Yelvington - Melville J Herskovits Theory of Folklore
-
Upload
ezequiel-grisendi -
Category
Documents
-
view
220 -
download
0
Transcript of Yelvington - Melville J Herskovits Theory of Folklore
-
7/30/2019 Yelvington - Melville J Herskovits Theory of Folklore
1/28
1
Melville J. Herskovitss Theory of Folklore
by
Kevin A. YelvingtonDepartment of Anthropology
University of South Florida
Presented to the Workshop on Folklore and the Politics of Belief in the CaribbeanMellon Seminar on Caribbean Cultural History
Department of History
University of California at Los AngelesMay 14, 2009
To understand Melville J. Herskovitss theory of folklore we must understand, as with
everything Herskovits did, Franz Boass approach to the subject. As is well known, Boas sought
to distinguish his approach to anthropology from that of the cultural evolutionists, and especially
that of E.B. Tylor. He accomplished this over a ten-year period at the end of the nineteenth
century, culminating with his article The Limitations of the Comparative Method of
Anthropology (Boas 1896). What is not always remembered is that he used folklore as a
platform for this critique. The Limitations article was indeed a study of the distribution of folk-
tale elements, and Boas used folklore to make his main points about culture: He argued that the
student of culture must see elements in relation to the whole, that is, the development and use of
such specimens as cooking utensils, weapons, and musical instruments needed to be seen in
relation to their surroundings, that is, the physical environment, the history of the people, and
the peoples with whom the people in question came into contact. These specimens, often the
decontextualized vehicles for the evolutionists arguments about the levels of culture read as
civilization, for Boas had to be seen in relation to the cultural whole. The same thing with
folklore which, too, was related to the culture as a whole and was one of the avenues of
-
7/30/2019 Yelvington - Melville J Herskovits Theory of Folklore
2/28
2
expression for the members of the culture. Further, toward the end of the century Boas used
folklore to work through his interest in the affects of one culture upon another. In 1898 he wrote
about tribal mythologies: The mythologies of the various tribes as we find them now are not
organic growths, but have gradually developed and obtained their present form by the accretion
of foreign material. While, sometimes, this material was adopted as-is, this foreign material was
adapted and changed in form according to the genius of the people who borrowed it (quoted in
Stocking 1974:5).
In the first decades of the twentieth century, Boas, again arguing from the example of
folklore, wrote that folklore was founded on events that reflect the [everyday] occurrences of
human life, particularly those that stir the emotions of the people. At the same time, because the
power of imagination in man was rather limited it was case of people preferring to operate
with the old stock of imaginative happenings than invent new ones. Thus, their imaginations
played with a few plots, which were extended by means of a number of motives that have a
very wide distribution, which each group selectively borrows, adopts and adapts under the
stress of a dominant idea or set of social practices characteristic of their own culture (quoted in
Stocking 1974:6). As Stocking sums up, although Boas was here concerned with folklore per se,
by implication he suggested something about the general dynamics of cultural processes the
processes by which the genius of a people acted to mold borrowed elements to a traditional
pattern (Stocking 1974:6).
By the time Herskovits was becoming one of his students, Boas was codifying his view
of the primary aim of his anthropology in a 1920 article entitled The Methods of Ethnology:
American scholars are primarily interested in the dynamic phenomena of cultural change, and to
-
7/30/2019 Yelvington - Melville J Herskovits Theory of Folklore
3/28
3
try to elucidate cultural history by the application of the results of their studies (Boas 1920:314).
This fit in well with his on-going critique of evolutionism: The history of human civilization
does not appear to us as determined entirely by psychological necessity that leads to a uniform
evolution the world over. We rather see that each cultural group has its own unique history,
dependent partly upon the peculiar inner development of the social group, and partly upon the
foreign influences to which it has been subjected. He further held that There have been
processes of gradual differentiation as well as processes of leveling down differences between
neighboring cultural centers, but it would be quite impossible to understand, on the basis of a
single evolutionary scheme, what happened to any particular people (Boas 1920:317). He then
went on to point to the studies of Elsie Clews Parsons, Alfred Kroeber, and Leslie Spier on the
acculturation process on the Zui, where, in contrast to the psychological explanation offered
by Frank Hamilton Cushing, misleading if plausible as it was, Dr. Parsons studies prove
conclusively the deep influence which Spanish ideas have had upon Zui culture, and, along with
Dr. Kroebers investigations, give us one of the best examples of acculturation that have come to
our notice. The historical study shows an entirely different picture compared to the
psychological explanation, a picture in which the unique combination of ancient traits (which
in themselves are undoubtedly complex) and of European influences, have brought about the
present condition (1920:317).
Despite Boass critique of evolutionism (see Stocking 1968:195-233) this did not mean
that he was completely at odds, consciously or unconsciously, with some of the assumptions of
the social evolutionists like Herbert Spencer or E.B. Tylor. His perspective entailed the
utilization of a key concept in the evolutionists schema: that of cultural survivals. Tylor
-
7/30/2019 Yelvington - Melville J Herskovits Theory of Folklore
4/28
4
defined survivals in Primitive Culture as processes, customs, and opinions, and so forth, which
have been carried on by force of habit into a new state of society different from that in which
they had their original home, and they thus remain as proofs and examples of an older condition
of culture out of which a newer has been evolved (Tylor 1871:16; cf. Hodgen 1936). Boas,
writing in 1898 on the myths of primitive people, again maintained that the material of which
they are built up is of heterogeneous origin, and that much of it is adopted ready-made. The
peculiar manner in which foreign and indigenous material is interwoven and worked into a
somewhat homogeneous fabric depends to a great extent upon the social conditions and habits of
the people. The oft-repeated actions, habits and customs of a people, especially to the extent
that they are enshrined in ritual, could be expected to be more stable than those not so established
via repetition in a proscribed form and via ritual:
Discrepancies between the two...belong to a class of phenomena that are called
survivals. The discrepancy may consist in the preservation of earlier customs in
traditions, or in fragments of early traditions under modified social conditions. The
survivals themselves are proof of the gradual process of assimilation between social
conditions and traditions which has wrought fundamental changes in the lore of mankind.
[Boas 1940 [1898]:423].
Nearly thirty years later Boas again took up the question of Tylors evolutionism, and
again he wanted to preserve the idea of survivals. According to Boas, Tylor wrongly assumed
that the antiquity of one particular type is essentially due to a classification in which the form
that appears as the simplest from any one point of view is considered at the same time as
historically the oldest. Tylor felt the weakness of this assumption when he tried to support his
-
7/30/2019 Yelvington - Melville J Herskovits Theory of Folklore
5/28
5
thesis by the study of survivals which indicate the character of earlier developmental stages.
The problem was that it cannot be claimed that a systematic attempt has ever been made to
substantiate the theory of a definite evolutionary sequence on the basis of the study of survivals.
All that can be said is that fragments of earlier historical stages are bound to exist and are found
(Boas 1924:342). Boas illustrated the existence of these fragments with a discussion of the
survival of matrilineal forms of kinship in patrilineal society. But this, however, does not by any
means provide that everywhere matrilineal society must have been the earlier form (Boas
1924:343).
In developing his approach to the folklore of the Afro-Americas, Herskovits drew upon
these fundamental Boasian ideas. The way was left open for Herskovits to pursue the idea of
cultural survivals. Indeed, Boas had written to Zora Neale Hurston in 1927 suggesting that
African mannerisms were retained by African Americans (cited in Baron 1994:105; and in
Gershenhorn 2004:253-254, note 38).1
Herskovits pursued a project that he saw as the
1Thus it seems not to be the case that, as Jackson argues, Boas believed that African
culture had been lost by blacks in America, even if he stressed the importance of educating
black Americas about African culture as a way of increasing race pride and countering the
strong feeling of despondency among the best classes of the Negro (Jackson 1986:98).
Herskovits had written to Austrian ethnomusicologist Erich Moritz von Hornbostel about
Hurston, his research assistant in his physical anthropological project on race mixing and the
American Negro. Although she was more White than Negro in her ancestry, Herskovits said,
her manner of speech, her expressions, in short, her motor behavior were what would be
-
7/30/2019 Yelvington - Melville J Herskovits Theory of Folklore
6/28
6
identification and documentation of African cultural survivals, within the theoretical tradition of
Boasian historical-cultural particularism and thus it might be said that Herskovits inherited
Boass incomplete critique of social evolutionism and with an eventual emphasis on
acculturation (see Redfield, Linton, and Herskovits 1936). After all, under acculturation it was
still the geist, or genius of a people, that molded borrowed elements to a traditional pattern.
Somewhat ironically, then, Herskovits began his cultural anthropological investigations
of African Americans in the early 1920s, and went from a perspective that emphasized the
assimilation of African Americans to their wider cultural surroundings, at the same time denying
the possibility of African cultural survivals (e.g., Herskovits 1925, 1927), a position, it must be
said, that was consonant with aspects of Boass thought, to taking up a position he would hold
for the rest of his life that these survivals underlay the behavioral repertoires of African
Americans (Baron 1994; Gershenhorn 2004; Jackson 1986; Yelvington 2006). This occurred
because of the interactions of a number of forces, including the personal influence of folklorist
Elsie Clews Parsons, a close associate of Boas and a teacher of Herskovits. Parsons collected
folklore in the Caribbean (e.g., Parsons 1918, 1933, 1936, 1943), she financed many of Boass
students and their publications, and along with Boas was active in the American Folk-Lore
Society and itsJournal of American Folk-Lore, exhibiting with Boas a great interest in Afro-
American folklore where between the both of them they put together several Negro Numbers
termed typically Negro and he suggested that these movements, observed by Herskovits when
Hurston was singing spirituals, had been carried over as a behavior pattern handed down thru
imitation and example from the original African slaves who were brought here (Herskovits to
von Hornbostel, June 10, 1927, quoted in Jackson 1986:107).
-
7/30/2019 Yelvington - Melville J Herskovits Theory of Folklore
7/28
7
as the issues of theJournal were affectionately called (Baker 1998, 2000; Deacon 1997;
Zumwalt 1992). Boas and others had founded the American Folk-Lore Society in 1888 and Boas
served as president in 1900, 1932, and 1934, and was the editor of theJournal of American Folk-
Lorebetween 1908 and 1923, and in all was on the editorial board for forty-four years. As Baker
shows (1998:143-167), Boas effected an alliance between black intellectuals and anthropologists
in the collection and publication of the folklore of the Afro-Americas. Thus, even though he
might have disavowed such a position, here was Boas facilitating the use of folklore for political
reasons, a tradition rooted in the German romanticism of Herder (Wilson 1973), a tradition of
which he was a part (Bunzl 1996),and where folklore was useful in nationalist constructions and
identity politics (Bendix 1997; Linke 1990; Zumwalt 1988).
Parsons traced folktales in quest for their points of origin, which she thought could be
discerned. About her work on Andros Island in the Bahamas, she said Whatever may have been
the provenience of the tales in Africa, Portuguese or other, I have no doubt that by far the greater
number of the Bahama tales were learned there, learned, not in America, but in Africa
(Parsons 1918:xii). She advocated that the lore which is a part of an intimate knowledge of
island life should be studied for an appreciation of the relations between African cultures and
the Negro in America (Parsons 1933:vii-viii). It was Parsons, with this orientation, who as early
as 1927 suggested through Boas to Herskovits immediately on the heels of Herskovitss
writings emphasizing the cultural assimilation of African Americans into the US mainstream
that Herskovits seek in the Suriname bush among the Bush Negro tribes there African
cultural continuities manifest in the New World in their purest, most unadulterated forms.
Herskovits wrote to Parsons in April, 1927 to say Dr. Boas told me of your very kind
-
7/30/2019 Yelvington - Melville J Herskovits Theory of Folklore
8/28
8
suggestion regarding field work in Suriname, and to say that he looked forward to talking with
her about the matter (Melville J. Herskovits Papers, Northwestern University, (hereafter H.P.N.),
Box 18, Folder 3, Herskovits to Parsons, April 30, 1927). By June, he was reporting on his
appointment to Northwestern University, and said I hope that, once established, the way will be
clared [sic] for some research on the Bush Negroes (H.P.N., Box 18, Folder 3, Herskovits to
Parsons, June 29, 1927). Parsonss replied by saying simply Congratulations on the first step
towards the Bush Negroes! (H.P.N., Box 18, Folder 3, Parsons to Herskovits, July 14, 1927).
Parsons played a pivotal role in Herskovitss thinking and in his academic career. She paid for
his first ethnological fieldwork trips, to Suriname in 1928 and 1929 and to Dahomey in 1931,
paying, as well, for the publication ofSuriname Folk-Lore, published by Columbia University
Press (Herskovits and Herskovits 1936), one of the two major volumes to come out of the
Suriname fieldwork (Simpson 1973:9; Zumwalt 1992:317). Upon hearing from Boas of Parsons
underwriting his first fieldwork trip to Suriname, Herskovits wrote to Parsons to thank her and
enthusiastically asserted Suriname seems to be a sort of an ethnological happy hunting-
grounds (H.P.N., Box 18, Folder 3, Herskovits to Parsons, December 6, 1927).
The fieldwork Melville Herskovits and his wife, anthropological partner, and co-author
Frances S. Herskovits conducted in Suriname in the summers of 1928 and 1929 was arduous for
them (Gershenhorn 2004:70-78; Price and Price 2003), but certainly yielded an enormous
amount of folklore material. Melville Herskovits, at least, regarded the ethnographic data he
collected in the bush among the Saramaka Bush Negroes with characteristic positivism and
empiricism, writing in his field diary in Suriname that Its an ethnological gold-mine here and
that the material is here so thick that it will take a steam-shovel to gather it in (Melville J. and
-
7/30/2019 Yelvington - Melville J Herskovits Theory of Folklore
9/28
9
Frances S. Herskovits Papers, Schomburg Center for Research in Black Culture, New York
Public Library, Suriname Field Trip Diary, entries of July 25 and July 28, 1928).2
Here,
Herskovits was referring to his ethnological interviews, but presumably he also held the same
view of the folklore material Frances was collecting in Paramaribo, the coastal capital of the
Dutch colony. Because of his fears for her safety, and the fears of Boas and Parsons,3
Frances
remained in the city during the first fieldwork trip of 1928, while Melville, along with guides,
ventured into the bush. However, it was Melville who worked up the material Frances
2In folklore, Herskovits came to complain that the folklore of the Afro-Americas was
presented as selected according to preconceived categories (e.g., Herskovits 1943), as if the
materials were already out there simply to be collected and not in correspondence to an
existing theoretical schema.
3See Franz Boas Papers, American Philosophical Society, Philadelphia, Boas to
Herskovits, December 3, 1927, where Boas wrote to Herskovits saying I talked over the plan of
your Surinam trip with Elsie and she says that she is willing to support it. In talking over the
matter both of us are doubtful as to whether it would be advisable for you to bring Frances along.
It is no joke travelling [sic] in the tropics and particularly when you leave the towns and go into
the woods it will be very hard for her. So that both of us dissuade very decidedly a joint trip.
Melville became ill and was bedridden before he could start his journey into the rainforest to
start ethnographic fieldwork among the Saramakas. Frances started her folklore collecting right
away. See Price and Price (2003). For Melvilles reply to Boas where he justifies Francess
attendance and participation, see ibid., Herskovits to Boas, December 6, 1927.
-
7/30/2019 Yelvington - Melville J Herskovits Theory of Folklore
10/28
10
collected (see H.P.N., Box 18, Folder 3, Frances S. Herskovits to Parsons, November 6, 1928).
Disavowing any idea of his newfound theoretical orientation being prepared for him, in
several places Herskovits retrospectively presented his Suriname fieldwork as a matter of
scientific discovery. For example, at the beginning ofThe Myth of the Negro Past(1941),
Herskovits that the first hand investigation of New World Negro societies outside the United
States led to the abandonment of his initial views. Further, he claimed that this research was not
designed to look for Africanisms, or African cultural survivals, and that only incidentally were
they encountered: It was the investigation on this broader base, wherein the problem of
Africanisms in present-day Negro behavior was only incidental, that forced revision of an
hypothesis which, in the initial stages of research, there was no tendency to question (1941:6).4
Yet, as I have argued elsewhere (Yelvington 2006), the Boasian tradition, the influence of
Parsons, and his developing relationships with ethnologists and folklorists in Latin America and
the Caribbean, such as Jean Price-Mars in Haiti, Fernando Ortiz in Cuba, and Arthur Ramos in
4Frances Herskovits wrote in an edited volume of Melvilles work, His field experience
in Suriname in 1928 and 1929 had a profound influence on his thinking, and though he was
scarcely conscious of this at the time, the findings in both the Bush and the city of Paramaribo
began shaping his concepts on acculturation. In the Guiana Bush, among the Saramacca peoples,
he saw, as he often told his students, nearly all of western sub-Saharan African represented, from
what is now Mali to Loango and into the Congo and the Loango chief who came to our base
camp invoked both the Great God of the Akan of the Gold Coast,Nyankompon, and the Bantu
Zambi (1966:vii-viii).
-
7/30/2019 Yelvington - Melville J Herskovits Theory of Folklore
11/28
11
Brazil, all of whom shared Herskovitss emerging theoretical orientation and intention document
what they defined as African cultural survivals in the national context albeit for varied
political purposes which can only be alluded to here. As with Herskovits, the study of folklore
was central to their enterprise.5
This was the era in the Caribbean as elsewhere when folklore
was used as a plank in nationalist arguments. In Puerto Rico, for instance, Antonio S. Pedreira
(who had studied at Columbia University in the 1920s) was developing a view of Puerto Rican
national identity centered around the image of thejbaro, or peasant, and Spanish cultural
heritage, and in this movement the Herderian study of folklore as revelatory of the national soul
became important (e.g., Pedreira 1935; cf. Flores 1979; Guerra 1998). Price-Mars, who had
railed against the social and cultural effects of the US occupation of Haiti and who had urged his
fellow Haitians to look to the folklore for the authentic Haitian culture rather than to be imitative
of France or North America (Price-Mars 1928), in Formation Ethnique, Folk-Lore et Culture de
Peuple Hatien he referred readers to the work of the Herskovitses as examples of how folklore
should be studied in order to be useful. He defined folklore as the sum of beliefs, superstitions,
legends, tales, songs, riddles and customs on which lie the life of a primitive people and
constitute the foundations of their culture. He went on:
5I will not cite the extensive works of these scholars here. The recent critical literature on
them includes but is not limited to the following: On Price-Mars, see Averill (2008); Largey
(2006); Magloire and Yelvington (2005); Ramsey (2002); on Ortiz, see Bronfman (2004);
Bremer (1993); Font and Quiroz (2005); Moore (1994, 1997);Palmi (2002); Rodrguez-
Mangual (2004); Sant (2002); on Ramos, see Barros (2000); Lange (2008); Romo (2007).
-
7/30/2019 Yelvington - Melville J Herskovits Theory of Folklore
12/28
12
There is no country which possesses as rich a well of oral tradition as ours. And these
traditions, profound and marvelous, date back to the origins of the race. Throughout
thousands of years, they embody the annals transmitted from one generation to the next
and by which the gestures of the past and the paths of the present are justified. They will
compact with steadfast patience the materials on which history will uproot much later
with hypotheses of its construction. During thousands of years, they were the deposits of
obscure thoughts of our ancestors, the discrete guardians of the recipe by which the
enigmas of the world are explained. And for a people deprived of archives, lacking a
written language, they consist in themselves of the inestimable worth of documents laden
with the secret of expired ages that await their alert interpreters (1956 [1939]:50-51, my
translation; see, also, Price-Mars 1951).
Yet, as with the ethnology coming out of Price-Mars, Ortiz, and Ramos, and others,
Herskovits found no difficulty in incorporating their arguments into his own as he constructed or,
rather, imbibed what was for him an apparently new paradigm as he entered into dialogue with
these scholars. He did not reflect at this point on the political dimensions of folklore scholarship
as he went about making unacknowledged nationalist arguments of his own.6
In an early
6Later, he acknowledged that in various countries the study of folklore has always been
marked by a strong nationalistic emphasis, and its investigation, often conducted under
governmental subsidies, has been focused on local or regional areas within specific domains
(1946:92), but he did not connect in print at least this observation with his own work nor to that
of those scholars on whose work he drew.
-
7/30/2019 Yelvington - Melville J Herskovits Theory of Folklore
13/28
13
published statement of this new program, the 1930 article The Negro in the New World: The
Statement of a Problem, Herskovits proposed that the study of the descendants of Africans in
the New World should be concerned with what was retained from African culture, what was
discarded, what was learned in the New World context and under what conditions culture could
be seen to maintain itself under strain. Here he called for more knowledge of African cultures, so
that we shall have an adequate basis to investigate the affiliation of those cultural traits with
American Negro has retained in his contact with white and Indian civilizations, and, on the
other hand, he assured that further investigation on this side of the Atlantic must result in more
data from which to draw conclusions as to the nature of the African cultural survivals which are
manifest in the behavior of the Negro in the Caribbean, the United States, and in South
America. He went on to say that it would be possible on the basis of then-current knowledge to
make a kind of chart indicating the extent to which the descendants of Africans brought to the
New World have retained Africanisms in their cultural behavior, with more in one locale in one
area of culture, and less in another place (1930:149).7 The decade of the 1930s was bookended
by the publication ofThe Myth of the Negro Past(1941), which sought to make the argument
that once the citizens, white and black, of the United States knew of the African cultural
background and that African Americans were like other immigrant groups in that they continued
to use the traditions of the motherland as they adapted to the new land then racism and
prejudice against African Americans would decrease.
Folklore figured prominently in this new theoretical orientation. Folklore was conceived
7Fifteen years later he did make such a chart. See Herskovits (1945).
-
7/30/2019 Yelvington - Melville J Herskovits Theory of Folklore
14/28
14
by Herskovits as one element of culture, such as religion or kinship, that could survive more or
less intact or be modified as it traveled. This view of folklore was consonant with the conception
of culture as a bundle of discernable traits. Folklore, then, for Herskovits could be used in
understanding the African cultural baseline as well as what had survived the Middle Passage.
Further, folklore was perhaps the Africanism par excellence, and it survived because it could for
a number of historical reasons. As he wrote in Life in a Haitian Valley, The trait of African
culture that has survived most tenaciously in all the New World, even when European influence
has been strongest, is that of folk-literature of tales, proverbs, and riddles (1937:264). Thus
there was for Herskovits more than a mere passing interest in folklore. In the key career years
between when he first began teaching a course on folklore in his second semester at
Northwestern, during the 1927-1928 school year (H.P.N., Box 18, Folder 3, Herskovits to
Parsons, September 26, 1927),8
to when he became the president of the American Folklore
Society in 1945, were crucial for his career and theoretical development.
The fieldwork in Suriname resulted in two books and in a number of articles. Rebel
Destiny (Herskovits and Herskovits 1934) had the feel of a travel account; Suriname Folk-Lore
(Herskovits and Herskovits 1936) consisted of a long Notes on the Culture of the Paramaribo
Negroes (pp. 1-113), followed by hundreds of pages of Anansi stories, proverbs, including
8Gershenhorn (2004:137-138) has Herskovits teaching folklore by the 1930s when he
formed a separate Department of Anthropology at Northwestern. However, according to my
evidence Herskovits was teaching folklore from the very beginning of his appointment as the
lone anthropologist in Northwesterns Department of Sociology.
-
7/30/2019 Yelvington - Melville J Herskovits Theory of Folklore
15/28
15
those about the head kerchiefs worn by the older women of Paramaribo, and riddles collected
mainly by Frances. The fieldwork in West Africa in 1931 solidified Herskovitss core theory of
folklore entailing the view of folklore again, including narrative, proverbs, and riddles as
oral folk-literature, as something somehow arising out of but distinct from cultural custom
(Herskovits and Herskovits 1958; see Baron 2004). The field methods consisted of hiring paid
informants to provide information in response to questions, and the Herskovitses attending
ceremonies and storytelling events of various types. The emphasis was on folklores function in
the moral education of the young, especially proverbs, on audience participation, including more
or less scripted interruptions of storytellers, multiple narrative forms, the role of improvisation,
the use of double entendre, especially in riddles where the lewd and obscene could be disguised
from those listeners too young to understand, and the use of indirection in speech, especially for
social and community control. Rather than a focus on folklore as texts, performance style and the
contexts in which folklore was performed were crucial for the understanding of folklores
meaning and function. InRebel Destiny, based on the 1928 and 1929 fieldwork, there was
already an emphasis on context. The Herskovitses wrote of a story-telling session that the
speakers message was not the most important aspect (at least to the Herskovitses): What really
mattered, however, was the way in which the intervals in the story-telling were dramatized
(1934:103).
In the 1930s, Melville Herskovitss attention was drawn to the possibilities of the
theoretical advancement of the discipline through the use of the concept of acculturation (see
Redfield, Linton, and J. Herskovits 1936). This impacted his view of folklore under the
conditions of acculturation. Writing on the effects of acculturation on folklore, Herskovits
-
7/30/2019 Yelvington - Melville J Herskovits Theory of Folklore
16/28
16
lamented that these effects were given explicit statement in but a few studies. He
acknowledged the painstaking investigations that tracked how themes from various sources
have been combined in the tales of Indo-European peoples, but comparable analyses of
primitive tribes were lacking. The exceptions were work done by American folklorists whose
interests were focused solely on American Indians and African Americans and whose collection
of stories showed European and the occasional African motifs. Yet this stopped short of
the approach Herskovits advocated: Their elements are ordinarily not broken down as to show
how incidents of foreign derivation were worked into the aboriginal tales; still less information is
available as to the relationship between these stories and their social setting (Herskovits
1938:106). Further, with respect to New World Negro lore, rather than the conventional
approach of the folklorists, which consisted in referring to those folk from whom the same
motifs have been collected, Herskovits said effort should be put into showing the manner in
which these literary products have been subject to the process of repatterning and recombination
that is so especially subject to observation in the field and he referred to the work of Parsons,
Martha Beckwiths Jamaica research (Beckwith 1929), the Haitian anthropologist Suzanne
Comhaire-Sylvain (1937), as well as his own in Suriname (Herskovits and Herskovits 1936), as
positive examples of this sort of scholarship (Herskovits 1938:107).
As Baron (2003) shows, Herskovits revised his conceptual metaphors through the years.
For example, African cultural survivals, which could be seen as quaint antiquated traits, later
became seen as retentions, with the implication that effort went into their retention and where,
in a more active conceptualization, behaviors were reinterpretations of African cultural traits
-
7/30/2019 Yelvington - Melville J Herskovits Theory of Folklore
17/28
17
and traditions (see, especially, Herskovits 1946:97; Herskovits and Herskovits 1947).9
Further,
retentions and reinterpretations were later preferred because the idea of survivals could suggest
that these traits no longer had a function where Herskovits was keen to emphasize that
Africanisms defined as retentions and reinterpretations were fully functioning, and functional, in
and for Afro-American cultures and not, as he put it, seen as cultural curiosities (Herskovits
1943:3). Now, not all of the Boasian baggage he took on became transformed and, indeed, one
could argue that the idea of retentions and reinterpretations was only a slight variation on the
idea of survivals. In some ways, Herskovits simply renamed Boasian concepts but retained their
meaning and utility. For instance, the idea of a people being preoccupied with a small range of
interests and who expended their energies in some cultural institutions at the expense of others
became cultural focus (see Herskovits 1947:542-560). And the idea of a people molding
borrowed cultural elements according to their traditional pattern, their particular cultural
genius, was Herskovitss own unremarked upon use of the Boasian principle of the geist. With
regards to folklore, it seems Herskovits did move beyond Boas in his emphasis on the social
setting and the performance of narratives (see Baron 1994, 2004).
In this light, we should look at some of his last explicit programmatic statements on
folklore. In the special issue of the Journal of American Folklore to commemorate the death of
Parsons, Herskovits weighed in on what he saw as Some Next Steps in the Study of Negro
Folklore. He surveyed the developments in the field due to Parsonss influence, which he
9It is possible that Herskovits reconsidered his position after reading Hodgens (1936)
critique.
-
7/30/2019 Yelvington - Melville J Herskovits Theory of Folklore
18/28
18
identified as collecting tales without the use of preconceived categories, the recording of stories
as narrated and the identity of the storyteller and other information on the context, the
importance of the use of the catch phrase in the folklore of the Afro-Americas which was
especially valuable in comparative analysis, and Parsonss anthropological point of using
folklore to study the larger problems of cultural form and cultural dynamics. Folklore, Parsons
had explained in conversation, permitted the study of diffusion in process (1943:1-2).
Herskovits stressed the need for the following next steps: The need for better
definitions, the need for additional data, especially from certain key geographical areas, the need
for a re-analysis of existing materials, and the need to more fully understand the social contexts
of folklore performance. He was anxious to differentiate between folklore as folk literature and
folk custom. He decried the emphasis on folk custom to the expense of folk literature in many
studies, and pleaded for defining more sharply the very word folklore, in terms of the
distinction between folk literature and folk custom (1943:4). Yet his reasoning continued to
betray an underlying evolutionism: The tales, proverbs and riddles which in many regions are
today the most purely African aspects of the life of the Negroes, have been put aside by students
of the Negro for the study of other phases of Negro life more difficult to access and less
amenable to identification (1943:3). Here the notion of being today more or less purely
African implies that culture is something that can be eroded more here or less there with the
passing of time. As a reminder, the social evolutionists like Spencer and Tylor felt that culture
was something to be achieved and that there were groups who possessed more or less of it. And
just as culture could be attained, it could also be lost and a kind of cultural regression could set
in. He went on to emphasize the need for talks, proverbs and riddles to be understood in relation
-
7/30/2019 Yelvington - Melville J Herskovits Theory of Folklore
19/28
19
to the cultural setting out of which they arose, and that the social setting of folklore is of
particular importance for the scientific analysis of materials from Negro societies (1943:7).
In his retiring presidential address at the American Folklore Societys meetings at the end
of 1945, Herskovits sought to define a modern approach to folklore and lauded the approaches
arising out of the US (as opposed to European) tradition. Stating that folklore was but one
manifestation of human culture (1946:94), he said If we refuse to consider the folk as
quaint, or backward, or ignorant, but use the term to designate any people or class in any society
that as a group exhibit identifiably distinctive modes of life; if we then concentrate our efforts on
the study of their literary expression, folklore becomes a field concerned with realities of life and
not with the relics of a dead past (1946:99). This literary expression was primarily oral, and
thus he advocated the study of oral literature as our primary concern (1946:100). These
positions are repeated at greater length in his textbook,Man and His Works (Herskovits
1947:414-426).
In sum, I believe it is important to consider Herskovitss researches in folklore for the following
reasons:
1. He represents an important figure not only in US anthropology of the middle twentieth
century. Not only that, he is rightly considered a pioneer of Caribbean anthropological research.
2. Because of his transnational scientific networks with Latin American and Caribbean scholars.
Herskovitss work was used to inform the use of folklore in nationalism , nationalist scholars
such as Ortiz, Price-Mars, and Ramos.
3. His students went on to take up his mantle in doing folklore research. These included his
-
7/30/2019 Yelvington - Melville J Herskovits Theory of Folklore
20/28
20
informal students like Zora Neale Hurston as well as those with whom he had an official capacity
as teacher, such as Katherine Dunham and Daniel Crowley in the Caribbean, and a number of
other students doing research in Africa.
4. For his Influence on other scholars, who had a similar orientation, such as Harold Courlander
and Alan Lomax.
As the Herskovitses recorded in Suriname (1936:144), the stylized completion of a story-telling
is often No tori kom kaba the story is at an end.
References
Manuscript Sources
American Philosophical Society, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Franz Boas Papers
Northwestern University Archives, Evanston, Illinois
Melville J. Herskovits Papers, Africana Manuscripts 6.
Schomburg Center for Research in Black Culture, New York Public Library, New York
Melville J. and Frances S. Herskovits Papers, MG 261
Secondary Sources
Averill, Gage
2008 Ballad Hunting in the Black Republic: Alan Lomax in Haiti, 1936-37. Caribbean
Studies 36(2):3-22.
Baker, Lee D.
1998 From Savage to Negro: Anthropology and the Construction of Race, 1896-1954.
-
7/30/2019 Yelvington - Melville J Herskovits Theory of Folklore
21/28
21
Berkeley: University of California Press.
2000 Research, Reform, and Racial Uplift: The Mission of the Hampton Folk-Lore
Society, 1893-1899. In Excluded Ancestors, Inventible Traditions: Essays Toward
a More Inclusive History of Anthropology. Richard Handler, ed. Pp. 42-80.
Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
Baron, Robert
1994 Africa in the Americas: Melville J. Herskovits Folkloristic and Anthropological
Scholarship, 1923-1941. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of
Pennsylvania.
2003 Amalgams and Mosaics, Syncretisms and Reinterpretations: Reading Herskovits
and Contemporary Creolists for Metaphors of Creolization. Journal of American
Folkore 116(459):88-115.
2004 Herskovits, Melville J. (1895-1963)In African Folklore: An Encyclopedia. Philip
M. Peek and Kwesi Yankah, eds. Pp. 167-169. London: Routledge.
Barros, Luitgarde Oliveira Cavalcante
2000 Arthur Ramos e as dinmicas sociais de seu tempo. Macei, Alagoas, Brazil:
Editora da Universidade Federal de Alagoas.
Beckwith, Martha Warren
1929 Black Roadways: A Study of Jamaican Folk Life. Chapel Hill: University of
North Carolina Press.
Boas, Franz
1896 The Limitations of the Comparative Method of Anthropology. Science (N.S.)
-
7/30/2019 Yelvington - Melville J Herskovits Theory of Folklore
22/28
22
4(103):901-908.
1920 The Methods of Ethnology. American Anthropologist 22(4):311-321.
1924 Evolution or Diffusion? American Anthropologist 26(3):340-344.
1940 Race, Language and Culture. New York: Macmillan.
Bremer, Thomas
1993 The Constitution of Alterity: Fernando Ortiz and the Beginnings of Latin-
American Ethnography out of the Spirit of Italian Criminology.In Alternative
Cultures in the Caribbean. Thomas Bremer and Ulrich Fleischmann, eds. Pp. 119-
129. Frankfurt: Vervuert.
Bronfman, Alejandra
2004 Measures of Equality: Social Science, Citizenship, and Race in Cuba, 1902-1940.
Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
Bunlz, Matti
1996 Franz Boas and the Humboldtian Tradition: From Volksgeistand
Nationalcharakterto an Anthropological Concept of Culture.In Volksgeist as
Method and Ethic: Essays on Boasian Ethnography and the German
Anthropological Tradition. George W. Stocking, Jr., ed. Pp. 17-78. Madison:
University of Wisconsin Press.
Comhaire-Sylvain, Suzanne
1937 Les contes hatiens. Part I: Maman dleau: origine immdiate et extension en
Amrique, Afrique et Europe occidentale. Part II: Conjoint animal ou dmon
dguis; origine immdiate et extension en Amrique, Afrique et Europe
-
7/30/2019 Yelvington - Melville J Herskovits Theory of Folklore
23/28
23
occidentale. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University of Paris.
Deacon, Desley
1997 Elsie Clews Parsons: Inventing Modern Life. Chicago: University of Chicago
Press.
Flores, Juan
1979 Insularismo y ideologa burguesa en Antonio S. Pedreira. Havana: Casa de las
Amricas.
Font, Mauricio A. and Alfonso W. Quiroz, eds.
2005 Cuban Counterpoints: The Legacy of Fernando Ortiz. Lanham, MD: Lexington
Books.
Gershenhorn, Jerry
2004 Melville J. Herskovits and the Racial Politics of Knowledge. Lincoln: University
of Nebraska Press.
Guerra, Lillian
1998 Popular Expression and National Identity in Puerto Rico: The Struggle for Self,
Community, and Nation. Gainesville: University Press of Florida.
Herskovits, Frances S.
1966 Introduction.In The New World Negro: Selected Papers in Afroamerican Studies,
by Melville J. Herskovits. Frances S. Herskovits, ed. Pp. vii-xi. Bloomington:
Indiana University Press.
Herskovits, Melville J.
1925 The Negros Americansim.In The New Negro. Alain Locke, ed. Pp. 353-360.
-
7/30/2019 Yelvington - Melville J Herskovits Theory of Folklore
24/28
24
New York: Albert & Charles Boni, Inc.
1927 Acculturation and the American Negro. Southwestern Political and Social Science
Quarterly 8(3):211-224.
1930 The Negro in the New World: The Statement of a Problem. American
Anthropologist 32(1):145-155.
1937 Life in a Haitian Valley. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
1938 Acculturation: The Study of Culture Contact. New York: J.J. Augustin.
1941 The Myth of the Negro Past. New York: Harper and Brothers.
1943 Some Next Steps in the Study of Negro Folklore. Journal of American Folklore
56(219):1-7.
1945 Problem, Method and Theory in Afroamerican Studies. Afroamrica 1(1-2):5-24.
1946 Folklore after a Hundred Years: A Problem in Redefinition. Journal of American
Folklore 59(232):89-100.
1947 Man and His Works: The Science of Cultural Anthropology. New York: Alfred
A. Knopf.
Herskovits, Melville J. and Frances S. Herskovits
1934 Rebel Destiny: Among the Bush Negroes of Dutch Guiana. New York:
Whittlesey House.
1936 Suriname Folk-Lore: With Transcriptions of Suriname Songs and Musicological
Analysis by M. Kolinski. New York: Columbia University Press.
1947 Trinidad Village. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
1958 Dahomean Narrative: A Cross-Cultural Analysis. Evanston, IL: Northwestern
-
7/30/2019 Yelvington - Melville J Herskovits Theory of Folklore
25/28
25
University Press.
Hodgen, Margaret T.
1936 The Doctrine of Survivals: A Chapter in the History of Scientific Method in the
Study of Man. London: Allenson.
Jackson, Walter A.
1986 Melville Herskovits and the Search for Afro-American Culture.In Malinowski,
Rivers, Benedict and Others: Essays on Culture and Personality. George W.
Stocking, Jr., ed. Pp. 95-126. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
Lange, Brad
2008 Importing Freud and Lamarck to the Tropics: Arthur Ramos and the
Transformation of Brazilian Racial Thought, 19261939. The Americas 65(1):9-
34.
Largey, Michael D.
2006 Vodou Nation: Haitian Art, Music, and Cultural Nationalism. Chicago: University
of Chicago Press.
Linke, Uli
1990 Folklore, Anthropology, and the Government of Social Life. Comparative Studies
in Society and History 32(1):117-148.
Magloire, Grarde and Kevin A. Yelvington
2005 Haiti and the Anthropological Imagination. Gradhiva (N.S.) 1:127-152.
Moore, Robin
1994 Representations of Afrocuban Expressive Culture in the Writings of Fernando
-
7/30/2019 Yelvington - Melville J Herskovits Theory of Folklore
26/28
26
Ortiz. Latin American Music Review 15(1):32-54.
1997 Nationalizing Blackness: Afrocubanismo and Artistic Revolution in Havana,
1920-1940. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
Palmi, Stephan
2002 Wizards and Scientists: Explorations in Afro-Cuban Modernity and Tradition.
Durham: Duke University Press.
Parsons, Elsie Clews
1918 Folk-Tales of Andros Island, Bahamas. New York: G.E. Stechert and Co.
1933 Folk-Lore of the Antilles, French and English. Part I. New York: G.E. Stechert
and Co.
1936 Folk-Lore of the Antilles, French and English. Part II. New York: G.E. Stechert
and Co.
1943 Folk-Lore of the Antilles, French and English. Part III. New York: G.E. Stechert
and Co.
Pedreira, Antonio S.
1935 La actualidad del jbaro. Boletn de la Universidad de Puerto Rico 6(1):5-49.
Price, Richard and Sally Price
2003 The Root of Roots: Or, How Afro-American Anthropology got its Start. Chicago:
Prickly Paradigm Press.
Price-Mars, Jean
1928 Ainsi parla lOncle. Paris: Imprimerie de Compigne.
1951 Folklore et Patriotisme. Port-au-Prince: Imprimerie Les Presses Libres.
-
7/30/2019 Yelvington - Melville J Herskovits Theory of Folklore
27/28
27
1956 [1939] Formation Ethnique, Folk-Lore et Culture de Peuple Hatien. 2nd. ed. Port-
au-Prince: Imprimerie N. A. Theodore.
Ramsey, Kate
2002 Without One Ritual Note: Folklore Performance and the Haitian State, 1935-
1946. Radical History Review 84:7-42.
Redfield, Robert, Ralph Linton, and Melville J. Herskovits
1936 Memorandum for the Study of Acculturation. American Anthropologist
38(1):149-152.
Rodrguez-Mangual, Edna M.
2004 Lydia Cabrera and the Construction of an Afro-Cuban Cultural Identity. Chapel
Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
Romo, Anadelia A.
2007 Rethinking Race and Culture in Brazils First Afro-Brazilian Congress of 1934.
Journal of Latin American Studies 39(1):31-54.
Sant, Enrico Mario
2002 Fernando Ortiz: contrapunteo y transculturacin. Madrid: Colibr Editorial.
Stocking, George W., Jr.
1968 Race, Culture, and Evolution: Essays in the History of Anthropology. New York:
The Free Press.
1974 Introduction: The Basic Assumptions of Boasian Anthropology.In The Shaping
of American Anthropology, 1883-1911: A Franz Boas Reader. George W.
Stocking, Jr., ed. Pp. 1-20. New York: The Free Press.
-
7/30/2019 Yelvington - Melville J Herskovits Theory of Folklore
28/28
28
Tylor, E.B.
1871 Primitive Culture: Researches into the Development of Mythology, Philosophy,
Religion, Art, and Custom. London: J. Murray.
Wilson, William A.
1973 Herder, Folklore and Romantic Nationalism. Journal of Popular Culture 6(4):819-
835.
Yelvington, Kevin A.
2006 The Invention of Africa in Latin America and the Caribbean: Political Discourse
and Anthropological Praxis, 1920-1940.In Afro-Atlantic Dialogues:
Anthropology in the Diaspora. Kevin A. Yelvington, ed. Pp. 35-82. Santa Fe,
NM: School of American Research Press.
Zumwalt, Rosemary Lvy
1992 Wealth and Rebellion: Elsie Clews Parsons, Anthropologist and Folklorist.
Urbana: University of Illinois Press.