (Lead Partner Metrics) date of 9/19/2014.** Chronic Absences and Out-of-School Suspensions include ONLY those students that fall within the contractual inclusion date of enrollment by 9/19/2014.

YOUR LOGO

JSEC 1st Time Credit Acquisition

JSEC Leading Indicators Baseline Data Performance Benchmarks

First Time Credit

Acquisition Rate

2011-20122012-2013

Actual[Benchmark]

2013-2014Actual

[Benchmark]

2014-2015Projected*

Algebra I 61% (71/116) 53% (105/199)75% (81/108)

75%

Geometry 76% (96/127) 74% (139/189)79% (88/111)

73%

Intro to Literature 79% (131/166) 72% (136/190)

77% (75/97)77%

World Literature 80% (176/220) 80% (111/138)83% (114/137)

92%

*2014-2015 rate shown is the percentage of those students projected to attain first time credit. The goal for 2014-2015 is 80%.

Unit Recovery has commenced to accelerate first time credit acquisition.

YOUR LOGO

CHS Student Leading Indicators

Leading Indicators Baseline Data Performance Benchmarks

Performance Measures 2011-2012

2012-2013Actual

[Benchmark]

2013-2014Actual

[Benchmark]

2014-2015Current[Target]

Student Attendance Data* 82.9% 87.4%

[84%]88.3%[85%]

85.5%[86%]

Chronic-Excessive

Absence Rate**57.1% 49.0%

[55.1%]42.0%

[53.1%]42.4%

[51.1%]

Out-of-School Suspensions** 188 164 129 102

[94]

*Student Attendance is for ALL students thus includes those students that enroll AFTER the contractually inclusive (Lead Partner Metrics) date of 9/19/2014.** Chronic Absences and Out-of-School Suspensions include ONLY those students that fall within the contractual inclusion date of enrollment by 9/19/2014.

YOUR LOGO

ADULT BEHAVIOR INDICATORS

YOUR LOGO

MPHS ELA Instructional Practice Implementation

78%

17%5%

Final Walkthroughs

Two or More

One

None

28%

28%

44%

Baseline Walkthroughs

Two or More

One

None

Anchor Standard #2 (Module #1)18 Teachers

Teacher Proficient in Two or More Look Fors

Teacher Proficient in One Look For

Teacher Proficient in None of the Look Fors

YOUR LOGO

MPHS ELA Instructional Practice Implementation

Anchor Standard #5 (Module #2)18 Teachers

33%

40%

27%

Baseline Walkthroughs

Two or More

One

None

83%

17%

Final Walkthroughs

Two or More

None

Teacher Proficient in Two or More Look Fors

Teacher Proficient in One Look For

Teacher Proficient in None of the Look Fors

YOUR LOGO

MPHS Math Instructional Practice Implementation

Math Practice #3 (Module #1)15 Teachers

54%

15%

31%

Baseline Walkthroughs

Two or More

One

None

73%

7%

20%

Final Walkthroughs

Two or More

One

None

Teacher Proficient in Two or More Look Fors

Teacher Proficient in One Look For

Teacher Proficient in None of the Look Fors

YOUR LOGO

MPHS Math Instructional Practice Implementation

Math Practice #2 (Module #2)13 Teachers

73%

7%

20%

Final Walkthroughs

Two or More

One

None

46%

27%

27%

Baseline Walkthroughs

Two or More

One

None

Teacher Proficient in Two or More Look Fors

Teacher Proficient in One Look For

Teacher Proficient in None of the Look Fors

YOUR LOGO

JSEC ELA Instructional Practice Implementation

Anchor Standard #2 (Module #1)12 Teachers

11%11%

78%

Baseline Walkthroughs

Two or More

One

None

64%

18%

18%

Final Walkthroughs

Two or More

One

None

Teacher Proficient in Two or More Look Fors

Teacher Proficient in One Look For

Teacher Proficient in None of the Look Fors

YOUR LOGO

JSEC ELA Instructional Practice Implementation

Anchor Standard #5 (Module #2)12 Teachers

17%

17%

66%

Baseline Walkthroughs

Two or More

One

None

73%

9%

18%

Final Walkthroughs

Two or More

One

None

Teacher Proficient in Two or More Look Fors

Teacher Proficient in One Look For

Teacher Proficient in None of the Look Fors

YOUR LOGO

JSEC Math Instructional Practice Implementation

Math Practice #3 (Module #1)10 Teachers

10%

40%

50%

Baseline Walkthroughs

Two or More

One

None

70%

10%

20%

Final Walkthroughs

Two or More

One

None

Teacher Proficient in Two or More Look Fors

Teacher Proficient in One Look For

Teacher Proficient in None of the Look Fors

YOUR LOGO

JSEC Math Instructional Practice Implementation

Math Practice #2 (Module #2)9 Teachers

12%

38%

50%

Baseline Walkthroughs

Two or More

One

None

74%

15%

11%

Final Walkthroughs

Two or More

One

None

Teacher Proficient in Two or More Look Fors

Teacher Proficient in One Look For

Teacher Proficient in None of the Look Fors

YOUR LOGO

Central ELA Instructional Practice Implementation

Anchor Standard #2 (Module #1)19 Teachers

17%

23%60%

Baseline Walkthroughs

Two or More

One

None

70%

23%

7%

Final Walkthroughs

Two or More

One

None

Teacher Proficient in Two or More Look Fors

Teacher Proficient in One Look For

Teacher Proficient in None of the Look Fors

YOUR LOGO

Central ELA Instructional Practice Implementation

Anchor Standard #5 (Module #2)19 Teachers

25%

25%

50%

Baseline Walkthroughs

Two or More

One

None

Teacher Proficient in Two or More Look Fors

Teacher Proficient in One Look For

Teacher Proficient in None of the Look Fors

YOUR LOGO

Central Math Instructional Practice Implementation

Math Practice #3 (Module #1)18 Teachers

13%

6%

81%

Baseline Walkthroughs

Two or More

One

None50%

22%

28%

Final Walkthroughs

Two or More

One

None

Teacher Proficient in Two or More Look Fors

Teacher Proficient in One Look For

Teacher Proficient in None of the Look Fors

YOUR LOGO

Central Math Instructional Practice Implementation

Math Practice #2 (Module #2)18 Teachers

22%

5%

73%

Baseline Walkthroughs

Two or More

One

None

Teacher Proficient in Two or More Look Fors

Teacher Proficient in One Look For

Teacher Proficient in None of the Look Fors

YOUR LOGO

Sustainability Planning

YOUR LOGO

Scope of Work Transfer Process

Modeling

CO-OWNERSHIP

Transfer

Key Objective: Sustainability

Common Core Aligned

Professional Development

Common Formative and

Summative Assessments

Digital Intervention

Implementation

Literacy Across the Curriculum (Tri-School Initiative)

Teacher Leader

Development

Administrator Development

YOUR LOGO

Sustainability Timeline: A Modular Approach

Module 1 Director Models Scope Implementation September 24th

Module 2 Director and Teacher Leader Co-Lead/Develop November 19th

Module 3 Teacher Leader leads, Director Supports and Collaborates February 4th

Module 4 Teacher Leaders leads, Director Provides Feedback April 8th

Transformational Scope of Work Transfer Process:

YOUR LOGO

A Closer Look: Professional Development

M1 •Director develops the presentation with Teacher Leader feedback.•Director presents majority, Teacher Leader presents minority.

M2 •Director and Teacher Leader co-develop the outline and presentation.•Teacher Leader presents majority, Director presents the minority.

M3 •Teacher Leader develops the outline with Director feedback.•Teacher Leader leads the presentation of the Anchor Standard/ SMP.

M4 •Teacher Leader implements the entire standard independently, from outline to CPT presentation.

The key goal with this effort is to develop capacity for Professional Development Implementation.

YOUR LOGO

Sustainability Phase Out Customization:Because One Size DOES NOT Fit ALL

YOUR LOGO

Sustainability Phase Out Customization:Because One Size DOES NOT Fit ALL

Each Teacher Leader and Tri-School Math and ELA Department has a different trajectory

Therefore – each department and Teacher Leader has a differentiated support plan

YOUR LOGO

Teacher Leader Scope Transfer Update

Inte

rven

tions

Comm

on A

sses

smen

ts

STAR Tes

ting

Inst

ruct

ional

Round

s

RIDE D

ocum

enta

tion

Liter

acy

Acros

s th

e Cur

riculu

m

Profe

ssion

al Dev

elopm

ent

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

0

3

0

3

0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0

2

0 0

1 1

0 0

2

1

5

0

4

7

6

5 5

4

5

4

2

3

9 Teacher Leaders 3 ELA TLs 3 ELL TLs 3 Math TLs

YOUR LOGO

OTI Report: Lead Partner Strengths

JSEC +

ELP showed great responsiveness to school

requests

Teachers appreciated structured approach for developing Common

Assessments

YOUR LOGO

OTI Report: Lead Partner Opportunities

JSEC Δ

Request for more coaching in classrooms

Request for more planning time for CCSS implementation

YOUR LOGO

Customized Phase Out Approach (2015)

School Needs OTI Findings Custom ELP Phase

Out Plan

JSEC

ELP Phase Out: June 18th

Modules Three & Four Co-Led by ELP &

School

MPHS

ELP Phase Out: June 18th

Modules Three & Four Co-Led by ELP &

School

CHS

ELP Phase Out: January 30th

Modules Three & Four to be Led by School

YOUR LOGO

Request for

more

Coaching

ENHANCED Coaching Support

YOUR LOGO

Enhanced Coaching Program PURPOSE

Reinforce content area standards already trained last year and this year (i.e. content area maintenance)

Train and support teachers in their first year with the Tri-Schools

Bolster support with relevant ELL and SPED strategies

Enhance the sustainability of training already implemented

YOUR LOGO

Standards to be Maintenance Coached

Mathematics SMP #1 SMP #4 SMP #6

ELA/ELL Anchor Standard 1 Anchor Standard 2

Teachers will be coached one standard at a time to maximize focus and attention.

Coaching progress will be tracked and monitored via Look Fors.

YOUR LOGO

NEXT STEPS

PARCC testing will consume

technology, time, and manpower.

Lead Partner will support with

scheduling and other logistics.

Through SUSTAINABILITY, Teacher Leaders

now drive transformation.

YOUR LOGO

Text