York Mills Collegiate InstituteHSP3M1

Tuesday June 2nd, 2009

The nature nurture debate has been going on for years

Many researchers and scientists argue about what affects intelligence more

After this presentation maybe you will have some knowledge and a better opinion about this topic

Madelaine Banks

This article is about a study conducted In 1973 at the Institute of Personality and Social Research in Berkeley, California among 400,000 people. showing that after the first-born, intelligence among children decreases

On average study found that first-borns have a higher IQ by 2 points.

People argue that this is true because first-born children are given more parental attention, fostering intelligence and they also tutor their younger siblings.

Crenson, M. (2005, February 28). Scholars Claim Brain Explains Gender Divide. Associated Press Times Union, Albany. Retrieved March 31st, 2009, from http://www.elibrary.com

Madelaine Banks

This would be a good addition to the textbook because it discusses the environmental side of intelligence.

It shows interesting and factual information about birth order, which is an important topic.

This article also gives points as to why a first-born child may be smarter than his younger siblings

This article is reliable because it was published in the Chicago Tribune by a regular author.

Mitchum, R. (2007, June 22). Study Finds First Born Smartest, Research Supports Nurture over Nature. Chicago Tribune. Retrieved April 2, 2009, from http://www.elibrary.com

Madelaine Banks

Harvard President Lawrence Summers suggests differences in intelligence between genders

Differences caused by different hormones/levels between genders

Males have greater range of IQ while women tend to stay average

Written by M. Crenson in February 2005Crenson, M. (2005, February 28). Scholars Claim Brain Explains Gender Divide. Associated Press Times Union, Albany. Retrieved March 31st, 2009, from http://www.elibrary.com

Mathew Sherman

Gender divide when it comes to human brain functions

Evidence that nature plays a role in defining intelligence

Help students better understand a natural factor given to specific sets of humans

Valuable and interesting for students to learn

Crenson, M. (2005, February 28). Scholars Claim Brain Explains Gender Divide. Associated Press Times Union, Albany. Retrieved March 31st, 2009, from http://www.elibrary.com

Mathew Sherman

Method: This experiment was about a girl, Susie, who’s mother had an IQ of 40 which is considered retardation. She was given the best method’s of fostering intelligence her entire life instead of going to regular school.

Hypothesis: The experimenter thought that these methods would increase her intelligence so she could be smarter than her mother.

Conclusion: It was concluded that the methods did help Susie and she ended up with an IQ that was 80 points higher than her mothers.

Madelaine Banks

This article would be a good addition to the textbook because it discusses the nurture side of intelligence.

This relates to the subject of nature not being restrictive in intelligence.

This article also comes from the reliable resource Science containing peer-reviewed journals such as this.

Even though the experiment was not conducted by the writer, she reports on the article with a lot of knowledge and accuracy.

Wickelgren, Ingrid. (1999, March). Nurture Helps Mold Able Minds (Environmental influences on intelligence levels). Science. 283.5409  p1832(1). Retrieved April. 20, 2009, from Gale AcademicOne Database. <http://www.gale.cengage.com>

Madelaine Banks

Objective: Look into the beliefs of two groups on subjects of genetics Social parents of an adoptive child and people with an absent

genetic parent subjected to compare to average peopleMethod:

Personal interviews in which subjects answered how severely they felt heredity impacted 16 human characteristics on a scale up to five Conclusions:

Average persons score near the middle; people from the two subject groups scored higher on average

Meerum Terwogt, Mark; Hoeksma, Jan; Koops, Willem (1993, Nov.). Common beliefs about the heredity of human characteristics. British Journal of Psychology. Retrieved Apr. 20th, 2009, from Knowledge Ontario Databases.

Mathew Sherman

Compares two different groups’ results to average people’s results

Results show that the groups’ average scores were higher, probably due to their APS related differing from the norm

Great example of different people’s perspectives on how much nature determines intelligence

Meerum Terwogt, Mark; Hoeksma, Jan; Koops, Willem (1993, Nov.). Common beliefs about the heredity of human characteristics. British Journal of Psychology. Retrieved Apr. 20th, 2009, from Knowledge Ontario Databases.

Mathew Sherman

It was hypothesized that we will discover that people think nurture and environmental factors are greater in determining intelligence than nature and genetic factors.

We conducted a survey to discover people in our school’s beliefs about how genetic and environmental factors will affect a person’s intelligence

We gave out thirty surveys consisting of 10 questions each.

Each survey was comprised of yes/no, multiple choice, and open-ended questions.

We recorded our results of the most important questions using graphs.

Mat Sherman

Question 4: Which of these factors affect intelligence the most?

These results showed that most people thought education and socialization were the greatest intelligence determining factors. This shows that nurture is being supported.

Madelaine Banks

Question 6: Who’s intelligence will be greater; a person from an abusive home with intelligent parents, or a person from a loving home with parents of average intelligence?

These results show that most people think that the environment determined intelligence more than the parent’s intelligence. These results favour nurture.

Mat Sherman

It was concluded that most people thought that nurture was a greater intelligence determining factor than nature

We categorized our answers into nature and nurture and came up with a summary graph of all of our answers.

Results showed that 61% of all answers favoured nurture while the other 39% favoured nature.

Madelaine Banks