Yellowtail Dam & Bighorn Lake Water Supply & Operations Meeting Billings, Montana October 9, 2008...
-
Upload
frederica-willis -
Category
Documents
-
view
217 -
download
4
Transcript of Yellowtail Dam & Bighorn Lake Water Supply & Operations Meeting Billings, Montana October 9, 2008...
Yellowtail Dam & Bighorn Lake Water Supply & Operations Meeting
Billings, Montana
October 9, 2008
RECLAMATIONManaging Water in the West
Purpose of Meeting Public outreach / education regarding
Yellowtail Dam & Bighorn Lake
Recap operations during water year 2008
Present operation scenarios for fall / winter 2008-2009
Obtain feedback / comment from public & interested parties
Meeting Agenda6:00 pm Doors open
6:30 pm Introductions, Welcome, and Meeting Objectives
6:40 pm Recap of Water Year 2008
7:15 pm Fall & Winter Reservoir Operation Scenarios
8:00 pm Facilitated Public Discussion
8:30 pm Adjourn
The Montana Area Office is responsible for managing the water supplies and administering Reclamation programs for Reclamation projects located in Montana east of the continental divide.
The Montana Area Office monitors hydrologic and climatic conditions, prepares inflow projections and operation plans, and directs water releases and lake level management at Yellowtail Dam & Bighorn Lake.
Yellowtail Dam, Bighorn Lake and Afterbay
Yellowtail Dam and Bighorn Lake
Visitor Center Powerplant
Bighorn Lake
Spillway Inlet
Yellowtail Dam, Bighorn Lake and Afterbay
Visitor Center
Yellowtail Dam
Substation
Yellowtail Afterbay Dam
Yellowtail Afterbay Dam and Afterbay
Bighorn Canal
Radial Gates
Sluice Gates
Afterbay Dam
Afterbay
Sewage Lagoons
Bighorn Reservoir AllocationsDam CrestElev. 3660.0
Top of Inactive Elev. 3547.00 (493,584 Acre-Feet)
SURCHARGE - 52,829 Acre-Feet Top of Exclusive Flood Elev. 3657.00 (1,328,360 AF)
EXCLUSIVE FLOOD CONTROL - 258,331 Acre-FeetTop of Joint Use Elev. 3640.00 (1,070,029 Acre-Feet)
JOINT USE - 240,342 Acre-Feet
Top of Active Conservation Elev. 3614.00 (829,687 Acre-Feet)
Top of Dead Elev. 3296.50 (16,008 Acre-Feet)
Maximum Water Surface or Top of Surcharge Elev. 3660.00 (1,381,189 Acre-Feet)
ACTIVE CONSERVATION - 336,103 Acre-Feet
INACTIVE CONSERVATION - 477,576 Acre-Feet
DEAD - 16,008 Acre-Feet
Streambed Elev. 3166.0
Spillway crest Elev. 3593.00
River Outlet Elev. 3300.0
WILDLIFE INDUSTRIALAGRICULTURE MUNICIPALRECREATIONFISH POWER
Powerplant Penstock Elev. 3450.00
Irrigation Outlet Elev. 3400.00
Bighorn Lake Annual Inflow Distribution(based on 1967-2005 data)
Bighorn Gain30%
Buffalo Bill Release
28%
Boysen Release
42%
OPERATIONS - Balancing the needs of the competing interests
Mountain Snowpack
Precipitation
Inflow to Bighorn Lake
Bighorn River Releases
Bighorn Lake Storage Conditions
Recap of Water Year 2008
Recap of Water Year 2008
Recap of Water Year 2008
Mountain Snowpack Conditions
0.0
2.0
4.0
6.0
8.0
10.0
12.0
14.0
16.0
18.0S
ep Oct
Nov
Dec
Jan
Feb Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
End of Month Date
Sn
ow
Wa
ter
Eq
uiv
ale
nt
(I
nc
he
s)
20072008Average
Recap of Water Year 2008
Peaked on 5/5 @ 110% of average
Recap of Water Year 2008
2008 Annual Inflow = 2,132.7 kaf (90% of average)
Historic Average Inflow = 2,372.7 kaf
Recap of Water Year 2008
2008 April-July Inflow = 1,298.3 kaf (117% of average)
Historic Average Inflow = 1,192.8 kaf
Recap of Water Year 2008
Recap of Water Year 2008
Recap of Water Year 2008
Recap of Water Year 2008
April-July Inflow – 1,298.3 kaf (117% of average)
Annual Inflow – 2,132.7 kaf (90% of average)
Oct-March Inflow – 520.6 kaf (57% of average)
10/07 Oct-Mar Forecast – 493.9 kaf (54% of average)
Recap of Water Year 2008
Average River Release = 2,728 cfs (87% of average)
2000-2007 Average River Release = 1,922 cfs
Historic Average River Release = 3,135 cfs
Recap of Water Year 2008
Recap of Water Year 2008
Peaked on 7/13 at 3642.50 feet
Ended year at 0.2 feet below full pool
Ended year 10.3 feet higher than in 2007
Summary of Water Year 2008• Water year started out with good precipitation – October well above
average but dropped to well below average during November.• Fall & winter releases were scheduled and maintained at 1,900 cfs.• Mountain precipitation above average during December-March.
Precipitation dropped to below average in April but well above average in May.
• October-March inflows were 57% of average totaling 520.6 kaf.• April-July inflows were 117% of average totaling 1,298.3 kaf.• On May 6 releases were reduced to 1,500 cfs to conserve storage.• Bighorn Lake reached a low level at elevation 3607.54 on May 8.• Bighorn Lake rose nearly 35 feet from May 8 to June 13, reaching a
peak elevation of 3642.50.• Record rains began around May 21 and continued into early June. The
rain accompanying the mountain snowmelt caused inflows to reach a peak of 14,130 cfs on May 24.
• On May 24 releases were gradually increased from 1,500 cfs to nearly 9,700 cfs by June 18.
• By the middle of July, releases were reduced from 6,200 cfs to 3,000 cfs and to 2,500 cfs by August 1. Releases are currently 2,700 cfs.
• Since June 13, storage has slowly declined to elevation 3640 by August 12 and has essentially remained full until present.
• Annual inflows were 90% of average totaling 2,132.7 kaf.• Storage in Bighorn Lake ended the water year at elevation 3639.8
which is 0.2 foot below full.
Bighorn Lake Conditions(as of October 1, 2008)
Elevation 3639.82 ft = 0.18 feet below full pool
Storage 1,067,800 af = 100% full
Inflows = 2,550 cfs
Total Outflow = 2,700 cfsRiver = 2,700 cfsCanal = 0 cfs
Boysen Reservoir Conditions(as of October 1, 2008)
Elevation 4718.88 ft = 6.12 feet below full pool
Storage 628,800 af = 85% full
Inflows = 550 cfs
Total Outflow = 700 cfs
Buffalo Bill Reservoir Conditions(as of October 1, 2008)
Elevation 5372.30 ft = 21.20 feet below full pool
Storage 484,400 af = 75% full
Inflows = 275 cfs
Total Outflow = 1,740 cfsRiver = 1,290 cfsHeart Mtn. Canal = 450
Water Supply Forecasts
• Fall forecasts rely heavily upon statistical information and analysis
• Reclamation monitors snow pack data each month from mid-October through May
• By about February 1 snow pack becomes a major factor
• Monthly plans are adjusted as needed based on snow data & anticipated normal spring precipitation
• Significant changes to operation plans may be needed
Bighorn Lake Inflow Forecast – Water Year 2009
Bighorn Lake Inflow Forecast – Water Year 2009
10/08 Oct-Mar Forecast – 674.2 kaf (74% of average)
Bighorn Lake Inflow Forecast – Water Year 2009
Bighorn Lake Inflow Forecast – Water Year 2009
10/08 Oct-Mar Forecast – 674.2 kaf (74% of average)
2008 Actual Oct-Mar Inflows – 520.6 kaf (57% of average)
Bighorn Lake Operation Scenarios
Bighorn Lake Operation Scenarios
Most Probable Inflow
• October – March Inflow forecast at 674.2 kaf (74% of average)
• Maintain fall and winter release at 2,500 cfs through March
• Reservoir level expected to drop to elevation 3618 by the end of March (typical flood control target is 3605 to 3614).
• Power generation during October – March would total 351.0 GWHrs.
Most Probable Inflow & 2500 cfs Release
Most Probable Inflow & 2500 cfs Release
Bighorn Lake Operation Scenarios
Minimum Probable Inflow
• October – March Inflow forecast at 629.8 kaf (69% of average)
• Maintain fall and winter release at 2,500 cfs through March
• Reservoir level expected to drop to elevation 3613 by the end of March (typical flood control target is 3605 to 3614).
• Generation during October – March would total 347.0 GWHrs.
Minimum Probable Inflow & 2500 cfs Release
Minimum Probable Inflow & 2500 cfs Release
Most and Minimum Probable Inflow & 2500 cfs Release
Most & Minimum Probable Inflow & 2500 cfs Release
Bighorn Lake Operation Scenarios
Maximum Probable Inflow
• October – March Inflow forecast at 747.8 kaf (82% of average)
• Maintain fall and winter release at 2,500 cfs through March
• Reservoir level expected to drop to elevation 3628 by the end of March (typical flood control target is 3605 to 3614).
• Generation during October – March would total 353.3 GWHrs.
Maximum Probable Inflow & 2500 cfs Release
Maximum Probable Inflow & 2500 cfs Release
All 3 Probable Inflow Scenarios & 2500 cfs Release
All 3 Probable Inflow Scenarios & 2500 cfs Release
Question: What is the effect of a release rate other than 2500 cfs ?
Response: We looked at the most probable runoff condition with release rates of 2400, 2500, and 2600 cfs.
Most Probable Inflow with 3 Release Rates
Most Probable Inflow with 3 Release Rates
Discussion & Comments
The information presented at this meeting can be found on the Montana
Area Office website at: www.usbr.gov/gp/mtao/yellowtail/index.cfm.
Please mail comments to:
Ms. Paula A. Holwegner
Bureau of Reclamation
2900 4th Avenue North, Suite 501
Billings, MT 59107
fax your comments to: 406-247-7338
or email your comments to: [email protected]
by October 13, 2008
Comments ?
Reclamation’s Internet Website
http://www.usbr.gov/gp/water/
• near real-time data available through the HYDROMET data system• summaries and plots of historical data• annual reservoir operating plan publication• monthly water supply reports• project data• snow plots• links to related internet sites