Yolo Bypass Salmonid Habitat Restoration & Fish Passage · Need: address decreased habitat quality...
Transcript of Yolo Bypass Salmonid Habitat Restoration & Fish Passage · Need: address decreased habitat quality...
![Page 1: Yolo Bypass Salmonid Habitat Restoration & Fish Passage · Need: address decreased habitat quality in the Sacramento River and an inadequate ability for fish to access higher quality](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071004/5fc16bfbe98a170d943afb24/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
1
Yolo Bypass Salmonid Habitat Restoration & Fish PassageEnvironmental Impact Statement Environmental Impact Report
January 17 and 18, 2018
State of California Department of Water Resources
![Page 2: Yolo Bypass Salmonid Habitat Restoration & Fish Passage · Need: address decreased habitat quality in the Sacramento River and an inadequate ability for fish to access higher quality](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071004/5fc16bfbe98a170d943afb24/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Meeting Agenda
• Open House (25 minutes)
• Overview Presentation (20 minutes)
• Clarifying Questions (15 minutes)
• Public Comment Period (60 minutes)
2
![Page 3: Yolo Bypass Salmonid Habitat Restoration & Fish Passage · Need: address decreased habitat quality in the Sacramento River and an inadequate ability for fish to access higher quality](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071004/5fc16bfbe98a170d943afb24/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Ground Rules
• Introduce yourself and your organization • Please speak one at a time, when called on by the facilitator • Be concise, respect the time limits, and finish when prompted by the facilitator • Don’t interrupt presenters or other public speakers • Take side conversations into another room • Focus on the issues not the people • Be respectful of all involved
3
![Page 4: Yolo Bypass Salmonid Habitat Restoration & Fish Passage · Need: address decreased habitat quality in the Sacramento River and an inadequate ability for fish to access higher quality](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071004/5fc16bfbe98a170d943afb24/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Meeting Purpose
• Provide information about the Yolo Bypass Salmonid Habitat Restoration and Fish Passage Project’s Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Report (EIS/EIR)
• Solicit feedback and comments on the Draft EIS/EIR
4
![Page 5: Yolo Bypass Salmonid Habitat Restoration & Fish Passage · Need: address decreased habitat quality in the Sacramento River and an inadequate ability for fish to access higher quality](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071004/5fc16bfbe98a170d943afb24/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Environmental Compliance
• The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) help identify and disclose environmental impacts of a proposed action/project
• Compliance required for an action that requires federal or state funding, permits, policy decisions, or actions
• Compliance for this project is in the form of an EIS/EIR • Lead agencies
– NEPA – Bureau of Reclamation (Reclamation) – CEQA – California Department of Water Resources (DWR)
5
![Page 6: Yolo Bypass Salmonid Habitat Restoration & Fish Passage · Need: address decreased habitat quality in the Sacramento River and an inadequate ability for fish to access higher quality](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071004/5fc16bfbe98a170d943afb24/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Background 2009 National Marine Fisheries Service Biological Opinion on State Water Project and Central Valley Project Operations
• Concluded project operations were likely to jeopardize continued existence of endangered and threatened fish species
• Required 73 actions to allow the CVP and SWP to continue operating and avoid jeopardy to the species
• Five actions are specific to the Yolo Bypass • This EIS/EIR focuses on two of the Yolo Bypass actions:
– Action I.6.1 – Restore floodplain rearing habitat in the lower Sacramento River Basin – Action I.7 – Reduce migratory delays and loss of salmon, steelhead, and sturgeon at Fremont Weir
and other structures in the Yolo Bypass
6
![Page 7: Yolo Bypass Salmonid Habitat Restoration & Fish Passage · Need: address decreased habitat quality in the Sacramento River and an inadequate ability for fish to access higher quality](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071004/5fc16bfbe98a170d943afb24/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Purpose and Need
• Need: address decreased habitat quality in the Sacramento River and an inadequate ability for fish to access higher quality habitat, which has led to a decline in abundance, spatial distribution, and life history diversity for native ESA-listed and CESA-listed fish species
• Purpose: enhance floodplain rearing habitat and fish passage in the Yolo Bypass and/or other suitable areas of the lower Sacramento River by implementing the NMFS Biological Opinion RPA actions I.6.1 and I.7 to benefit: – Sacramento River winter-run Chinook salmon – Central Valley spring-run Chinook salmon – Central Valley steelhead – Southern distinct population segment of North American green sturgeon
7
![Page 8: Yolo Bypass Salmonid Habitat Restoration & Fish Passage · Need: address decreased habitat quality in the Sacramento River and an inadequate ability for fish to access higher quality](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071004/5fc16bfbe98a170d943afb24/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
8
Related DWR and Reclamation Projects in the Yolo Bypass
• These accelerated projects contribute to meeting fish passage objectives of the RPA – Wallace Weir Fish Rescue Facility – Fremont Weir Adult Fish Passage Modification Project – Agricultural Road Crossing #4 Fish Passage Improvement
Project – Lisbon Weir Fish Passage Modification Project – Putah Creek Realignment
• Lower Elkhorn Basin Levee Setback Project
![Page 9: Yolo Bypass Salmonid Habitat Restoration & Fish Passage · Need: address decreased habitat quality in the Sacramento River and an inadequate ability for fish to access higher quality](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071004/5fc16bfbe98a170d943afb24/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Project Overview
• Fish passage for salmon, steelhead, and sturgeon • Seasonal floodplain habitat for juvenile salmon and steelhead
– Working with natural hydrograph (rain events) – Typically extending natural flood events by 1-2 weeks – Not inundating entire Bypass for the entire winter
• Inundation would be from November 1 – March 15 for most alternatives (except for Alternative 4, which could also end inundation on March 7)
• Alternatives based on substantial input from stakeholders • Works with existing land uses and willing landowners in Bypass • Draft EIS/EIR identifies Alternative 1 as the preferred alternative for CEQA
purposes only, but this does not foreclose any alternatives for implementation
9
![Page 10: Yolo Bypass Salmonid Habitat Restoration & Fish Passage · Need: address decreased habitat quality in the Sacramento River and an inadequate ability for fish to access higher quality](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071004/5fc16bfbe98a170d943afb24/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
10
EIS/EIR Alternatives
![Page 11: Yolo Bypass Salmonid Habitat Restoration & Fish Passage · Need: address decreased habitat quality in the Sacramento River and an inadequate ability for fish to access higher quality](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071004/5fc16bfbe98a170d943afb24/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
11
Alternative 4: Managed Flows
• Alternative 4 includes two water control structures to maintain water on the floodplain
![Page 12: Yolo Bypass Salmonid Habitat Restoration & Fish Passage · Need: address decreased habitat quality in the Sacramento River and an inadequate ability for fish to access higher quality](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071004/5fc16bfbe98a170d943afb24/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
12
Hydraulic Modeling Inundation Characteristics in April 2011
Inundation Extent per Aerial Imagery
from 2011
Fremont Weir
Sacramento Weir
Knights Landing
Ridge Cut
Cache Creek Settling
Basin
Willow Slough
I-5
I-80
Inundation Extent per Aerial Imagery
from 2011
Sacramento Weir
Willow Slough
I-80
Putah Creek
![Page 13: Yolo Bypass Salmonid Habitat Restoration & Fish Passage · Need: address decreased habitat quality in the Sacramento River and an inadequate ability for fish to access higher quality](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071004/5fc16bfbe98a170d943afb24/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Environmental Impact Analysis
• Analyzing direct, indirect, and cumulative impacts from construction and operations
• Construction-related impacts (such as air quality, noise, traffic, biological resources) are greater for alternatives with more ground disturbance
• Operations-related impacts (such as agricultural land use, socioeconomics, hunting/recreation, and biological resources) are affected by period of inundation, amount of flow entering the Bypass, and area of inundation
• Next few slides cover resources of high interest to the public, but the Draft EIS/EIR covers all resources
13
![Page 14: Yolo Bypass Salmonid Habitat Restoration & Fish Passage · Need: address decreased habitat quality in the Sacramento River and an inadequate ability for fish to access higher quality](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071004/5fc16bfbe98a170d943afb24/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Aquatic Resources • Assessment methods
– Consider how fish would benefit or be affected by each alternative’s construction and operations – Analyze potential benefits through models that investigate depth, duration, and frequency of
inundation, and how fish would enter and use the Yolo Bypass
• Impact findings – All alternatives would have construction-related adverse impacts to fish – All alternatives would improve fish passage at times, but could strand fish at other times
• Fish stranding could be significant under Alternative 4 because of the water control structures – All alternatives would improve rearing opportunities and conditions for fish
• Mitigation measures – Implement construction-related Best Management Practices – Rescue fish stranded during construction – Restore habitat degraded during construction – Monitor fish passage at water control structures and change operations to address problems
14
![Page 15: Yolo Bypass Salmonid Habitat Restoration & Fish Passage · Need: address decreased habitat quality in the Sacramento River and an inadequate ability for fish to access higher quality](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071004/5fc16bfbe98a170d943afb24/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Vegetation, Wetlands, and Wildlife
• Assessment methods – Consider species and habitats that may be affected by construction and operations of new facilities,
based on surveys and mapping analyses
• Impact findings – Construction and operations for all alternatives would result in significant impacts to special-status
species, but mitigation measures would reduce those impacts to less than significant levels
• Mitigation measures – Pre-construction surveys, avoidance, training, best management practices, and (if needed)
compensatory mitigation
15
![Page 16: Yolo Bypass Salmonid Habitat Restoration & Fish Passage · Need: address decreased habitat quality in the Sacramento River and an inadequate ability for fish to access higher quality](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071004/5fc16bfbe98a170d943afb24/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Recreation
• Assessment methods – Consider how changes in inundation timing and locations could affect waterfowl food availability and
hunting opportunities
• Impact findings – Waterfowl food availability: the alternatives would affect food availability, but only during times when
supply is greater than demand (indicating negligible impact to food availability relative to waterfowl demand for food)
– Hunting: the alternatives would reduce hunting opportunities by about 1-2 weeks because water depth would be greater than 18 inches on managed wetland areas
16
![Page 17: Yolo Bypass Salmonid Habitat Restoration & Fish Passage · Need: address decreased habitat quality in the Sacramento River and an inadequate ability for fish to access higher quality](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071004/5fc16bfbe98a170d943afb24/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Agricultural Economics
• Assessment methods – Bypass Production Model estimates economic effects to agricultural users in the Yolo Bypass
• Planting could begin after inundation (last day wet plus 34 days for field drying and preparation) • Model considers how growers would change planting with longer inundation • Later planting dates (or no planting) would affect crop yields and revenue
– “Tipping point” analysis considered indirect effects
• Impact findings – Inundation structure closure dates would reduce impacts to agricultural users – Indirect effects from changes in agricultural production would not cause rice mills or tomato
processing facilities to go out of business
17
![Page 18: Yolo Bypass Salmonid Habitat Restoration & Fish Passage · Need: address decreased habitat quality in the Sacramento River and an inadequate ability for fish to access higher quality](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071004/5fc16bfbe98a170d943afb24/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Agricultural Land Use
• Assessment methods – GIS analysis that compares existing land uses to areas that would be affected by construction and
operations
• Impact findings – All alternatives would permanently affect land uses within the Fremont Weir Wildlife Area – Alternative 4 would also affect 1 acre of Prime Farmland and 30 acres of Unique Farmland near the
water control structures
• Mitigation measures – Purchase conservation easements to partially mitigate for Alternative 4 effects, but the easements
would not fully mitigate
18
![Page 19: Yolo Bypass Salmonid Habitat Restoration & Fish Passage · Need: address decreased habitat quality in the Sacramento River and an inadequate ability for fish to access higher quality](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071004/5fc16bfbe98a170d943afb24/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Cultural Resources
• Assessment methods – Compare alternative features to identified archaeological sites, historic-era built resources, human
remains, and paleontological resources
• Impact findings – All alternatives are likely to encounter resources in the Fremont Weir Wildlife Area
• Mitigation measures – Prepare a treatment plan to manage identified resources, with a priority on preservation in place and
avoidance where possible – Conduct a detailed inventory before construction begins – Conduct pre-construction training for workers – Follow State and Federal laws about human remains
19
![Page 20: Yolo Bypass Salmonid Habitat Restoration & Fish Passage · Need: address decreased habitat quality in the Sacramento River and an inadequate ability for fish to access higher quality](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071004/5fc16bfbe98a170d943afb24/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Process
• CEQA/NEPA compliance is the focus of tonight’s meeting, but only a part of the overall process for implementation
• Agencies planning to continue working closely with landowners and stakeholders
Evaluate Effects and
IdentifyMitigationMeasures
DevelopDraft
EIS/EIR
Public Review of
Draft EIS/EIR
Respond toPublic
Comments
DevelopFinal
EIS/EIR
Finalize Decision
Documents
Nov 2016 – Apr 2017 – Dec 2017 – Feb 2018 – May 2018 – Dec 2018Mar 2017 Oct 2017 Feb 2018 Apr 2018 Nov 2018
20
![Page 21: Yolo Bypass Salmonid Habitat Restoration & Fish Passage · Need: address decreased habitat quality in the Sacramento River and an inadequate ability for fish to access higher quality](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071004/5fc16bfbe98a170d943afb24/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Schedule
• Close of public comments: February 15, 2018
• Final EIS/EIR release: November 2018
• Notice of Determination, CEQA Findings, Record of Decision: December 2018
• Agencies will continue to work closely with landowners and stakeholders: 2017 – 2020
• Permitting: 2017 – 2020
• Construction start: 2020 or 2021
21
![Page 22: Yolo Bypass Salmonid Habitat Restoration & Fish Passage · Need: address decreased habitat quality in the Sacramento River and an inadequate ability for fish to access higher quality](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071004/5fc16bfbe98a170d943afb24/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
How to Submit Comments
• Tonight: state oral comments during public hearing or fill out a comment form • By February 15, 2018 by email or letter to:
Mr. Ben Nelson Bureau of Reclamation, Bay-Delta Office 801 I Street, Suite 140 Sacramento, CA 95814 [email protected]
Ms. Karen Enstrom California Department of Water Resources 3500 Industrial Boulevard West Sacramento, CA 95691 [email protected]
22
![Page 23: Yolo Bypass Salmonid Habitat Restoration & Fish Passage · Need: address decreased habitat quality in the Sacramento River and an inadequate ability for fish to access higher quality](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071004/5fc16bfbe98a170d943afb24/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Ground Rules
• Introduce yourself and your organization • Please speak one at a time, when called on by the facilitator • Be concise, respect the time limits, and finish when prompted by the facilitator • Don’t interrupt presenters or other public speakers • Take side conversations into another room • Focus on the issues not the people • Be respectful of all involved
23